Richter 1976

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		53	0.43	84	0.00	73	0.04	63	0.04	71	0.03	73	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		47	0.44	27	0.01	17	0.07	24	0.31	26	0.27	22	0.29
Ashkenazy 1981		20	0.53	16	0.01	26	0.09	13	0.39	48	0.05	35	0.14
Bacha 2000		72	0.33	85	0.00	80	0.03	80	0.03	56	0.04	67	0.03
Badura 1965		69	0.35	28	0.01	50	0.05	49	0.05	43	0.12	45	0.08
Barbosa 1983		56	0.42	60	0.00	55	0.04	65	0.04	69	0.04	60	0.04
Biret 1990		73	0.32	61	0.00	79	0.02	87	0.02	79	0.03	89	0.02
Blet 2003		21	0.53	42	0.00	42	0.05	38	0.15	39	0.16	33	0.15
Block 1995		9	0.58	10	0.03	19	0.06	21	0.33	18	0.36	14	0.34
Blumental 1952		84	0.17	68	0.00	85	0.03	79	0.03	85	0.02	86	0.02
Boshniakovich 1969		31	0.48	48	0.00	43	0.05	44	0.11	45	0.06	46	0.08
Brailowsky 1960		38	0.46	59	0.00	40	0.06	42	0.13	52	0.05	42	0.08
Bunin 1987		25	0.50	13	0.01	10	0.08	7	0.42	29	0.29	11	0.35
Bunin 1987b		26	0.50	29	0.00	11	0.10	8	0.41	29	0.29	12	0.34
Chiu 1999		41	0.46	31	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.12	39	0.18	32	0.15
Cohen 1997		68	0.36	62	0.00	61	0.04	57	0.04	48	0.06	55	0.05
Cortot 1951		64	0.38	86	0.00	74	0.03	73	0.03	67	0.04	79	0.03
Csalog 1996		36	0.48	23	0.01	29	0.06	33	0.19	16	0.49	19	0.31
Czerny 1949		79	0.29	79	0.00	83	0.04	64	0.04	86	0.02	72	0.03
Czerny 1990		8	0.58	14	0.01	21	0.12	12	0.39	27	0.24	20	0.31
Duchoud 2007		32	0.48	56	0.00	38	0.05	36	0.16	53	0.05	41	0.09
Ezaki 2006		48	0.43	82	0.00	58	0.03	72	0.03	82	0.02	82	0.02
Falvay 1989		18	0.54	43	0.00	31	0.06	30	0.23	39	0.12	31	0.17
Farrell 1958		74	0.31	63	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	86	0.02	84	0.02
Ferenczy 1958		65	0.37	87	0.00	66	0.03	83	0.03	45	0.07	54	0.05
Fliere 1977		1	0.64	2	0.11	2	0.14	1	0.59	22	0.39	2	0.48
Fou 1978		22	0.53	35	0.00	28	0.08	28	0.26	40	0.18	26	0.22
Francois 1956		63	0.38	57	0.00	75	0.03	85	0.03	79	0.03	80	0.03
Friedman 1923		87	0.11	24	0.01	87	0.03	71	0.03	67	0.04	81	0.03
Friedman 1923b		86	0.11	47	0.00	86	0.03	84	0.03	71	0.04	75	0.03
Friedman 1930		81	0.26	12	0.02	57	0.03	67	0.03	77	0.03	70	0.03
Garcia 2007		66	0.37	36	0.00	48	0.07	45	0.07	9	0.62	27	0.21
Garcia 2007b		85	0.16	32	0.00	82	0.03	76	0.03	52	0.05	66	0.04
Gierzod 1998		70	0.34	65	0.00	76	0.03	70	0.03	80	0.02	85	0.02
Gornostaeva 1994		49	0.43	58	0.00	71	0.04	54	0.04	85	0.02	76	0.03
Groot 1988		2	0.61	34	0.00	8	0.11	6	0.42	30	0.27	15	0.34
Harasiewicz 1955		16	0.55	4	0.08	3	0.12	4	0.45	17	0.36	6	0.40
Hatto 1993		62	0.38	18	0.01	34	0.05	32	0.20	32	0.20	29	0.20
Hatto 1997		76	0.30	83	0.00	53	0.04	61	0.04	73	0.03	71	0.03
Horowitz 1949		27	0.50	11	0.02	16	0.09	18	0.36	16	0.36	9	0.36
Indjic 1988		67	0.36	64	0.00	35	0.05	37	0.16	42	0.13	34	0.14
Kapell 1951		14	0.55	1	0.16	1	0.16	9	0.41	32	0.30	10	0.35
Kissin 1993		6	0.60	9	0.03	12	0.08	17	0.37	28	0.31	13	0.34
Kushner 1989		3	0.61	15	0.01	20	0.08	23	0.33	25	0.30	18	0.31
Luisada 1991		51	0.43	46	0.00	64	0.04	60	0.04	71	0.04	57	0.04
Lushtak 2004		23	0.52	70	0.00	25	0.07	15	0.37	39	0.15	25	0.24
Malcuzynski 1961		12	0.56	50	0.00	22	0.08	26	0.29	50	0.05	36	0.12
Magaloff 1978		4	0.60	19	0.01	7	0.10	16	0.37	24	0.27	17	0.32
Magin 1975		17	0.55	6	0.06	9	0.10	5	0.43	9	0.48	4	0.45
