Morozova 2008

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		7	0.60	6	0.06	5	0.14	5	0.48	9	0.47	7	0.47
Anderszewski 2003		49	0.47	56	0.00	60	0.04	54	0.04	33	0.22	66	0.09
Ashkenazy 1981		12	0.57	30	0.00	13	0.09	13	0.37	29	0.27	19	0.32
Bacha 2000		78	0.34	28	0.00	63	0.03	71	0.03	37	0.23	69	0.08
Badura 1965		35	0.52	46	0.00	33	0.05	36	0.14	7	0.49	28	0.26
Barbosa 1983		36	0.52	41	0.00	30	0.08	25	0.22	24	0.41	24	0.30
Biret 1990		53	0.46	84	0.00	64	0.03	72	0.03	37	0.18	74	0.07
Blet 2003		17	0.56	42	0.00	46	0.05	49	0.05	25	0.30	50	0.12
Block 1995		68	0.41	60	0.00	55	0.04	56	0.04	36	0.16	71	0.08
Blumental 1952		31	0.52	7	0.04	12	0.07	26	0.21	6	0.49	18	0.32
Boshniakovich 1969		20	0.55	35	0.00	41	0.07	35	0.14	20	0.46	29	0.25
Brailowsky 1960		25	0.54	47	0.00	50	0.06	48	0.06	5	0.52	35	0.18
Bunin 1987		23	0.54	61	0.00	21	0.06	37	0.14	28	0.30	32	0.20
Bunin 1987b		22	0.54	39	0.00	20	0.06	32	0.15	28	0.30	31	0.21
Chiu 1999		9	0.58	3	0.09	9	0.11	6	0.46	6	0.65	3	0.55
Cohen 1997		87	0.21	62	0.00	87	0.04	69	0.04	65	0.04	85	0.04
Cortot 1951		54	0.46	74	0.00	68	0.04	67	0.04	29	0.27	64	0.10
Csalog 1996		86	0.23	51	0.00	85	0.03	76	0.03	44	0.12	76	0.06
Czerny 1949		34	0.52	48	0.00	23	0.06	20	0.26	22	0.40	17	0.32
Czerny 1990		2	0.63	2	0.13	2	0.13	4	0.51	8	0.53	5	0.52
Duchoud 2007		30	0.53	63	0.00	28	0.07	22	0.23	21	0.43	22	0.31
Ezaki 2006		1	0.64	1	0.14	1	0.14	7	0.44	14	0.44	8	0.44
Falvay 1989		14	0.56	32	0.00	16	0.08	14	0.37	12	0.40	12	0.38
Farrell 1958		52	0.46	52	0.00	72	0.05	51	0.05	15	0.37	43	0.14
Ferenczy 1958		72	0.38	80	0.00	82	0.02	85	0.02	44	0.08	84	0.04
Fliere 1977		5	0.62	12	0.02	7	0.13	2	0.55	15	0.52	4	0.53
Fou 1978		8	0.58	15	0.02	11	0.08	8	0.43	22	0.41	10	0.42
Francois 1956		59	0.45	19	0.01	29	0.05	28	0.19	35	0.16	39	0.17
Friedman 1923		83	0.29	72	0.00	80	0.03	73	0.03	17	0.37	58	0.11
Friedman 1923b		84	0.29	70	0.00	79	0.02	87	0.02	17	0.38	67	0.09
Friedman 1930		71	0.39	43	0.00	65	0.04	59	0.04	27	0.32	56	0.11
Garcia 2007		85	0.28	66	0.00	81	0.03	77	0.03	23	0.33	63	0.10
Garcia 2007b		80	0.33	73	0.00	76	0.03	80	0.03	9	0.46	53	0.12
Gierzod 1998		57	0.45	37	0.00	32	0.05	41	0.11	37	0.14	52	0.12
Gornostaeva 1994		21	0.54	25	0.01	24	0.08	17	0.32	22	0.33	20	0.32
Groot 1988		24	0.54	9	0.04	6	0.13	9	0.42	13	0.44	9	0.43
Harasiewicz 1955		28	0.53	69	0.00	45	0.05	50	0.05	40	0.14	72	0.08
Hatto 1993		62	0.44	16	0.02	42	0.06	34	0.14	15	0.36	30	0.22
Hatto 1997		56	0.46	75	0.00	47	0.06	46	0.06	22	0.34	45	0.14
Horowitz 1949		46	0.49	34	0.00	38	0.05	42	0.10	17	0.36	33	0.19
Indjic 1988		65	0.44	53	0.00	43	0.06	39	0.12	22	0.30	34	0.19
Kapell 1951		64	0.44	31	0.00	67	0.04	66	0.04	49	0.05	81	0.04
Kissin 1993		26	0.53	38	0.00	49	0.06	47	0.06	37	0.21	55	0.11
Kushner 1989		3	0.63	5	0.07	3	0.11	3	0.51	6	0.63	2	0.57
Luisada 1991		4	0.62	13	0.02	8	0.11	12	0.39	14	0.44	11	0.41
Lushtak 2004		18	0.55	20	0.01	40	0.05	33	0.14	32	0.23	38	0.18
Malcuzynski 1961		15	0.56	26	0.01	19	0.06	16	0.36	30	0.27	21	0.31
Magaloff 1978		38	0.51	14	0.02	18	0.07	27	0.20	43	0.09	47	0.13
Magin 1975		27	0.53	79	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	19	0.27	41	0.15
