Brailowsky 1960

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		38	0.48	20	0.01	60	0.04	63	0.04	69	0.03	78	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		39	0.48	14	0.02	30	0.07	28	0.29	41	0.18	22	0.23
Ashkenazy 1981		51	0.44	49	0.00	51	0.04	59	0.04	80	0.03	80	0.03
Bacha 2000		18	0.54	19	0.01	14	0.09	13	0.44	5	0.58	3	0.51
Badura 1965		73	0.34	22	0.01	72	0.05	48	0.05	49	0.05	54	0.05
Barbosa 1983		67	0.36	75	0.00	61	0.04	58	0.04	47	0.05	61	0.04
Biret 1990		43	0.47	61	0.00	58	0.04	70	0.04	47	0.06	55	0.05
Blet 2003		68	0.36	68	0.00	76	0.04	74	0.04	81	0.03	73	0.03
Block 1995		16	0.55	13	0.02	5	0.10	19	0.39	17	0.36	12	0.37
Blumental 1952		72	0.34	10	0.03	33	0.05	44	0.09	60	0.04	50	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		6	0.57	51	0.00	20	0.11	24	0.33	28	0.31	18	0.32
Brailowsky 1960		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Bunin 1987		35	0.48	65	0.00	46	0.04	54	0.04	80	0.03	81	0.03
Bunin 1987b		34	0.49	31	0.00	45	0.04	56	0.04	69	0.03	69	0.03
Chiu 1999		55	0.43	72	0.00	31	0.07	30	0.24	60	0.04	32	0.10
Cohen 1997		44	0.47	5	0.05	13	0.08	10	0.45	5	0.52	4	0.48
Cortot 1951		70	0.35	54	0.00	78	0.04	60	0.04	73	0.03	83	0.03
Csalog 1996		64	0.39	50	0.00	65	0.05	51	0.05	37	0.22	33	0.10
Czerny 1949		65	0.38	63	0.00	48	0.04	68	0.04	71	0.03	76	0.03
Czerny 1990		60	0.40	48	0.00	73	0.06	45	0.06	75	0.03	62	0.04
Duchoud 2007		66	0.37	88	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	79	0.03	79	0.03
Ezaki 2006		4	0.59	6	0.05	18	0.09	9	0.46	42	0.10	23	0.21
Falvay 1989		5	0.58	2	0.10	2	0.11	4	0.53	34	0.18	19	0.31
Farrell 1958		32	0.50	28	0.00	54	0.06	46	0.06	30	0.26	30	0.12
Ferenczy 1958		50	0.44	27	0.01	70	0.06	47	0.06	48	0.07	48	0.06
Fliere 1977		17	0.54	33	0.00	24	0.10	20	0.39	55	0.05	28	0.14
Fou 1978		3	0.60	8	0.04	3	0.11	3	0.54	28	0.37	6	0.45
Francois 1956		54	0.43	64	0.00	47	0.04	55	0.04	76	0.03	84	0.03
Friedman 1923		88	-0.02	73	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	85	0.02	90	0.02
Friedman 1923b		87	0.00	66	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	84	0.02	89	0.02
Friedman 1930		85	0.10	45	0.00	81	0.02	87	0.02	81	0.03	86	0.02
Garcia 2007		75	0.33	34	0.00	62	0.03	79	0.03	30	0.23	39	0.08
Garcia 2007b		82	0.23	55	0.00	74	0.04	65	0.04	43	0.10	51	0.06
Gierzod 1998		21	0.53	17	0.01	16	0.07	26	0.31	46	0.07	27	0.15
Gornostaeva 1994		7	0.57	25	0.01	28	0.07	29	0.26	37	0.17	24	0.21
Groot 1988		10	0.56	53	0.00	23	0.09	17	0.39	52	0.04	31	0.12
Harasiewicz 1955		33	0.49	35	0.00	17	0.07	14	0.43	43	0.10	25	0.21
Hatto 1993		80	0.27	81	0.00	66	0.04	64	0.04	71	0.03	82	0.03
Hatto 1997		76	0.33	87	0.00	41	0.05	39	0.11	57	0.04	47	0.07
Horowitz 1949		22	0.53	3	0.07	9	0.08	7	0.50	19	0.34	9	0.41
Indjic 1988		79	0.27	78	0.00	67	0.04	67	0.04	78	0.03	72	0.03
Kapell 1951		59	0.40	42	0.00	68	0.04	61	0.04	69	0.04	59	0.04
Kissin 1993		30	0.50	58	0.00	38	0.05	34	0.17	52	0.05	35	0.09
Kushner 1989		28	0.51	83	0.00	42	0.05	37	0.14	59	0.04	43	0.07
Luisada 1991		8	0.56	26	0.01	27	0.08	27	0.30	32	0.25	21	0.27
Lushtak 2004		48	0.45	56	0.00	40	0.05	41	0.10	63	0.04	49	0.06
Malcuzynski 1961		15	0.55	59	0.00	35	0.05	32	0.18	74	0.03	44	0.07
