Rangell 2001

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		29	0.52	29	0.01	33	0.07	23	0.29	46	0.06	37	0.13
Anderszewski 2003		56	0.40	24	0.01	57	0.04	62	0.04	48	0.04	63	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		30	0.50	62	0.00	43	0.06	38	0.18	59	0.04	52	0.08
Bacha 2000		25	0.53	64	0.00	45	0.06	47	0.06	25	0.39	33	0.15
Badura 1965		49	0.44	44	0.00	31	0.06	26	0.27	18	0.38	15	0.32
Barbosa 1983		64	0.39	7	0.04	12	0.08	22	0.29	52	0.05	41	0.12
Biret 1990		22	0.54	41	0.00	42	0.05	39	0.18	34	0.23	30	0.20
Blet 2003		45	0.45	3	0.10	7	0.12	19	0.33	36	0.21	19	0.26
Block 1995		23	0.54	20	0.01	25	0.08	35	0.19	20	0.33	20	0.25
Blumental 1952		83	0.21	78	0.00	86	0.02	83	0.02	78	0.03	87	0.02
Boshniakovich 1969		7	0.59	4	0.09	5	0.14	3	0.60	6	0.61	1	0.60
Brailowsky 1960		19	0.55	43	0.00	22	0.08	20	0.32	15	0.43	14	0.37
Bunin 1987		60	0.39	60	0.00	74	0.03	75	0.03	68	0.04	80	0.03
Bunin 1987b		59	0.40	42	0.00	73	0.03	72	0.03	63	0.04	72	0.03
Chiu 1999		51	0.43	23	0.01	13	0.10	11	0.43	24	0.40	8	0.41
Cohen 1997		63	0.39	34	0.00	29	0.06	44	0.12	12	0.41	26	0.22
Cortot 1951		61	0.39	52	0.00	69	0.03	69	0.03	45	0.08	59	0.05
Csalog 1996		36	0.49	73	0.00	44	0.07	42	0.13	19	0.44	22	0.24
Czerny 1949		75	0.33	38	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	63	0.03	78	0.03
Czerny 1990		32	0.50	67	0.00	59	0.04	52	0.04	77	0.03	82	0.03
Duchoud 2007		18	0.56	6	0.05	14	0.11	21	0.31	39	0.16	25	0.22
Ezaki 2006		8	0.59	16	0.01	11	0.09	7	0.52	25	0.30	12	0.39
Falvay 1989		38	0.48	58	0.00	37	0.07	36	0.19	41	0.09	35	0.13
Farrell 1958		37	0.49	26	0.01	48	0.04	55	0.04	35	0.20	49	0.09
Ferenczy 1958		71	0.36	45	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	75	0.03	86	0.02
Fliere 1977		2	0.65	1	0.19	1	0.19	1	0.63	16	0.52	2	0.57
Fou 1978		24	0.53	8	0.04	3	0.14	5	0.53	20	0.43	4	0.48
Francois 1956		57	0.40	81	0.00	72	0.03	68	0.03	77	0.03	83	0.03
Friedman 1923		86	0.14	36	0.00	82	0.03	78	0.03	57	0.06	67	0.04
Friedman 1923b		85	0.15	25	0.01	81	0.03	77	0.03	72	0.04	81	0.03
Friedman 1930		82	0.22	27	0.01	63	0.04	64	0.04	59	0.04	64	0.04
Garcia 2007		74	0.33	47	0.00	67	0.04	63	0.04	26	0.31	44	0.11
Garcia 2007b		84	0.15	84	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	66	0.03	90	0.02
Gierzod 1998		35	0.49	68	0.00	52	0.04	57	0.04	61	0.05	66	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		10	0.59	53	0.00	18	0.06	14	0.39	15	0.42	11	0.40
Groot 1988		28	0.52	79	0.00	49	0.05	49	0.05	48	0.05	58	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		55	0.41	12	0.01	19	0.07	16	0.37	42	0.13	27	0.22
Hatto 1993		79	0.29	88	0.00	39	0.06	40	0.17	46	0.06	47	0.10
Hatto 1997		77	0.31	48	0.00	17	0.07	32	0.21	65	0.04	51	0.09
Horowitz 1949		43	0.46	18	0.01	56	0.05	51	0.05	41	0.09	56	0.07
Indjic 1988		80	0.28	85	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.16	61	0.05	50	0.09
Kapell 1951		27	0.52	19	0.01	53	0.04	54	0.04	62	0.04	62	0.04
Kissin 1993		13	0.59	30	0.00	8	0.11	8	0.47	22	0.35	9	0.41
Kushner 1989		17	0.56	50	0.00	24	0.08	33	0.21	31	0.22	29	0.21
Luisada 1991		34	0.49	22	0.01	38	0.08	31	0.24	39	0.15	31	0.19
Lushtak 2004		46	0.44	39	0.00	32	0.06	28	0.26	62	0.04	46	0.10
