Milkina 1970

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		11	0.59	34	0.00	36	0.07	31	0.24	26	0.19	34	0.21
Anderszewski 2003		55	0.44	16	0.01	59	0.04	65	0.04	57	0.03	81	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		35	0.51	57	0.00	39	0.06	30	0.25	66	0.04	42	0.10
Bacha 2000		15	0.57	25	0.00	31	0.05	29	0.26	7	0.57	14	0.38
Badura 1965		73	0.38	64	0.00	67	0.05	49	0.05	45	0.06	59	0.05
Barbosa 1983		63	0.41	45	0.00	46	0.05	54	0.05	64	0.04	67	0.04
Biret 1990		20	0.55	35	0.00	16	0.09	11	0.44	14	0.47	11	0.45
Blet 2003		60	0.42	60	0.00	70	0.04	64	0.04	67	0.05	68	0.04
Block 1995		38	0.50	65	0.00	43	0.05	39	0.17	27	0.24	36	0.20
Blumental 1952		80	0.31	29	0.00	55	0.04	58	0.04	44	0.10	52	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		54	0.44	61	0.00	58	0.04	59	0.04	49	0.05	72	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		19	0.56	49	0.00	32	0.05	23	0.34	21	0.38	17	0.36
Bunin 1987		78	0.34	74	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	83	0.03	85	0.03
Bunin 1987b		75	0.34	24	0.00	80	0.03	81	0.03	82	0.03	79	0.03
Chiu 1999		59	0.42	50	0.00	24	0.07	16	0.37	25	0.40	15	0.38
Cohen 1997		50	0.45	8	0.03	11	0.12	25	0.32	3	0.56	12	0.42
Cortot 1951		71	0.38	67	0.00	76	0.04	78	0.04	69	0.04	75	0.04
Csalog 1996		28	0.52	62	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.15	15	0.50	29	0.27
Czerny 1949		45	0.47	10	0.02	18	0.08	42	0.15	32	0.27	35	0.20
Czerny 1990		33	0.51	79	0.00	54	0.04	63	0.04	67	0.04	73	0.04
Duchoud 2007		36	0.50	68	0.00	53	0.04	61	0.04	46	0.06	58	0.05
Ezaki 2006		24	0.53	19	0.00	45	0.07	46	0.07	61	0.04	53	0.05
Falvay 1989		1	0.70	1	0.43	1	0.43	1	0.72	1	0.75	1	0.73
Farrell 1958		31	0.51	41	0.00	57	0.04	72	0.04	37	0.19	45	0.09
Ferenczy 1958		52	0.44	31	0.00	74	0.04	73	0.04	47	0.07	57	0.05
Fliere 1977		42	0.49	82	0.00	47	0.06	48	0.06	67	0.04	54	0.05
Fou 1978		6	0.63	75	0.00	2	0.16	4	0.59	8	0.50	4	0.54
Francois 1956		13	0.58	6	0.04	17	0.08	19	0.36	29	0.27	25	0.31
Friedman 1923		90	-0.08	83	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	86	0.02	90	0.01
Friedman 1923b		89	-0.07	87	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	87	0.02	88	0.02
Friedman 1930		87	0.00	88	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	87	0.01	89	0.01
Garcia 2007		82	0.14	39	0.00	83	0.03	82	0.03	77	0.03	83	0.03
Garcia 2007b		83	0.09	32	0.00	84	0.03	79	0.03	65	0.03	86	0.03
Gierzod 1998		48	0.46	69	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	65	0.04	70	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		16	0.57	23	0.00	26	0.06	26	0.32	23	0.33	24	0.32
Groot 1988		5	0.64	76	0.00	10	0.11	14	0.41	29	0.27	21	0.33
Harasiewicz 1955		46	0.46	9	0.02	5	0.11	8	0.46	30	0.24	22	0.33
Hatto 1993		70	0.38	30	0.00	48	0.05	53	0.05	65	0.04	74	0.04
Hatto 1997		62	0.41	11	0.02	41	0.06	44	0.12	53	0.05	47	0.08
Horowitz 1949		25	0.53	51	0.00	21	0.06	21	0.36	22	0.32	20	0.34
Indjic 1988		68	0.39	84	0.00	49	0.08	45	0.08	63	0.04	51	0.06
Kapell 1951		37	0.50	40	0.00	63	0.04	60	0.04	83	0.03	78	0.03
Kissin 1993		4	0.66	36	0.00	4	0.25	5	0.53	11	0.53	5	0.53
Kushner 1989		17	0.57	77	0.00	28	0.10	24	0.33	23	0.31	23	0.32
Luisada 1991		29	0.52	7	0.03	13	0.11	15	0.39	21	0.34	16	0.36
Lushtak 2004		72	0.38	89	0.00	64	0.03	83	0.03	85	0.03	84	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		9	0.63	90	0.00	30	0.05	32	0.22	47	0.06	41	0.11
