Paderewski 1930

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		53	0.42	72	0.00	71	0.03	74	0.03	62	0.04	78	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		52	0.42	30	0.00	33	0.05	37	0.15	61	0.03	48	0.07
Ashkenazy 1981		9	0.59	13	0.02	8	0.10	6	0.53	34	0.20	12	0.33
Bacha 2000		70	0.33	84	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	69	0.03	86	0.02
Badura 1965		64	0.40	56	0.00	57	0.03	64	0.03	67	0.04	81	0.03
Barbosa 1983		66	0.38	45	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.12	77	0.04	47	0.07
Biret 1990		65	0.40	44	0.00	66	0.03	70	0.03	58	0.04	83	0.03
Blet 2003		14	0.55	2	0.13	2	0.14	5	0.54	11	0.44	5	0.49
Block 1995		10	0.58	6	0.04	9	0.10	8	0.51	13	0.44	6	0.47
Blumental 1952		56	0.42	60	0.00	19	0.09	34	0.17	19	0.32	23	0.23
Boshniakovich 1969		6	0.60	14	0.01	11	0.10	2	0.54	16	0.51	2	0.52
Brailowsky 1960		69	0.34	80	0.00	86	0.02	85	0.02	85	0.02	87	0.02
Bunin 1987		32	0.49	11	0.02	22	0.14	17	0.34	36	0.18	18	0.25
Bunin 1987b		30	0.49	12	0.02	21	0.07	18	0.34	36	0.18	15	0.25
Chiu 1999		77	0.31	52	0.00	64	0.03	73	0.03	64	0.04	69	0.03
Cohen 1997		74	0.32	73	0.00	72	0.04	60	0.04	44	0.10	51	0.06
Cortot 1951		18	0.54	15	0.01	12	0.11	13	0.43	11	0.46	7	0.44
Csalog 1996		67	0.36	50	0.00	85	0.03	81	0.03	66	0.04	75	0.03
Czerny 1949		51	0.42	57	0.00	68	0.03	79	0.03	61	0.04	77	0.03
Czerny 1990		15	0.54	74	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.11	57	0.05	49	0.07
Duchoud 2007		50	0.43	85	0.00	63	0.03	78	0.03	72	0.04	79	0.03
Ezaki 2006		41	0.47	86	0.00	67	0.03	75	0.03	81	0.03	66	0.03
Falvay 1989		47	0.43	76	0.00	70	0.03	77	0.03	76	0.03	71	0.03
Farrell 1958		49	0.43	9	0.03	25	0.08	27	0.21	28	0.27	20	0.24
Ferenczy 1958		34	0.48	65	0.00	50	0.06	46	0.06	22	0.35	33	0.14
Fliere 1977		5	0.60	18	0.01	13	0.10	9	0.50	40	0.12	19	0.24
Fou 1978		62	0.40	41	0.00	53	0.04	54	0.04	67	0.04	61	0.04
Francois 1956		36	0.48	39	0.00	47	0.05	53	0.05	78	0.03	65	0.04
Friedman 1923		85	0.21	37	0.00	32	0.06	40	0.12	24	0.30	27	0.19
Friedman 1923b		84	0.21	35	0.00	31	0.05	39	0.12	25	0.29	26	0.19
Friedman 1930		54	0.42	1	0.13	1	0.13	10	0.50	8	0.54	1	0.52
Garcia 2007		82	0.25	69	0.00	75	0.04	58	0.04	49	0.06	56	0.05
Garcia 2007b		86	0.17	61	0.00	74	0.02	84	0.02	38	0.20	52	0.06
Gierzod 1998		19	0.52	67	0.00	37	0.06	28	0.20	62	0.05	38	0.10
Gornostaeva 1994		28	0.49	68	0.00	51	0.05	49	0.05	49	0.05	57	0.05
Groot 1988		12	0.57	46	0.00	39	0.06	31	0.18	47	0.05	43	0.09
Harasiewicz 1955		59	0.41	48	0.00	38	0.06	35	0.17	65	0.04	46	0.08
Hatto 1993		76	0.31	31	0.00	35	0.06	33	0.18	64	0.04	45	0.08
Hatto 1997		78	0.30	75	0.00	36	0.07	38	0.14	51	0.05	44	0.08
Horowitz 1949		55	0.42	29	0.00	60	0.03	63	0.03	81	0.03	74	0.03
Indjic 1988		75	0.31	24	0.01	34	0.05	32	0.18	56	0.05	40	0.09
Kapell 1951		2	0.62	7	0.04	5	0.13	1	0.55	22	0.43	4	0.49
Kissin 1993		7	0.59	4	0.11	7	0.12	16	0.40	33	0.26	13	0.32
Kushner 1989		22	0.51	54	0.00	45	0.05	51	0.05	64	0.04	62	0.04
Luisada 1991		58	0.41	42	0.00	62	0.03	69	0.03	81	0.03	67	0.03
Lushtak 2004		31	0.49	23	0.01	16	0.10	11	0.45	41	0.14	17	0.25
Malcuzynski 1961		1	0.62	21	0.01	14	0.10	12	0.43	43	0.12	22	0.23
Magaloff 1978		3	0.61	28	0.00	15	0.11	14	0.43	46	0.07	29	0.17
