Friedman 1930

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		67	0.23	84	0.00	51	0.03	73	0.03	85	0.02	84	0.02
Anderszewski 2003		47	0.30	69	0.00	56	0.04	62	0.04	46	0.04	62	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		8	0.46	9	0.01	16	0.10	10	0.52	40	0.13	15	0.26
Bacha 2000		83	0.09	76	0.00	82	0.02	85	0.02	82	0.03	81	0.02
Badura 1965		32	0.36	25	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.10	53	0.05	51	0.07
Barbosa 1983		58	0.25	60	0.00	62	0.05	54	0.05	54	0.05	56	0.05
Biret 1990		53	0.28	70	0.00	49	0.04	66	0.04	57	0.04	65	0.04
Blet 2003		26	0.38	29	0.00	22	0.07	21	0.40	38	0.16	16	0.25
Block 1995		59	0.25	51	0.00	60	0.04	65	0.04	82	0.03	78	0.03
Blumental 1952		54	0.27	19	0.00	35	0.07	35	0.24	30	0.21	21	0.22
Boshniakovich 1969		45	0.31	77	0.00	55	0.04	63	0.04	85	0.02	79	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		81	0.10	57	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	87	0.02	82	0.02
Bunin 1987		11	0.44	12	0.01	6	0.13	5	0.57	15	0.43	9	0.50
Bunin 1987b		10	0.44	42	0.00	7	0.22	4	0.57	15	0.43	7	0.50
Chiu 1999		31	0.37	16	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	47	0.06	48	0.07
Cohen 1997		80	0.10	52	0.00	85	0.02	82	0.02	82	0.02	85	0.02
Cortot 1951		39	0.33	63	0.00	36	0.10	32	0.28	39	0.15	23	0.20
Csalog 1996		86	0.03	43	0.00	86	0.01	88	0.01	83	0.02	89	0.01
Czerny 1949		27	0.37	36	0.00	31	0.08	24	0.38	38	0.15	19	0.24
Czerny 1990		18	0.40	26	0.00	17	0.09	18	0.47	41	0.13	18	0.25
Duchoud 2007		16	0.41	71	0.00	19	0.08	16	0.48	34	0.25	13	0.35
Ezaki 2006		28	0.37	78	0.00	34	0.10	29	0.30	64	0.04	31	0.11
Falvay 1989		78	0.14	85	0.00	79	0.04	56	0.04	77	0.03	68	0.03
Farrell 1958		60	0.25	86	0.00	57	0.04	68	0.04	58	0.04	59	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		79	0.13	87	0.00	70	0.03	75	0.03	72	0.03	76	0.03
Fliere 1977		7	0.46	8	0.01	14	0.08	15	0.48	44	0.10	20	0.22
Fou 1978		74	0.17	23	0.00	77	0.05	55	0.05	78	0.03	60	0.04
Francois 1956		43	0.32	53	0.00	30	0.06	31	0.28	63	0.03	41	0.09
Friedman 1923		1	0.68	1	0.43	1	0.42	1	0.78	2	0.83	2	0.80
Friedman 1923b		2	0.68	2	0.25	2	0.65	2	0.78	2	0.82	1	0.80
Friedman 1930		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Garcia 2007		63	0.24	58	0.00	66	0.06	46	0.06	39	0.13	39	0.09
Garcia 2007b		55	0.27	73	0.00	65	0.04	58	0.04	27	0.26	37	0.10
Gierzod 1998		30	0.37	54	0.00	27	0.08	25	0.37	51	0.05	27	0.14
Gornostaeva 1994		33	0.36	4	0.04	13	0.08	30	0.29	51	0.04	35	0.11
Groot 1988		48	0.30	48	0.00	28	0.07	37	0.20	64	0.04	40	0.09
Harasiewicz 1955		21	0.40	15	0.01	39	0.10	36	0.21	72	0.03	46	0.08
Hatto 1993		36	0.33	10	0.01	47	0.04	57	0.04	39	0.15	45	0.08
Hatto 1997		44	0.31	49	0.00	46	0.05	50	0.05	44	0.09	49	0.07
Horowitz 1949		38	0.33	18	0.00	50	0.03	70	0.03	53	0.05	61	0.04
Indjic 1988		42	0.32	74	0.00	48	0.07	45	0.07	36	0.17	33	0.11
Kapell 1951		13	0.43	14	0.01	10	0.13	12	0.52	27	0.39	11	0.45
Kissin 1993		75	0.16	46	0.00	74	0.04	61	0.04	80	0.03	74	0.03
Kushner 1989		40	0.32	79	0.00	54	0.03	78	0.03	67	0.04	69	0.03
Luisada 1991		62	0.24	64	0.00	67	0.04	60	0.04	82	0.03	66	0.03
Lushtak 2004		25	0.39	65	0.00	23	0.07	22	0.40	61	0.04	29	0.13