Magaloff 1978		12	0.59	38	0.00	22	0.07	18	0.36	40	0.14	32	0.22
Magin 1975		39	0.50	52	0.00	34	0.06	36	0.20	28	0.23	33	0.21
Michalowski 1933		81	0.18	21	0.00	62	0.04	76	0.04	73	0.04	65	0.04
Milkina 1970		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Mohovich 1999		18	0.57	33	0.00	37	0.08	33	0.22	43	0.12	39	0.16
Moravec 1969		7	0.63	5	0.04	12	0.11	6	0.47	5	0.53	6	0.50
Morozova 2008		43	0.47	18	0.00	25	0.07	28	0.31	23	0.23	30	0.27
Neighaus 1950		22	0.55	12	0.02	23	0.07	20	0.36	46	0.08	37	0.17
Niedzielski 1931		67	0.40	56	0.00	72	0.04	71	0.04	54	0.05	63	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		21	0.55	44	0.00	40	0.06	38	0.18	36	0.15	38	0.16
Osinska 1989		23	0.55	13	0.02	14	0.10	12	0.43	12	0.47	10	0.45
Pachmann 1927		64	0.40	47	0.00	61	0.05	56	0.05	41	0.12	46	0.08
Paderewski 1930		53	0.44	53	0.00	73	0.04	70	0.04	57	0.04	64	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		66	0.40	85	0.00	65	0.04	74	0.04	62	0.04	60	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		61	0.41	42	0.00	19	0.07	22	0.34	9	0.48	13	0.40
Poblocka 1999		40	0.50	80	0.00	69	0.04	69	0.04	79	0.03	77	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		58	0.43	27	0.00	56	0.05	51	0.05	39	0.18	44	0.09
Rachmaninoff 1923		77	0.34	58	0.00	66	0.04	62	0.04	57	0.04	62	0.04
Rangell 2001		10	0.62	22	0.00	7	0.13	10	0.44	6	0.52	8	0.48
Richter 1976		56	0.44	54	0.00	68	0.06	47	0.06	48	0.05	56	0.05
Rosen 1989		34	0.51	86	0.00	44	0.07	43	0.13	45	0.05	49	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		69	0.39	63	0.00	75	0.04	77	0.04	65	0.04	71	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		57	0.43	37	0.00	33	0.05	35	0.20	16	0.45	26	0.30
Rosenthal 1931b		65	0.40	43	0.00	35	0.07	40	0.16	18	0.39	31	0.25
Rosenthal 1931c		51	0.45	66	0.00	60	0.04	68	0.04	49	0.05	76	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		47	0.46	28	0.00	29	0.07	34	0.21	10	0.43	27	0.30
Rossi 2007		84	0.07	78	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	42	0.08	55	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		27	0.52	2	0.09	6	0.12	13	0.41	1	0.62	7	0.50
Rubinstein 1952		2	0.70	4	0.05	3	0.20	2	0.61	2	0.63	2	0.62
Rubinstein 1966		3	0.66	14	0.01	8	0.14	3	0.59	4	0.64	3	0.61
Schilhawsky 1960		74	0.34	20	0.00	79	0.04	67	0.04	84	0.03	82	0.03
Shebanova 2002		14	0.57	59	0.00	15	0.09	7	0.46	15	0.46	9	0.46
Smith 1975		30	0.52	26	0.00	38	0.08	37	0.20	55	0.04	43	0.09
Sokolov 2002		26	0.53	15	0.01	51	0.04	57	0.04	62	0.04	61	0.04
Sztompka 1959		76	0.34	70	0.00	77	0.04	75	0.04	79	0.03	80	0.03
Tomsic 1995		8	0.63	3	0.07	9	0.17	9	0.45	24	0.27	18	0.35
Uninsky 1932		79	0.32	71	0.00	78	0.05	50	0.05	70	0.04	69	0.04
Uninsky 1971		49	0.45	17	0.00	71	0.05	55	0.05	77	0.03	66	0.04
Wasowski 1980		44	0.47	72	0.00	52	0.04	66	0.04	27	0.28	40	0.11
Zak 1937		41	0.50	81	0.00	27	0.06	27	0.31	31	0.27	28	0.29
Zak 1951		32	0.51	73	0.00	20	0.05	17	0.36	27	0.32	19	0.34
Random 1		88	-0.02	46	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	17	0.30	50	0.08
Random 2		85	0.03	55	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	14	0.35	48	0.08
Random 3		86	0.01	48	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	74	0.03	87	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).