Barbosa 1983

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		2	0.60	10	0.03	4	0.19	8	0.54	14	0.43	10	0.48
Anderszewski 2003		70	0.29	85	0.00	62	0.04	73	0.04	70	0.03	79	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		53	0.39	86	0.00	42	0.07	41	0.15	78	0.03	55	0.07
Bacha 2000		56	0.39	50	0.00	46	0.04	71	0.04	14	0.47	37	0.14
Badura 1965		52	0.40	74	0.00	56	0.05	56	0.05	42	0.12	51	0.08
Barbosa 1983		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Biret 1990		31	0.46	51	0.00	34	0.11	23	0.42	24	0.39	15	0.40
Blet 2003		1	0.62	1	0.22	1	0.22	1	0.64	1	0.67	1	0.65
Block 1995		75	0.27	11	0.02	69	0.04	66	0.04	76	0.03	82	0.03
Blumental 1952		73	0.28	90	0.00	75	0.04	60	0.04	65	0.04	71	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		46	0.41	47	0.00	48	0.05	55	0.05	32	0.27	41	0.12
Brailowsky 1960		64	0.36	65	0.00	74	0.05	47	0.05	58	0.04	64	0.04
Bunin 1987		15	0.53	24	0.01	29	0.07	14	0.47	25	0.33	19	0.39
Bunin 1987b		14	0.53	15	0.01	30	0.13	13	0.47	25	0.32	17	0.39
Chiu 1999		3	0.59	3	0.09	2	0.15	2	0.63	4	0.66	2	0.64
Cohen 1997		77	0.26	71	0.00	70	0.04	67	0.04	36	0.15	52	0.08
Cortot 1951		68	0.31	69	0.00	64	0.04	63	0.04	56	0.05	72	0.04
Csalog 1996		37	0.44	16	0.01	26	0.06	31	0.35	21	0.41	21	0.38
Czerny 1949		54	0.39	67	0.00	67	0.05	46	0.05	48	0.06	61	0.05
Czerny 1990		29	0.48	34	0.00	40	0.08	39	0.23	49	0.06	42	0.12
Duchoud 2007		19	0.52	27	0.01	22	0.07	15	0.47	23	0.43	12	0.45
Ezaki 2006		20	0.52	75	0.00	35	0.14	25	0.40	36	0.14	33	0.24
Falvay 1989		30	0.47	64	0.00	41	0.09	40	0.22	50	0.05	45	0.10
Farrell 1958		63	0.38	52	0.00	59	0.05	53	0.05	56	0.04	66	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		48	0.41	76	0.00	45	0.04	62	0.04	24	0.30	44	0.11
Fliere 1977		13	0.53	39	0.00	13	0.08	17	0.45	27	0.25	25	0.34
Fou 1978		34	0.45	6	0.04	11	0.09	26	0.40	35	0.23	28	0.30
Francois 1956		10	0.54	25	0.01	24	0.08	20	0.43	27	0.27	26	0.34
Friedman 1923		87	0.16	35	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	66	0.04	84	0.03
Friedman 1923b		85	0.17	80	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	75	0.04	83	0.03
Friedman 1930		78	0.25	56	0.00	68	0.05	54	0.05	54	0.05	60	0.05
Garcia 2007		72	0.28	31	0.00	71	0.05	49	0.05	24	0.33	39	0.13
Garcia 2007b		82	0.21	54	0.00	79	0.04	59	0.04	40	0.14	56	0.07
Gierzod 1998		59	0.38	87	0.00	66	0.04	61	0.04	77	0.03	80	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		36	0.44	57	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.11	69	0.03	58	0.06
Groot 1988		7	0.56	14	0.01	12	0.09	3	0.61	16	0.42	7	0.51
Harasiewicz 1955		32	0.46	32	0.00	20	0.08	38	0.24	59	0.04	47	0.10
Hatto 1993		65	0.36	20	0.01	9	0.12	32	0.33	19	0.32	27	0.32
Hatto 1997		58	0.38	12	0.02	8	0.09	28	0.38	19	0.37	22	0.37
Horowitz 1949		61	0.38	38	0.00	57	0.04	78	0.04	56	0.04	69	0.04
Indjic 1988		60	0.38	4	0.07	7	0.10	29	0.38	14	0.38	20	0.38
Kapell 1951		17	0.52	45	0.00	33	0.11	19	0.44	34	0.29	23	0.36
Kissin 1993		39	0.43	68	0.00	51	0.05	50	0.05	45	0.07	57	0.06
Kushner 1989		43	0.42	88	0.00	65	0.04	65	0.04	74	0.03	78	0.03
Luisada 1991		33	0.46	13	0.02	21	0.11	35	0.27	40	0.14	36	0.19
Lushtak 2004		4	0.59	9	0.03	3	0.18	4	0.58	10	0.52	5	0.55
