Poblocka 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		9	0.62	38	0.00	30	0.05	22	0.30	21	0.30	26	0.30
Anderszewski 2003		46	0.51	6	0.03	9	0.11	20	0.32	10	0.51	16	0.40
Ashkenazy 1981		8	0.62	5	0.03	8	0.12	7	0.50	16	0.45	9	0.47
Bacha 2000		56	0.48	77	0.00	76	0.03	80	0.03	38	0.22	56	0.08
Badura 1965		64	0.44	21	0.01	49	0.05	56	0.05	22	0.33	44	0.13
Barbosa 1983		52	0.50	39	0.00	14	0.07	17	0.37	18	0.45	15	0.41
Biret 1990		11	0.61	68	0.00	25	0.11	19	0.34	18	0.46	17	0.40
Blet 2003		18	0.60	48	0.00	19	0.09	9	0.44	8	0.46	11	0.45
Block 1995		57	0.48	53	0.00	68	0.05	54	0.05	35	0.17	55	0.09
Blumental 1952		72	0.40	58	0.00	46	0.04	59	0.04	22	0.27	52	0.10
Boshniakovich 1969		38	0.54	24	0.01	53	0.05	52	0.05	36	0.19	53	0.10
Brailowsky 1960		45	0.52	27	0.00	66	0.05	53	0.05	43	0.10	58	0.07
Bunin 1987		40	0.54	35	0.00	41	0.04	37	0.17	32	0.23	36	0.20
Bunin 1987b		39	0.54	41	0.00	42	0.06	38	0.17	32	0.22	38	0.19
Chiu 1999		70	0.40	47	0.00	52	0.04	60	0.04	38	0.18	57	0.08
Cohen 1997		68	0.42	20	0.01	64	0.04	62	0.04	16	0.39	47	0.12
Cortot 1951		43	0.52	37	0.00	47	0.05	49	0.05	18	0.35	45	0.13
Csalog 1996		13	0.61	2	0.14	2	0.14	8	0.45	2	0.60	5	0.52
Czerny 1949		59	0.47	78	0.00	67	0.05	47	0.05	52	0.05	68	0.05
Czerny 1990		7	0.63	56	0.00	15	0.07	10	0.44	14	0.45	13	0.44
Duchoud 2007		5	0.64	10	0.02	5	0.12	4	0.53	5	0.51	6	0.52
Ezaki 2006		6	0.63	14	0.01	17	0.07	13	0.39	26	0.29	20	0.34
Falvay 1989		28	0.57	40	0.00	13	0.07	24	0.28	62	0.04	49	0.11
Farrell 1958		48	0.51	44	0.00	58	0.04	64	0.04	19	0.35	46	0.12
Ferenczy 1958		14	0.61	28	0.00	22	0.10	14	0.39	5	0.52	12	0.45
Fliere 1977		2	0.68	4	0.04	3	0.16	2	0.57	17	0.52	2	0.54
Fou 1978		54	0.49	22	0.01	60	0.04	67	0.04	45	0.07	66	0.05
Francois 1956		42	0.53	50	0.00	44	0.07	43	0.13	39	0.15	41	0.14
Friedman 1923		87	0.19	70	0.00	82	0.04	74	0.04	50	0.06	69	0.05
Friedman 1923b		85	0.20	43	0.00	81	0.04	63	0.04	41	0.11	61	0.07
Friedman 1930		79	0.32	51	0.00	62	0.04	69	0.04	33	0.27	51	0.10
Garcia 2007		78	0.33	64	0.00	77	0.04	77	0.04	18	0.42	43	0.13
Garcia 2007b		83	0.22	71	0.00	83	0.04	70	0.04	56	0.04	77	0.04
Gierzod 1998		29	0.57	61	0.00	32	0.05	29	0.24	16	0.34	31	0.29
Gornostaeva 1994		37	0.54	54	0.00	65	0.04	58	0.04	68	0.03	84	0.03
Groot 1988		10	0.62	18	0.01	35	0.05	35	0.19	32	0.24	35	0.21
Harasiewicz 1955		77	0.35	36	0.00	50	0.05	46	0.05	71	0.03	76	0.04
Hatto 1993		74	0.39	79	0.00	21	0.07	31	0.22	11	0.42	28	0.30
Hatto 1997		61	0.46	11	0.02	10	0.10	27	0.25	15	0.44	23	0.33
Horowitz 1949		66	0.43	60	0.00	78	0.04	65	0.04	72	0.03	81	0.03
Indjic 1988		71	0.40	72	0.00	20	0.07	32	0.22	11	0.41	25	0.30
Kapell 1951		1	0.71	1	0.34	1	0.34	1	0.66	1	0.57	1	0.61
Kissin 1993		34	0.55	49	0.00	55	0.04	73	0.04	48	0.06	67	0.05
Kushner 1989		26	0.58	55	0.00	51	0.05	51	0.05	40	0.15	54	0.09
Luisada 1991		32	0.56	7	0.03	23	0.09	23	0.29	17	0.37	22	0.33
Lushtak 2004		22	0.59	17	0.01	6	0.11	5	0.53	7	0.55	3	0.54
Malcuzynski 1961		23	0.58	12	0.02	48	0.05	50	0.05	45	0.07	64	0.06
Magaloff 1978		15	0.60	31	0.00	36	0.06	41	0.15	48	0.07	50	0.10
Magin 1975		69	0.41	23	0.01	74	0.03	85	0.03	68	0.03	79	0.03