Michalowski 1933		78	0.30	37	0.00	56	0.03	68	0.03	54	0.05	59	0.04
Milkina 1970		46	0.44	51	0.00	52	0.05	48	0.05	47	0.06	52	0.05
Mohovich 1999		19	0.53	52	0.00	32	0.08	29	0.25	54	0.05	38	0.11
Moravec 1969		43	0.45	77	0.00	70	0.04	59	0.04	70	0.04	56	0.04
Morozova 2008		29	0.49	54	0.00	37	0.05	31	0.20	63	0.04	40	0.09
Neighaus 1950		58	0.40	44	0.00	60	0.05	50	0.05	84	0.03	63	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		37	0.47	21	0.01	24	0.08	25	0.31	4	0.50	8	0.39
Ohlsson 1999		39	0.46	20	0.01	49	0.07	46	0.07	74	0.04	53	0.05
Osinska 1989		44	0.44	38	0.00	69	0.03	69	0.03	69	0.04	68	0.03
Pachmann 1927		28	0.50	17	0.01	27	0.08	19	0.34	18	0.47	5	0.40
Paderewski 1930		34	0.48	40	0.00	36	0.05	34	0.17	45	0.07	37	0.11
Perlemuter 1992		5	0.60	3	0.10	4	0.13	3	0.46	11	0.49	3	0.47
Pierdomenico 2008		30	0.49	49	0.00	39	0.07	35	0.17	26	0.23	28	0.20
Poblocka 1999		15	0.55	55	0.00	23	0.09	11	0.40	33	0.21	21	0.29
Rabcewiczowa 1932		82	0.25	78	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	84	0.02	83	0.02
Rachmaninoff 1923		57	0.41	71	0.00	30	0.06	39	0.15	63	0.04	43	0.08
Rangell 2001		59	0.40	41	0.00	63	0.04	62	0.04	71	0.03	77	0.03
Richter 1976		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosen 1989		50	0.43	26	0.01	68	0.03	82	0.03	62	0.04	74	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		61	0.39	80	0.00	54	0.04	56	0.04	39	0.14	49	0.07
Rosenthal 1931		71	0.33	66	0.00	65	0.03	77	0.03	51	0.05	61	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		80	0.29	75	0.00	77	0.03	78	0.03	49	0.05	64	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		60	0.40	72	0.00	62	0.03	66	0.03	48	0.05	65	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.30	76	0.00	78	0.03	74	0.03	69	0.03	78	0.03
Rossi 2007		75	0.31	88	0.00	72	0.04	58	0.04	30	0.20	39	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		83	0.23	7	0.06	5	0.11	41	0.14	65	0.04	48	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		40	0.46	39	0.00	51	0.05	51	0.05	42	0.12	47	0.08
Rubinstein 1966		55	0.42	53	0.00	67	0.03	75	0.03	70	0.04	69	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		35	0.48	45	0.00	18	0.09	20	0.34	24	0.33	16	0.33
Shebanova 2002		13	0.56	5	0.07	13	0.09	22	0.33	39	0.22	24	0.27
Smith 1975		42	0.45	73	0.00	59	0.04	55	0.04	60	0.04	58	0.04
Sokolov 2002		10	0.58	8	0.05	6	0.09	10	0.40	18	0.39	7	0.39
Sztompka 1959		24	0.50	22	0.01	41	0.05	40	0.15	69	0.04	44	0.08
Tomsic 1995		11	0.57	25	0.01	14	0.07	14	0.39	30	0.20	23	0.28
Uninsky 1932		52	0.43	33	0.00	45	0.04	53	0.04	49	0.05	62	0.04
Uninsky 1971		54	0.43	81	0.00	46	0.05	52	0.05	48	0.07	50	0.06
Wasowski 1980		7	0.58	30	0.00	15	0.09	2	0.51	1	0.64	1	0.57
Zak 1937		45	0.44	89	0.00	47	0.06	47	0.06	55	0.05	51	0.05
Zak 1951		33	0.48	67	0.00	33	0.07	27	0.28	43	0.13	30	0.19
Random 1		89	-0.07	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	61	0.03	87	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.08	69	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	86	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		88	0.00	74	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	51	0.03	88	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).