Zak 1937

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		26	0.52	52	0.00	29	0.10	29	0.29	37	0.13	33	0.19
Anderszewski 2003		79	0.30	27	0.00	63	0.04	65	0.04	49	0.04	66	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		34	0.50	53	0.00	21	0.09	22	0.36	38	0.15	32	0.23
Bacha 2000		41	0.48	28	0.00	55	0.06	46	0.06	13	0.47	36	0.17
Badura 1965		65	0.37	54	0.00	53	0.05	53	0.05	48	0.05	60	0.05
Barbosa 1983		18	0.56	55	0.00	14	0.09	14	0.45	10	0.51	12	0.48
Biret 1990		27	0.52	29	0.00	23	0.10	18	0.39	17	0.46	16	0.42
Blet 2003		20	0.54	56	0.00	35	0.06	36	0.22	33	0.24	31	0.23
Block 1995		61	0.40	15	0.00	68	0.04	70	0.04	48	0.04	68	0.04
Blumental 1952		62	0.38	57	0.00	64	0.04	67	0.04	36	0.17	51	0.08
Boshniakovich 1969		15	0.56	2	0.00	13	0.10	11	0.47	10	0.57	8	0.52
Brailowsky 1960		30	0.51	58	0.00	34	0.07	32	0.24	12	0.44	23	0.32
Bunin 1987		28	0.51	59	0.00	36	0.05	34	0.22	45	0.07	43	0.12
Bunin 1987b		29	0.51	9	0.00	37	0.06	35	0.22	46	0.07	42	0.12
Chiu 1999		6	0.59	30	0.00	4	0.20	3	0.63	9	0.61	3	0.62
Cohen 1997		83	0.22	5	0.00	78	0.04	73	0.04	52	0.05	70	0.04
Cortot 1951		71	0.35	60	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	72	0.03	85	0.03
Csalog 1996		25	0.53	31	0.00	19	0.08	27	0.32	4	0.58	15	0.43
Czerny 1949		59	0.41	61	0.00	62	0.06	47	0.06	45	0.07	53	0.06
Czerny 1990		49	0.47	32	0.00	46	0.04	64	0.04	71	0.04	73	0.04
Duchoud 2007		39	0.49	33	0.00	43	0.04	44	0.08	54	0.05	54	0.06
Ezaki 2006		44	0.48	10	0.00	39	0.05	38	0.19	57	0.05	46	0.10
Falvay 1989		5	0.63	34	0.00	7	0.14	4	0.59	10	0.48	6	0.53
Farrell 1958		46	0.47	62	0.00	51	0.06	48	0.06	16	0.37	39	0.15
Ferenczy 1958		78	0.30	63	0.00	85	0.03	82	0.03	84	0.02	88	0.02
Fliere 1977		9	0.58	16	0.00	16	0.08	13	0.45	30	0.23	22	0.32
Fou 1978		10	0.57	64	0.00	11	0.12	8	0.53	18	0.43	9	0.48
Francois 1956		24	0.53	35	0.00	18	0.08	19	0.39	24	0.32	21	0.35
Friedman 1923		86	0.16	36	0.00	86	0.04	72	0.04	69	0.04	76	0.04
Friedman 1923b		85	0.18	37	0.00	84	0.03	78	0.03	55	0.05	71	0.04
Friedman 1930		81	0.23	38	0.00	75	0.03	83	0.03	76	0.03	82	0.03
Garcia 2007		69	0.35	17	0.00	69	0.05	49	0.05	19	0.41	41	0.14
Garcia 2007b		84	0.21	39	0.00	77	0.04	75	0.04	30	0.25	48	0.10
Gierzod 1998		40	0.49	18	0.00	38	0.05	40	0.14	55	0.05	50	0.08
Gornostaeva 1994		57	0.43	65	0.00	66	0.04	66	0.04	66	0.04	72	0.04
Groot 1988		13	0.57	66	0.00	12	0.12	16	0.41	23	0.34	20	0.37
Harasiewicz 1955		45	0.47	19	0.00	9	0.10	20	0.38	38	0.17	29	0.25
Hatto 1993		72	0.34	11	0.00	59	0.08	43	0.08	60	0.04	55	0.06
Hatto 1997		66	0.36	67	0.00	58	0.05	63	0.05	60	0.04	67	0.04
Horowitz 1949		3	0.64	68	0.00	2	0.28	6	0.57	3	0.55	4	0.56
Indjic 1988		64	0.37	69	0.00	31	0.07	37	0.21	41	0.13	37	0.17
Kapell 1951		37	0.50	40	0.00	54	0.05	60	0.05	70	0.04	63	0.04
Kissin 1993		12	0.57	3	0.00	10	0.10	9	0.51	15	0.45	11	0.48
Kushner 1989		38	0.49	12	0.00	52	0.05	61	0.05	51	0.04	62	0.04
Luisada 1991		21	0.54	70	0.00	5	0.18	12	0.47	11	0.45	14	0.46
Lushtak 2004		8	0.58	41	0.00	8	0.11	5	0.58	11	0.52	5	0.55
Malcuzynski 1961		11	0.57	71	0.00	24	0.08	17	0.40	37	0.20	26	0.28
Magaloff 1978		32	0.51	42	0.00	30	0.09	23	0.35	38	0.16	30	0.24
