Rosen 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		17	0.58	16	0.00	12	0.12	12	0.47	13	0.45	11	0.46
Anderszewski 2003		72	0.38	84	0.00	77	0.04	68	0.04	54	0.03	84	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		26	0.54	80	0.00	29	0.06	24	0.33	43	0.10	38	0.18
Bacha 2000		31	0.53	58	0.00	46	0.05	46	0.05	12	0.47	40	0.15
Badura 1965		71	0.38	47	0.00	64	0.03	70	0.03	33	0.22	61	0.08
Barbosa 1983		69	0.40	86	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.13	42	0.15	41	0.14
Biret 1990		19	0.57	26	0.00	37	0.09	27	0.31	23	0.41	21	0.36
Blet 2003		49	0.48	81	0.00	49	0.04	61	0.04	51	0.05	76	0.04
Block 1995		11	0.60	33	0.00	11	0.17	14	0.43	15	0.41	14	0.42
Blumental 1952		82	0.33	64	0.00	51	0.03	81	0.03	59	0.04	87	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		14	0.59	21	0.00	8	0.12	13	0.46	13	0.55	10	0.50
Brailowsky 1960		22	0.56	55	0.00	32	0.06	29	0.30	18	0.39	22	0.34
Bunin 1987		68	0.40	70	0.00	80	0.04	58	0.04	63	0.04	79	0.04
Bunin 1987b		66	0.40	87	0.00	79	0.04	55	0.04	61	0.04	73	0.04
Chiu 1999		24	0.55	7	0.01	14	0.10	10	0.51	12	0.54	9	0.52
Cohen 1997		58	0.45	20	0.00	36	0.06	40	0.14	18	0.37	33	0.23
Cortot 1951		33	0.52	22	0.00	33	0.06	35	0.18	22	0.34	31	0.25
Csalog 1996		57	0.45	5	0.04	75	0.03	77	0.03	36	0.24	59	0.08
Czerny 1949		47	0.48	68	0.00	21	0.06	34	0.21	30	0.30	29	0.25
Czerny 1990		28	0.53	27	0.00	17	0.08	21	0.37	34	0.19	27	0.27
Duchoud 2007		32	0.52	46	0.00	24	0.07	31	0.25	31	0.31	24	0.28
Ezaki 2006		9	0.64	19	0.00	5	0.11	6	0.59	12	0.48	8	0.53
Falvay 1989		30	0.53	44	0.00	39	0.07	32	0.24	44	0.07	43	0.13
Farrell 1958		36	0.50	65	0.00	35	0.06	41	0.14	27	0.29	36	0.20
Ferenczy 1958		79	0.36	53	0.00	84	0.03	82	0.03	69	0.03	86	0.03
Fliere 1977		5	0.67	14	0.00	6	0.13	5	0.64	13	0.54	5	0.59
Fou 1978		15	0.58	42	0.00	15	0.12	11	0.48	19	0.43	12	0.45
Francois 1956		29	0.53	45	0.00	13	0.17	18	0.42	19	0.38	16	0.40
Friedman 1923		78	0.36	39	0.00	57	0.03	79	0.03	9	0.46	45	0.12
Friedman 1923b		77	0.37	88	0.00	56	0.04	69	0.04	7	0.51	42	0.14
Friedman 1930		65	0.41	37	0.00	41	0.06	39	0.16	23	0.39	28	0.25
Garcia 2007		80	0.33	36	0.00	52	0.03	72	0.03	27	0.29	54	0.09
Garcia 2007b		86	0.21	75	0.00	85	0.02	88	0.02	70	0.03	90	0.02
Gierzod 1998		18	0.58	31	0.00	16	0.08	15	0.43	15	0.35	17	0.39
Gornostaeva 1994		2	0.73	1	0.32	1	0.31	2	0.75	1	0.76	2	0.75
Groot 1988		20	0.57	23	0.00	23	0.07	23	0.34	37	0.19	30	0.25
Harasiewicz 1955		45	0.48	24	0.00	20	0.09	22	0.35	41	0.14	35	0.22
Hatto 1993		81	0.33	79	0.00	70	0.04	54	0.04	45	0.07	68	0.05
Hatto 1997		75	0.37	10	0.01	30	0.06	38	0.16	61	0.04	60	0.08
Horowitz 1949		59	0.44	51	0.00	74	0.04	65	0.04	67	0.04	75	0.04
Indjic 1988		84	0.30	76	0.00	71	0.04	49	0.04	45	0.07	67	0.05
Kapell 1951		48	0.48	82	0.00	72	0.04	50	0.04	48	0.05	71	0.04
Kissin 1993		25	0.54	62	0.00	31	0.05	33	0.22	35	0.22	34	0.22
Kushner 1989		10	0.61	71	0.00	19	0.08	20	0.39	17	0.37	18	0.38
Luisada 1991		39	0.50	77	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.13	44	0.10	46	0.11
Lushtak 2004		44	0.48	41	0.00	50	0.03	75	0.03	50	0.05	78	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		6	0.66	59	0.00	10	0.16	8	0.55	22	0.36	13	0.44
