Rubinstein 1966

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		8	0.58	47	0.00	17	0.09	19	0.41	30	0.17	22	0.26
Anderszewski 2003		51	0.44	14	0.01	53	0.05	63	0.05	63	0.03	67	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		43	0.47	50	0.00	34	0.05	37	0.20	60	0.04	44	0.09
Bacha 2000		27	0.51	37	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.10	24	0.40	26	0.20
Badura 1965		56	0.42	40	0.00	21	0.11	22	0.39	11	0.45	11	0.42
Barbosa 1983		20	0.54	3	0.05	5	0.20	6	0.55	5	0.56	5	0.55
Biret 1990		42	0.48	70	0.00	51	0.05	64	0.05	68	0.04	71	0.04
Blet 2003		23	0.53	60	0.00	28	0.06	27	0.32	45	0.07	31	0.15
Block 1995		60	0.41	55	0.00	50	0.05	66	0.05	62	0.04	69	0.04
Blumental 1952		73	0.36	20	0.00	68	0.05	60	0.05	69	0.04	70	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		40	0.48	31	0.00	12	0.09	16	0.42	24	0.38	14	0.40
Brailowsky 1960		41	0.48	9	0.01	45	0.04	68	0.04	40	0.11	45	0.07
Bunin 1987		66	0.39	87	0.00	74	0.03	79	0.03	71	0.04	83	0.03
Bunin 1987b		64	0.39	88	0.00	73	0.04	75	0.04	68	0.03	78	0.03
Chiu 1999		61	0.41	58	0.00	39	0.08	36	0.21	48	0.05	39	0.10
Cohen 1997		75	0.35	44	0.00	35	0.06	39	0.14	30	0.26	29	0.19
Cortot 1951		69	0.38	66	0.00	77	0.03	83	0.03	71	0.03	84	0.03
Csalog 1996		24	0.53	18	0.01	36	0.09	31	0.29	17	0.47	16	0.37
Czerny 1949		58	0.42	56	0.00	55	0.06	54	0.06	54	0.05	56	0.05
Czerny 1990		32	0.50	48	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.10	64	0.04	51	0.06
Duchoud 2007		36	0.49	45	0.00	62	0.07	45	0.07	64	0.04	58	0.05
Ezaki 2006		22	0.54	52	0.00	29	0.08	26	0.32	40	0.11	28	0.19
Falvay 1989		10	0.56	34	0.00	18	0.08	15	0.43	35	0.17	20	0.27
Farrell 1958		39	0.48	21	0.00	46	0.04	69	0.04	42	0.13	47	0.07
Ferenczy 1958		37	0.49	19	0.01	59	0.06	57	0.06	38	0.14	43	0.09
Fliere 1977		15	0.55	82	0.00	20	0.14	20	0.41	56	0.05	32	0.14
Fou 1978		4	0.65	1	0.46	1	0.46	2	0.68	2	0.61	3	0.64
Francois 1956		30	0.50	38	0.00	30	0.06	34	0.25	50	0.05	38	0.11
Friedman 1923		85	0.03	83	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	87	0.02	89	0.02
Friedman 1923b		86	0.03	86	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	85	0.02	87	0.02
Friedman 1930		84	0.09	71	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	80	0.03	85	0.02
Garcia 2007		81	0.28	8	0.01	76	0.03	77	0.03	42	0.11	50	0.06
Garcia 2007b		83	0.09	79	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	78	0.02	88	0.02
Gierzod 1998		48	0.45	80	0.00	57	0.06	48	0.06	64	0.04	57	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		21	0.54	28	0.00	19	0.09	7	0.51	30	0.24	18	0.35
Groot 1988		7	0.59	75	0.00	14	0.08	11	0.46	38	0.19	19	0.30
Harasiewicz 1955		76	0.34	42	0.00	26	0.07	28	0.31	56	0.04	37	0.11
Hatto 1993		52	0.44	15	0.01	31	0.07	29	0.30	38	0.16	25	0.22
Hatto 1997		34	0.50	7	0.01	24	0.07	23	0.37	31	0.20	21	0.27
Horowitz 1949		63	0.41	84	0.00	47	0.05	59	0.05	40	0.09	48	0.07
Indjic 1988		50	0.45	25	0.00	32	0.10	32	0.28	39	0.15	27	0.20
Kapell 1951		38	0.48	51	0.00	64	0.06	55	0.06	81	0.03	64	0.04
Kissin 1993		9	0.57	11	0.01	10	0.13	8	0.50	21	0.35	9	0.42
Kushner 1989		16	0.55	49	0.00	22	0.09	21	0.40	41	0.13	24	0.23
Luisada 1991		14	0.55	10	0.01	9	0.14	9	0.50	25	0.33	12	0.41
Lushtak 2004		35	0.49	53	0.00	25	0.07	25	0.33	56	0.05	34	0.13
