Ohlsson 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		29	0.56	74	0.00	46	0.05	53	0.05	43	0.10	64	0.07
Anderszewski 2003		22	0.58	32	0.00	26	0.08	30	0.23	16	0.48	23	0.33
Ashkenazy 1981		2	0.70	2	0.23	2	0.39	1	0.63	5	0.61	1	0.62
Bacha 2000		56	0.50	55	0.00	48	0.05	48	0.05	9	0.54	39	0.16
Badura 1965		69	0.44	56	0.00	51	0.04	56	0.04	25	0.30	50	0.11
Barbosa 1983		58	0.50	65	0.00	24	0.08	33	0.20	16	0.46	26	0.30
Biret 1990		5	0.67	57	0.00	3	0.11	3	0.53	3	0.66	3	0.59
Blet 2003		32	0.55	72	0.00	50	0.06	46	0.06	35	0.22	48	0.11
Block 1995		78	0.39	39	0.00	82	0.03	77	0.03	74	0.03	85	0.03
Blumental 1952		79	0.38	76	0.00	73	0.04	73	0.04	40	0.13	65	0.07
Boshniakovich 1969		61	0.49	29	0.00	75	0.03	75	0.03	48	0.05	80	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		47	0.52	36	0.00	65	0.04	67	0.04	35	0.16	61	0.08
Bunin 1987		39	0.54	54	0.00	58	0.04	66	0.04	51	0.06	76	0.05
Bunin 1987b		38	0.54	69	0.00	59	0.07	45	0.07	49	0.06	68	0.06
Chiu 1999		35	0.55	18	0.01	9	0.09	5	0.51	5	0.65	4	0.58
Cohen 1997		76	0.41	26	0.00	62	0.03	79	0.03	14	0.40	51	0.11
Cortot 1951		59	0.50	25	0.00	61	0.04	71	0.04	35	0.22	59	0.09
Csalog 1996		34	0.55	28	0.00	19	0.07	21	0.29	7	0.56	17	0.40
Czerny 1949		54	0.51	34	0.00	52	0.05	50	0.05	37	0.16	57	0.09
Czerny 1990		24	0.58	77	0.00	39	0.06	31	0.20	44	0.09	46	0.13
Duchoud 2007		1	0.72	1	0.29	1	0.29	2	0.59	3	0.59	2	0.59
Ezaki 2006		8	0.66	45	0.00	14	0.12	8	0.49	11	0.48	10	0.48
Falvay 1989		55	0.51	62	0.00	29	0.09	24	0.26	31	0.20	33	0.23
Farrell 1958		50	0.51	81	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	36	0.20	62	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		74	0.42	87	0.00	81	0.04	68	0.04	54	0.05	78	0.04
Fliere 1977		3	0.67	37	0.00	18	0.09	13	0.42	20	0.44	13	0.43
Fou 1978		57	0.50	4	0.04	6	0.09	27	0.24	34	0.24	32	0.24
Francois 1956		31	0.55	20	0.01	32	0.08	35	0.19	37	0.16	38	0.17
Friedman 1923		84	0.28	82	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	25	0.29	60	0.09
Friedman 1923b		81	0.28	78	0.00	78	0.03	83	0.03	23	0.29	58	0.09
Friedman 1930		77	0.40	51	0.00	56	0.04	60	0.04	26	0.32	49	0.11
Garcia 2007		85	0.23	38	0.00	83	0.03	85	0.03	41	0.13	71	0.06
Garcia 2007b		86	0.22	79	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	75	0.03	89	0.02
Gierzod 1998		13	0.61	70	0.00	23	0.08	20	0.30	5	0.46	19	0.37
Gornostaeva 1994		19	0.59	22	0.01	40	0.05	43	0.12	35	0.19	41	0.15
Groot 1988		46	0.52	73	0.00	67	0.04	55	0.04	57	0.04	83	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		71	0.43	6	0.04	35	0.06	41	0.12	49	0.04	67	0.07
Hatto 1993		27	0.57	66	0.00	10	0.07	9	0.47	5	0.56	8	0.51
Hatto 1997		17	0.59	67	0.00	11	0.10	7	0.49	6	0.54	7	0.51
Horowitz 1949		64	0.47	33	0.00	69	0.04	59	0.04	62	0.04	77	0.04
Indjic 1988		25	0.58	9	0.03	4	0.10	6	0.50	5	0.56	6	0.53
Kapell 1951		10	0.64	47	0.00	25	0.10	23	0.27	17	0.45	20	0.35
Kissin 1993		40	0.54	10	0.02	7	0.09	18	0.32	20	0.37	21	0.34
Kushner 1989		21	0.59	80	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.12	37	0.16	43	0.14
Luisada 1991		15	0.60	42	0.00	21	0.08	14	0.41	13	0.44	14	0.42
Lushtak 2004		20	0.59	19	0.01	13	0.11	10	0.46	9	0.53	9	0.49
Malcuzynski 1961		12	0.63	44	0.00	37	0.05	38	0.13	55	0.04	63	0.07
