Hatto 1993

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		71	0.25	21	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	42	0.10	41	0.09
Anderszewski 2003		4	0.59	32	0.00	4	0.28	10	0.52	6	0.54	6	0.53
Ashkenazy 1981		3	0.66	11	0.00	3	0.45	3	0.82	1	0.67	3	0.74
Bacha 2000		17	0.43	6	0.00	27	0.06	36	0.18	15	0.47	18	0.29
Badura 1965		78	0.22	45	0.00	65	0.04	62	0.04	72	0.04	72	0.04
Barbosa 1983		37	0.36	12	0.00	14	0.09	19	0.32	32	0.33	16	0.32
Biret 1990		21	0.39	2	0.00	26	0.06	24	0.29	39	0.16	27	0.22
Blet 2003		9	0.47	18	0.00	11	0.11	13	0.41	21	0.36	12	0.38
Block 1995		86	0.15	59	0.00	77	0.03	83	0.03	80	0.03	79	0.03
Blumental 1952		18	0.43	46	0.00	21	0.10	29	0.24	17	0.35	20	0.29
Boshniakovich 1969		73	0.25	47	0.00	70	0.04	70	0.04	75	0.03	80	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		68	0.27	22	0.00	69	0.03	71	0.03	64	0.04	77	0.03
Bunin 1987		24	0.39	33	0.00	34	0.06	23	0.29	41	0.14	31	0.20
Bunin 1987b		22	0.39	60	0.00	33	0.05	22	0.29	42	0.14	29	0.20
Chiu 1999		16	0.43	7	0.00	16	0.12	16	0.36	28	0.37	13	0.36
Cohen 1997		64	0.28	61	0.00	71	0.03	79	0.03	40	0.13	55	0.06
Cortot 1951		75	0.25	26	0.00	76	0.03	75	0.03	76	0.03	82	0.03
Csalog 1996		74	0.25	62	0.00	55	0.04	63	0.04	34	0.26	37	0.10
Czerny 1949		84	0.18	48	0.00	74	0.04	69	0.04	62	0.04	69	0.04
Czerny 1990		33	0.36	34	0.00	22	0.07	18	0.33	39	0.14	28	0.21
Duchoud 2007		8	0.55	13	0.00	6	0.19	7	0.53	6	0.51	7	0.52
Ezaki 2006		39	0.35	35	0.00	32	0.05	28	0.25	53	0.05	35	0.11
Falvay 1989		46	0.33	49	0.00	53	0.05	48	0.05	48	0.05	57	0.05
Farrell 1958		60	0.28	63	0.00	80	0.03	87	0.03	88	0.02	87	0.02
Ferenczy 1958		69	0.26	64	0.00	58	0.04	58	0.04	36	0.16	48	0.08
Fliere 1977		15	0.44	14	0.00	20	0.08	17	0.35	36	0.15	23	0.23
Fou 1978		32	0.37	65	0.00	51	0.04	68	0.04	74	0.04	64	0.04
Francois 1956		85	0.17	66	0.00	72	0.03	84	0.03	57	0.04	85	0.03
Friedman 1923		67	0.27	50	0.00	79	0.03	78	0.03	47	0.07	61	0.05
Friedman 1923b		66	0.27	36	0.00	78	0.03	86	0.03	58	0.05	73	0.04
Friedman 1930		48	0.33	23	0.00	37	0.06	39	0.15	57	0.04	47	0.08
Garcia 2007		63	0.28	51	0.00	68	0.03	72	0.03	51	0.06	70	0.04
Garcia 2007b		42	0.34	67	0.00	31	0.05	31	0.22	7	0.51	14	0.33
Gierzod 1998		23	0.39	24	0.00	28	0.07	27	0.27	30	0.19	24	0.23
Gornostaeva 1994		80	0.22	68	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	83	0.02	89	0.02
Groot 1988		51	0.31	52	0.00	54	0.05	54	0.05	66	0.03	74	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		49	0.33	27	0.00	29	0.07	25	0.28	67	0.03	43	0.09
Hatto 1993		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Hatto 1997		2	0.91	3	0.00	2	0.89	2	0.95	2	0.93	2	0.94
Horowitz 1949		41	0.34	37	0.00	52	0.05	52	0.05	65	0.04	68	0.04
Indjic 1988		1	0.98	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	0.99	1	0.99	1	0.99
Kapell 1951		11	0.47	38	0.00	12	0.12	8	0.53	26	0.40	9	0.46
Kissin 1993		54	0.31	39	0.00	45	0.04	57	0.04	41	0.18	46	0.08
Kushner 1989		29	0.38	28	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.13	49	0.05	44	0.08
Luisada 1991		5	0.57	25	0.00	5	0.26	4	0.68	3	0.63	4	0.65
Lushtak 2004		25	0.39	69	0.00	39	0.06	37	0.17	68	0.04	49	0.08
Malcuzynski 1961		36	0.36	15	0.00	46	0.04	66	0.04	49	0.05	66	0.04