Malcuzynski 1961		4	0.64	5	0.05	9	0.11	25	0.28	39	0.18	24	0.22
Magaloff 1978		1	0.67	2	0.16	2	0.16	4	0.58	14	0.36	6	0.46
Magin 1975		47	0.44	86	0.00	54	0.04	61	0.04	41	0.12	54	0.07
Michalowski 1933		81	0.23	74	0.00	84	0.02	84	0.02	81	0.03	85	0.02
Milkina 1970		5	0.62	9	0.03	6	0.13	6	0.52	10	0.44	5	0.48
Mohovich 1999		11	0.59	32	0.00	15	0.10	13	0.42	32	0.24	16	0.32
Moravec 1969		44	0.45	28	0.01	65	0.03	66	0.03	80	0.03	68	0.03
Morozova 2008		73	0.35	40	0.00	62	0.04	58	0.04	82	0.03	77	0.03
Neighaus 1950		12	0.59	17	0.01	16	0.07	10	0.43	51	0.06	32	0.16
Niedzielski 1931		68	0.38	80	0.00	78	0.03	79	0.03	78	0.03	71	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		9	0.59	13	0.01	23	0.07	18	0.35	37	0.15	23	0.23
Osinska 1989		26	0.53	14	0.01	28	0.06	34	0.20	28	0.22	28	0.21
Pachmann 1927		52	0.43	46	0.00	34	0.06	27	0.26	22	0.37	17	0.31
Paderewski 1930		21	0.54	89	0.00	27	0.06	37	0.18	21	0.31	21	0.24
Perlemuter 1992		70	0.36	55	0.00	58	0.04	60	0.04	70	0.04	61	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		33	0.49	69	0.00	46	0.06	45	0.06	22	0.25	39	0.12
Poblocka 1999		6	0.60	21	0.01	20	0.07	17	0.37	28	0.25	18	0.30
Rabcewiczowa 1932		53	0.42	37	0.00	68	0.03	67	0.03	41	0.16	55	0.07
Rachmaninoff 1923		76	0.32	71	0.00	71	0.03	70	0.03	72	0.04	70	0.03
Rangell 2001		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Richter 1976		58	0.40	82	0.00	66	0.03	71	0.03	62	0.04	73	0.03
Rosen 1989		3	0.64	10	0.02	4	0.13	2	0.61	9	0.51	3	0.56
Rosenthal 1930		65	0.38	65	0.00	77	0.03	82	0.03	63	0.04	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		67	0.38	72	0.00	55	0.05	50	0.05	23	0.34	36	0.13
Rosenthal 1931b		54	0.41	83	0.00	50	0.05	48	0.05	22	0.35	38	0.13
Rosenthal 1931c		41	0.47	59	0.00	51	0.04	53	0.04	30	0.26	48	0.10
Rosenthal 1931d		39	0.47	35	0.00	47	0.06	46	0.06	19	0.35	34	0.14
Rossi 2007		87	0.13	75	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	78	0.02	84	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		78	0.30	77	0.00	61	0.03	65	0.03	23	0.36	45	0.10
Rubinstein 1952		20	0.55	54	0.00	26	0.07	9	0.44	15	0.46	7	0.45
Rubinstein 1966		15	0.56	11	0.02	10	0.09	15	0.38	13	0.45	10	0.41
Schilhawsky 1960		72	0.36	49	0.00	79	0.03	76	0.03	67	0.03	76	0.03
Shebanova 2002		14	0.58	15	0.01	21	0.07	12	0.42	27	0.35	13	0.38
Smith 1975		42	0.47	76	0.00	41	0.06	43	0.13	64	0.04	53	0.07
Sokolov 2002		48	0.44	51	0.00	80	0.03	73	0.03	73	0.03	69	0.03
Sztompka 1959		66	0.38	63	0.00	76	0.03	80	0.03	61	0.04	74	0.03
Tomsic 1995		16	0.56	87	0.00	30	0.05	24	0.28	46	0.05	40	0.12
Uninsky 1932		69	0.37	66	0.00	70	0.03	74	0.03	60	0.05	65	0.04
Uninsky 1971		50	0.43	31	0.00	64	0.04	59	0.04	78	0.03	75	0.03
Wasowski 1980		62	0.39	56	0.00	60	0.04	56	0.04	70	0.04	60	0.04
Zak 1937		31	0.50	33	0.00	36	0.08	29	0.25	56	0.05	42	0.11
Zak 1951		40	0.47	57	0.00	35	0.05	30	0.25	56	0.05	43	0.11
Random 1		90	-0.05	61	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	75	0.03	88	0.02
Random 2		89	0.00	70	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	38	0.13	57	0.05
Random 3		88	0.01	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	63	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).