Michalowski 1933

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		68	0.24	60	0.00	56	0.05	57	0.05	81	0.02	78	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		12	0.46	18	0.01	10	0.10	11	0.45	15	0.48	9	0.46
Ashkenazy 1981		1	0.56	1	0.25	1	0.24	1	0.58	15	0.46	1	0.52
Bacha 2000		78	0.16	16	0.01	62	0.03	80	0.03	60	0.04	70	0.03
Badura 1965		51	0.32	76	0.00	65	0.04	61	0.04	57	0.04	65	0.04
Barbosa 1983		60	0.29	64	0.00	43	0.07	42	0.15	51	0.05	47	0.09
Biret 1990		36	0.37	83	0.00	36	0.07	35	0.26	36	0.18	31	0.22
Blet 2003		30	0.38	34	0.00	16	0.07	18	0.41	27	0.30	22	0.35
Block 1995		43	0.36	15	0.01	48	0.06	46	0.06	29	0.24	37	0.12
Blumental 1952		25	0.40	42	0.00	13	0.07	13	0.42	5	0.50	11	0.46
Boshniakovich 1969		41	0.36	55	0.00	60	0.04	74	0.04	68	0.03	80	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		74	0.20	47	0.00	79	0.04	63	0.04	82	0.03	71	0.03
Bunin 1987		33	0.38	67	0.00	29	0.07	26	0.36	37	0.18	28	0.25
Bunin 1987b		31	0.38	68	0.00	30	0.08	25	0.36	38	0.17	27	0.25
Chiu 1999		45	0.35	30	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.17	52	0.05	46	0.09
Cohen 1997		75	0.19	20	0.01	78	0.04	69	0.04	68	0.04	68	0.04
Cortot 1951		27	0.39	75	0.00	27	0.08	19	0.40	20	0.35	21	0.37
Csalog 1996		80	0.14	36	0.00	77	0.03	83	0.03	59	0.05	62	0.04
Czerny 1949		39	0.36	71	0.00	37	0.06	41	0.16	42	0.13	34	0.14
Czerny 1990		13	0.45	58	0.00	17	0.07	15	0.42	40	0.14	29	0.24
Duchoud 2007		8	0.46	25	0.01	6	0.12	10	0.45	17	0.44	13	0.44
Ezaki 2006		49	0.33	80	0.00	61	0.05	51	0.05	77	0.03	54	0.04
Falvay 1989		76	0.18	23	0.01	58	0.04	60	0.04	72	0.04	56	0.04
Farrell 1958		67	0.25	85	0.00	63	0.04	71	0.04	81	0.03	73	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		53	0.31	77	0.00	22	0.07	31	0.29	17	0.40	23	0.34
Fliere 1977		17	0.44	29	0.00	39	0.06	38	0.17	54	0.05	44	0.09
Fou 1978		81	0.13	69	0.00	81	0.04	72	0.04	82	0.03	74	0.03
Francois 1956		63	0.28	63	0.00	55	0.04	62	0.04	82	0.03	84	0.03
Friedman 1923		44	0.36	53	0.00	26	0.08	29	0.33	6	0.51	17	0.41
Friedman 1923b		40	0.36	62	0.00	25	0.09	28	0.34	8	0.50	15	0.41
Friedman 1930		5	0.49	13	0.01	18	0.08	16	0.42	9	0.52	6	0.47
Garcia 2007		48	0.33	65	0.00	53	0.05	59	0.05	8	0.63	33	0.18
Garcia 2007b		23	0.42	10	0.02	24	0.07	24	0.36	3	0.71	3	0.51
Gierzod 1998		42	0.36	49	0.00	33	0.07	27	0.35	50	0.05	35	0.13
Gornostaeva 1994		50	0.32	56	0.00	49	0.05	53	0.05	72	0.03	69	0.04
Groot 1988		46	0.35	19	0.01	45	0.06	47	0.06	58	0.04	53	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		19	0.43	48	0.00	32	0.07	34	0.26	53	0.04	43	0.10
Hatto 1993		32	0.38	50	0.00	15	0.07	12	0.42	12	0.41	16	0.41
Hatto 1997		59	0.29	59	0.00	23	0.09	37	0.24	20	0.36	25	0.29
Horowitz 1949		61	0.29	54	0.00	71	0.04	76	0.04	79	0.03	76	0.03
Indjic 1988		47	0.35	32	0.00	11	0.07	21	0.38	15	0.37	20	0.37
Kapell 1951		4	0.49	4	0.05	3	0.29	5	0.47	18	0.45	7	0.46
Kissin 1993		73	0.21	72	0.00	76	0.03	79	0.03	84	0.02	86	0.02
Kushner 1989		24	0.40	22	0.01	21	0.10	23	0.36	27	0.28	24	0.32
Luisada 1991		18	0.44	14	0.01	19	0.08	14	0.42	23	0.34	19	0.38
Lushtak 2004		58	0.30	84	0.00	54	0.05	52	0.05	77	0.03	66	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		38	0.36	41	0.00	46	0.06	48	0.06	72	0.03	58	0.04
Magaloff 1978		35	0.37	7	0.03	47	0.05	55	0.05	62	0.03	55	0.04