Malcuzynski 1961		19	0.40	44	0.00	21	0.08	19	0.45	65	0.04	28	0.13
Magaloff 1978		24	0.39	3	0.08	8	0.14	17	0.47	39	0.15	14	0.27
Magin 1975		52	0.28	21	0.00	64	0.05	52	0.05	65	0.04	58	0.04
Michalowski 1933		4	0.49	17	0.00	12	0.10	9	0.52	16	0.42	10	0.47
Milkina 1970		87	0.00	88	0.00	87	0.01	87	0.01	88	0.02	88	0.01
Mohovich 1999		66	0.23	89	0.00	61	0.05	51	0.05	80	0.03	63	0.04
Moravec 1969		64	0.24	50	0.00	41	0.05	41	0.12	53	0.05	42	0.08
Morozova 2008		23	0.39	31	0.00	33	0.06	27	0.32	59	0.04	34	0.11
Neighaus 1950		9	0.45	40	0.00	18	0.07	13	0.50	60	0.05	24	0.16
Niedzielski 1931		70	0.21	45	0.00	40	0.05	40	0.13	47	0.06	38	0.09
Ohlsson 1999		20	0.40	30	0.00	15	0.09	26	0.32	60	0.04	32	0.11
Osinska 1989		51	0.29	47	0.00	59	0.04	67	0.04	82	0.03	67	0.03
Pachmann 1927		77	0.16	20	0.00	78	0.06	47	0.06	67	0.04	55	0.05
Paderewski 1930		14	0.42	6	0.02	9	0.11	8	0.54	10	0.50	5	0.52
Perlemuter 1992		50	0.29	80	0.00	42	0.04	42	0.10	64	0.04	52	0.06
Pierdomenico 2008		37	0.33	39	0.00	58	0.04	69	0.04	58	0.04	57	0.04
Poblocka 1999		41	0.32	61	0.00	38	0.09	33	0.27	69	0.04	36	0.10
Rabcewiczowa 1932		34	0.35	34	0.00	45	0.05	53	0.05	50	0.05	54	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		6	0.46	11	0.01	4	0.19	3	0.62	7	0.52	3	0.57
Rangell 2001		68	0.22	81	0.00	75	0.04	59	0.04	64	0.04	64	0.04
Richter 1976		56	0.26	13	0.01	52	0.03	77	0.03	67	0.03	73	0.03
Rosen 1989		17	0.41	66	0.00	24	0.08	23	0.39	39	0.16	17	0.25
Rosenthal 1930		15	0.42	35	0.00	20	0.09	11	0.52	15	0.52	6	0.52
Rosenthal 1931		72	0.18	55	0.00	69	0.04	64	0.04	69	0.03	75	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		69	0.22	72	0.00	63	0.05	49	0.05	43	0.13	47	0.08
Rosenthal 1931c		35	0.35	32	0.00	37	0.08	38	0.20	35	0.22	22	0.21
Rosenthal 1931d		76	0.16	67	0.00	68	0.03	79	0.03	65	0.04	80	0.03
Rossi 2007		71	0.20	82	0.00	76	0.05	48	0.05	43	0.08	53	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		89	-0.05	68	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	86	0.02	87	0.01
Rubinstein 1952		88	-0.01	37	0.00	88	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		82	0.09	27	0.00	80	0.03	80	0.03	86	0.02	83	0.02
Schilhawsky 1960		5	0.47	33	0.00	11	0.10	14	0.49	16	0.41	12	0.45
Shebanova 2002		57	0.26	24	0.00	53	0.03	74	0.03	72	0.04	77	0.03
Smith 1975		22	0.40	22	0.00	26	0.09	20	0.43	47	0.05	25	0.15
Sokolov 2002		29	0.37	75	0.00	32	0.06	34	0.27	56	0.05	30	0.12
Sztompka 1959		3	0.49	28	0.00	5	0.22	7	0.56	15	0.44	8	0.50
Tomsic 1995		73	0.18	62	0.00	71	0.03	72	0.03	71	0.04	72	0.03
Uninsky 1932		12	0.44	5	0.03	3	0.21	6	0.56	6	0.50	4	0.53
Uninsky 1971		49	0.30	41	0.00	25	0.07	28	0.31	49	0.06	26	0.14
Wasowski 1980		46	0.31	7	0.02	29	0.06	39	0.17	67	0.04	43	0.08
Zak 1937		65	0.23	56	0.00	73	0.03	76	0.03	83	0.03	70	0.03
Zak 1951		61	0.24	38	0.00	72	0.03	71	0.03	83	0.03	71	0.03
Random 1		90	-0.07	83	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	82	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		85	0.05	59	0.00	84	0.02	83	0.02	28	0.22	50	0.07
Random 3		84	0.06	90	0.00	83	0.02	84	0.02	20	0.34	44	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).