Magaloff 1978		11	0.64	5	0.04	28	0.09	16	0.35	36	0.17	31	0.24
Magin 1975		23	0.58	12	0.02	27	0.09	15	0.37	6	0.54	12	0.45
Michalowski 1933		68	0.44	48	0.00	41	0.05	39	0.13	17	0.42	34	0.23
Milkina 1970		30	0.55	49	0.00	36	0.05	36	0.15	38	0.18	40	0.16
Mohovich 1999		48	0.52	85	0.00	66	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04	81	0.04
Moravec 1969		41	0.54	21	0.01	33	0.08	26	0.24	15	0.38	25	0.30
Morozova 2008		44	0.52	60	0.00	45	0.05	49	0.05	45	0.07	70	0.06
Neighaus 1950		7	0.66	7	0.03	15	0.09	12	0.44	23	0.38	16	0.41
Niedzielski 1931		45	0.52	31	0.00	55	0.04	57	0.04	6	0.46	42	0.14
Ohlsson 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Osinska 1989		28	0.56	35	0.00	43	0.06	40	0.12	22	0.27	37	0.18
Pachmann 1927		73	0.43	15	0.01	57	0.04	65	0.04	29	0.25	54	0.10
Paderewski 1930		49	0.51	17	0.01	72	0.04	62	0.04	48	0.06	74	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		72	0.43	46	0.00	68	0.06	47	0.06	53	0.04	72	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		63	0.48	52	0.00	47	0.04	58	0.04	12	0.42	45	0.13
Poblocka 1999		6	0.67	40	0.00	12	0.16	11	0.45	6	0.51	11	0.48
Rabcewiczowa 1932		60	0.50	53	0.00	71	0.04	64	0.04	30	0.25	53	0.10
Rachmaninoff 1923		62	0.48	27	0.00	53	0.05	51	0.05	33	0.19	52	0.10
Rangell 2001		16	0.59	30	0.00	38	0.05	37	0.15	18	0.35	35	0.23
Richter 1976		67	0.46	14	0.01	60	0.04	74	0.04	46	0.07	73	0.05
Rosen 1989		18	0.59	24	0.00	30	0.09	22	0.28	17	0.42	22	0.34
Rosenthal 1930		70	0.44	68	0.00	80	0.04	72	0.04	49	0.05	79	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		82	0.28	88	0.00	86	0.02	88	0.02	75	0.03	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		83	0.28	89	0.00	87	0.03	82	0.03	76	0.03	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		66	0.46	86	0.00	76	0.04	69	0.04	46	0.05	84	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		80	0.32	83	0.00	77	0.03	78	0.03	49	0.05	82	0.04
Rossi 2007		87	0.19	58	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	58	0.03	87	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		75	0.42	23	0.00	63	0.03	81	0.03	20	0.38	47	0.11
Rubinstein 1952		42	0.53	3	0.07	5	0.07	28	0.23	20	0.41	24	0.31
Rubinstein 1966		51	0.51	61	0.00	64	0.04	70	0.04	44	0.09	69	0.06
Schilhawsky 1960		36	0.54	71	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	17	0.40	36	0.19
Shebanova 2002		9	0.64	11	0.02	8	0.09	4	0.53	6	0.57	5	0.55
Smith 1975		14	0.60	59	0.00	22	0.07	19	0.31	25	0.28	27	0.29
Sokolov 2002		4	0.67	13	0.01	16	0.10	17	0.35	9	0.48	15	0.41
Sztompka 1959		52	0.51	43	0.00	70	0.04	63	0.04	53	0.06	75	0.05
Tomsic 1995		37	0.54	75	0.00	49	0.05	54	0.05	40	0.15	55	0.09
Uninsky 1932		65	0.46	50	0.00	54	0.05	52	0.05	37	0.16	56	0.09
Uninsky 1971		33	0.55	8	0.03	17	0.10	34	0.20	33	0.31	30	0.25
Wasowski 1980		26	0.57	16	0.01	20	0.08	25	0.25	2	0.55	18	0.37
Zak 1937		43	0.53	41	0.00	34	0.07	32	0.20	26	0.32	29	0.25
Zak 1951		53	0.51	63	0.00	31	0.07	29	0.23	23	0.35	28	0.28
Random 1		89	0.01	90	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	27	0.22	66	0.07
Random 2		90	-0.08	84	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	88	0.01	90	0.01
Random 3		88	0.14	64	0.00	88	0.03	84	0.03	1	0.62	44	0.14

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).