Groot 1988

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		10	0.67	21	0.01	16	0.07	17	0.41	7	0.50	15	0.45
Anderszewski 2003		75	0.35	43	0.00	73	0.05	51	0.05	68	0.03	77	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		49	0.53	18	0.01	52	0.04	56	0.04	41	0.12	66	0.07
Bacha 2000		63	0.48	83	0.00	75	0.03	77	0.03	39	0.19	58	0.08
Badura 1965		70	0.43	49	0.00	68	0.03	70	0.03	39	0.15	64	0.07
Barbosa 1983		41	0.56	25	0.00	27	0.11	16	0.42	3	0.61	9	0.51
Biret 1990		66	0.47	84	0.00	77	0.03	78	0.03	52	0.05	81	0.04
Blet 2003		31	0.58	27	0.00	43	0.07	41	0.15	28	0.30	41	0.21
Block 1995		25	0.60	62	0.00	32	0.06	31	0.24	16	0.41	31	0.31
Blumental 1952		84	0.26	80	0.00	86	0.03	75	0.03	64	0.04	85	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		38	0.56	64	0.00	41	0.06	39	0.17	21	0.44	37	0.27
Brailowsky 1960		39	0.56	70	0.00	54	0.04	52	0.04	17	0.39	48	0.12
Bunin 1987		24	0.60	12	0.02	24	0.08	25	0.31	18	0.40	23	0.35
Bunin 1987b		23	0.60	52	0.00	25	0.08	26	0.31	18	0.40	22	0.35
Chiu 1999		67	0.47	66	0.00	30	0.06	34	0.23	22	0.42	30	0.31
Cohen 1997		76	0.34	73	0.00	84	0.02	83	0.02	50	0.06	86	0.03
Cortot 1951		72	0.39	89	0.00	85	0.02	81	0.02	52	0.05	88	0.03
Csalog 1996		47	0.53	55	0.00	51	0.04	54	0.04	28	0.31	51	0.11
Czerny 1949		55	0.52	44	0.00	63	0.04	65	0.04	35	0.23	54	0.10
Czerny 1990		11	0.66	32	0.00	17	0.09	8	0.50	11	0.50	10	0.50
Duchoud 2007		53	0.52	53	0.00	71	0.04	62	0.04	63	0.04	79	0.04
Ezaki 2006		15	0.64	56	0.00	22	0.08	18	0.38	23	0.31	25	0.34
Falvay 1989		3	0.71	2	0.13	2	0.14	1	0.63	4	0.64	2	0.63
Farrell 1958		57	0.50	81	0.00	74	0.04	59	0.04	32	0.24	53	0.10
Ferenczy 1958		69	0.46	85	0.00	83	0.02	85	0.02	49	0.07	78	0.04
Fliere 1977		4	0.71	5	0.07	6	0.12	5	0.57	8	0.59	5	0.58
Fou 1978		19	0.63	47	0.00	15	0.07	14	0.43	21	0.42	19	0.42
Francois 1956		7	0.70	22	0.01	12	0.09	10	0.48	5	0.56	8	0.52
Friedman 1923		87	0.15	51	0.00	81	0.02	87	0.02	45	0.08	83	0.04
Friedman 1923b		86	0.16	48	0.00	80	0.02	84	0.02	62	0.05	87	0.03
Friedman 1930		80	0.30	74	0.00	64	0.04	64	0.04	37	0.20	56	0.09
Garcia 2007		81	0.29	45	0.00	78	0.02	80	0.02	36	0.17	68	0.06
Garcia 2007b		83	0.26	42	0.00	82	0.02	86	0.02	16	0.40	57	0.09
Gierzod 1998		58	0.49	71	0.00	55	0.04	60	0.04	40	0.10	67	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		8	0.68	6	0.07	4	0.13	11	0.48	12	0.50	11	0.49
Groot 1988		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Harasiewicz 1955		45	0.53	14	0.02	13	0.12	19	0.38	20	0.32	24	0.35
Hatto 1993		79	0.31	59	0.00	59	0.03	66	0.03	54	0.05	82	0.04
Hatto 1997		77	0.33	46	0.00	62	0.03	69	0.03	59	0.04	84	0.03
Horowitz 1949		16	0.64	16	0.01	10	0.08	12	0.45	4	0.52	12	0.48
Indjic 1988		78	0.33	60	0.00	61	0.03	76	0.03	50	0.05	76	0.04
Kapell 1951		37	0.57	86	0.00	69	0.03	73	0.03	55	0.05	74	0.04
Kissin 1993		13	0.65	26	0.00	14	0.07	15	0.43	14	0.46	16	0.44
Kushner 1989		18	0.63	65	0.00	34	0.07	35	0.21	21	0.34	36	0.27
Luisada 1991		48	0.53	28	0.00	53	0.04	61	0.04	41	0.14	61	0.07
Lushtak 2004		62	0.48	50	0.00	60	0.03	71	0.03	48	0.05	80	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		2	0.73	23	0.00	11	0.11	9	0.48	14	0.42	14	0.45
