Cohen 1997

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		63	0.23	55	0.00	71	0.03	75	0.03	75	0.03	75	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		43	0.30	30	0.00	28	0.07	32	0.22	60	0.03	37	0.08
Ashkenazy 1981		10	0.44	10	0.04	15	0.08	23	0.33	77	0.03	32	0.10
Bacha 2000		12	0.43	80	0.00	26	0.08	24	0.33	30	0.33	7	0.33
Badura 1965		72	0.20	68	0.00	65	0.04	59	0.04	76	0.03	77	0.03
Barbosa 1983		59	0.26	19	0.01	35	0.05	36	0.15	67	0.04	36	0.08
Biret 1990		13	0.42	40	0.00	12	0.14	10	0.48	40	0.15	11	0.27
Blet 2003		77	0.18	72	0.00	79	0.02	83	0.02	82	0.03	82	0.02
Block 1995		35	0.34	6	0.05	8	0.12	34	0.19	34	0.18	17	0.18
Blumental 1952		78	0.16	61	0.00	78	0.02	81	0.02	82	0.03	86	0.02
Boshniakovich 1969		57	0.27	73	0.00	48	0.04	61	0.04	55	0.04	61	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		2	0.47	12	0.03	4	0.16	5	0.52	10	0.45	4	0.48
Bunin 1987		67	0.23	35	0.00	74	0.06	51	0.06	84	0.03	62	0.04
Bunin 1987b		66	0.23	56	0.00	73	0.04	63	0.04	86	0.02	68	0.03
Chiu 1999		33	0.34	29	0.00	42	0.06	39	0.14	82	0.03	43	0.06
Cohen 1997		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Cortot 1951		37	0.33	28	0.00	49	0.05	53	0.05	47	0.06	52	0.05
Csalog 1996		1	0.47	8	0.04	3	0.13	6	0.52	13	0.50	2	0.51
Czerny 1949		71	0.20	48	0.00	58	0.04	57	0.04	64	0.03	74	0.03
Czerny 1990		79	0.16	69	0.00	82	0.03	77	0.03	88	0.02	88	0.02
Duchoud 2007		47	0.30	41	0.00	54	0.05	54	0.05	70	0.04	60	0.04
Ezaki 2006		32	0.34	17	0.01	33	0.05	38	0.14	79	0.03	41	0.06
Falvay 1989		9	0.44	7	0.04	6	0.14	9	0.49	53	0.05	18	0.16
Farrell 1958		23	0.37	85	0.00	37	0.05	31	0.23	46	0.05	29	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		27	0.35	15	0.01	32	0.06	26	0.31	31	0.21	12	0.26
Fliere 1977		42	0.31	78	0.00	60	0.04	58	0.04	64	0.04	55	0.04
Fou 1978		16	0.41	67	0.00	23	0.06	22	0.35	64	0.04	27	0.12
Francois 1956		54	0.28	5	0.06	21	0.07	29	0.26	67	0.03	35	0.09
Friedman 1923		90	-0.07	86	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	88	0.02	90	0.01
Friedman 1923b		89	-0.07	81	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	88	0.02	87	0.02
Friedman 1930		83	0.10	74	0.00	81	0.02	82	0.02	82	0.02	83	0.02
Garcia 2007		81	0.15	59	0.00	67	0.03	76	0.03	83	0.02	85	0.02
Garcia 2007b		74	0.19	76	0.00	69	0.03	74	0.03	69	0.03	79	0.03
Gierzod 1998		19	0.38	75	0.00	24	0.07	20	0.36	54	0.05	25	0.13
Gornostaeva 1994		38	0.33	9	0.04	18	0.07	33	0.20	43	0.12	23	0.15
Groot 1988		36	0.34	77	0.00	46	0.06	50	0.06	83	0.02	78	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		48	0.30	34	0.00	45	0.06	46	0.06	60	0.04	53	0.05
Hatto 1993		55	0.28	79	0.00	39	0.05	40	0.13	79	0.03	45	0.06
Hatto 1997		40	0.32	37	0.00	16	0.08	25	0.32	75	0.03	31	0.10
Horowitz 1949		73	0.19	58	0.00	66	0.03	73	0.03	71	0.03	71	0.03
Indjic 1988		58	0.27	49	0.00	38	0.05	37	0.15	83	0.02	50	0.05
Kapell 1951		45	0.30	54	0.00	55	0.04	60	0.04	75	0.03	67	0.03
Kissin 1993		44	0.30	64	0.00	52	0.06	47	0.06	72	0.04	49	0.05
Kushner 1989		30	0.34	44	0.00	51	0.08	45	0.08	85	0.03	47	0.05
Luisada 1991		53	0.28	87	0.00	59	0.04	62	0.04	68	0.04	54	0.04
Lushtak 2004		17	0.40	26	0.00	20	0.08	11	0.47	60	0.04	24	0.14
