Blumental 1952

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		44	0.35	45	0.00	27	0.05	32	0.20	49	0.06	34	0.11
Anderszewski 2003		36	0.36	22	0.00	35	0.07	26	0.24	40	0.19	26	0.21
Ashkenazy 1981		1	0.55	5	0.08	7	0.16	2	0.60	33	0.22	8	0.36
Bacha 2000		32	0.37	35	0.00	38	0.06	37	0.17	33	0.26	25	0.21
Badura 1965		34	0.37	15	0.01	34	0.06	35	0.17	68	0.04	44	0.08
Barbosa 1983		62	0.28	69	0.00	65	0.04	65	0.04	60	0.04	59	0.04
Biret 1990		52	0.32	66	0.00	58	0.04	58	0.04	73	0.04	66	0.04
Blet 2003		38	0.36	25	0.00	57	0.04	55	0.04	73	0.04	61	0.04
Block 1995		76	0.24	31	0.00	46	0.05	50	0.05	39	0.14	45	0.08
Blumental 1952		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Boshniakovich 1969		6	0.49	17	0.01	18	0.09	24	0.26	42	0.15	28	0.20
Brailowsky 1960		46	0.34	10	0.02	53	0.04	60	0.04	44	0.09	50	0.06
Bunin 1987		50	0.33	46	0.00	55	0.03	75	0.03	79	0.03	78	0.03
Bunin 1987b		49	0.33	26	0.00	54	0.03	74	0.03	71	0.03	74	0.03
Chiu 1999		31	0.37	37	0.00	32	0.06	31	0.21	44	0.07	31	0.12
Cohen 1997		84	0.16	33	0.00	83	0.03	82	0.03	81	0.02	87	0.02
Cortot 1951		12	0.44	82	0.00	15	0.09	12	0.43	14	0.38	5	0.40
Csalog 1996		86	0.11	63	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	81	0.02	90	0.01
Czerny 1949		13	0.44	55	0.00	10	0.11	11	0.43	29	0.31	7	0.37
Czerny 1990		8	0.47	39	0.00	14	0.10	7	0.46	35	0.18	15	0.29
Duchoud 2007		53	0.32	74	0.00	61	0.05	52	0.05	65	0.04	63	0.04
Ezaki 2006		28	0.38	75	0.00	26	0.06	38	0.16	58	0.04	40	0.08
Falvay 1989		45	0.35	57	0.00	68	0.03	76	0.03	81	0.03	72	0.03
Farrell 1958		54	0.31	60	0.00	59	0.05	53	0.05	61	0.04	56	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		48	0.33	14	0.01	8	0.11	23	0.26	25	0.30	19	0.28
Fliere 1977		35	0.37	52	0.00	66	0.04	56	0.04	81	0.03	70	0.03
Fou 1978		60	0.30	36	0.00	69	0.04	66	0.04	71	0.04	57	0.04
Francois 1956		79	0.21	76	0.00	62	0.04	61	0.04	53	0.05	68	0.04
Friedman 1923		68	0.26	64	0.00	30	0.06	28	0.24	18	0.36	17	0.29
Friedman 1923b		69	0.26	67	0.00	29	0.05	29	0.24	19	0.36	14	0.29
Friedman 1930		67	0.27	32	0.00	37	0.08	30	0.21	35	0.24	24	0.22
Garcia 2007		72	0.25	40	0.00	60	0.04	57	0.04	33	0.19	39	0.09
Garcia 2007b		59	0.30	42	0.00	31	0.06	33	0.20	6	0.53	11	0.33
Gierzod 1998		4	0.51	7	0.04	4	0.13	3	0.58	10	0.41	2	0.49
Gornostaeva 1994		65	0.27	49	0.00	76	0.04	71	0.04	75	0.03	79	0.03
Groot 1988		71	0.26	50	0.00	77	0.04	64	0.04	75	0.03	81	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		61	0.30	41	0.00	47	0.05	47	0.05	87	0.02	82	0.03
Hatto 1993		15	0.43	65	0.00	13	0.11	17	0.35	29	0.24	16	0.29
Hatto 1997		19	0.42	29	0.00	17	0.12	16	0.35	23	0.32	10	0.33
Horowitz 1949		24	0.39	11	0.02	21	0.09	27	0.24	42	0.09	29	0.15
Indjic 1988		16	0.43	70	0.00	16	0.12	18	0.33	28	0.24	18	0.28
Kapell 1951		29	0.38	2	0.14	2	0.14	8	0.45	31	0.31	6	0.37
Kissin 1993		40	0.36	38	0.00	48	0.05	49	0.05	62	0.04	58	0.04
Kushner 1989		10	0.45	18	0.01	19	0.08	13	0.39	34	0.18	20	0.26
Luisada 1991		17	0.42	27	0.00	33	0.06	34	0.19	43	0.10	30	0.14
Lushtak 2004		25	0.38	44	0.00	28	0.06	39	0.16	44	0.08	35	0.11
Malcuzynski 1961		22	0.40	9	0.03	25	0.08	20	0.30	56	0.04	32	0.11
Magaloff 1978		66	0.27	30	0.00	71	0.03	77	0.03	75	0.03	71	0.03
Magin 1975		14	0.43	3	0.13	3	0.13	21	0.28	32	0.21	22	0.24
