Zak 1951

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		24	0.53	45	0.00	20	0.08	24	0.33	27	0.19	33	0.25
Anderszewski 2003		75	0.32	5	0.00	59	0.07	46	0.07	42	0.12	51	0.09
Ashkenazy 1981		36	0.50	25	0.00	21	0.07	21	0.38	35	0.19	32	0.27
Bacha 2000		48	0.46	46	0.00	58	0.06	47	0.06	11	0.49	41	0.17
Badura 1965		61	0.41	47	0.00	49	0.05	61	0.05	38	0.15	52	0.09
Barbosa 1983		13	0.56	48	0.00	17	0.09	13	0.47	7	0.56	8	0.51
Biret 1990		43	0.48	7	0.00	27	0.08	25	0.33	16	0.46	20	0.39
Blet 2003		27	0.53	14	0.00	37	0.08	37	0.21	31	0.25	34	0.23
Block 1995		58	0.42	15	0.00	67	0.05	51	0.05	50	0.04	74	0.04
Blumental 1952		66	0.35	49	0.00	71	0.04	68	0.04	42	0.10	59	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		19	0.54	26	0.00	18	0.09	20	0.39	12	0.55	13	0.46
Brailowsky 1960		34	0.51	50	0.00	40	0.08	38	0.21	11	0.44	27	0.30
Bunin 1987		25	0.53	51	0.00	35	0.06	33	0.26	39	0.17	37	0.21
Bunin 1987b		26	0.53	27	0.00	36	0.07	34	0.26	39	0.17	36	0.21
Chiu 1999		12	0.57	52	0.00	11	0.11	6	0.57	11	0.56	6	0.56
Cohen 1997		83	0.22	53	0.00	83	0.03	81	0.03	56	0.04	84	0.03
Cortot 1951		69	0.35	54	0.00	78	0.02	87	0.02	62	0.04	85	0.03
Csalog 1996		38	0.49	16	0.00	28	0.07	36	0.21	5	0.57	23	0.35
Czerny 1949		57	0.43	55	0.00	60	0.04	63	0.04	55	0.05	72	0.04
Czerny 1990		51	0.46	56	0.00	46	0.05	55	0.05	65	0.04	76	0.04
Duchoud 2007		46	0.47	57	0.00	56	0.05	50	0.05	66	0.04	73	0.04
Ezaki 2006		30	0.52	28	0.00	34	0.08	30	0.30	37	0.12	38	0.19
Falvay 1989		3	0.65	8	0.00	5	0.17	4	0.64	7	0.54	5	0.59
Farrell 1958		59	0.42	58	0.00	54	0.04	67	0.04	24	0.32	46	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		74	0.32	59	0.00	77	0.02	86	0.02	68	0.03	87	0.02
Fliere 1977		15	0.56	9	0.00	24	0.07	22	0.38	33	0.21	30	0.28
Fou 1978		8	0.59	29	0.00	9	0.10	7	0.56	16	0.44	9	0.50
Francois 1956		14	0.56	60	0.00	15	0.11	16	0.43	17	0.39	19	0.41
Friedman 1923		87	0.14	61	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	70	0.04	86	0.03
Friedman 1923b		85	0.16	17	0.00	85	0.04	73	0.04	69	0.04	75	0.04
Friedman 1930		81	0.24	2	0.00	76	0.03	83	0.03	71	0.03	81	0.03
Garcia 2007		79	0.31	3	0.00	74	0.03	82	0.03	22	0.34	49	0.10
Garcia 2007b		84	0.18	30	0.00	84	0.04	74	0.04	33	0.24	50	0.10
Gierzod 1998		41	0.48	62	0.00	41	0.08	40	0.19	36	0.15	43	0.17
Gornostaeva 1994		55	0.44	6	0.00	66	0.08	45	0.08	57	0.04	60	0.06
Groot 1988		11	0.58	63	0.00	12	0.08	14	0.45	20	0.37	18	0.41
Harasiewicz 1955		23	0.54	31	0.00	7	0.14	9	0.52	12	0.38	14	0.44
Hatto 1993		78	0.31	64	0.00	57	0.06	48	0.06	56	0.05	65	0.05
Hatto 1997		71	0.33	65	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	46	0.06	55	0.08
Horowitz 1949		5	0.63	66	0.00	2	0.28	8	0.54	6	0.51	7	0.52
Indjic 1988		70	0.34	18	0.00	42	0.10	39	0.19	40	0.15	42	0.17
Kapell 1951		37	0.49	32	0.00	53	0.04	64	0.04	53	0.05	69	0.04
Kissin 1993		10	0.59	67	0.00	10	0.11	11	0.51	13	0.47	10	0.49
Kushner 1989		35	0.50	10	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	47	0.06	62	0.05
Luisada 1991		31	0.51	68	0.00	8	0.12	15	0.43	16	0.41	16	0.42
Lushtak 2004		6	0.60	33	0.00	6	0.12	3	0.65	4	0.60	3	0.62
Malcuzynski 1961		9	0.59	69	0.00	14	0.12	10	0.51	27	0.33	17	0.41
Magaloff 1978		29	0.52	19	0.00	25	0.08	18	0.40	28	0.23	28	0.30
Magin 1975		63	0.39	20	0.00	29	0.06	42	0.15	40	0.14	44	0.14