Magaloff 1978		58	0.30	70	0.00	62	0.05	51	0.05	58	0.04	62	0.04
Magin 1975		7	0.56	40	0.00	8	0.32	6	0.54	4	0.58	5	0.56
Michalowski 1933		30	0.38	71	0.00	15	0.10	12	0.41	12	0.42	11	0.41
Milkina 1970		28	0.38	53	0.00	47	0.04	65	0.04	53	0.05	65	0.04
Mohovich 1999		57	0.30	41	0.00	61	0.05	50	0.05	38	0.15	42	0.09
Moravec 1969		56	0.30	72	0.00	43	0.04	42	0.11	35	0.13	34	0.12
Morozova 2008		13	0.44	16	0.00	10	0.12	15	0.36	34	0.14	26	0.22
Neighaus 1950		20	0.42	73	0.00	30	0.05	35	0.18	65	0.04	50	0.08
Niedzielski 1931		62	0.28	74	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.14	22	0.24	33	0.18
Ohlsson 1999		6	0.57	8	0.00	7	0.26	5	0.56	9	0.47	8	0.51
Osinska 1989		81	0.21	29	0.00	73	0.03	80	0.03	72	0.04	76	0.03
Pachmann 1927		76	0.24	54	0.00	66	0.05	55	0.05	43	0.10	52	0.07
Paderewski 1930		53	0.31	75	0.00	60	0.04	64	0.04	33	0.18	45	0.08
Perlemuter 1992		79	0.22	9	0.00	75	0.03	85	0.03	79	0.03	75	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		55	0.30	76	0.00	42	0.05	43	0.09	49	0.05	51	0.07
Poblocka 1999		26	0.39	55	0.00	17	0.08	11	0.42	31	0.22	17	0.30
Rabcewiczowa 1932		83	0.18	77	0.00	83	0.03	73	0.03	83	0.02	86	0.02
Rachmaninoff 1923		65	0.27	78	0.00	57	0.05	49	0.05	73	0.03	63	0.04
Rangell 2001		59	0.29	79	0.00	67	0.06	46	0.06	40	0.17	39	0.10
Richter 1976		31	0.38	42	0.00	35	0.05	32	0.20	32	0.20	30	0.20
Rosen 1989		47	0.33	80	0.00	64	0.07	45	0.07	54	0.04	60	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		50	0.31	4	0.00	59	0.05	53	0.05	53	0.04	71	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		70	0.25	81	0.00	85	0.03	74	0.03	73	0.03	78	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		72	0.25	56	0.00	86	0.04	61	0.04	70	0.03	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		61	0.28	82	0.00	81	0.03	76	0.03	70	0.03	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		82	0.19	19	0.00	84	0.03	77	0.03	72	0.03	81	0.03
Rossi 2007		90	-0.13	83	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	89	0.01	90	0.01
Rubinstein 1939		19	0.43	17	0.00	23	0.07	30	0.24	12	0.43	15	0.32
Rubinstein 1952		77	0.23	84	0.00	63	0.05	47	0.05	50	0.07	56	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		14	0.44	20	0.00	38	0.05	38	0.16	29	0.30	25	0.22
Schilhawsky 1960		45	0.33	57	0.00	25	0.06	34	0.19	37	0.20	32	0.19
Shebanova 2002		10	0.47	85	0.00	9	0.18	9	0.53	19	0.40	10	0.46
Smith 1975		38	0.36	10	0.00	19	0.07	26	0.27	67	0.04	36	0.10
Sokolov 2002		12	0.45	86	0.00	13	0.12	21	0.31	38	0.21	22	0.26
Sztompka 1959		44	0.33	58	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	47	0.06	59	0.05
Tomsic 1995		35	0.36	5	0.00	48	0.04	67	0.04	50	0.05	67	0.04
Uninsky 1932		40	0.35	43	0.00	36	0.05	33	0.20	72	0.04	40	0.09
Uninsky 1971		34	0.36	44	0.00	24	0.06	14	0.39	40	0.21	19	0.29
Wasowski 1980		27	0.38	30	0.00	18	0.08	20	0.32	31	0.23	21	0.27
Zak 1937		43	0.34	31	0.00	50	0.04	60	0.04	43	0.08	54	0.06
Zak 1951		52	0.31	87	0.00	49	0.05	56	0.05	48	0.06	58	0.05
Random 1		89	0.00	88	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	52	0.04	88	0.02
Random 2		88	0.05	89	0.00	87	0.03	82	0.03	13	0.35	38	0.10
Random 3		87	0.09	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	28	0.27	53	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).