Magin 1975		28	0.39	9	0.02	50	0.06	50	0.06	30	0.22	39	0.11
Michalowski 1933		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Milkina 1970		77	0.18	8	0.02	72	0.04	73	0.04	76	0.04	57	0.04
Mohovich 1999		64	0.27	70	0.00	64	0.04	65	0.04	69	0.04	67	0.04
Moravec 1969		65	0.27	37	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	54	0.05	50	0.07
Morozova 2008		26	0.39	26	0.01	38	0.06	36	0.24	61	0.04	42	0.10
Neighaus 1950		21	0.43	39	0.00	34	0.06	30	0.30	61	0.05	38	0.12
Niedzielski 1931		56	0.30	38	0.00	57	0.07	45	0.07	33	0.14	41	0.10
Ohlsson 1999		16	0.44	27	0.01	12	0.07	17	0.42	39	0.13	30	0.23
Osinska 1989		20	0.43	33	0.00	40	0.05	43	0.14	45	0.07	40	0.10
Pachmann 1927		82	0.12	45	0.00	82	0.04	77	0.04	78	0.03	77	0.03
Paderewski 1930		6	0.47	31	0.00	14	0.09	8	0.45	15	0.41	14	0.43
Perlemuter 1992		34	0.38	6	0.03	28	0.07	32	0.27	38	0.14	32	0.19
Pierdomenico 2008		52	0.32	73	0.00	73	0.04	78	0.04	73	0.03	72	0.03
Poblocka 1999		10	0.46	5	0.04	4	0.19	4	0.47	11	0.43	12	0.45
Rabcewiczowa 1932		11	0.46	44	0.00	31	0.10	22	0.37	20	0.43	18	0.40
Rachmaninoff 1923		54	0.31	35	0.00	52	0.05	58	0.05	49	0.05	51	0.05
Rangell 2001		70	0.23	28	0.00	74	0.03	81	0.03	84	0.02	88	0.02
Richter 1976		57	0.30	11	0.02	59	0.05	54	0.05	68	0.03	61	0.04
Rosen 1989		37	0.37	74	0.00	51	0.06	49	0.06	67	0.04	52	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		62	0.28	78	0.00	69	0.04	68	0.04	56	0.04	64	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		86	0.06	88	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	81	0.02	87	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		84	0.08	86	0.00	83	0.04	75	0.04	87	0.02	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		71	0.23	81	0.00	75	0.04	67	0.04	77	0.03	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.06	89	0.00	86	0.03	84	0.03	74	0.03	81	0.03
Rossi 2007		55	0.30	24	0.01	67	0.03	82	0.03	20	0.29	45	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		88	0.02	46	0.00	88	0.02	85	0.02	82	0.03	85	0.02
Rubinstein 1952		83	0.08	61	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	78	0.03	89	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		79	0.16	79	0.00	80	0.04	64	0.04	58	0.05	63	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		9	0.46	17	0.01	9	0.10	9	0.45	9	0.51	5	0.48
Shebanova 2002		29	0.39	12	0.02	41	0.06	39	0.17	59	0.05	48	0.09
Smith 1975		15	0.45	57	0.00	20	0.07	20	0.39	72	0.04	36	0.12
Sokolov 2002		7	0.47	3	0.13	5	0.17	2	0.57	16	0.41	4	0.48
Sztompka 1959		2	0.56	2	0.18	2	0.29	3	0.49	3	0.53	2	0.51
Tomsic 1995		66	0.25	66	0.00	68	0.04	66	0.04	67	0.04	60	0.04
Uninsky 1932		3	0.49	21	0.01	8	0.16	7	0.46	11	0.47	10	0.46
Uninsky 1971		14	0.45	51	0.00	7	0.17	6	0.46	14	0.47	8	0.46
Wasowski 1980		22	0.42	52	0.00	35	0.07	33	0.27	32	0.23	26	0.25
Zak 1937		72	0.22	43	0.00	70	0.04	70	0.04	85	0.03	75	0.03
Zak 1951		69	0.24	40	0.00	66	0.05	56	0.05	76	0.03	59	0.04
Random 1		89	-0.02	90	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	45	0.06	79	0.03
Random 2		90	-0.04	87	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	79	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		87	0.04	82	0.00	84	0.02	88	0.02	17	0.35	49	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).