Magin 1975		63	0.37	43	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.09	55	0.05	52	0.07
Michalowski 1933		82	0.22	13	0.00	72	0.03	85	0.03	70	0.04	80	0.03
Milkina 1970		35	0.50	72	0.00	33	0.06	31	0.27	27	0.31	25	0.29
Mohovich 1999		4	0.63	20	0.00	6	0.12	7	0.55	12	0.52	7	0.53
Moravec 1969		23	0.53	73	0.00	22	0.08	30	0.29	20	0.33	24	0.31
Morozova 2008		51	0.46	7	0.00	32	0.06	33	0.23	38	0.14	35	0.18
Neighaus 1950		2	0.66	6	0.00	3	0.28	2	0.70	10	0.57	2	0.63
Niedzielski 1931		53	0.45	74	0.00	48	0.05	58	0.05	5	0.47	38	0.15
Ohlsson 1999		22	0.53	75	0.00	20	0.08	26	0.32	32	0.20	28	0.25
Osinska 1989		43	0.48	44	0.00	47	0.05	52	0.05	53	0.06	56	0.05
Pachmann 1927		19	0.55	76	0.00	17	0.09	15	0.42	10	0.55	10	0.48
Paderewski 1930		73	0.33	77	0.00	81	0.03	87	0.03	82	0.02	87	0.02
Perlemuter 1992		33	0.50	78	0.00	41	0.07	41	0.14	36	0.15	40	0.14
Pierdomenico 2008		50	0.47	21	0.00	56	0.05	59	0.05	25	0.24	44	0.11
Poblocka 1999		42	0.48	8	0.00	45	0.05	62	0.05	76	0.04	61	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		76	0.31	79	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	71	0.03	79	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		54	0.45	80	0.00	40	0.06	39	0.16	32	0.20	34	0.18
Rangell 2001		36	0.50	45	0.00	50	0.05	56	0.05	29	0.25	45	0.11
Richter 1976		56	0.44	81	0.00	49	0.05	55	0.05	47	0.06	58	0.05
Rosen 1989		48	0.47	22	0.00	60	0.05	54	0.05	76	0.03	69	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		77	0.31	46	0.00	83	0.03	77	0.03	75	0.03	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.27	23	0.00	80	0.03	76	0.03	53	0.04	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		74	0.32	14	0.00	73	0.03	86	0.03	53	0.05	75	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		68	0.35	82	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	71	0.03	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		70	0.35	83	0.00	74	0.04	74	0.04	56	0.04	74	0.04
Rossi 2007		87	0.10	84	0.00	87	0.03	79	0.03	65	0.03	77	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		75	0.32	85	0.00	76	0.03	84	0.03	27	0.31	47	0.10
Rubinstein 1952		17	0.56	86	0.00	25	0.07	24	0.35	14	0.47	17	0.41
Rubinstein 1966		16	0.56	47	0.00	28	0.09	28	0.32	17	0.42	18	0.37
Schilhawsky 1960		31	0.51	87	0.00	27	0.08	25	0.33	15	0.42	19	0.37
Shebanova 2002		7	0.58	88	0.00	15	0.08	10	0.49	13	0.48	13	0.48
Smith 1975		60	0.41	48	0.00	65	0.04	68	0.04	81	0.03	78	0.03
Sokolov 2002		47	0.47	24	0.00	61	0.05	51	0.05	58	0.05	57	0.05
Sztompka 1959		67	0.35	49	0.00	71	0.04	71	0.04	66	0.04	64	0.04
Tomsic 1995		14	0.57	25	0.00	26	0.10	21	0.38	36	0.18	27	0.26
Uninsky 1932		52	0.46	26	0.00	57	0.05	57	0.05	58	0.05	59	0.05
Uninsky 1971		55	0.45	50	0.00	67	0.05	50	0.05	70	0.03	65	0.04
Wasowski 1980		58	0.42	51	0.00	44	0.04	45	0.07	44	0.12	49	0.09
Zak 1937		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Zak 1951		1	0.98	1	1.00	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Random 1		88	-0.02	89	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	55	0.04	84	0.03
Random 2		90	-0.13	90	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	89	0.01	89	0.01
Random 3		89	-0.09	4	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).