Uninsky 1971

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		6	0.63	13	0.01	14	0.07	9	0.51	8	0.50	11	0.50
Anderszewski 2003		40	0.50	41	0.00	13	0.08	20	0.42	12	0.51	16	0.46
Ashkenazy 1981		28	0.54	53	0.00	28	0.07	25	0.41	30	0.26	27	0.33
Bacha 2000		64	0.39	50	0.00	74	0.03	75	0.03	68	0.03	74	0.03
Badura 1965		36	0.51	11	0.01	31	0.10	27	0.36	9	0.47	22	0.41
Barbosa 1983		19	0.56	38	0.00	18	0.07	11	0.50	12	0.48	13	0.49
Biret 1990		25	0.55	30	0.00	35	0.08	34	0.28	25	0.38	28	0.33
Blet 2003		17	0.58	60	0.00	30	0.09	19	0.44	15	0.42	20	0.43
Block 1995		63	0.40	37	0.00	56	0.04	56	0.04	57	0.04	70	0.04
Blumental 1952		32	0.52	27	0.00	24	0.06	31	0.33	4	0.50	23	0.41
Boshniakovich 1969		44	0.47	40	0.00	57	0.04	61	0.04	74	0.03	84	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		57	0.42	15	0.01	79	0.03	79	0.03	53	0.05	61	0.04
Bunin 1987		4	0.66	5	0.03	5	0.32	3	0.62	3	0.59	4	0.60
Bunin 1987b		3	0.67	7	0.02	4	0.25	2	0.62	3	0.59	3	0.60
Chiu 1999		68	0.37	57	0.00	61	0.04	59	0.04	51	0.05	62	0.04
Cohen 1997		85	0.23	22	0.00	76	0.03	81	0.03	55	0.05	71	0.04
Cortot 1951		20	0.55	34	0.00	25	0.06	28	0.35	10	0.48	24	0.41
Csalog 1996		71	0.34	31	0.00	70	0.03	64	0.03	52	0.06	68	0.04
Czerny 1949		8	0.62	17	0.01	11	0.08	10	0.51	12	0.61	5	0.56
Czerny 1990		12	0.59	72	0.00	34	0.09	24	0.41	36	0.17	35	0.26
Duchoud 2007		11	0.59	21	0.00	19	0.07	17	0.45	16	0.46	18	0.45
Ezaki 2006		5	0.64	6	0.02	8	0.09	7	0.53	13	0.45	12	0.49
Falvay 1989		47	0.46	35	0.00	62	0.03	67	0.03	75	0.03	76	0.03
Farrell 1958		58	0.42	68	0.00	65	0.03	71	0.03	70	0.03	78	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		21	0.55	62	0.00	21	0.08	32	0.32	6	0.49	25	0.40
Fliere 1977		41	0.50	84	0.00	54	0.07	47	0.07	74	0.04	54	0.05
Fou 1978		75	0.33	59	0.00	80	0.03	66	0.03	83	0.03	79	0.03
Francois 1956		29	0.54	18	0.01	36	0.09	29	0.35	28	0.27	31	0.31
Friedman 1923		82	0.28	85	0.00	46	0.05	53	0.05	7	0.49	45	0.16
Friedman 1923b		81	0.28	89	0.00	45	0.06	50	0.06	9	0.50	42	0.17
Friedman 1930		80	0.30	63	0.00	47	0.06	49	0.06	28	0.31	46	0.14
Garcia 2007		83	0.26	86	0.00	77	0.03	80	0.03	46	0.06	69	0.04
Garcia 2007b		87	0.14	64	0.00	86	0.03	65	0.03	63	0.04	86	0.03
Gierzod 1998		34	0.52	66	0.00	38	0.09	37	0.25	31	0.18	38	0.21
Gornostaeva 1994		22	0.55	9	0.02	40	0.07	36	0.26	36	0.18	37	0.22
Groot 1988		27	0.54	55	0.00	41	0.10	38	0.24	43	0.12	43	0.17
Harasiewicz 1955		31	0.52	3	0.06	3	0.19	5	0.61	5	0.47	6	0.54
Hatto 1993		70	0.36	58	0.00	33	0.08	40	0.21	14	0.39	34	0.29
Hatto 1997		48	0.46	26	0.00	12	0.08	23	0.42	12	0.46	19	0.44
Horowitz 1949		66	0.38	73	0.00	67	0.03	72	0.03	74	0.03	80	0.03
Indjic 1988		67	0.38	45	0.00	32	0.08	39	0.21	12	0.40	32	0.29
Kapell 1951		9	0.61	4	0.05	6	0.18	12	0.49	8	0.52	10	0.50
Kissin 1993		61	0.41	33	0.00	75	0.03	74	0.03	64	0.04	81	0.03
Kushner 1989		37	0.51	47	0.00	52	0.05	54	0.05	70	0.04	64	0.04
Luisada 1991		65	0.38	36	0.00	81	0.04	57	0.04	73	0.04	59	0.04
Lushtak 2004		30	0.53	51	0.00	22	0.07	22	0.42	20	0.43	21	0.42
Malcuzynski 1961		10	0.60	19	0.01	10	0.10	18	0.45	36	0.21	29	0.31
Magaloff 1978		45	0.46	44	0.00	55	0.05	55	0.05	68	0.03	63	0.04
