Rachmaninoff 1923

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		14	0.52	25	0.00	24	0.08	26	0.28	28	0.18	31	0.22
Anderszewski 2003		68	0.33	75	0.00	64	0.04	69	0.04	52	0.03	79	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		38	0.42	17	0.01	26	0.08	24	0.30	55	0.05	42	0.12
Bacha 2000		86	0.12	33	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	86	0.02	84	0.02
Badura 1965		50	0.40	71	0.00	53	0.04	62	0.04	41	0.14	49	0.07
Barbosa 1983		41	0.41	35	0.00	62	0.04	71	0.04	76	0.04	67	0.04
Biret 1990		39	0.42	37	0.00	46	0.05	48	0.05	55	0.04	72	0.04
Blet 2003		24	0.47	39	0.00	39	0.07	37	0.15	43	0.10	41	0.12
Block 1995		56	0.38	60	0.00	54	0.04	65	0.04	45	0.05	69	0.04
Blumental 1952		81	0.24	40	0.00	69	0.03	81	0.03	46	0.06	70	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		62	0.35	55	0.00	72	0.04	64	0.04	69	0.03	82	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		53	0.39	50	0.00	71	0.03	75	0.03	69	0.04	75	0.03
Bunin 1987		2	0.63	6	0.06	4	0.24	6	0.54	4	0.57	8	0.55
Bunin 1987b		1	0.63	3	0.16	3	0.19	5	0.55	4	0.57	7	0.56
Chiu 1999		37	0.43	8	0.03	12	0.09	20	0.38	20	0.44	14	0.41
Cohen 1997		87	0.00	53	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	86	0.02	90	0.01
Cortot 1951		63	0.35	76	0.00	67	0.04	70	0.04	41	0.14	51	0.07
Csalog 1996		85	0.16	48	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	79	0.02	85	0.02
Czerny 1949		15	0.52	51	0.00	21	0.07	22	0.35	25	0.37	16	0.36
Czerny 1990		3	0.61	2	0.18	2	0.24	2	0.68	4	0.61	2	0.64
Duchoud 2007		9	0.55	23	0.00	19	0.11	13	0.45	25	0.40	13	0.42
Ezaki 2006		18	0.50	61	0.00	17	0.10	25	0.28	38	0.11	34	0.18
Falvay 1989		45	0.41	56	0.00	56	0.05	51	0.05	45	0.07	52	0.06
Farrell 1958		28	0.46	16	0.01	33	0.04	31	0.20	5	0.52	21	0.32
Ferenczy 1958		80	0.26	47	0.00	82	0.04	59	0.04	59	0.04	68	0.04
Fliere 1977		10	0.55	38	0.00	13	0.10	11	0.48	31	0.23	18	0.33
Fou 1978		55	0.39	27	0.00	60	0.04	56	0.04	62	0.04	64	0.04
Francois 1956		11	0.55	52	0.00	22	0.08	23	0.34	22	0.33	20	0.33
Friedman 1923		49	0.40	10	0.02	16	0.11	16	0.39	4	0.63	10	0.50
Friedman 1923b		44	0.41	24	0.00	15	0.09	15	0.42	4	0.67	9	0.53
Friedman 1930		29	0.46	26	0.00	8	0.11	7	0.52	3	0.62	5	0.57
Garcia 2007		78	0.27	67	0.00	70	0.03	78	0.03	38	0.14	55	0.06
Garcia 2007b		84	0.21	82	0.00	76	0.03	80	0.03	48	0.05	74	0.04
Gierzod 1998		76	0.27	68	0.00	68	0.03	83	0.03	74	0.03	81	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		22	0.48	31	0.00	28	0.09	29	0.26	38	0.17	32	0.21
Groot 1988		13	0.53	18	0.01	23	0.11	18	0.39	28	0.29	17	0.34
Harasiewicz 1955		21	0.48	36	0.00	20	0.11	19	0.39	28	0.24	22	0.31
Hatto 1993		75	0.27	62	0.00	63	0.03	73	0.03	49	0.05	73	0.04
Hatto 1997		66	0.33	57	0.00	51	0.06	45	0.06	35	0.13	47	0.09
Horowitz 1949		5	0.60	1	0.23	1	0.23	1	0.77	1	0.72	1	0.74
Indjic 1988		71	0.30	21	0.00	59	0.04	60	0.04	44	0.09	54	0.06
Kapell 1951		27	0.47	28	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.09	38	0.15	40	0.12
Kissin 1993		60	0.36	45	0.00	61	0.04	58	0.04	58	0.05	66	0.04
Kushner 1989		30	0.46	69	0.00	37	0.06	35	0.18	46	0.06	44	0.10
Luisada 1991		33	0.45	63	0.00	45	0.05	47	0.05	47	0.06	56	0.05
Lushtak 2004		48	0.40	72	0.00	41	0.05	42	0.11	52	0.05	50	0.07
Malcuzynski 1961		12	0.53	19	0.00	18	0.09	14	0.43	33	0.25	19	0.33