Michalowski 1933		70	0.39	54	0.00	54	0.04	61	0.04	36	0.24	62	0.10
Milkina 1970		48	0.47	33	0.00	27	0.06	23	0.23	28	0.31	26	0.27
Mohovich 1999		44	0.49	64	0.00	58	0.04	65	0.04	45	0.07	79	0.05
Moravec 1969		61	0.44	11	0.03	10	0.09	18	0.31	25	0.29	23	0.30
Morozova 2008		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Neighaus 1950		19	0.55	18	0.01	14	0.08	11	0.40	24	0.37	13	0.38
Niedzielski 1931		82	0.30	36	0.00	78	0.02	86	0.02	39	0.12	77	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		32	0.52	27	0.01	48	0.07	45	0.07	49	0.05	75	0.06
Osinska 1989		45	0.49	89	0.00	34	0.05	43	0.08	32	0.17	49	0.12
Pachmann 1927		81	0.30	67	0.00	83	0.03	81	0.03	49	0.05	82	0.04
Paderewski 1930		76	0.35	76	0.00	86	0.03	74	0.03	66	0.03	86	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		13	0.57	8	0.04	15	0.11	10	0.40	7	0.56	6	0.47
Pierdomenico 2008		66	0.43	78	0.00	61	0.04	64	0.04	28	0.23	60	0.10
Poblocka 1999		43	0.49	21	0.01	52	0.04	53	0.04	42	0.13	73	0.07
Rabcewiczowa 1932		58	0.45	87	0.00	66	0.04	57	0.04	31	0.23	61	0.10
Rachmaninoff 1923		6	0.60	4	0.08	4	0.12	1	0.57	3	0.63	1	0.60
Rangell 2001		77	0.35	68	0.00	75	0.03	82	0.03	58	0.04	87	0.03
Richter 1976		42	0.49	57	0.00	57	0.04	63	0.04	31	0.20	65	0.09
Rosen 1989		41	0.50	23	0.01	22	0.05	24	0.23	26	0.32	27	0.27
Rosenthal 1930		47	0.48	58	0.00	31	0.05	29	0.17	13	0.54	25	0.30
Rosenthal 1931		67	0.42	49	0.00	69	0.04	62	0.04	10	0.53	42	0.15
Rosenthal 1931b		73	0.38	65	0.00	70	0.04	58	0.04	10	0.50	46	0.14
Rosenthal 1931c		60	0.44	29	0.00	59	0.04	68	0.04	17	0.43	48	0.13
Rosenthal 1931d		79	0.33	45	0.00	73	0.03	78	0.03	26	0.26	68	0.09
Rossi 2007		75	0.36	90	0.00	77	0.02	83	0.02	17	0.34	70	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		69	0.40	24	0.01	74	0.03	79	0.03	18	0.41	54	0.11
Rubinstein 1952		74	0.36	44	0.00	84	0.02	84	0.02	59	0.05	88	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		39	0.50	86	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	24	0.34	51	0.12
Schilhawsky 1960		63	0.44	71	0.00	71	0.04	55	0.04	50	0.05	83	0.04
Shebanova 2002		29	0.53	17	0.01	25	0.07	19	0.30	23	0.39	15	0.34
Smith 1975		11	0.57	81	0.00	39	0.04	30	0.16	39	0.16	40	0.16
Sokolov 2002		10	0.58	59	0.00	17	0.07	15	0.36	17	0.39	14	0.37
Sztompka 1959		16	0.56	22	0.01	26	0.09	21	0.26	17	0.43	16	0.33
Tomsic 1995		37	0.51	10	0.03	37	0.04	40	0.12	38	0.17	44	0.14
Uninsky 1932		33	0.52	50	0.00	51	0.05	52	0.05	27	0.23	57	0.11
Uninsky 1971		50	0.47	55	0.00	62	0.03	75	0.03	45	0.08	78	0.05
Wasowski 1980		40	0.50	77	0.00	56	0.03	70	0.03	16	0.35	59	0.10
Zak 1937		55	0.46	40	0.00	36	0.05	38	0.14	33	0.23	36	0.18
Zak 1951		51	0.47	85	0.00	35	0.04	31	0.15	35	0.22	37	0.18
Random 1		90	-0.02	82	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	63	0.03	90	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.02	88	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	50	0.05	89	0.02
Random 3		88	0.00	83	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	40	0.13	80	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).