Magaloff 1978

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		53	0.50	86	0.00	68	0.02	87	0.02	55	0.05	85	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		64	0.46	42	0.00	66	0.04	55	0.04	38	0.19	58	0.09
Ashkenazy 1981		28	0.59	11	0.02	21	0.05	27	0.25	26	0.31	33	0.28
Bacha 2000		55	0.49	58	0.00	69	0.02	85	0.02	26	0.37	57	0.09
Badura 1965		73	0.39	49	0.00	71	0.04	56	0.04	54	0.05	73	0.04
Barbosa 1983		78	0.34	57	0.00	67	0.03	61	0.03	68	0.04	82	0.03
Biret 1990		44	0.52	84	0.00	58	0.03	79	0.03	43	0.13	64	0.06
Blet 2003		71	0.43	68	0.00	75	0.04	54	0.04	58	0.05	71	0.04
Block 1995		9	0.67	7	0.03	9	0.10	10	0.40	8	0.49	16	0.44
Blumental 1952		83	0.27	35	0.00	84	0.03	75	0.03	77	0.03	87	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		10	0.66	2	0.17	3	0.18	9	0.45	8	0.58	8	0.51
Brailowsky 1960		17	0.62	44	0.00	15	0.08	17	0.34	1	0.58	14	0.44
Bunin 1987		38	0.57	34	0.00	47	0.07	47	0.07	16	0.42	47	0.17
Bunin 1987b		36	0.57	21	0.01	48	0.09	44	0.09	16	0.42	43	0.19
Chiu 1999		69	0.44	12	0.02	28	0.07	25	0.25	17	0.48	22	0.35
Cohen 1997		66	0.46	56	0.00	56	0.04	53	0.04	4	0.53	48	0.15
Cortot 1951		70	0.44	70	0.00	81	0.03	77	0.03	51	0.06	76	0.04
Csalog 1996		65	0.46	59	0.00	76	0.04	57	0.04	26	0.33	54	0.11
Czerny 1949		68	0.45	53	0.00	61	0.03	69	0.03	40	0.13	62	0.06
Czerny 1990		40	0.56	85	0.00	53	0.03	65	0.03	63	0.05	74	0.04
Duchoud 2007		54	0.49	28	0.01	65	0.03	76	0.03	69	0.04	86	0.03
Ezaki 2006		13	0.64	38	0.00	23	0.06	26	0.25	15	0.42	27	0.32
Falvay 1989		31	0.59	23	0.01	14	0.08	11	0.40	8	0.49	15	0.44
Farrell 1958		51	0.50	80	0.00	70	0.03	71	0.03	14	0.39	53	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		77	0.35	87	0.00	87	0.03	73	0.03	74	0.03	83	0.03
Fliere 1977		2	0.76	3	0.08	2	0.24	1	0.73	1	0.78	1	0.75
Fou 1978		24	0.61	14	0.01	12	0.09	8	0.45	10	0.49	10	0.47
Francois 1956		33	0.58	47	0.00	33	0.05	33	0.18	23	0.33	38	0.24
Friedman 1923		86	0.21	51	0.00	83	0.03	74	0.03	39	0.13	65	0.06
Friedman 1923b		85	0.22	64	0.00	82	0.03	80	0.03	38	0.12	63	0.06
Friedman 1930		72	0.39	6	0.03	30	0.05	39	0.15	17	0.47	35	0.27
Garcia 2007		82	0.28	52	0.00	80	0.03	72	0.03	29	0.24	61	0.08
Garcia 2007b		87	0.17	78	0.00	86	0.03	83	0.03	47	0.05	77	0.04
Gierzod 1998		23	0.61	31	0.00	32	0.07	30	0.21	7	0.44	31	0.30
Gornostaeva 1994		3	0.72	19	0.01	6	0.09	6	0.47	8	0.58	5	0.52
Groot 1988		5	0.70	18	0.01	5	0.08	5	0.49	7	0.55	6	0.52
Harasiewicz 1955		42	0.53	45	0.00	10	0.09	15	0.35	13	0.38	21	0.36
Hatto 1993		80	0.30	88	0.00	63	0.04	58	0.04	51	0.05	75	0.04
Hatto 1997		79	0.33	29	0.01	31	0.06	37	0.17	39	0.11	49	0.14
Horowitz 1949		19	0.62	5	0.06	13	0.09	13	0.37	2	0.55	13	0.45
Indjic 1988		81	0.30	89	0.00	62	0.03	64	0.03	54	0.05	70	0.04
Kapell 1951		49	0.51	81	0.00	64	0.03	63	0.03	57	0.04	81	0.03
Kissin 1993		7	0.68	8	0.03	7	0.09	7	0.46	9	0.56	7	0.51
Kushner 1989		11	0.65	60	0.00	25	0.06	29	0.22	22	0.32	34	0.27
Luisada 1991		45	0.52	55	0.00	54	0.03	66	0.03	34	0.21	59	0.08
Lushtak 2004		41	0.53	4	0.06	19	0.06	23	0.27	18	0.44	25	0.34
Malcuzynski 1961		1	0.79	1	0.22	1	0.22	2	0.63	2	0.64	2	0.63