Magin 1975		55	0.43	42	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	51	0.05	49	0.08
Michalowski 1933		49	0.45	56	0.00	23	0.08	14	0.47	6	0.46	15	0.46
Milkina 1970		50	0.45	28	0.00	71	0.03	77	0.03	55	0.05	66	0.04
Mohovich 1999		15	0.58	24	0.00	17	0.09	30	0.34	30	0.25	33	0.29
Moravec 1969		53	0.44	67	0.00	73	0.03	73	0.03	71	0.04	75	0.03
Morozova 2008		43	0.47	79	0.00	48	0.08	45	0.08	75	0.03	57	0.05
Neighaus 1950		26	0.55	43	0.00	16	0.09	16	0.45	34	0.21	30	0.31
Niedzielski 1931		74	0.33	80	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	81	0.03	77	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		23	0.55	14	0.01	26	0.08	33	0.31	34	0.20	36	0.25
Osinska 1989		38	0.50	32	0.00	50	0.06	51	0.06	44	0.10	48	0.08
Pachmann 1927		73	0.34	20	0.00	66	0.03	68	0.03	45	0.06	67	0.04
Paderewski 1930		35	0.51	29	0.00	43	0.08	43	0.15	29	0.20	40	0.17
Perlemuter 1992		16	0.58	23	0.00	9	0.09	8	0.52	10	0.53	8	0.52
Pierdomenico 2008		76	0.32	90	0.00	83	0.02	84	0.02	70	0.03	87	0.02
Poblocka 1999		18	0.57	8	0.02	20	0.07	26	0.37	16	0.37	26	0.37
Rabcewiczowa 1932		14	0.59	25	0.00	29	0.10	15	0.45	7	0.62	7	0.53
Rachmaninoff 1923		52	0.44	87	0.00	39	0.07	41	0.18	38	0.14	44	0.16
Rangell 2001		54	0.43	54	0.00	72	0.03	78	0.03	59	0.04	85	0.03
Richter 1976		56	0.43	88	0.00	53	0.07	48	0.07	52	0.05	52	0.06
Rosen 1989		42	0.48	16	0.01	42	0.06	42	0.17	47	0.05	47	0.09
Rosenthal 1930		39	0.50	12	0.01	49	0.07	46	0.07	27	0.39	41	0.17
Rosenthal 1931		78	0.31	70	0.00	59	0.03	63	0.03	43	0.12	53	0.06
Rosenthal 1931b		79	0.30	49	0.00	58	0.03	62	0.03	41	0.15	51	0.07
Rosenthal 1931c		62	0.41	69	0.00	63	0.04	60	0.04	53	0.05	73	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.31	39	0.00	68	0.04	58	0.04	57	0.04	72	0.04
Rossi 2007		84	0.25	75	0.00	85	0.03	82	0.03	38	0.10	55	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		86	0.14	48	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	81	0.03	88	0.02
Rubinstein 1952		72	0.34	74	0.00	82	0.02	86	0.02	77	0.03	90	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		59	0.42	52	0.00	78	0.03	76	0.03	71	0.04	82	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		33	0.52	71	0.00	27	0.11	21	0.42	10	0.49	17	0.45
Shebanova 2002		60	0.42	65	0.00	69	0.02	85	0.02	69	0.05	83	0.03
Smith 1975		7	0.62	10	0.01	7	0.09	6	0.53	10	0.47	9	0.50
Sokolov 2002		2	0.71	2	0.15	2	0.29	4	0.62	1	0.62	2	0.62
Sztompka 1959		13	0.59	46	0.00	15	0.10	13	0.47	12	0.46	14	0.46
Tomsic 1995		24	0.55	76	0.00	37	0.10	35	0.27	43	0.12	39	0.18
Uninsky 1932		1	0.76	1	0.45	1	0.44	1	0.75	1	0.77	1	0.76
Uninsky 1971		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Wasowski 1980		69	0.36	81	0.00	64	0.03	69	0.03	52	0.05	60	0.04
Zak 1937		51	0.45	82	0.00	60	0.03	70	0.03	50	0.05	65	0.04
Zak 1951		46	0.46	83	0.00	51	0.05	52	0.05	58	0.05	56	0.05
Random 1		89	0.01	61	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	24	0.23	58	0.05
Random 2		88	0.01	77	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	26	0.23	50	0.07
Random 3		90	0.00	78	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	45	0.05	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).