Michalowski 1933		82	0.24	70	0.00	72	0.03	76	0.03	56	0.05	70	0.04
Milkina 1970		33	0.51	71	0.00	30	0.06	27	0.32	17	0.36	25	0.34
Mohovich 1999		4	0.64	34	0.00	4	0.12	5	0.60	7	0.60	4	0.60
Moravec 1969		28	0.52	72	0.00	26	0.06	31	0.26	23	0.31	29	0.28
Morozova 2008		45	0.47	35	0.00	38	0.08	35	0.22	31	0.15	40	0.18
Neighaus 1950		2	0.65	11	0.00	3	0.30	2	0.70	6	0.58	2	0.64
Niedzielski 1931		62	0.41	73	0.00	51	0.04	70	0.04	11	0.39	45	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		32	0.51	4	0.00	22	0.07	23	0.35	29	0.23	31	0.28
Osinska 1989		40	0.49	21	0.00	45	0.06	49	0.06	42	0.12	53	0.08
Pachmann 1927		18	0.55	12	0.00	19	0.08	17	0.41	12	0.54	12	0.47
Paderewski 1930		72	0.33	74	0.00	79	0.03	84	0.03	72	0.03	79	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		21	0.54	22	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.26	23	0.38	26	0.31
Pierdomenico 2008		54	0.45	75	0.00	65	0.05	53	0.05	31	0.21	48	0.10
Poblocka 1999		47	0.47	76	0.00	47	0.05	62	0.05	75	0.04	67	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		73	0.32	36	0.00	80	0.04	72	0.04	70	0.03	78	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		49	0.46	77	0.00	39	0.08	41	0.18	28	0.27	35	0.22
Rangell 2001		44	0.47	37	0.00	52	0.05	56	0.05	30	0.25	47	0.11
Richter 1976		42	0.48	23	0.00	43	0.07	43	0.13	27	0.28	39	0.19
Rosen 1989		52	0.46	13	0.00	63	0.04	66	0.04	84	0.03	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		77	0.31	38	0.00	81	0.04	75	0.04	73	0.03	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		76	0.32	78	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	45	0.06	71	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		67	0.35	39	0.00	69	0.04	71	0.04	35	0.18	56	0.08
Rosenthal 1931c		64	0.38	79	0.00	68	0.05	54	0.05	47	0.05	66	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		65	0.37	80	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	38	0.11	58	0.07
Rossi 2007		86	0.15	81	0.00	87	0.03	77	0.03	66	0.03	77	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		80	0.28	82	0.00	82	0.03	85	0.03	31	0.24	54	0.08
Rubinstein 1952		16	0.55	83	0.00	23	0.08	26	0.33	16	0.46	21	0.39
Rubinstein 1966		22	0.54	40	0.00	33	0.08	29	0.30	18	0.41	24	0.35
Schilhawsky 1960		20	0.54	41	0.00	16	0.09	19	0.39	4	0.58	11	0.48
Shebanova 2002		17	0.55	84	0.00	31	0.06	28	0.31	18	0.42	22	0.36
Smith 1975		56	0.44	85	0.00	62	0.04	65	0.04	61	0.04	68	0.04
Sokolov 2002		39	0.49	42	0.00	55	0.05	59	0.05	54	0.05	61	0.05
Sztompka 1959		68	0.35	43	0.00	73	0.03	79	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.03
Tomsic 1995		7	0.60	44	0.00	13	0.10	12	0.49	14	0.38	15	0.43
Uninsky 1932		53	0.45	24	0.00	61	0.05	60	0.05	53	0.05	64	0.05
Uninsky 1971		50	0.46	86	0.00	64	0.05	58	0.05	52	0.05	63	0.05
Wasowski 1980		60	0.41	87	0.00	48	0.05	57	0.05	45	0.09	57	0.07
Zak 1937		1	0.98	1	1.00	1	0.99	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Zak 1951		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 1		88	-0.03	88	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	67	0.03	88	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.13	89	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	85	0.02	89	0.01
Random 3		89	-0.08	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	87	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).