Michalowski 1933		21	0.40	12	0.02	9	0.11	5	0.50	13	0.42	3	0.46
Milkina 1970		56	0.31	34	0.00	43	0.04	44	0.10	58	0.04	51	0.06
Mohovich 1999		55	0.31	19	0.01	70	0.03	72	0.03	78	0.03	77	0.03
Moravec 1969		11	0.45	1	0.19	1	0.19	1	0.60	7	0.50	1	0.55
Morozova 2008		2	0.52	4	0.08	6	0.12	6	0.49	26	0.21	12	0.32
Neighaus 1950		39	0.36	56	0.00	42	0.05	41	0.11	74	0.04	49	0.07
Niedzielski 1931		75	0.24	53	0.00	51	0.06	45	0.06	31	0.16	37	0.10
Ohlsson 1999		27	0.38	71	0.00	41	0.04	40	0.13	73	0.04	47	0.07
Osinska 1989		41	0.36	83	0.00	40	0.05	43	0.10	49	0.06	41	0.08
Pachmann 1927		87	0.06	86	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	87	0.02	89	0.01
Paderewski 1930		18	0.42	8	0.03	24	0.10	19	0.32	34	0.17	23	0.23
Perlemuter 1992		30	0.37	28	0.00	45	0.05	48	0.05	48	0.05	53	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		77	0.23	87	0.00	75	0.03	73	0.03	77	0.03	73	0.03
Poblocka 1999		23	0.40	20	0.01	23	0.07	22	0.27	59	0.04	36	0.10
Rabcewiczowa 1932		47	0.34	84	0.00	56	0.04	67	0.04	36	0.19	38	0.09
Rachmaninoff 1923		74	0.24	43	0.00	50	0.06	46	0.06	81	0.03	55	0.04
Rangell 2001		80	0.21	88	0.00	82	0.03	78	0.03	83	0.02	88	0.02
Richter 1976		83	0.17	79	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	79	0.03	86	0.02
Rosen 1989		51	0.33	85	0.00	52	0.04	59	0.04	81	0.03	76	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		58	0.30	21	0.00	63	0.04	62	0.04	48	0.05	64	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		81	0.20	77	0.00	80	0.04	63	0.04	55	0.04	60	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		78	0.21	58	0.00	78	0.04	54	0.04	72	0.03	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		57	0.31	48	0.00	67	0.04	68	0.04	57	0.04	67	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		82	0.19	80	0.00	79	0.02	83	0.02	66	0.04	80	0.03
Rossi 2007		85	0.13	89	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	79	0.02	85	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		70	0.26	61	0.00	73	0.04	70	0.04	35	0.17	42	0.08
Rubinstein 1952		73	0.25	90	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	72	0.04	84	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		42	0.36	24	0.00	64	0.04	69	0.04	60	0.05	62	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		33	0.37	23	0.00	36	0.08	25	0.25	55	0.05	33	0.11
Shebanova 2002		9	0.45	54	0.00	20	0.09	14	0.36	44	0.11	27	0.20
Smith 1975		20	0.40	68	0.00	22	0.09	15	0.36	37	0.18	21	0.25
Sokolov 2002		37	0.36	72	0.00	49	0.05	51	0.05	64	0.04	54	0.04
Sztompka 1959		7	0.47	6	0.06	5	0.11	9	0.45	33	0.28	9	0.35
Tomsic 1995		63	0.28	51	0.00	74	0.03	79	0.03	72	0.03	75	0.03
Uninsky 1932		5	0.49	16	0.01	12	0.10	10	0.44	30	0.21	13	0.30
Uninsky 1971		3	0.52	13	0.01	11	0.11	4	0.50	31	0.33	4	0.41
Wasowski 1980		64	0.28	73	0.00	72	0.03	80	0.03	85	0.03	69	0.03
Zak 1937		26	0.38	78	0.00	39	0.06	36	0.17	67	0.04	43	0.08
Zak 1951		43	0.35	81	0.00	44	0.05	42	0.10	68	0.04	52	0.06
Random 1		90	-0.02	47	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	31	0.19	65	0.04
Random 2		89	0.01	59	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	24	0.26	48	0.07
Random 3		88	0.02	62	0.00	87	0.02	84	0.02	18	0.35	46	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).