Magaloff 1978		5	0.70	3	0.11	3	0.12	7	0.55	5	0.49	7	0.52
Magin 1975		61	0.49	30	0.00	47	0.05	49	0.05	33	0.19	52	0.10
Michalowski 1933		74	0.35	41	0.00	65	0.04	58	0.04	47	0.06	71	0.05
Milkina 1970		17	0.64	29	0.00	29	0.07	29	0.27	14	0.41	28	0.33
Mohovich 1999		6	0.70	7	0.05	8	0.13	3	0.60	3	0.65	3	0.62
Moravec 1969		34	0.57	57	0.00	67	0.03	68	0.03	28	0.20	59	0.08
Morozova 2008		44	0.54	9	0.03	9	0.10	13	0.44	9	0.42	18	0.43
Neighaus 1950		9	0.67	19	0.01	7	0.12	4	0.59	8	0.57	6	0.58
Niedzielski 1931		65	0.47	67	0.00	76	0.02	79	0.02	41	0.09	73	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		51	0.52	24	0.00	72	0.04	57	0.04	55	0.04	75	0.04
Osinska 1989		40	0.56	63	0.00	48	0.04	55	0.04	47	0.06	69	0.05
Pachmann 1927		29	0.59	34	0.00	21	0.09	22	0.36	6	0.61	13	0.47
Paderewski 1930		35	0.57	38	0.00	46	0.05	47	0.05	31	0.18	55	0.09
Perlemuter 1992		12	0.66	4	0.10	5	0.12	2	0.60	1	0.71	1	0.65
Pierdomenico 2008		60	0.49	87	0.00	49	0.05	50	0.05	18	0.32	47	0.13
Poblocka 1999		20	0.62	13	0.02	35	0.06	32	0.24	35	0.19	40	0.21
Rabcewiczowa 1932		64	0.47	77	0.00	70	0.04	53	0.04	40	0.18	60	0.08
Rachmaninoff 1923		46	0.53	17	0.01	26	0.09	28	0.29	18	0.39	26	0.34
Rangell 2001		54	0.52	78	0.00	50	0.05	48	0.05	49	0.05	72	0.05
Richter 1976		21	0.61	61	0.00	31	0.06	30	0.27	6	0.42	27	0.34
Rosen 1989		32	0.57	35	0.00	37	0.07	37	0.19	23	0.34	38	0.25
Rosenthal 1930		50	0.52	39	0.00	33	0.07	36	0.20	16	0.52	29	0.32
Rosenthal 1931		71	0.40	75	0.00	56	0.03	67	0.03	14	0.46	49	0.12
Rosenthal 1931b		73	0.38	79	0.00	58	0.04	63	0.04	19	0.38	50	0.12
Rosenthal 1931c		56	0.51	40	0.00	45	0.05	46	0.05	12	0.52	44	0.16
Rosenthal 1931d		68	0.46	68	0.00	57	0.05	45	0.05	8	0.44	45	0.15
Rossi 2007		85	0.23	90	0.00	87	0.03	72	0.03	34	0.17	62	0.07
Rubinstein 1939		82	0.28	37	0.00	79	0.02	82	0.02	38	0.14	70	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		14	0.65	10	0.02	18	0.08	21	0.37	9	0.52	17	0.44
Rubinstein 1966		27	0.59	69	0.00	38	0.07	38	0.19	11	0.46	33	0.30
Schilhawsky 1960		52	0.52	72	0.00	66	0.03	74	0.03	39	0.18	63	0.07
Shebanova 2002		26	0.60	11	0.02	28	0.07	27	0.30	31	0.31	34	0.30
Smith 1975		22	0.61	36	0.00	23	0.07	24	0.32	27	0.28	32	0.30
Sokolov 2002		28	0.59	54	0.00	39	0.07	40	0.15	37	0.22	42	0.18
Sztompka 1959		33	0.57	8	0.03	36	0.07	33	0.23	24	0.37	35	0.29
Tomsic 1995		1	0.73	1	0.17	1	0.17	6	0.55	2	0.64	4	0.59
Uninsky 1932		59	0.49	31	0.00	42	0.05	44	0.11	34	0.18	46	0.14
Uninsky 1971		43	0.54	20	0.01	40	0.06	43	0.12	38	0.24	43	0.17
Wasowski 1980		42	0.55	15	0.01	44	0.07	42	0.13	20	0.33	39	0.21
Zak 1937		36	0.57	33	0.00	20	0.08	23	0.34	16	0.41	21	0.37
Zak 1951		30	0.58	58	0.00	19	0.08	20	0.37	14	0.45	20	0.41
Random 1		89	-0.04	76	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	23	0.25	65	0.07
Random 2		90	-0.05	88	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	71	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.04	82	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	88	0.01	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).