Falvay 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		8	0.64	7	0.04	11	0.20	11	0.41	20	0.37	12	0.39
Anderszewski 2003		77	0.36	77	0.00	58	0.04	67	0.04	43	0.11	59	0.07
Ashkenazy 1981		31	0.54	18	0.01	18	0.05	21	0.29	31	0.25	28	0.27
Bacha 2000		26	0.56	41	0.00	46	0.05	58	0.05	8	0.56	37	0.17
Badura 1965		66	0.42	15	0.01	63	0.04	68	0.04	51	0.05	78	0.04
Barbosa 1983		56	0.47	58	0.00	52	0.05	50	0.05	40	0.22	51	0.10
Biret 1990		43	0.52	12	0.01	29	0.06	28	0.21	27	0.36	29	0.27
Blet 2003		48	0.48	68	0.00	77	0.05	57	0.05	54	0.05	67	0.05
Block 1995		49	0.48	86	0.00	67	0.03	78	0.03	47	0.04	86	0.03
Blumental 1952		79	0.35	74	0.00	74	0.03	81	0.03	76	0.03	87	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		52	0.48	50	0.00	70	0.04	60	0.04	47	0.05	79	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		22	0.58	33	0.00	34	0.05	34	0.18	4	0.53	19	0.31
Bunin 1987		50	0.48	29	0.00	61	0.04	65	0.04	61	0.04	80	0.04
Bunin 1987b		51	0.48	28	0.00	62	0.05	51	0.05	58	0.04	73	0.04
Chiu 1999		37	0.53	51	0.00	31	0.05	30	0.20	21	0.43	23	0.29
Cohen 1997		61	0.44	48	0.00	49	0.05	53	0.05	9	0.49	42	0.16
Cortot 1951		70	0.40	44	0.00	81	0.05	55	0.05	53	0.05	71	0.05
Csalog 1996		35	0.53	19	0.01	51	0.05	56	0.05	9	0.53	41	0.16
Czerny 1949		29	0.55	36	0.00	39	0.06	37	0.14	23	0.40	32	0.24
Czerny 1990		20	0.58	78	0.00	33	0.08	33	0.19	59	0.05	55	0.10
Duchoud 2007		57	0.47	14	0.01	56	0.04	64	0.04	47	0.06	69	0.05
Ezaki 2006		13	0.61	34	0.00	23	0.07	15	0.35	30	0.27	17	0.31
Falvay 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Farrell 1958		42	0.52	55	0.00	53	0.06	47	0.06	6	0.49	38	0.17
Ferenczy 1958		54	0.48	27	0.00	72	0.04	71	0.04	29	0.23	53	0.10
Fliere 1977		30	0.55	80	0.00	37	0.05	38	0.14	43	0.10	47	0.12
Fou 1978		3	0.71	2	0.12	2	0.20	2	0.70	4	0.58	3	0.64
Francois 1956		9	0.64	5	0.05	6	0.20	5	0.55	3	0.63	6	0.59
Friedman 1923		89	-0.04	87	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	81	0.03	90	0.02
Friedman 1923b		88	-0.03	69	0.00	89	0.02	86	0.02	79	0.03	89	0.02
Friedman 1930		85	0.14	88	0.00	85	0.03	77	0.03	56	0.04	84	0.03
Garcia 2007		82	0.20	46	0.00	82	0.03	85	0.03	61	0.04	85	0.03
Garcia 2007b		84	0.17	49	0.00	84	0.04	70	0.04	31	0.25	58	0.10
Gierzod 1998		45	0.51	45	0.00	19	0.06	32	0.20	18	0.32	30	0.25
Gornostaeva 1994		21	0.58	53	0.00	20	0.05	26	0.23	28	0.26	33	0.24
Groot 1988		2	0.71	4	0.05	4	0.19	4	0.64	1	0.63	4	0.63
Harasiewicz 1955		40	0.52	22	0.00	22	0.05	19	0.32	34	0.20	31	0.25
Hatto 1993		80	0.33	56	0.00	57	0.05	48	0.05	48	0.05	70	0.05
Hatto 1997		68	0.41	11	0.01	28	0.06	36	0.14	38	0.12	44	0.13
Horowitz 1949		33	0.54	57	0.00	12	0.10	24	0.25	15	0.37	22	0.30
Indjic 1988		78	0.36	37	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	65	0.04	76	0.04
Kapell 1951		44	0.51	30	0.00	55	0.05	49	0.05	65	0.04	72	0.04
Kissin 1993		5	0.69	9	0.03	5	0.21	6	0.55	8	0.56	7	0.55
Kushner 1989		14	0.60	38	0.00	35	0.06	29	0.21	19	0.36	26	0.27
Luisada 1991		36	0.53	31	0.00	13	0.07	20	0.29	22	0.34	18	0.31
Lushtak 2004		28	0.56	60	0.00	26	0.06	16	0.34	23	0.36	15	0.35
Malcuzynski 1961		15	0.60	65	0.00	24	0.08	23	0.27	38	0.19	34	0.23
