Rosenthal 1931b

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		49	0.30	30	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	82	0.02	48	0.05
Anderszewski 2003		12	0.43	49	0.00	9	0.13	15	0.45	37	0.19	8	0.29
Ashkenazy 1981		29	0.36	50	0.00	35	0.06	33	0.18	86	0.03	43	0.07
Bacha 2000		35	0.34	31	0.00	59	0.05	55	0.05	51	0.05	46	0.05
Badura 1965		64	0.25	51	0.00	53	0.04	63	0.04	73	0.04	59	0.04
Barbosa 1983		78	0.18	14	0.00	82	0.02	82	0.02	88	0.02	84	0.02
Biret 1990		65	0.24	15	0.00	74	0.04	64	0.04	83	0.03	78	0.03
Blet 2003		76	0.21	52	0.00	79	0.02	83	0.02	86	0.02	85	0.02
Block 1995		20	0.38	32	0.00	28	0.08	27	0.26	59	0.04	26	0.10
Blumental 1952		75	0.21	53	0.00	64	0.03	72	0.03	54	0.04	76	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		41	0.32	21	0.00	29	0.07	29	0.22	61	0.04	33	0.09
Brailowsky 1960		5	0.51	16	0.00	5	0.21	6	0.60	8	0.50	5	0.55
Bunin 1987		26	0.37	54	0.00	34	0.07	31	0.20	58	0.05	27	0.10
Bunin 1987b		25	0.37	55	0.00	32	0.06	30	0.21	66	0.04	31	0.09
Chiu 1999		62	0.25	33	0.00	55	0.05	54	0.05	75	0.04	51	0.04
Cohen 1997		37	0.34	9	0.00	31	0.07	26	0.27	21	0.35	7	0.31
Cortot 1951		52	0.29	34	0.00	73	0.03	69	0.03	74	0.03	80	0.03
Csalog 1996		85	0.10	56	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	87	0.02	90	0.01
Czerny 1949		54	0.28	57	0.00	40	0.06	38	0.16	76	0.03	41	0.07
Czerny 1990		74	0.22	22	0.00	77	0.03	80	0.03	80	0.03	77	0.03
Duchoud 2007		66	0.24	58	0.00	75	0.04	65	0.04	86	0.02	74	0.03
Ezaki 2006		11	0.44	7	0.00	14	0.07	7	0.54	65	0.04	16	0.15
Falvay 1989		24	0.38	10	0.00	23	0.11	21	0.35	80	0.03	25	0.10
Farrell 1958		34	0.34	59	0.00	51	0.04	59	0.04	78	0.03	67	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		56	0.27	4	0.00	70	0.03	78	0.03	60	0.04	73	0.03
Fliere 1977		28	0.36	60	0.00	30	0.08	32	0.20	86	0.02	44	0.06
Fou 1978		13	0.43	35	0.00	16	0.08	12	0.47	50	0.07	14	0.18
Francois 1956		38	0.34	36	0.00	25	0.06	24	0.33	72	0.03	29	0.10
Friedman 1923		80	0.16	61	0.00	65	0.03	75	0.03	55	0.06	62	0.04
Friedman 1923b		81	0.16	62	0.00	66	0.04	66	0.04	66	0.05	60	0.04
Friedman 1930		72	0.22	23	0.00	41	0.06	43	0.13	49	0.05	38	0.08
Garcia 2007		70	0.23	63	0.00	63	0.03	67	0.03	62	0.04	75	0.03
Garcia 2007b		82	0.16	37	0.00	62	0.04	56	0.04	53	0.04	61	0.04
Gierzod 1998		7	0.47	64	0.00	8	0.13	9	0.51	45	0.08	13	0.20
Gornostaeva 1994		9	0.44	65	0.00	17	0.07	14	0.46	47	0.05	18	0.15
Groot 1988		21	0.38	38	0.00	13	0.06	19	0.38	63	0.04	23	0.12
Harasiewicz 1955		30	0.36	66	0.00	21	0.11	17	0.42	75	0.03	24	0.11
Hatto 1993		63	0.25	67	0.00	71	0.03	70	0.03	61	0.04	79	0.03
Hatto 1997		55	0.28	68	0.00	47	0.05	51	0.05	83	0.03	58	0.04
Horowitz 1949		19	0.38	69	0.00	22	0.12	20	0.37	38	0.12	12	0.21
Indjic 1988		69	0.23	70	0.00	76	0.04	60	0.04	68	0.04	57	0.04
Kapell 1951		71	0.23	71	0.00	83	0.03	71	0.03	89	0.02	82	0.02
Kissin 1993		40	0.33	39	0.00	36	0.06	39	0.15	73	0.04	37	0.08
Kushner 1989		10	0.44	72	0.00	20	0.10	25	0.28	73	0.03	30	0.09
Luisada 1991		44	0.32	40	0.00	60	0.04	58	0.04	85	0.03	63	0.03
Lushtak 2004		48	0.30	73	0.00	39	0.05	40	0.15	71	0.03	42	0.07
Malcuzynski 1961		8	0.46	41	0.00	15	0.07	11	0.49	59	0.04	19	0.14