Magaloff 1978		2	0.62	1	0.24	1	0.24	1	0.58	17	0.34	7	0.44
Magin 1975		53	0.43	84	0.00	43	0.05	42	0.10	38	0.15	29	0.12
Michalowski 1933		84	0.20	39	0.00	79	0.03	82	0.03	63	0.04	71	0.03
Milkina 1970		9	0.56	85	0.00	22	0.10	21	0.38	23	0.34	14	0.36
Mohovich 1999		1	0.63	7	0.04	8	0.10	2	0.55	26	0.29	10	0.40
Moravec 1969		47	0.46	38	0.00	32	0.06	36	0.15	67	0.04	36	0.08
Morozova 2008		19	0.54	12	0.03	21	0.15	5	0.52	48	0.06	26	0.18
Neighaus 1950		31	0.50	46	0.00	36	0.06	33	0.17	76	0.04	41	0.08
Niedzielski 1931		69	0.35	41	0.00	64	0.03	76	0.03	55	0.05	58	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		24	0.52	30	0.00	37	0.07	35	0.16	67	0.04	38	0.08
Osinska 1989		41	0.48	62	0.00	57	0.04	72	0.04	66	0.04	56	0.04
Pachmann 1927		37	0.48	69	0.00	25	0.08	25	0.32	23	0.36	15	0.34
Paderewski 1930		71	0.34	76	0.00	82	0.02	85	0.02	85	0.02	85	0.02
Perlemuter 1992		52	0.44	43	0.00	56	0.03	77	0.03	51	0.04	65	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		61	0.40	89	0.00	53	0.05	49	0.05	52	0.05	52	0.05
Poblocka 1999		25	0.52	32	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.10	53	0.05	42	0.07
Rabcewiczowa 1932		74	0.34	90	0.00	80	0.03	80	0.03	68	0.03	68	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		63	0.39	67	0.00	59	0.04	69	0.04	75	0.03	67	0.03
Rangell 2001		14	0.55	15	0.02	4	0.09	15	0.43	20	0.32	13	0.37
Richter 1976		45	0.46	77	0.00	52	0.05	52	0.05	42	0.13	37	0.08
Rosen 1989		11	0.56	37	0.00	19	0.08	18	0.39	29	0.30	16	0.34
Rosenthal 1930		56	0.42	57	0.00	49	0.04	62	0.04	38	0.18	40	0.08
Rosenthal 1931		36	0.48	60	0.00	15	0.08	16	0.41	8	0.54	5	0.47
Rosenthal 1931b		27	0.51	24	0.01	7	0.12	8	0.50	6	0.60	1	0.55
Rosenthal 1931c		58	0.41	36	0.00	55	0.04	57	0.04	52	0.05	63	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		12	0.56	16	0.02	6	0.10	6	0.51	6	0.55	2	0.53
Rossi 2007		83	0.22	82	0.00	83	0.02	83	0.02	41	0.09	57	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		46	0.46	4	0.06	10	0.08	23	0.34	5	0.52	8	0.42
Rubinstein 1952		13	0.56	18	0.01	26	0.11	22	0.37	21	0.39	11	0.38
Rubinstein 1966		40	0.48	11	0.03	34	0.05	40	0.11	68	0.04	46	0.07
Schilhawsky 1960		62	0.40	47	0.00	63	0.03	78	0.03	75	0.03	74	0.03
Shebanova 2002		42	0.47	79	0.00	50	0.04	66	0.04	53	0.06	53	0.05
Smith 1975		20	0.53	40	0.00	29	0.06	31	0.21	73	0.04	34	0.09
Sokolov 2002		49	0.44	52	0.00	69	0.05	50	0.05	85	0.02	66	0.03
Sztompka 1959		81	0.24	80	0.00	85	0.04	71	0.04	82	0.03	70	0.03
Tomsic 1995		23	0.52	23	0.01	39	0.05	38	0.12	61	0.04	45	0.07
Uninsky 1932		78	0.27	44	0.00	84	0.04	75	0.04	83	0.02	75	0.03
Uninsky 1971		57	0.42	21	0.01	71	0.05	53	0.05	79	0.03	60	0.04
Wasowski 1980		77	0.33	71	0.00	77	0.04	73	0.04	82	0.03	64	0.03
Zak 1937		26	0.51	29	0.00	12	0.09	12	0.44	32	0.24	17	0.32
Zak 1951		29	0.51	9	0.03	11	0.08	11	0.44	38	0.21	20	0.30
Random 1		90	-0.08	86	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	71	0.03	87	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.04	74	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	46	0.06	77	0.03
Random 3		86	0.00	70	0.00	87	0.02	84	0.02	59	0.03	88	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).