Schilhawsky 1960

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		49	0.44	46	0.00	57	0.05	54	0.05	64	0.04	65	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		24	0.50	1	0.21	1	0.21	12	0.49	18	0.46	8	0.47
Ashkenazy 1981		14	0.54	65	0.00	14	0.10	13	0.47	37	0.17	20	0.28
Bacha 2000		63	0.37	36	0.00	63	0.03	69	0.03	49	0.06	56	0.04
Badura 1965		53	0.41	24	0.00	51	0.06	49	0.06	36	0.19	44	0.11
Barbosa 1983		15	0.54	22	0.01	22	0.08	18	0.39	22	0.42	13	0.40
Biret 1990		39	0.46	54	0.00	32	0.06	31	0.24	29	0.26	25	0.25
Blet 2003		16	0.53	26	0.00	18	0.07	20	0.37	23	0.35	16	0.36
Block 1995		55	0.40	21	0.01	29	0.06	41	0.17	46	0.04	48	0.08
Blumental 1952		66	0.37	20	0.01	50	0.05	55	0.05	25	0.25	45	0.11
Boshniakovich 1969		40	0.45	17	0.01	31	0.07	38	0.18	40	0.16	34	0.17
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.40	38	0.00	70	0.03	75	0.03	78	0.03	71	0.03
Bunin 1987		2	0.61	6	0.05	3	0.16	2	0.62	5	0.56	3	0.59
Bunin 1987b		3	0.61	3	0.09	4	0.28	3	0.62	5	0.56	2	0.59
Chiu 1999		50	0.42	33	0.00	53	0.06	47	0.06	61	0.04	54	0.05
Cohen 1997		86	0.23	76	0.00	85	0.03	70	0.03	64	0.04	81	0.03
Cortot 1951		34	0.47	51	0.00	45	0.06	48	0.06	25	0.32	40	0.14
Csalog 1996		65	0.37	69	0.00	71	0.03	81	0.03	48	0.07	55	0.05
Czerny 1949		42	0.45	90	0.00	49	0.05	52	0.05	46	0.07	51	0.06
Czerny 1990		28	0.48	57	0.00	39	0.08	29	0.27	53	0.05	42	0.12
Duchoud 2007		35	0.46	70	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.16	37	0.19	33	0.17
Ezaki 2006		23	0.51	66	0.00	38	0.08	27	0.28	66	0.04	43	0.11
Falvay 1989		57	0.40	44	0.00	66	0.03	73	0.03	79	0.03	72	0.03
Farrell 1958		59	0.39	71	0.00	65	0.03	72	0.03	77	0.03	73	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		29	0.48	61	0.00	36	0.06	25	0.32	15	0.44	14	0.38
Fliere 1977		12	0.54	64	0.00	33	0.06	28	0.28	49	0.06	41	0.13
Fou 1978		71	0.35	52	0.00	77	0.04	63	0.04	65	0.04	59	0.04
Francois 1956		19	0.52	50	0.00	35	0.06	36	0.20	41	0.15	36	0.17
Friedman 1923		80	0.33	29	0.00	54	0.07	46	0.07	16	0.38	39	0.16
Friedman 1923b		72	0.35	18	0.01	52	0.07	45	0.07	16	0.40	35	0.17
Friedman 1930		31	0.47	13	0.01	25	0.11	16	0.41	14	0.49	12	0.45
Garcia 2007		83	0.24	37	0.00	69	0.03	80	0.03	43	0.11	52	0.06
Garcia 2007b		85	0.23	39	0.00	79	0.03	77	0.03	58	0.04	85	0.03
Gierzod 1998		17	0.53	40	0.00	34	0.06	30	0.26	41	0.10	38	0.16
Gornostaeva 1994		46	0.44	58	0.00	73	0.03	79	0.03	77	0.03	82	0.03
Groot 1988		20	0.52	72	0.00	40	0.08	39	0.18	74	0.03	50	0.07
Harasiewicz 1955		8	0.55	14	0.01	10	0.12	7	0.52	29	0.24	17	0.35
Hatto 1993		76	0.33	59	0.00	17	0.07	37	0.20	34	0.19	32	0.19
Hatto 1997		64	0.37	16	0.01	11	0.10	32	0.24	25	0.29	22	0.26
Horowitz 1949		9	0.55	4	0.08	13	0.10	6	0.52	10	0.41	9	0.46
Indjic 1988		73	0.34	42	0.00	16	0.09	35	0.21	24	0.28	26	0.24
Kapell 1951		1	0.64	2	0.19	2	0.28	1	0.65	7	0.53	1	0.59
Kissin 1993		61	0.38	77	0.00	72	0.03	78	0.03	79	0.03	75	0.03
Kushner 1989		32	0.47	32	0.00	55	0.04	59	0.04	62	0.04	60	0.04
Luisada 1991		58	0.39	86	0.00	67	0.03	66	0.03	83	0.03	70	0.03
Lushtak 2004		4	0.58	5	0.06	5	0.27	5	0.57	14	0.48	4	0.52
Malcuzynski 1961		6	0.57	30	0.00	15	0.12	14	0.43	40	0.15	24	0.25
Magaloff 1978		21	0.51	15	0.01	28	0.09	23	0.34	59	0.03	46	0.10
Magin 1975		70	0.35	82	0.00	47	0.05	57	0.05	72	0.03	57	0.04