Magaloff 1978		17	0.59	6	0.04	7	0.16	8	0.49	11	0.40	10	0.44
Magin 1975		60	0.44	71	0.00	60	0.05	59	0.05	45	0.06	65	0.05
Michalowski 1933		83	0.18	26	0.00	64	0.04	72	0.04	60	0.04	75	0.04
Milkina 1970		4	0.70	1	0.42	1	0.41	1	0.75	1	0.72	1	0.73
Mohovich 1999		11	0.61	81	0.00	14	0.06	17	0.32	24	0.31	20	0.31
Moravec 1969		16	0.60	25	0.00	25	0.06	22	0.28	14	0.40	16	0.33
Morozova 2008		27	0.56	17	0.01	17	0.06	12	0.40	14	0.37	13	0.38
Neighaus 1950		19	0.58	42	0.00	16	0.06	13	0.39	30	0.25	21	0.31
Niedzielski 1931		76	0.37	16	0.01	75	0.03	83	0.03	42	0.09	64	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		47	0.51	82	0.00	27	0.05	31	0.20	24	0.26	35	0.23
Osinska 1989		25	0.56	24	0.00	32	0.06	27	0.22	16	0.36	25	0.28
Pachmann 1927		46	0.51	62	0.00	47	0.06	46	0.06	20	0.45	40	0.16
Paderewski 1930		64	0.43	79	0.00	78	0.03	76	0.03	77	0.03	81	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		38	0.53	72	0.00	44	0.04	43	0.08	42	0.12	50	0.10
Pierdomenico 2008		41	0.52	20	0.00	30	0.05	25	0.24	6	0.54	14	0.36
Poblocka 1999		23	0.57	40	0.00	45	0.04	62	0.04	24	0.28	49	0.11
Rabcewiczowa 1932		65	0.43	83	0.00	71	0.04	66	0.04	48	0.06	66	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		69	0.41	84	0.00	43	0.04	45	0.07	51	0.05	61	0.06
Rangell 2001		53	0.48	35	0.00	41	0.04	41	0.09	36	0.19	46	0.13
Richter 1976		32	0.54	39	0.00	36	0.05	39	0.12	30	0.23	39	0.17
Rosen 1989		39	0.53	32	0.00	48	0.07	44	0.07	32	0.24	45	0.13
Rosenthal 1930		67	0.42	75	0.00	69	0.04	63	0.04	37	0.25	54	0.10
Rosenthal 1931		73	0.38	70	0.00	66	0.03	82	0.03	22	0.36	52	0.10
Rosenthal 1931b		75	0.38	66	0.00	65	0.03	80	0.03	21	0.35	56	0.10
Rosenthal 1931c		59	0.45	76	0.00	68	0.04	74	0.04	31	0.25	57	0.10
Rosenthal 1931d		63	0.43	85	0.00	59	0.04	61	0.04	18	0.36	48	0.12
Rossi 2007		81	0.25	54	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	44	0.08	63	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		72	0.39	13	0.01	54	0.05	54	0.05	7	0.48	43	0.15
Rubinstein 1952		6	0.66	8	0.03	9	0.20	9	0.49	4	0.60	8	0.54
Rubinstein 1966		24	0.56	52	0.00	38	0.06	35	0.17	15	0.43	27	0.27
Schilhawsky 1960		71	0.40	63	0.00	76	0.03	79	0.03	73	0.03	83	0.03
Shebanova 2002		12	0.61	43	0.00	15	0.06	14	0.37	17	0.43	11	0.40
Smith 1975		18	0.59	47	0.00	21	0.06	18	0.32	30	0.26	24	0.29
Sokolov 2002		34	0.53	61	0.00	42	0.04	42	0.08	52	0.05	60	0.06
Sztompka 1959		62	0.44	89	0.00	79	0.04	69	0.04	71	0.04	74	0.04
Tomsic 1995		1	0.73	3	0.07	3	0.19	3	0.67	3	0.63	2	0.65
Uninsky 1932		74	0.38	73	0.00	80	0.04	73	0.04	76	0.04	77	0.04
Uninsky 1971		58	0.46	21	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	67	0.03	82	0.03
Wasowski 1980		55	0.48	10	0.01	40	0.04	40	0.10	19	0.33	36	0.18
Zak 1937		10	0.63	64	0.00	10	0.16	10	0.48	4	0.59	9	0.53
Zak 1951		7	0.65	23	0.00	8	0.20	7	0.54	4	0.64	5	0.59
Random 1		87	-0.02	90	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	34	0.16	62	0.06
Random 2		90	-0.05	59	0.00	86	0.02	88	0.02	41	0.11	68	0.05
Random 3		86	-0.01	67	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	57	0.03	88	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).