Rubinstein 1952

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		27	0.50	54	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.13	56	0.05	41	0.08
Anderszewski 2003		79	0.22	50	0.00	71	0.03	74	0.03	79	0.03	70	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		50	0.41	26	0.00	48	0.05	60	0.05	74	0.04	65	0.04
Bacha 2000		28	0.50	63	0.00	27	0.08	25	0.26	18	0.45	19	0.34
Badura 1965		66	0.34	81	0.00	55	0.05	64	0.05	65	0.04	64	0.04
Barbosa 1983		44	0.44	17	0.01	35	0.05	34	0.18	58	0.04	39	0.08
Biret 1990		42	0.45	27	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.12	63	0.04	42	0.07
Blet 2003		46	0.44	60	0.00	57	0.04	65	0.04	72	0.04	61	0.04
Block 1995		32	0.48	42	0.00	26	0.09	31	0.19	38	0.15	27	0.17
Blumental 1952		76	0.25	58	0.00	73	0.04	72	0.04	81	0.03	76	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		22	0.53	23	0.00	24	0.08	22	0.39	30	0.29	20	0.34
Brailowsky 1960		15	0.56	57	0.00	22	0.11	21	0.39	22	0.37	16	0.38
Bunin 1987		65	0.34	10	0.03	68	0.04	71	0.04	88	0.02	79	0.03
Bunin 1987b		64	0.34	22	0.00	69	0.04	70	0.04	78	0.03	68	0.03
Chiu 1999		49	0.41	64	0.00	21	0.10	23	0.36	35	0.20	23	0.27
Cohen 1997		35	0.47	14	0.01	13	0.12	10	0.52	1	0.61	7	0.56
Cortot 1951		71	0.27	65	0.00	78	0.03	75	0.03	85	0.02	87	0.02
Csalog 1996		8	0.63	7	0.05	5	0.16	6	0.59	1	0.62	4	0.60
Czerny 1949		59	0.37	53	0.00	66	0.05	62	0.05	79	0.03	63	0.04
Czerny 1990		41	0.45	75	0.00	58	0.06	55	0.06	81	0.03	66	0.04
Duchoud 2007		62	0.35	36	0.00	67	0.04	69	0.04	83	0.03	74	0.03
Ezaki 2006		36	0.47	76	0.00	56	0.05	61	0.05	63	0.04	58	0.04
Falvay 1989		4	0.66	49	0.00	7	0.19	4	0.60	9	0.49	8	0.54
Farrell 1958		55	0.39	51	0.00	62	0.07	48	0.07	68	0.03	52	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		67	0.33	80	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	81	0.03	72	0.03
Fliere 1977		17	0.55	59	0.00	20	0.12	18	0.43	60	0.05	30	0.15
Fou 1978		6	0.63	3	0.13	2	0.20	5	0.59	5	0.54	6	0.56
Francois 1956		19	0.55	21	0.01	29	0.07	30	0.21	42	0.13	28	0.17
Friedman 1923		90	-0.20	86	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	89	0.01	90	0.01
Friedman 1923b		89	-0.19	87	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	89	0.01	89	0.01
Friedman 1930		86	-0.01	52	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.02	84	0.02
Garcia 2007		82	0.14	82	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	86	0.02	86	0.02
Garcia 2007b		84	0.04	77	0.00	84	0.02	88	0.02	88	0.02	88	0.02
Gierzod 1998		45	0.44	70	0.00	49	0.08	45	0.08	52	0.05	46	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		24	0.52	15	0.01	25	0.09	24	0.31	39	0.16	24	0.22
Groot 1988		5	0.65	4	0.09	8	0.12	9	0.52	21	0.37	13	0.44
Harasiewicz 1955		58	0.37	9	0.03	33	0.05	38	0.14	63	0.04	43	0.07
Hatto 1993		78	0.23	78	0.00	46	0.07	50	0.07	47	0.05	47	0.06
Hatto 1997		72	0.27	16	0.01	28	0.07	37	0.16	56	0.04	40	0.08
Horowitz 1949		30	0.49	31	0.00	34	0.05	28	0.24	48	0.05	34	0.11
Indjic 1988		75	0.25	83	0.00	31	0.06	39	0.13	46	0.06	35	0.09
Kapell 1951		51	0.41	30	0.00	65	0.04	68	0.04	64	0.04	60	0.04
Kissin 1993		3	0.68	13	0.02	6	0.20	3	0.62	7	0.58	3	0.60
Kushner 1989		38	0.46	88	0.00	53	0.07	53	0.07	83	0.03	53	0.05
Luisada 1991		34	0.47	39	0.00	23	0.07	27	0.24	57	0.05	33	0.11
Lushtak 2004		43	0.44	11	0.02	30	0.06	32	0.19	38	0.16	26	0.17
