Boshniakovich 1969

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   51  0.4586  0.0070  0.0287  0.0280  0.0388  0.02
Anderszewski 2003   67  0.3826  0.0054  0.0459  0.0465  0.0376  0.03
Ashkenazy 1981   28  0.5320  0.0030  0.0627  0.3268  0.0440  0.11
Bacha 2000   59  0.4263  0.0071  0.0373  0.0348  0.0658  0.04
Badura 1965   47  0.4654  0.0031  0.0633  0.2429  0.2629  0.25
Barbosa 1983   62  0.4152  0.0027  0.0932  0.2755  0.0539  0.12
Biret 1990   53  0.4440  0.0069  0.0382  0.0366  0.0483  0.03
Blet 2003   38  0.4848  0.0035  0.0737  0.1774  0.0449  0.08
Block 1995   5  0.641  0.231  0.231  0.771  0.801  0.78
Blumental 1952   36  0.4919  0.0040  0.0642  0.1524  0.2632  0.20
Boshniakovich 1969   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Brailowsky 1960   17  0.5761  0.0028  0.0828  0.3124  0.3325  0.32
Bunin 1987   44  0.4849  0.0064  0.0551  0.0555  0.0557  0.05
Bunin 1987b   43  0.4869  0.0063  0.0383  0.0355  0.0561  0.04
Chiu 1999   58  0.4274  0.0044  0.0644  0.1173  0.0452  0.07
Cohen 1997   79  0.2775  0.0053  0.0455  0.0461  0.0465  0.04
Cortot 1951   60  0.4228  0.0072  0.0362  0.0354  0.0566  0.04
Csalog 1996   76  0.3335  0.0085  0.0381  0.0350  0.0664  0.04
Czerny 1949   69  0.3787  0.0084  0.0371  0.0385  0.0286  0.02
Czerny 1990   34  0.4981  0.0065  0.0453  0.0483  0.0382  0.03
Duchoud 2007   68  0.3850  0.0078  0.0454  0.0474  0.0380  0.03
Ezaki 2006   31  0.5257  0.0039  0.0641  0.1662  0.0446  0.08
Falvay 1989   42  0.4888  0.0047  0.0547  0.0560  0.0459  0.04
Farrell 1958   56  0.4382  0.0036  0.0638  0.1625  0.2931  0.22
Ferenczy 1958   81  0.2683  0.0087  0.0366  0.0376  0.0379  0.03
Fliere 1977   1  0.683  0.172  0.242  0.706  0.612  0.65
Fou 1978   14  0.584  0.084  0.227  0.609  0.505  0.55
Francois 1956   65  0.3853  0.0079  0.0457  0.0464  0.0385  0.03
Friedman 1923   86  0.2065  0.0076  0.0458  0.0433  0.1751  0.08
Friedman 1923b   85  0.2166  0.0075  0.0460  0.0433  0.1850  0.08
Friedman 1930   78  0.3146  0.0067  0.0285  0.0263  0.0477  0.03
Garcia 2007   55  0.4415  0.0125  0.0926  0.362  0.769  0.52
Garcia 2007b   75  0.3338  0.0061  0.0379  0.0317  0.3941  0.11
Gierzod 1998   27  0.5329  0.0038  0.0735  0.2139  0.1135  0.15
Gornostaeva 1994   8  0.6143  0.0019  0.1015  0.5219  0.3917  0.45
Groot 1988   18  0.5651  0.0024  0.0921  0.4439  0.1727  0.27
Harasiewicz 1955   33  0.509  0.0210  0.119  0.5832  0.2321  0.37
Hatto 1993   82  0.2559  0.0059  0.0375  0.0370  0.0484  0.03
Hatto 1997   84  0.2255  0.0083  0.0286  0.0266  0.0478  0.03
Horowitz 1949   22  0.548  0.0221  0.0825  0.3729  0.2626  0.31
Indjic 1988   83  0.2442  0.0081  0.0376  0.0369  0.0475  0.03
Kapell 1951   63  0.4044  0.0077  0.0363  0.0377  0.0371  0.03
Kissin 1993   9  0.6021  0.0016  0.0917  0.5123  0.3418  0.42
Kushner 1989   7  0.6132  0.0017  0.0911  0.5614  0.4115  0.48
Luisada 1991   29  0.5327  0.0034  0.0631  0.2735  0.1930  0.23
Lushtak 2004   16  0.5713  0.0113  0.1018  0.5026  0.3519  0.42