Michalowski 1933		60	0.46	34	0.00	16	0.08	11	0.43	4	0.47	10	0.45
Milkina 1970		51	0.50	85	0.00	72	0.03	79	0.03	69	0.04	80	0.03
Mohovich 1999		20	0.60	26	0.00	34	0.05	26	0.26	29	0.25	32	0.25
Moravec 1969		41	0.53	59	0.00	54	0.04	66	0.04	24	0.30	48	0.11
Morozova 2008		53	0.49	25	0.01	43	0.06	42	0.13	53	0.04	60	0.07
Neighaus 1950		31	0.56	16	0.01	40	0.08	34	0.20	36	0.17	39	0.18
Niedzielski 1931		65	0.43	46	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	35	0.12	63	0.06
Ohlsson 1999		3	0.67	15	0.01	7	0.13	6	0.51	11	0.45	7	0.48
Osinska 1989		16	0.60	69	0.00	29	0.06	30	0.23	14	0.41	24	0.31
Pachmann 1927		73	0.39	86	0.00	71	0.03	87	0.03	56	0.05	75	0.04
Paderewski 1930		12	0.61	30	0.00	18	0.08	18	0.36	7	0.52	14	0.43
Perlemuter 1992		44	0.52	19	0.01	31	0.05	25	0.26	24	0.33	29	0.29
Pierdomenico 2008		75	0.38	82	0.00	79	0.04	61	0.04	68	0.03	78	0.03
Poblocka 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rabcewiczowa 1932		49	0.50	80	0.00	59	0.05	48	0.05	26	0.34	42	0.13
Rachmaninoff 1923		76	0.37	76	0.00	63	0.05	55	0.05	67	0.04	71	0.04
Rangell 2001		19	0.60	9	0.02	28	0.06	28	0.25	17	0.37	27	0.30
Richter 1976		35	0.55	57	0.00	33	0.05	33	0.21	11	0.40	30	0.29
Rosen 1989		24	0.58	63	0.00	38	0.05	40	0.17	25	0.33	33	0.24
Rosenthal 1930		62	0.45	67	0.00	73	0.03	83	0.03	62	0.04	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.22	83	0.00	87	0.03	82	0.03	78	0.03	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.23	87	0.00	86	0.03	86	0.03	81	0.02	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		67	0.42	88	0.00	80	0.04	71	0.04	63	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		80	0.29	73	0.00	85	0.03	84	0.03	82	0.02	88	0.02
Rossi 2007		86	0.20	65	0.00	84	0.05	57	0.05	64	0.03	70	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		81	0.26	33	0.00	70	0.04	78	0.04	51	0.05	72	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		50	0.50	52	0.00	69	0.04	72	0.04	46	0.08	65	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		36	0.55	29	0.00	61	0.04	68	0.04	40	0.13	59	0.07
Schilhawsky 1960		33	0.56	8	0.03	11	0.09	12	0.42	8	0.52	8	0.47
Shebanova 2002		17	0.60	13	0.01	26	0.10	21	0.31	20	0.40	19	0.35
Smith 1975		30	0.57	74	0.00	24	0.12	15	0.38	24	0.31	21	0.34
Sokolov 2002		25	0.58	89	0.00	45	0.06	45	0.06	47	0.06	62	0.06
Sztompka 1959		4	0.66	3	0.06	4	0.11	3	0.55	6	0.51	4	0.53
Tomsic 1995		21	0.59	66	0.00	39	0.06	36	0.17	41	0.15	40	0.16
Uninsky 1932		63	0.44	75	0.00	27	0.08	39	0.17	24	0.25	34	0.21
Uninsky 1971		27	0.57	32	0.00	12	0.08	16	0.37	26	0.37	18	0.37
Wasowski 1980		47	0.51	62	0.00	37	0.05	44	0.10	14	0.38	37	0.19
Zak 1937		55	0.48	45	0.00	57	0.04	76	0.04	62	0.05	73	0.04
Zak 1951		58	0.47	42	0.00	56	0.04	75	0.04	62	0.05	74	0.04
Random 1		90	-0.08	84	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	85	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		89	-0.05	90	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	62	0.03	86	0.02
Random 3		88	0.02	81	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	53	0.03	87	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).