Magin 1975		48	0.43	17	0.01	59	0.03	76	0.03	63	0.04	72	0.03
Michalowski 1933		38	0.47	33	0.00	18	0.10	15	0.41	8	0.45	9	0.43
Milkina 1970		45	0.44	77	0.00	73	0.04	57	0.04	70	0.04	63	0.04
Mohovich 1999		20	0.52	58	0.00	40	0.06	25	0.22	74	0.04	42	0.09
Moravec 1969		26	0.50	22	0.01	48	0.05	50	0.05	29	0.20	37	0.10
Morozova 2008		68	0.35	49	0.00	77	0.03	66	0.03	74	0.03	76	0.03
Neighaus 1950		24	0.51	62	0.00	24	0.07	19	0.34	41	0.13	25	0.21
Niedzielski 1931		57	0.41	16	0.01	55	0.04	56	0.04	49	0.05	60	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		21	0.51	20	0.01	46	0.06	48	0.06	62	0.04	54	0.05
Osinska 1989		13	0.57	47	0.00	17	0.10	20	0.34	18	0.34	11	0.34
Pachmann 1927		63	0.40	19	0.01	23	0.08	23	0.25	31	0.25	16	0.25
Paderewski 1930		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Perlemuter 1992		44	0.46	38	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	44	0.12	35	0.11
Pierdomenico 2008		60	0.41	43	0.00	65	0.04	55	0.04	47	0.06	53	0.05
Poblocka 1999		4	0.61	3	0.13	3	0.13	7	0.52	18	0.36	8	0.43
Rabcewiczowa 1932		43	0.47	32	0.00	49	0.06	47	0.06	28	0.29	34	0.13
Rachmaninoff 1923		79	0.29	70	0.00	76	0.03	67	0.03	82	0.03	70	0.03
Rangell 2001		16	0.54	36	0.00	20	0.08	21	0.31	37	0.18	21	0.24
Richter 1976		37	0.48	63	0.00	52	0.07	45	0.07	34	0.17	36	0.11
Rosen 1989		39	0.47	53	0.00	30	0.05	30	0.20	37	0.16	28	0.18
Rosenthal 1930		61	0.41	89	0.00	69	0.03	62	0.03	58	0.04	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		81	0.26	87	0.00	80	0.02	83	0.02	72	0.03	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		80	0.27	78	0.00	81	0.03	65	0.03	68	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		35	0.48	25	0.01	29	0.05	41	0.12	34	0.22	32	0.16
Rosenthal 1931d		71	0.33	81	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	59	0.04	84	0.03
Rossi 2007		83	0.24	82	0.00	78	0.04	59	0.04	40	0.09	50	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		87	0.16	79	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	73	0.03	88	0.02
Rubinstein 1952		27	0.50	55	0.00	56	0.03	61	0.03	49	0.07	58	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		42	0.47	64	0.00	54	0.05	52	0.05	47	0.06	55	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		29	0.49	26	0.00	28	0.05	24	0.23	34	0.22	24	0.22
Shebanova 2002		17	0.54	8	0.04	10	0.10	22	0.30	38	0.23	14	0.26
Smith 1975		11	0.57	10	0.03	6	0.13	4	0.54	29	0.27	10	0.38
Sokolov 2002		33	0.48	59	0.00	58	0.03	71	0.03	65	0.04	68	0.03
Sztompka 1959		8	0.59	5	0.07	4	0.17	3	0.54	10	0.48	3	0.51
Tomsic 1995		25	0.50	34	0.00	41	0.06	36	0.15	52	0.05	39	0.09
Uninsky 1932		40	0.47	71	0.00	26	0.06	26	0.22	39	0.12	31	0.16
Uninsky 1971		23	0.51	27	0.00	27	0.07	29	0.20	43	0.15	30	0.17
Wasowski 1980		46	0.43	40	0.00	61	0.03	68	0.03	49	0.06	59	0.04
Zak 1937		72	0.33	88	0.00	83	0.02	82	0.02	87	0.03	89	0.02
Zak 1951		73	0.33	90	0.00	82	0.03	72	0.03	84	0.03	73	0.03
Random 1		90	-0.02	51	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	33	0.18	64	0.04
Random 2		88	0.06	66	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	6	0.42	41	0.09
Random 3		89	0.02	83	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	43	0.08	82	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).