Malcuzynski 1961		40	0.43	42	0.00	54	0.05	48	0.05	77	0.03	68	0.04
Magaloff 1978		66	0.34	36	0.00	52	0.04	68	0.04	61	0.03	74	0.03
Magin 1975		79	0.23	77	0.00	77	0.04	70	0.04	66	0.03	77	0.03
Michalowski 1933		69	0.29	78	0.00	60	0.05	51	0.05	42	0.15	48	0.09
Milkina 1970		47	0.41	33	0.00	53	0.04	64	0.04	54	0.05	67	0.04
Mohovich 1999		9	0.55	2	0.09	5	0.10	9	0.52	17	0.44	11	0.48
Moravec 1969		62	0.38	81	0.00	73	0.04	74	0.04	76	0.03	73	0.03
Morozova 2008		21	0.52	43	0.00	31	0.09	24	0.41	25	0.22	30	0.30
Neighaus 1950		23	0.51	8	0.03	10	0.09	6	0.56	28	0.28	16	0.40
Niedzielski 1931		67	0.32	44	0.00	72	0.03	79	0.03	63	0.04	76	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		25	0.50	18	0.01	23	0.08	16	0.46	33	0.20	29	0.30
Osinska 1989		49	0.41	72	0.00	61	0.05	45	0.05	74	0.04	63	0.04
Pachmann 1927		18	0.52	23	0.01	14	0.08	11	0.51	5	0.62	3	0.56
Paderewski 1930		57	0.38	58	0.00	63	0.04	77	0.04	42	0.12	54	0.07
Perlemuter 1992		22	0.51	30	0.01	38	0.08	36	0.26	35	0.15	35	0.20
Pierdomenico 2008		71	0.29	82	0.00	78	0.04	75	0.04	87	0.02	75	0.03
Poblocka 1999		26	0.50	48	0.00	18	0.09	18	0.45	17	0.37	13	0.41
Rabcewiczowa 1932		38	0.44	49	0.00	37	0.10	33	0.29	21	0.43	24	0.35
Rachmaninoff 1923		45	0.41	41	0.00	55	0.04	76	0.04	71	0.04	65	0.04
Rangell 2001		55	0.39	37	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	22	0.29	43	0.12
Richter 1976		44	0.42	55	0.00	58	0.04	69	0.04	65	0.04	70	0.04
Rosen 1989		51	0.40	29	0.01	25	0.06	42	0.15	42	0.13	38	0.14
Rosenthal 1930		76	0.27	63	0.00	80	0.03	80	0.03	70	0.03	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.22	59	0.00	84	0.02	83	0.02	82	0.02	86	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		84	0.18	60	0.00	85	0.02	88	0.02	82	0.02	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		81	0.21	79	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	83	0.02	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.18	83	0.00	86	0.02	84	0.02	76	0.03	88	0.02
Rossi 2007		86	0.16	84	0.00	87	0.02	85	0.02	69	0.03	85	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		74	0.28	73	0.00	76	0.04	72	0.04	30	0.25	46	0.10
Rubinstein 1952		35	0.44	19	0.01	49	0.04	58	0.04	34	0.18	53	0.08
Rubinstein 1966		11	0.54	5	0.07	6	0.09	5	0.56	6	0.55	4	0.55
Schilhawsky 1960		12	0.54	28	0.01	19	0.09	22	0.42	18	0.39	14	0.40
Shebanova 2002		24	0.51	46	0.00	27	0.07	21	0.43	26	0.35	18	0.39
Smith 1975		27	0.49	61	0.00	39	0.08	34	0.29	51	0.05	40	0.12
Sokolov 2002		41	0.42	70	0.00	43	0.05	44	0.10	46	0.07	50	0.08
Sztompka 1959		42	0.42	53	0.00	47	0.05	57	0.05	48	0.06	59	0.05
Tomsic 1995		28	0.49	40	0.00	36	0.13	30	0.36	32	0.19	32	0.26
Uninsky 1932		16	0.52	17	0.01	28	0.07	27	0.38	28	0.22	31	0.29
Uninsky 1971		6	0.56	22	0.01	17	0.10	12	0.48	11	0.50	8	0.49
Wasowski 1980		50	0.41	66	0.00	32	0.09	37	0.24	38	0.19	34	0.21
Zak 1937		8	0.56	7	0.04	16	0.10	10	0.51	14	0.45	9	0.48
Zak 1951		5	0.56	21	0.01	15	0.08	7	0.56	13	0.47	6	0.51
Random 1		88	0.02	62	0.00	89	0.02	87	0.02	14	0.38	49	0.09
Random 2		89	0.01	26	0.01	88	0.01	89	0.01	22	0.27	62	0.05
Random 3		90	-0.06	89	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	66	0.03	87	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).