Malcuzynski 1961		49	0.30	27	0.00	64	0.04	69	0.04	82	0.03	69	0.03
Magaloff 1978		4	0.46	36	0.00	10	0.10	4	0.53	53	0.04	20	0.15
Magin 1975		76	0.18	43	0.00	80	0.03	79	0.03	77	0.03	66	0.03
Michalowski 1933		75	0.19	20	0.01	56	0.04	68	0.04	69	0.04	57	0.04
Milkina 1970		7	0.45	3	0.08	5	0.15	3	0.56	25	0.32	5	0.42
Mohovich 1999		41	0.32	65	0.00	40	0.06	35	0.17	65	0.04	39	0.08
Moravec 1969		56	0.28	24	0.01	61	0.04	67	0.04	78	0.03	63	0.03
Morozova 2008		70	0.21	50	0.00	72	0.04	65	0.04	69	0.04	59	0.04
Neighaus 1950		29	0.34	39	0.00	41	0.05	42	0.11	85	0.02	51	0.05
Niedzielski 1931		82	0.11	57	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	87	0.02	81	0.02
Ohlsson 1999		15	0.41	25	0.01	22	0.06	14	0.40	79	0.03	30	0.11
Osinska 1989		11	0.43	13	0.02	11	0.12	8	0.50	41	0.12	13	0.24
Pachmann 1927		20	0.38	32	0.00	17	0.08	15	0.40	35	0.19	10	0.28
Paderewski 1930		39	0.32	82	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	60	0.04	44	0.06
Perlemuter 1992		61	0.25	62	0.00	68	0.03	71	0.03	80	0.03	64	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		46	0.30	70	0.00	43	0.05	41	0.12	65	0.04	40	0.07
Poblocka 1999		14	0.42	51	0.00	25	0.07	16	0.39	62	0.04	26	0.12
Rabcewiczowa 1932		51	0.29	45	0.00	47	0.06	49	0.06	65	0.04	46	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		88	0.00	71	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	88	0.01	89	0.01
Rangell 2001		18	0.39	4	0.07	7	0.12	12	0.41	44	0.12	15	0.22
Richter 1976		26	0.36	47	0.00	50	0.06	48	0.06	57	0.04	48	0.05
Rosen 1989		6	0.45	18	0.01	13	0.10	18	0.37	40	0.14	14	0.23
Rosenthal 1930		52	0.29	66	0.00	57	0.04	66	0.04	69	0.03	76	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		34	0.34	46	0.00	29	0.08	17	0.37	24	0.28	8	0.32
Rosenthal 1931b		31	0.34	38	0.00	30	0.12	21	0.35	26	0.27	9	0.31
Rosenthal 1931c		22	0.37	21	0.01	31	0.08	28	0.27	43	0.09	19	0.16
Rosenthal 1931d		24	0.36	42	0.00	27	0.11	13	0.41	21	0.29	6	0.34
Rossi 2007		86	0.03	52	0.00	83	0.02	88	0.02	76	0.02	80	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		21	0.38	1	0.21	1	0.21	7	0.50	6	0.50	3	0.50
Rubinstein 1952		3	0.47	2	0.10	2	0.21	1	0.61	10	0.52	1	0.56
Rubinstein 1966		28	0.35	60	0.00	19	0.09	30	0.26	39	0.14	16	0.19
Schilhawsky 1960		65	0.23	88	0.00	75	0.04	64	0.04	70	0.03	73	0.03
Shebanova 2002		5	0.45	63	0.00	14	0.17	19	0.36	51	0.06	22	0.15
Smith 1975		8	0.45	11	0.04	9	0.11	2	0.59	66	0.04	21	0.15
Sokolov 2002		60	0.26	22	0.01	70	0.03	72	0.03	84	0.03	65	0.03
Sztompka 1959		62	0.23	33	0.00	76	0.04	70	0.04	83	0.03	72	0.03
Tomsic 1995		25	0.36	31	0.00	34	0.08	27	0.28	75	0.03	33	0.09
Uninsky 1932		85	0.04	89	0.00	88	0.03	80	0.03	86	0.02	84	0.02
Uninsky 1971		64	0.23	14	0.02	53	0.05	55	0.05	81	0.03	58	0.04
Wasowski 1980		50	0.30	16	0.01	36	0.05	43	0.11	77	0.03	42	0.06
Zak 1937		69	0.22	83	0.00	63	0.05	52	0.05	73	0.04	56	0.04
Zak 1951		68	0.22	84	0.00	62	0.04	56	0.04	81	0.03	70	0.03
Random 1		87	0.03	53	0.00	86	0.02	84	0.02	11	0.41	34	0.09
Random 2		84	0.04	90	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	16	0.32	38	0.08
Random 3		80	0.15	23	0.01	77	0.03	78	0.03	7	0.45	28	0.12

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).