Garcia 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		74	0.19	44	0.00	64	0.04	63	0.04	84	0.02	73	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		26	0.30	10	0.01	15	0.12	15	0.44	73	0.03	22	0.11
Ashkenazy 1981		9	0.36	38	0.00	17	0.10	12	0.48	81	0.03	20	0.12
Bacha 2000		32	0.29	42	0.00	45	0.05	54	0.05	58	0.04	48	0.04
Badura 1965		83	0.10	55	0.00	82	0.03	71	0.03	84	0.02	85	0.02
Barbosa 1983		36	0.28	6	0.03	16	0.10	24	0.33	49	0.05	19	0.13
Biret 1990		43	0.27	37	0.00	56	0.05	53	0.05	87	0.02	77	0.03
Blet 2003		45	0.26	40	0.00	42	0.05	40	0.13	77	0.04	37	0.07
Block 1995		2	0.44	2	0.18	3	0.33	1	0.78	21	0.33	3	0.51
Blumental 1952		50	0.25	16	0.01	23	0.09	33	0.19	57	0.04	30	0.09
Boshniakovich 1969		1	0.44	3	0.14	2	0.37	2	0.76	26	0.36	2	0.52
Brailowsky 1960		20	0.33	30	0.00	30	0.07	30	0.23	79	0.03	32	0.08
Bunin 1987		34	0.29	62	0.00	50	0.05	57	0.05	69	0.04	53	0.04
Bunin 1987b		33	0.29	85	0.00	51	0.08	45	0.08	70	0.03	44	0.05
Chiu 1999		31	0.29	23	0.00	32	0.05	32	0.20	77	0.03	33	0.08
Cohen 1997		79	0.15	39	0.00	80	0.02	83	0.02	76	0.03	86	0.02
Cortot 1951		52	0.25	63	0.00	57	0.05	52	0.05	68	0.04	55	0.04
Csalog 1996		82	0.13	80	0.00	84	0.02	82	0.02	77	0.03	83	0.02
Czerny 1949		86	0.07	82	0.00	86	0.03	75	0.03	89	0.02	84	0.02
Czerny 1990		29	0.29	83	0.00	37	0.05	31	0.21	84	0.03	36	0.08
Duchoud 2007		22	0.31	60	0.00	33	0.06	28	0.27	82	0.03	28	0.09
Ezaki 2006		76	0.18	41	0.00	58	0.04	64	0.04	84	0.02	56	0.03
Falvay 1989		71	0.20	22	0.00	65	0.04	61	0.04	85	0.03	61	0.03
Farrell 1958		54	0.24	52	0.00	60	0.04	60	0.04	79	0.03	64	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		65	0.21	48	0.00	75	0.03	74	0.03	78	0.03	71	0.03
Fliere 1977		4	0.40	20	0.00	5	0.23	5	0.64	69	0.04	10	0.16
Fou 1978		56	0.24	74	0.00	69	0.03	67	0.03	84	0.03	65	0.03
Francois 1956		85	0.09	86	0.00	85	0.02	81	0.02	86	0.02	89	0.02
Friedman 1923		38	0.28	35	0.00	26	0.06	25	0.31	29	0.24	6	0.27
Friedman 1923b		28	0.30	45	0.00	25	0.06	21	0.35	24	0.29	5	0.32
Friedman 1930		58	0.24	65	0.00	40	0.05	39	0.13	46	0.06	27	0.09
Garcia 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Garcia 2007b		3	0.43	1	0.37	1	0.37	3	0.74	2	0.73	1	0.73
Gierzod 1998		62	0.21	49	0.00	52	0.06	48	0.06	87	0.02	74	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		61	0.22	75	0.00	74	0.03	79	0.03	82	0.03	76	0.03
Groot 1988		35	0.29	15	0.01	31	0.06	36	0.17	80	0.02	43	0.06
Harasiewicz 1955		13	0.34	5	0.03	8	0.13	7	0.64	70	0.03	16	0.14
Hatto 1993		41	0.28	58	0.00	46	0.06	51	0.06	72	0.03	54	0.04
Hatto 1997		75	0.19	24	0.00	71	0.03	69	0.03	86	0.03	70	0.03
Horowitz 1949		42	0.28	34	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	80	0.03	45	0.05
Indjic 1988		46	0.26	66	0.00	47	0.06	47	0.06	71	0.03	52	0.04
Kapell 1951		25	0.30	33	0.00	35	0.07	34	0.19	71	0.04	26	0.09
Kissin 1993		64	0.21	87	0.00	70	0.03	72	0.03	74	0.04	69	0.03
Kushner 1989		21	0.32	50	0.00	18	0.13	20	0.40	75	0.03	21	0.11
Luisada 1991		7	0.37	59	0.00	21	0.08	16	0.43	63	0.05	13	0.15
Lushtak 2004		30	0.29	88	0.00	36	0.06	37	0.17	80	0.03	38	0.07
Malcuzynski 1961		49	0.26	56	0.00	55	0.05	55	0.05	83	0.03	50	0.04
Magaloff 1978		40	0.28	12	0.01	29	0.08	29	0.24	72	0.03	34	0.08