Malcuzynski 1961		20	0.54	24	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.13	81	0.03	45	0.06
Magaloff 1978		11	0.60	8	0.03	11	0.12	12	0.49	35	0.17	22	0.29
Magin 1975		52	0.41	25	0.00	45	0.07	51	0.07	59	0.04	51	0.05
Michalowski 1933		83	0.08	55	0.00	83	0.03	78	0.03	87	0.02	82	0.02
Milkina 1970		1	0.70	2	0.14	3	0.19	2	0.63	2	0.61	2	0.62
Mohovich 1999		10	0.61	71	0.00	19	0.11	19	0.42	22	0.33	18	0.37
Moravec 1969		21	0.53	18	0.01	38	0.07	33	0.18	32	0.17	25	0.17
Morozova 2008		60	0.36	66	0.00	54	0.05	59	0.05	84	0.02	71	0.03
Neighaus 1950		31	0.48	37	0.00	39	0.05	36	0.16	63	0.05	37	0.09
Niedzielski 1931		53	0.40	56	0.00	63	0.08	47	0.08	66	0.03	50	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		23	0.53	6	0.06	16	0.12	20	0.41	28	0.23	21	0.31
Osinska 1989		12	0.58	12	0.02	12	0.10	11	0.51	13	0.43	11	0.47
Pachmann 1927		14	0.56	48	0.00	15	0.14	17	0.44	9	0.58	10	0.51
Paderewski 1930		29	0.50	46	0.00	52	0.07	49	0.07	61	0.03	54	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		33	0.47	40	0.00	32	0.05	35	0.18	37	0.14	29	0.16
Pierdomenico 2008		48	0.42	47	0.00	36	0.05	29	0.23	45	0.07	31	0.13
Poblocka 1999		26	0.50	41	0.00	51	0.08	46	0.08	72	0.04	44	0.06
Rabcewiczowa 1932		61	0.36	38	0.00	64	0.06	54	0.06	72	0.03	59	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		80	0.22	89	0.00	81	0.02	83	0.02	84	0.03	81	0.02
Rangell 2001		18	0.55	67	0.00	14	0.13	15	0.46	9	0.44	12	0.45
Richter 1976		40	0.46	45	0.00	40	0.05	42	0.12	51	0.05	38	0.08
Rosen 1989		39	0.46	43	0.00	37	0.07	26	0.25	71	0.03	36	0.09
Rosenthal 1930		69	0.30	35	0.00	74	0.04	73	0.04	84	0.02	75	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		73	0.27	84	0.00	61	0.06	56	0.06	50	0.05	55	0.05
Rosenthal 1931b		74	0.27	90	0.00	60	0.05	63	0.05	50	0.05	56	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		56	0.38	72	0.00	59	0.06	57	0.06	60	0.04	57	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		54	0.39	61	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	32	0.16	32	0.13
Rossi 2007		81	0.15	34	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	75	0.02	80	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		25	0.51	1	0.16	1	0.16	8	0.52	2	0.61	5	0.56
Rubinstein 1952		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1966		2	0.68	19	0.01	4	0.15	1	0.63	3	0.67	1	0.65
Schilhawsky 1960		68	0.30	44	0.00	72	0.04	66	0.04	64	0.04	62	0.04
Shebanova 2002		9	0.61	28	0.00	9	0.13	7	0.55	12	0.49	9	0.52
Smith 1975		37	0.47	33	0.00	50	0.07	52	0.07	52	0.04	49	0.05
Sokolov 2002		57	0.38	20	0.01	70	0.04	67	0.04	79	0.03	67	0.03
Sztompka 1959		70	0.29	32	0.00	75	0.03	76	0.03	80	0.03	69	0.03
Tomsic 1995		7	0.63	5	0.07	10	0.17	13	0.47	22	0.29	17	0.37
Uninsky 1932		77	0.24	68	0.00	80	0.02	85	0.02	82	0.02	85	0.02
Uninsky 1971		63	0.34	79	0.00	76	0.03	77	0.03	86	0.02	83	0.02
Wasowski 1980		47	0.42	29	0.00	47	0.06	58	0.06	53	0.05	48	0.05
Zak 1937		13	0.56	85	0.00	17	0.11	14	0.47	24	0.35	14	0.41
Zak 1951		16	0.55	62	0.00	18	0.14	16	0.46	26	0.33	15	0.39
Random 1		88	-0.08	69	0.00	88	0.02	84	0.02	50	0.04	77	0.03
Random 2		87	-0.02	73	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	48	0.05	73	0.03
Random 3		85	0.00	74	0.00	87	0.03	81	0.03	60	0.03	78	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).