Magaloff 1978		3	0.71	4	0.08	4	0.35	4	0.71	4	0.55	4	0.62
Magin 1975		60	0.44	61	0.00	55	0.03	83	0.03	39	0.15	63	0.07
Michalowski 1933		76	0.37	56	0.00	66	0.04	67	0.04	49	0.06	66	0.05
Milkina 1970		35	0.51	73	0.00	47	0.05	45	0.05	43	0.13	56	0.08
Mohovich 1999		7	0.65	6	0.03	7	0.13	7	0.59	10	0.55	6	0.57
Moravec 1969		56	0.46	43	0.00	65	0.04	63	0.04	47	0.06	64	0.05
Morozova 2008		40	0.50	9	0.01	22	0.08	26	0.32	24	0.23	26	0.27
Neighaus 1950		1	0.73	3	0.19	2	0.44	1	0.77	1	0.71	3	0.74
Niedzielski 1931		83	0.32	85	0.00	86	0.03	85	0.03	76	0.03	81	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		13	0.59	17	0.00	28	0.10	17	0.42	22	0.28	23	0.34
Osinska 1989		4	0.70	2	0.22	3	0.35	3	0.72	1	0.78	1	0.75
Pachmann 1927		53	0.46	11	0.01	60	0.03	73	0.03	33	0.22	57	0.08
Paderewski 1930		50	0.47	63	0.00	34	0.06	37	0.16	30	0.20	37	0.18
Perlemuter 1992		41	0.50	48	0.00	40	0.07	36	0.18	34	0.15	39	0.16
Pierdomenico 2008		21	0.56	30	0.00	26	0.06	30	0.28	8	0.50	20	0.37
Poblocka 1999		16	0.58	29	0.00	25	0.05	25	0.33	40	0.17	32	0.24
Rabcewiczowa 1932		27	0.54	32	0.00	38	0.10	28	0.31	14	0.54	15	0.41
Rachmaninoff 1923		70	0.40	49	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	39	0.14	48	0.11
Rangell 2001		8	0.64	8	0.01	9	0.15	9	0.51	2	0.61	7	0.56
Richter 1976		61	0.43	12	0.01	83	0.04	62	0.04	82	0.03	83	0.03
Rosen 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1930		51	0.47	69	0.00	63	0.03	78	0.03	29	0.35	51	0.10
Rosenthal 1931		73	0.38	40	0.00	78	0.04	53	0.04	36	0.17	58	0.08
Rosenthal 1931b		67	0.40	78	0.00	76	0.03	74	0.03	28	0.23	62	0.08
Rosenthal 1931c		42	0.49	13	0.01	48	0.05	48	0.05	26	0.32	44	0.13
Rosenthal 1931d		62	0.43	52	0.00	73	0.04	56	0.04	25	0.27	52	0.10
Rossi 2007		85	0.28	57	0.00	68	0.04	66	0.04	19	0.30	47	0.11
Rubinstein 1939		87	0.20	25	0.00	87	0.03	87	0.03	56	0.04	80	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		55	0.46	34	0.00	53	0.03	71	0.03	26	0.25	55	0.09
Rubinstein 1966		38	0.50	35	0.00	54	0.04	51	0.04	33	0.28	49	0.11
Schilhawsky 1960		74	0.37	72	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	83	0.03	85	0.03
Shebanova 2002		12	0.60	18	0.00	27	0.07	19	0.39	24	0.38	19	0.38
Smith 1975		23	0.56	66	0.00	18	0.07	16	0.43	38	0.17	25	0.27
Sokolov 2002		46	0.48	83	0.00	69	0.04	60	0.04	51	0.05	70	0.04
Sztompka 1959		37	0.50	67	0.00	62	0.04	64	0.04	50	0.06	65	0.05
Tomsic 1995		34	0.51	38	0.00	61	0.04	59	0.04	55	0.05	74	0.04
Uninsky 1932		63	0.43	28	0.00	67	0.04	52	0.04	54	0.05	77	0.04
Uninsky 1971		43	0.48	15	0.00	45	0.05	47	0.05	42	0.17	53	0.09
Wasowski 1980		64	0.41	60	0.00	82	0.04	57	0.04	61	0.05	69	0.04
Zak 1937		52	0.47	50	0.00	59	0.03	76	0.03	54	0.05	72	0.04
Zak 1951		54	0.46	54	0.00	58	0.03	84	0.03	66	0.04	82	0.03
Random 1		89	-0.01	74	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	51	0.04	89	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.07	89	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	77	0.03	88	0.02
Random 3		88	0.09	90	0.00	88	0.03	86	0.03	13	0.38	50	0.11

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).