Magin 1975		66	0.21	76	0.00	67	0.03	66	0.03	76	0.03	63	0.03
Michalowski 1933		16	0.33	53	0.00	11	0.08	8	0.63	59	0.05	8	0.18
Milkina 1970		81	0.14	17	0.01	66	0.03	77	0.03	82	0.03	66	0.03
Mohovich 1999		5	0.39	4	0.06	6	0.14	4	0.67	60	0.04	12	0.16
Moravec 1969		77	0.17	90	0.00	63	0.04	58	0.04	84	0.02	57	0.03
Morozova 2008		39	0.28	25	0.00	24	0.10	23	0.33	77	0.03	25	0.10
Neighaus 1950		12	0.34	31	0.00	22	0.11	17	0.43	86	0.02	31	0.09
Niedzielski 1931		27	0.30	7	0.02	4	0.26	13	0.47	14	0.35	4	0.41
Ohlsson 1999		60	0.23	36	0.00	38	0.05	41	0.13	85	0.03	40	0.06
Osinska 1989		55	0.24	69	0.00	73	0.03	78	0.03	81	0.03	59	0.03
Pachmann 1927		70	0.20	51	0.00	62	0.03	65	0.03	79	0.03	68	0.03
Paderewski 1930		51	0.25	57	0.00	53	0.06	49	0.06	58	0.04	46	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		19	0.33	11	0.01	14	0.10	10	0.57	75	0.03	17	0.13
Pierdomenico 2008		14	0.34	27	0.00	34	0.06	35	0.19	82	0.03	35	0.08
Poblocka 1999		18	0.33	19	0.00	19	0.10	18	0.42	77	0.04	18	0.13
Rabcewiczowa 1932		73	0.19	70	0.00	78	0.03	80	0.03	79	0.02	81	0.02
Rachmaninoff 1923		44	0.27	77	0.00	39	0.05	38	0.14	78	0.03	39	0.06
Rangell 2001		17	0.33	18	0.00	28	0.07	26	0.31	63	0.04	23	0.11
Richter 1976		8	0.37	13	0.01	7	0.12	9	0.62	45	0.07	7	0.21
Rosen 1989		15	0.33	29	0.00	27	0.06	27	0.29	72	0.03	29	0.09
Rosenthal 1930		72	0.20	71	0.00	79	0.03	76	0.03	76	0.03	75	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		78	0.15	89	0.00	76	0.02	84	0.02	85	0.02	82	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		59	0.23	61	0.00	61	0.04	62	0.04	67	0.03	78	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		69	0.20	32	0.00	72	0.03	73	0.03	73	0.03	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		68	0.20	43	0.00	77	0.02	85	0.02	75	0.03	87	0.02
Rossi 2007		84	0.10	72	0.00	81	0.03	70	0.03	61	0.03	60	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		87	0.07	67	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	72	0.03	80	0.02
Rubinstein 1952		80	0.14	78	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	80	0.03	88	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		37	0.28	9	0.01	43	0.06	42	0.11	77	0.03	41	0.06
Schilhawsky 1960		57	0.24	28	0.00	41	0.06	43	0.11	80	0.03	42	0.06
Shebanova 2002		11	0.35	8	0.02	20	0.08	14	0.45	56	0.06	11	0.16
Smith 1975		63	0.21	68	0.00	68	0.04	59	0.04	82	0.03	62	0.03
Sokolov 2002		53	0.25	46	0.00	49	0.05	56	0.05	80	0.03	49	0.04
Sztompka 1959		24	0.31	14	0.01	10	0.08	11	0.50	62	0.04	15	0.14
Tomsic 1995		47	0.26	84	0.00	48	0.06	50	0.06	85	0.02	67	0.03
Uninsky 1932		6	0.38	21	0.00	12	0.10	6	0.64	57	0.05	9	0.18
Uninsky 1971		48	0.26	73	0.00	54	0.06	46	0.06	80	0.03	51	0.04
Wasowski 1980		67	0.21	47	0.00	59	0.03	68	0.03	73	0.04	58	0.03
Zak 1937		10	0.35	26	0.00	9	0.15	19	0.41	49	0.05	14	0.14
Zak 1951		23	0.31	54	0.00	13	0.10	22	0.34	82	0.03	24	0.10
Random 1		88	-0.05	81	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	36	0.13	47	0.05
Random 2		89	-0.07	64	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	61	0.04	72	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.12	79	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	85	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).