Malcuzynski 1961		25	0.53	26	0.00	56	0.07	46	0.07	69	0.04	54	0.05
Magaloff 1978		45	0.47	41	0.00	58	0.06	49	0.06	67	0.03	63	0.04
Magin 1975		71	0.36	57	0.00	69	0.04	73	0.04	74	0.03	77	0.03
Michalowski 1933		82	0.16	78	0.00	82	0.05	58	0.05	64	0.04	66	0.04
Milkina 1970		3	0.66	5	0.02	4	0.25	4	0.64	3	0.59	4	0.61
Mohovich 1999		2	0.68	2	0.23	3	0.39	1	0.75	2	0.67	1	0.71
Moravec 1969		28	0.51	36	0.00	54	0.05	65	0.05	65	0.04	61	0.04
Morozova 2008		33	0.50	46	0.00	23	0.10	24	0.34	60	0.04	35	0.12
Neighaus 1950		26	0.52	29	0.00	27	0.06	30	0.30	49	0.07	33	0.14
Niedzielski 1931		77	0.33	72	0.00	80	0.04	72	0.04	82	0.02	76	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		29	0.51	62	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	70	0.04	49	0.06
Osinska 1989		18	0.55	35	0.00	8	0.17	14	0.44	11	0.47	7	0.45
Pachmann 1927		47	0.46	76	0.00	37	0.06	38	0.19	24	0.34	23	0.25
Paderewski 1930		46	0.47	63	0.00	60	0.06	47	0.06	52	0.05	55	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		55	0.43	67	0.00	48	0.06	56	0.06	65	0.04	52	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		70	0.38	43	0.00	61	0.06	52	0.06	57	0.04	53	0.05
Poblocka 1999		17	0.55	33	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.13	68	0.04	46	0.07
Rabcewiczowa 1932		49	0.45	61	0.00	40	0.05	41	0.13	32	0.23	30	0.17
Rachmaninoff 1923		80	0.29	27	0.00	79	0.03	78	0.03	74	0.03	75	0.03
Rangell 2001		12	0.56	16	0.01	11	0.14	13	0.45	15	0.38	13	0.41
Richter 1976		57	0.42	39	0.00	71	0.04	70	0.04	75	0.03	79	0.03
Rosen 1989		31	0.50	64	0.00	33	0.05	33	0.28	51	0.04	36	0.11
Rosenthal 1930		67	0.39	23	0.00	75	0.03	80	0.03	74	0.03	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		68	0.39	22	0.00	52	0.05	62	0.05	29	0.22	41	0.10
Rosenthal 1931b		74	0.35	65	0.00	66	0.06	50	0.06	46	0.05	60	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		54	0.43	77	0.00	65	0.06	51	0.06	65	0.03	72	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		72	0.36	73	0.00	67	0.06	53	0.06	48	0.05	59	0.05
Rossi 2007		87	0.02	81	0.00	85	0.03	81	0.03	56	0.03	74	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		6	0.60	13	0.01	7	0.16	10	0.49	3	0.58	6	0.53
Rubinstein 1952		1	0.68	4	0.04	2	0.30	3	0.67	1	0.63	2	0.65
Rubinstein 1966		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Schilhawsky 1960		78	0.33	59	0.00	78	0.03	85	0.03	68	0.03	81	0.03
Shebanova 2002		11	0.56	74	0.00	13	0.09	12	0.45	21	0.39	10	0.42
Smith 1975		44	0.47	30	0.00	38	0.06	35	0.24	76	0.04	40	0.10
Sokolov 2002		65	0.39	54	0.00	81	0.04	76	0.04	76	0.03	73	0.03
Sztompka 1959		53	0.44	69	0.00	63	0.05	61	0.05	65	0.04	65	0.04
Tomsic 1995		5	0.62	6	0.02	6	0.18	5	0.61	18	0.31	8	0.43
Uninsky 1932		79	0.33	68	0.00	72	0.03	82	0.03	66	0.05	68	0.04
Uninsky 1971		59	0.42	24	0.00	70	0.04	71	0.04	76	0.03	80	0.03
Wasowski 1980		62	0.41	85	0.00	49	0.04	67	0.04	60	0.05	62	0.04
Zak 1937		13	0.56	17	0.01	16	0.12	17	0.42	28	0.32	15	0.37
Zak 1951		19	0.54	12	0.01	15	0.08	18	0.41	29	0.30	17	0.35
Random 1		90	-0.07	89	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	73	0.03	86	0.02
Random 2		88	0.00	32	0.00	86	0.04	74	0.04	25	0.23	42	0.10
Random 3		89	-0.04	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	81	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).