Magaloff 1978		6	0.50	74	0.00	6	0.27	5	0.61	32	0.18	6	0.33
Magin 1975		31	0.35	75	0.00	33	0.06	36	0.17	60	0.04	35	0.08
Michalowski 1933		86	0.08	76	0.00	80	0.02	87	0.02	75	0.04	71	0.03
Milkina 1970		17	0.40	77	0.00	12	0.06	18	0.39	40	0.16	10	0.25
Mohovich 1999		18	0.40	78	0.00	10	0.08	13	0.46	52	0.05	17	0.15
Moravec 1969		43	0.32	17	0.00	48	0.05	52	0.05	81	0.03	50	0.04
Morozova 2008		23	0.38	5	0.00	11	0.07	10	0.50	58	0.04	20	0.14
Neighaus 1950		22	0.38	42	0.00	26	0.06	23	0.34	78	0.03	28	0.10
Niedzielski 1931		61	0.25	18	0.00	61	0.05	45	0.05	65	0.04	53	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		53	0.28	79	0.00	72	0.03	76	0.03	82	0.03	70	0.03
Osinska 1989		60	0.25	80	0.00	68	0.03	73	0.03	80	0.04	64	0.03
Pachmann 1927		67	0.23	81	0.00	46	0.04	57	0.04	71	0.03	69	0.03
Paderewski 1930		59	0.27	19	0.00	69	0.03	68	0.03	65	0.03	68	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		50	0.29	82	0.00	42	0.06	34	0.18	60	0.04	34	0.08
Pierdomenico 2008		58	0.27	83	0.00	57	0.05	48	0.05	55	0.04	52	0.04
Poblocka 1999		68	0.23	84	0.00	84	0.02	81	0.02	86	0.03	81	0.02
Rabcewiczowa 1932		73	0.22	20	0.00	49	0.05	47	0.05	67	0.04	54	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		27	0.37	24	0.00	19	0.08	16	0.42	41	0.11	11	0.21
Rangell 2001		14	0.41	85	0.00	18	0.07	22	0.35	48	0.05	21	0.13
Richter 1976		51	0.29	86	0.00	58	0.05	49	0.05	78	0.03	56	0.04
Rosen 1989		16	0.40	43	0.00	27	0.07	28	0.23	74	0.03	39	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.61	8	0.00	4	0.38	4	0.79	2	0.76	4	0.77
Rosenthal 1931		1	0.94	1	0.91	1	0.90	1	0.99	1	1.00	1	0.99
Rosenthal 1931b		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931c		3	0.77	3	0.01	3	0.86	3	0.95	1	0.92	3	0.93
Rosenthal 1931d		2	0.93	2	0.08	2	0.94	2	0.99	1	0.99	2	0.99
Rossi 2007		84	0.11	87	0.00	67	0.03	74	0.03	49	0.04	66	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		46	0.31	44	0.00	24	0.09	37	0.17	16	0.41	9	0.26
Rubinstein 1952		57	0.27	88	0.00	56	0.05	50	0.05	63	0.05	49	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		33	0.35	11	0.00	45	0.05	46	0.05	50	0.06	47	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		39	0.33	89	0.00	50	0.04	61	0.04	76	0.03	72	0.03
Shebanova 2002		77	0.20	12	0.00	78	0.02	84	0.02	83	0.03	87	0.02
Smith 1975		15	0.41	25	0.00	7	0.13	8	0.54	46	0.05	15	0.16
Sokolov 2002		36	0.34	26	0.00	52	0.04	62	0.04	86	0.02	65	0.03
Sztompka 1959		79	0.17	27	0.00	81	0.02	85	0.02	81	0.03	83	0.02
Tomsic 1995		45	0.32	28	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.13	82	0.03	45	0.06
Uninsky 1932		83	0.15	45	0.00	85	0.03	77	0.03	84	0.02	86	0.02
Uninsky 1971		47	0.30	6	0.00	38	0.05	41	0.15	62	0.03	40	0.07
Wasowski 1980		87	0.08	90	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	88	0.01	89	0.01
Zak 1937		42	0.32	13	0.00	54	0.05	53	0.05	86	0.03	55	0.04
Zak 1951		32	0.35	46	0.00	37	0.06	35	0.18	71	0.04	36	0.08
Random 1		88	0.04	47	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	9	0.44	32	0.09
Random 2		89	0.04	29	0.00	86	0.03	79	0.03	3	0.45	22	0.12
Random 3		90	-0.03	48	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	67	0.03	88	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).