Michalowski 1933		38	0.46	10	0.02	12	0.09	9	0.51	9	0.45	6	0.48
Milkina 1970		74	0.34	35	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	67	0.04	74	0.03
Mohovich 1999		36	0.46	63	0.00	46	0.05	51	0.05	77	0.03	66	0.04
Moravec 1969		48	0.44	55	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	77	0.03	69	0.03
Morozova 2008		47	0.44	43	0.00	48	0.05	50	0.05	55	0.04	63	0.04
Neighaus 1950		27	0.49	53	0.00	37	0.06	33	0.22	62	0.05	47	0.10
Niedzielski 1931		52	0.42	11	0.02	44	0.08	43	0.15	9	0.42	23	0.25
Ohlsson 1999		11	0.54	48	0.00	24	0.10	17	0.40	44	0.09	31	0.19
Osinska 1989		45	0.44	60	0.00	58	0.05	58	0.05	52	0.06	53	0.05
Pachmann 1927		68	0.36	73	0.00	61	0.05	53	0.05	62	0.04	62	0.04
Paderewski 1930		26	0.49	7	0.04	30	0.06	34	0.22	24	0.23	27	0.22
Perlemuter 1992		25	0.49	19	0.01	27	0.08	19	0.38	43	0.12	28	0.21
Pierdomenico 2008		82	0.30	87	0.00	81	0.02	86	0.02	79	0.03	87	0.02
Poblocka 1999		7	0.56	8	0.02	6	0.20	8	0.52	12	0.42	7	0.47
Rabcewiczowa 1932		67	0.37	62	0.00	76	0.03	71	0.03	47	0.06	58	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		41	0.45	83	0.00	26	0.07	22	0.36	30	0.22	19	0.28
Rangell 2001		69	0.36	78	0.00	78	0.03	67	0.03	76	0.03	83	0.03
Richter 1976		30	0.48	23	0.01	21	0.08	24	0.33	20	0.34	18	0.33
Rosen 1989		62	0.37	68	0.00	75	0.03	83	0.03	80	0.03	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		54	0.40	74	0.00	68	0.03	74	0.03	52	0.04	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		77	0.33	79	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	57	0.04	76	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		79	0.33	88	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	61	0.04	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		44	0.44	67	0.00	59	0.04	60	0.04	38	0.16	49	0.08
Rosenthal 1931d		75	0.34	27	0.00	64	0.03	65	0.03	50	0.05	67	0.04
Rossi 2007		84	0.23	56	0.00	82	0.02	85	0.02	57	0.03	86	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		87	0.13	25	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	79	0.03	88	0.02
Rubinstein 1952		81	0.30	47	0.00	86	0.04	64	0.04	66	0.04	68	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		78	0.33	49	0.00	84	0.03	68	0.03	85	0.03	77	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Shebanova 2002		60	0.38	41	0.00	56	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.05	64	0.04
Smith 1975		10	0.55	28	0.00	23	0.09	21	0.37	43	0.12	29	0.21
Sokolov 2002		5	0.57	12	0.02	8	0.16	11	0.49	15	0.41	10	0.45
Sztompka 1959		33	0.47	89	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.17	42	0.15	37	0.16
Tomsic 1995		51	0.42	80	0.00	60	0.05	56	0.05	56	0.04	61	0.04
Uninsky 1932		43	0.45	81	0.00	19	0.07	26	0.30	26	0.25	21	0.27
Uninsky 1971		18	0.52	31	0.00	7	0.17	10	0.49	21	0.42	11	0.45
Wasowski 1980		37	0.46	84	0.00	43	0.07	44	0.15	30	0.25	30	0.19
Zak 1937		22	0.51	45	0.00	20	0.08	15	0.42	25	0.33	15	0.37
Zak 1951		13	0.54	9	0.02	9	0.13	4	0.58	19	0.39	5	0.48
Random 1		90	-0.05	75	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	80	0.03	89	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.02	34	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	55	0.05	78	0.03
Random 3		89	-0.02	85	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	75	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).