Magaloff 1978		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Magin 1975		21	0.62	40	0.00	16	0.06	22	0.28	11	0.43	23	0.35
Michalowski 1933		75	0.37	39	0.00	60	0.03	62	0.03	55	0.05	68	0.04
Milkina 1970		30	0.59	72	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.14	18	0.36	40	0.22
Mohovich 1999		12	0.64	71	0.00	17	0.08	19	0.31	14	0.48	19	0.39
Moravec 1969		57	0.48	76	0.00	72	0.03	78	0.03	66	0.04	78	0.03
Morozova 2008		48	0.51	26	0.01	43	0.05	43	0.09	27	0.20	51	0.13
Neighaus 1950		6	0.68	16	0.01	11	0.08	3	0.55	5	0.60	4	0.57
Niedzielski 1931		63	0.46	36	0.00	77	0.02	86	0.02	51	0.05	80	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		16	0.64	24	0.01	34	0.05	36	0.17	16	0.35	37	0.24
Osinska 1989		15	0.64	30	0.01	37	0.05	34	0.18	8	0.52	29	0.31
Pachmann 1927		43	0.52	20	0.01	27	0.07	18	0.32	4	0.65	11	0.46
Paderewski 1930		22	0.61	15	0.01	51	0.07	46	0.07	14	0.43	46	0.17
Perlemuter 1992		32	0.58	27	0.01	20	0.06	20	0.30	9	0.55	18	0.41
Pierdomenico 2008		37	0.57	46	0.00	26	0.07	21	0.30	2	0.63	17	0.43
Poblocka 1999		25	0.60	67	0.00	52	0.07	48	0.07	41	0.15	55	0.10
Rabcewiczowa 1932		56	0.48	13	0.01	57	0.03	70	0.03	34	0.20	60	0.08
Rachmaninoff 1923		59	0.47	43	0.00	39	0.05	41	0.13	21	0.36	39	0.22
Rangell 2001		8	0.67	32	0.00	8	0.08	14	0.36	4	0.58	12	0.46
Richter 1976		27	0.60	17	0.01	24	0.05	24	0.27	16	0.37	28	0.32
Rosen 1989		4	0.71	9	0.03	4	0.10	4	0.55	4	0.71	3	0.62
Rosenthal 1930		35	0.57	41	0.00	46	0.06	51	0.06	9	0.56	44	0.18
Rosenthal 1931		60	0.47	77	0.00	45	0.07	50	0.07	6	0.58	41	0.20
Rosenthal 1931b		52	0.50	90	0.00	40	0.06	32	0.18	5	0.61	26	0.33
Rosenthal 1931c		14	0.64	33	0.00	22	0.05	16	0.34	5	0.71	9	0.49
Rosenthal 1931d		39	0.56	65	0.00	41	0.10	31	0.20	5	0.60	24	0.35
Rossi 2007		76	0.37	37	0.00	49	0.06	52	0.06	4	0.51	45	0.17
Rubinstein 1939		84	0.26	62	0.00	85	0.03	81	0.03	43	0.10	66	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		26	0.60	10	0.02	36	0.06	35	0.17	12	0.49	32	0.29
Rubinstein 1966		61	0.47	73	0.00	73	0.03	67	0.03	49	0.06	72	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		47	0.51	75	0.00	55	0.03	59	0.03	23	0.34	56	0.10
Shebanova 2002		34	0.57	63	0.00	50	0.07	49	0.07	37	0.24	52	0.13
Smith 1975		20	0.62	25	0.01	18	0.06	12	0.37	15	0.39	20	0.38
Sokolov 2002		18	0.62	22	0.01	35	0.06	42	0.12	31	0.31	42	0.19
Sztompka 1959		58	0.48	50	0.00	59	0.03	84	0.03	60	0.05	67	0.04
Tomsic 1995		29	0.59	69	0.00	44	0.05	45	0.09	35	0.18	50	0.13
Uninsky 1932		74	0.37	54	0.00	79	0.03	82	0.03	71	0.04	84	0.03
Uninsky 1971		62	0.46	48	0.00	74	0.03	68	0.03	55	0.05	69	0.04
Wasowski 1980		67	0.45	66	0.00	78	0.03	60	0.03	79	0.03	79	0.03
Zak 1937		50	0.51	82	0.00	38	0.05	38	0.16	23	0.35	36	0.24
Zak 1951		46	0.52	79	0.00	29	0.07	28	0.23	18	0.40	30	0.30
Random 1		90	-0.03	83	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	48	0.04	90	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.03	74	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	58	0.04	89	0.02
Random 3		88	0.03	61	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	46	0.05	88	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).