Anderszewski 2003

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		68	0.34	54	0.00	72	0.03	56	0.03	61	0.04	80	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ashkenazy 1981		5	0.59	11	0.04	5	0.18	5	0.56	17	0.44	7	0.50
Bacha 2000		61	0.36	31	0.00	71	0.03	74	0.03	32	0.26	40	0.09
Badura 1965		62	0.36	49	0.00	67	0.03	71	0.03	50	0.05	63	0.04
Barbosa 1983		78	0.29	81	0.00	60	0.03	70	0.03	73	0.04	77	0.03
Biret 1990		44	0.42	90	0.00	45	0.04	45	0.04	49	0.05	66	0.04
Blet 2003		35	0.43	72	0.00	40	0.08	35	0.20	60	0.05	36	0.10
Block 1995		31	0.45	44	0.00	37	0.07	32	0.23	32	0.20	29	0.21
Blumental 1952		59	0.36	26	0.00	22	0.09	40	0.19	26	0.24	30	0.21
Boshniakovich 1969		53	0.38	39	0.00	70	0.03	65	0.03	59	0.04	83	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		21	0.48	25	0.00	31	0.07	41	0.18	28	0.29	26	0.23
Bunin 1987		28	0.46	84	0.00	32	0.07	22	0.32	38	0.17	27	0.23
Bunin 1987b		26	0.46	61	0.00	27	0.06	21	0.32	37	0.18	25	0.24
Chiu 1999		80	0.27	82	0.00	82	0.02	83	0.02	84	0.03	87	0.02
Cohen 1997		74	0.30	21	0.01	50	0.03	60	0.03	32	0.22	49	0.08
Cortot 1951		45	0.41	36	0.00	48	0.03	58	0.03	43	0.10	58	0.05
Csalog 1996		86	0.17	45	0.00	83	0.03	75	0.03	45	0.08	57	0.05
Czerny 1949		49	0.40	63	0.00	25	0.06	34	0.21	34	0.24	28	0.22
Czerny 1990		30	0.45	65	0.00	39	0.08	28	0.24	45	0.07	31	0.13
Duchoud 2007		11	0.55	27	0.00	12	0.14	14	0.49	26	0.39	15	0.44
Ezaki 2006		18	0.49	50	0.00	30	0.06	25	0.28	49	0.05	32	0.12
Falvay 1989		60	0.36	73	0.00	43	0.04	43	0.11	67	0.04	52	0.07
Farrell 1958		47	0.40	88	0.00	64	0.03	77	0.03	48	0.04	71	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		22	0.48	10	0.04	20	0.10	20	0.34	10	0.48	17	0.40
Fliere 1977		39	0.43	56	0.00	62	0.02	80	0.02	75	0.04	68	0.03
Fou 1978		63	0.36	37	0.00	57	0.03	62	0.03	61	0.04	72	0.03
Francois 1956		58	0.36	13	0.02	33	0.07	36	0.19	66	0.03	50	0.08
Friedman 1923		84	0.18	85	0.00	86	0.02	89	0.02	61	0.05	85	0.03
Friedman 1923b		85	0.17	83	0.00	87	0.03	72	0.03	56	0.05	64	0.04
Friedman 1930		76	0.30	57	0.00	77	0.04	46	0.04	62	0.04	62	0.04
Garcia 2007		75	0.30	35	0.00	66	0.03	73	0.03	15	0.44	34	0.11
Garcia 2007b		81	0.25	34	0.00	80	0.03	78	0.03	29	0.26	47	0.09
Gierzod 1998		12	0.55	9	0.04	15	0.17	3	0.58	6	0.45	6	0.51
Gornostaeva 1994		17	0.49	16	0.01	29	0.06	27	0.25	65	0.04	38	0.10
Groot 1988		65	0.35	69	0.00	54	0.03	68	0.03	51	0.05	67	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		19	0.49	2	0.12	8	0.20	9	0.52	9	0.42	10	0.47
Hatto 1993		7	0.59	3	0.08	2	0.21	6	0.54	10	0.52	4	0.53
Hatto 1997		3	0.60	1	0.16	1	0.16	1	0.63	5	0.55	1	0.59
Horowitz 1949		70	0.33	55	0.00	75	0.03	59	0.03	77	0.03	74	0.03
Indjic 1988		10	0.56	48	0.00	3	0.16	7	0.53	8	0.50	5	0.51
Kapell 1951		9	0.57	4	0.07	9	0.16	4	0.57	9	0.52	3	0.54
Kissin 1993		67	0.34	43	0.00	61	0.03	76	0.03	69	0.04	76	0.03
Kushner 1989		13	0.52	32	0.00	21	0.09	23	0.31	48	0.05	33	0.12
Luisada 1991		4	0.60	29	0.00	7	0.16	8	0.52	9	0.46	8	0.49
Lushtak 2004		38	0.43	18	0.01	18	0.18	17	0.47	31	0.27	18	0.36
Malcuzynski 1961		24	0.47	89	0.00	36	0.06	30	0.24	61	0.04	35	0.10
Magaloff 1978		27	0.46	40	0.00	38	0.06	38	0.19	55	0.04	42	0.09
Magin 1975		1	0.62	5	0.07	4	0.26	11	0.51	13	0.40	14	0.45