Magaloff 1978		25	0.47	64	0.00	25	0.08	21	0.36	41	0.13	29	0.22
Magin 1975		47	0.41	77	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.10	34	0.19	37	0.14
Michalowski 1933		70	0.31	83	0.00	52	0.05	49	0.05	58	0.05	58	0.05
Milkina 1970		65	0.34	87	0.00	75	0.04	57	0.04	62	0.04	65	0.04
Mohovich 1999		42	0.41	58	0.00	50	0.04	54	0.04	57	0.05	71	0.04
Moravec 1969		19	0.50	7	0.03	11	0.08	17	0.39	16	0.38	15	0.38
Morozova 2008		4	0.60	4	0.07	5	0.30	3	0.63	1	0.57	3	0.60
Neighaus 1950		20	0.49	12	0.01	14	0.09	12	0.47	35	0.19	23	0.30
Niedzielski 1931		32	0.45	29	0.00	40	0.05	40	0.12	7	0.46	28	0.23
Ohlsson 1999		23	0.48	11	0.02	38	0.06	33	0.19	51	0.05	45	0.10
Osinska 1989		67	0.33	78	0.00	74	0.04	61	0.04	73	0.04	60	0.04
Pachmann 1927		74	0.28	84	0.00	78	0.04	66	0.04	70	0.03	78	0.03
Paderewski 1930		72	0.29	59	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	67	0.03	77	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		16	0.52	9	0.03	7	0.13	10	0.49	15	0.47	11	0.48
Pierdomenico 2008		64	0.35	43	0.00	66	0.04	68	0.04	43	0.10	53	0.06
Poblocka 1999		57	0.37	73	0.00	58	0.04	67	0.04	55	0.05	61	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		54	0.39	79	0.00	65	0.03	77	0.03	46	0.06	63	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rangell 2001		69	0.32	49	0.00	77	0.04	72	0.04	70	0.03	83	0.03
Richter 1976		46	0.41	70	0.00	55	0.04	63	0.04	39	0.15	48	0.08
Rosen 1989		52	0.40	54	0.00	27	0.07	39	0.14	44	0.09	43	0.11
Rosenthal 1930		8	0.55	15	0.01	10	0.10	9	0.51	5	0.67	4	0.58
Rosenthal 1931		61	0.36	34	0.00	48	0.05	46	0.05	21	0.36	38	0.13
Rosenthal 1931b		58	0.37	44	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.11	16	0.42	33	0.21
Rosenthal 1931c		40	0.42	20	0.00	34	0.04	36	0.17	20	0.37	26	0.25
Rosenthal 1931d		51	0.40	46	0.00	47	0.04	55	0.04	11	0.40	39	0.13
Rossi 2007		79	0.26	80	0.00	73	0.03	76	0.03	24	0.27	46	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		82	0.24	22	0.00	83	0.03	79	0.03	67	0.04	76	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		83	0.22	66	0.00	86	0.03	84	0.03	83	0.02	88	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		73	0.29	41	0.00	81	0.03	74	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		34	0.45	85	0.00	36	0.06	30	0.22	22	0.36	25	0.28
Shebanova 2002		77	0.27	32	0.00	79	0.05	50	0.05	68	0.05	59	0.05
Smith 1975		43	0.41	65	0.00	49	0.05	53	0.05	70	0.04	62	0.04
Sokolov 2002		7	0.56	30	0.00	9	0.09	8	0.52	13	0.41	12	0.46
Sztompka 1959		26	0.47	13	0.01	30	0.06	27	0.27	30	0.29	24	0.28
Tomsic 1995		59	0.36	42	0.00	57	0.05	52	0.05	45	0.05	57	0.05
Uninsky 1932		6	0.57	5	0.07	6	0.16	4	0.61	4	0.53	6	0.57
Uninsky 1971		36	0.44	81	0.00	32	0.05	38	0.14	41	0.18	36	0.16
Wasowski 1980		17	0.50	14	0.01	31	0.06	34	0.18	22	0.33	27	0.24
Zak 1937		35	0.45	88	0.00	35	0.05	32	0.20	39	0.16	35	0.18
Zak 1951		31	0.46	89	0.00	29	0.06	28	0.27	41	0.18	30	0.22
Random 1		89	-0.05	86	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	62	0.03	87	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.01	90	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	64	0.03	86	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.07	74	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	84	0.02	89	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).