Malcuzynski 1961   2  0.666  0.036  0.184  0.6720  0.3712  0.50
Magaloff 1978   3  0.662  0.213  0.258  0.589  0.4510  0.51
Magin 1975   30  0.5323  0.0043  0.0643  0.1325  0.2533  0.18
Michalowski 1933   71  0.3672  0.0060  0.0368  0.0374  0.0473  0.03
Milkina 1970   54  0.4462  0.0046  0.0549  0.0559  0.0460  0.04
Mohovich 1999   6  0.6337  0.0011  0.115  0.6116  0.466  0.53
Moravec 1969   73  0.3556  0.0082  0.0284  0.0252  0.0567  0.03
Morozova 2008   21  0.5524  0.0023  0.0920  0.4635  0.1428  0.25
Neighaus 1950   4  0.6510  0.015  0.173  0.6915  0.504  0.59
Niedzielski 1931   64  0.4034  0.0058  0.0370  0.0334  0.1355  0.06
Ohlsson 1999   35  0.4916  0.0151  0.0548  0.0575  0.0362  0.04
Osinska 1989   15  0.5839  0.0026  0.1022  0.4321  0.2822  0.35
Pachmann 1927   37  0.4831  0.0015  0.1019  0.4911  0.5411  0.51
Paderewski 1930   10  0.6014  0.0114  0.1116  0.512  0.548  0.52
Perlemuter 1992   20  0.5660  0.0018  0.0814  0.5319  0.4314  0.48
Pierdomenico 2008   49  0.4673  0.0049  0.0452  0.0438  0.1847  0.08
Poblocka 1999   24  0.5458  0.0033  0.0736  0.1952  0.0543  0.10
Rabcewiczowa 1932   57  0.4336  0.0074  0.0364  0.0358  0.0470  0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923   72  0.3570  0.0057  0.0369  0.0364  0.0469  0.03
Rangell 2001   11  0.5912  0.017  0.186  0.613  0.603  0.60
Richter 1976   40  0.4833  0.0048  0.0645  0.0644  0.1148  0.08
Rosen 1989   13  0.5925  0.0012  0.1113  0.5513  0.4613  0.50
Rosenthal 1930   74  0.3476  0.0080  0.0378  0.0372  0.0381  0.03
Rosenthal 1931   80  0.2771  0.0073  0.0380  0.0348  0.0563  0.04
Rosenthal 1931b   77  0.3277  0.0055  0.0461  0.0429  0.2245  0.09
Rosenthal 1931c   61  0.4184  0.0052  0.0456  0.0444  0.0856  0.06
Rosenthal 1931d   70  0.3789  0.0068  0.0377  0.0331  0.1654  0.07
Rossi 2007   66  0.3878  0.0050  0.0550  0.0521  0.2937  0.12
Rubinstein 1939   87  0.2079  0.0086  0.0367  0.0337  0.1553  0.07
Rubinstein 1952   26  0.5317  0.0129  0.0830  0.2922  0.3923  0.34
Rubinstein 1966   41  0.4818  0.0020  0.1124  0.3816  0.4220  0.40
Schilhawsky 1960   52  0.4541  0.0042  0.0740  0.1638  0.1834  0.17
Shebanova 2002   12  0.5922  0.0022  0.0823  0.4134  0.2724  0.33
Smith 1975   32  0.5147  0.0037  0.0934  0.2474  0.0444  0.10
Sokolov 2002   48  0.4645  0.0066  0.0365  0.0371  0.0368  0.03
Sztompka 1959   50  0.4564  0.0062  0.0372  0.0370  0.0472  0.03
Tomsic 1995   25  0.5467  0.0032  0.0729  0.3151  0.0538  0.12
Uninsky 1932   45  0.4711  0.0141  0.0739  0.1640  0.1136  0.13
Uninsky 1971   46  0.4730  0.0056  0.0374  0.0361  0.0474  0.03
Wasowski 1980   39  0.4868  0.0045  0.0546  0.0536  0.1942  0.10
Zak 1937   19  0.565  0.058  0.1110  0.5711  0.477  0.52
Zak 1951   23  0.547  0.039  0.1412  0.5520  0.3916  0.46
Random 1   88  -0.0185  0.0088  0.0188  0.0159  0.0389  0.02
Random 2   90  -0.0780  0.0089  0.0189  0.0176  0.0387  0.02
Random 3   89  -0.0390  0.0090  0.0190  0.0179  0.0290  0.01

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).