Michalowski 1933		29	0.46	46	0.00	14	0.16	15	0.48	11	0.45	11	0.46
Milkina 1970		33	0.44	33	0.00	59	0.03	57	0.03	65	0.04	73	0.03
Mohovich 1999		20	0.48	23	0.01	19	0.10	19	0.35	27	0.27	21	0.31
Moravec 1969		55	0.37	15	0.01	44	0.05	44	0.10	48	0.05	51	0.07
Morozova 2008		23	0.47	52	0.00	23	0.11	33	0.22	54	0.04	45	0.09
Neighaus 1950		42	0.42	77	0.00	35	0.06	31	0.23	68	0.04	39	0.10
Niedzielski 1931		52	0.38	70	0.00	53	0.03	67	0.03	20	0.27	43	0.09
Ohlsson 1999		8	0.58	28	0.00	11	0.10	16	0.48	30	0.23	19	0.33
Osinska 1989		64	0.35	76	0.00	76	0.03	66	0.03	65	0.04	69	0.03
Pachmann 1927		87	0.12	42	0.00	81	0.02	88	0.02	64	0.04	75	0.03
Paderewski 1930		43	0.42	47	0.00	58	0.03	61	0.03	37	0.15	53	0.07
Perlemuter 1992		56	0.37	64	0.00	41	0.06	39	0.19	56	0.04	41	0.09
Pierdomenico 2008		79	0.27	58	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	72	0.03	88	0.02
Poblocka 1999		14	0.51	20	0.01	16	0.11	10	0.51	20	0.32	16	0.40
Rabcewiczowa 1932		48	0.40	59	0.00	63	0.02	81	0.02	43	0.13	56	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		69	0.33	78	0.00	69	0.03	52	0.03	69	0.04	70	0.03
Rangell 2001		46	0.40	17	0.01	52	0.04	48	0.04	62	0.04	65	0.04
Richter 1976		34	0.44	71	0.00	34	0.06	26	0.27	24	0.31	22	0.29
Rosen 1989		51	0.38	86	0.00	73	0.03	54	0.03	68	0.04	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		41	0.43	38	0.00	56	0.03	64	0.03	55	0.04	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		25	0.46	6	0.06	26	0.06	29	0.24	15	0.46	20	0.33
Rosenthal 1931b		36	0.43	14	0.01	28	0.06	37	0.19	15	0.45	23	0.29
Rosenthal 1931c		37	0.43	41	0.00	55	0.03	51	0.03	36	0.18	54	0.07
Rosenthal 1931d		57	0.37	79	0.00	46	0.04	47	0.04	28	0.19	46	0.09
Rossi 2007		83	0.18	74	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	63	0.03	86	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		71	0.32	24	0.00	51	0.03	55	0.03	32	0.24	48	0.08
Rubinstein 1952		82	0.22	66	0.00	78	0.03	79	0.03	74	0.03	84	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		32	0.44	19	0.01	49	0.03	63	0.03	63	0.05	61	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		16	0.50	7	0.05	10	0.14	18	0.46	12	0.49	9	0.47
Shebanova 2002		73	0.31	51	0.00	79	0.03	53	0.03	74	0.04	79	0.03
Smith 1975		2	0.61	8	0.05	6	0.16	2	0.60	6	0.51	2	0.55
Sokolov 2002		6	0.59	60	0.00	13	0.20	13	0.50	14	0.41	13	0.45
Sztompka 1959		50	0.40	67	0.00	47	0.03	50	0.03	54	0.06	60	0.04
Tomsic 1995		40	0.43	12	0.03	24	0.07	24	0.30	27	0.22	24	0.26
Uninsky 1932		66	0.34	75	0.00	65	0.02	84	0.02	52	0.05	78	0.03
Uninsky 1971		15	0.50	22	0.01	17	0.13	12	0.51	20	0.42	12	0.46
Wasowski 1980		54	0.38	62	0.00	68	0.03	69	0.03	43	0.13	55	0.06
Zak 1937		77	0.30	68	0.00	74	0.04	49	0.04	65	0.04	59	0.04
Zak 1951		72	0.32	53	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.12	46	0.07	44	0.09
Random 1		90	-0.06	80	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	72	0.03	90	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.01	87	0.00	89	0.02	87	0.02	69	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		88	0.11	30	0.00	88	0.02	82	0.02	6	0.47	37	0.10

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).