Chiu 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		39	0.41	55	0.00	50	0.07	52	0.07	36	0.27	50	0.14
Anderszewski 2003		72	0.28	76	0.00	80	0.04	70	0.04	64	0.04	69	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		4	0.57	4	0.06	6	0.15	7	0.72	15	0.75	7	0.73
Bacha 2000		56	0.36	27	0.00	31	0.10	38	0.25	12	0.54	35	0.37
Badura 1965		73	0.26	56	0.00	66	0.05	69	0.05	57	0.04	72	0.04
Barbosa 1983		32	0.44	77	0.00	44	0.08	44	0.15	17	0.50	43	0.27
Biret 1990		50	0.36	44	0.00	55	0.05	68	0.05	22	0.53	48	0.16
Blet 2003		22	0.48	31	0.00	38	0.10	32	0.35	18	0.57	30	0.45
Block 1995		55	0.36	32	0.00	63	0.08	49	0.08	48	0.06	61	0.07
Blumental 1952		53	0.36	65	0.00	54	0.06	60	0.06	34	0.28	51	0.13
Boshniakovich 1969		69	0.29	82	0.00	62	0.08	48	0.08	45	0.08	58	0.08
Brailowsky 1960		77	0.21	83	0.00	70	0.04	79	0.04	55	0.06	65	0.05
Bunin 1987		42	0.40	34	0.00	34	0.08	35	0.29	14	0.54	33	0.40
Bunin 1987b		41	0.40	29	0.00	33	0.08	33	0.32	14	0.55	31	0.42
Chiu 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Cohen 1997		66	0.31	66	0.00	78	0.03	82	0.03	59	0.05	74	0.04
Cortot 1951		62	0.32	41	0.00	79	0.04	73	0.04	62	0.04	77	0.04
Csalog 1996		16	0.50	25	0.00	21	0.11	20	0.60	3	0.76	14	0.68
Czerny 1949		79	0.19	70	0.00	85	0.03	83	0.03	72	0.04	86	0.03
Czerny 1990		15	0.50	7	0.03	12	0.11	12	0.67	8	0.80	8	0.73
Duchoud 2007		6	0.55	2	0.15	2	0.20	2	0.76	2	0.79	3	0.77
Ezaki 2006		81	0.18	84	0.00	82	0.03	80	0.03	79	0.03	81	0.03
Falvay 1989		47	0.37	85	0.00	60	0.06	56	0.06	43	0.12	57	0.08
Farrell 1958		33	0.44	33	0.00	39	0.08	41	0.21	4	0.64	37	0.37
Ferenczy 1958		87	0.08	51	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	71	0.04	85	0.03
Fliere 1977		3	0.58	12	0.01	10	0.13	4	0.73	18	0.69	10	0.71
Fou 1978		23	0.47	53	0.00	37	0.08	36	0.27	19	0.43	39	0.34
Francois 1956		76	0.22	62	0.00	71	0.04	77	0.04	62	0.04	80	0.04
Friedman 1923		11	0.53	6	0.04	9	0.18	6	0.73	6	0.78	5	0.75
Friedman 1923b		12	0.53	8	0.03	8	0.14	5	0.73	6	0.78	4	0.75
Friedman 1930		9	0.54	17	0.01	14	0.13	13	0.66	7	0.74	13	0.70
Garcia 2007		59	0.33	39	0.00	48	0.10	45	0.10	33	0.37	46	0.19
Garcia 2007b		48	0.37	18	0.01	28	0.11	29	0.38	19	0.55	29	0.46
Gierzod 1998		84	0.15	57	0.00	75	0.04	74	0.04	59	0.05	70	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		61	0.32	45	0.00	65	0.04	72	0.04	58	0.05	75	0.04
Groot 1988		36	0.43	50	0.00	30	0.11	25	0.46	28	0.34	34	0.40
Harasiewicz 1955		13	0.53	23	0.00	47	0.10	47	0.10	43	0.14	53	0.12
Hatto 1993		8	0.54	26	0.00	11	0.13	15	0.64	10	0.61	20	0.62
Hatto 1997		38	0.41	54	0.00	49	0.07	55	0.07	33	0.22	52	0.12
Horowitz 1949		20	0.49	11	0.02	15	0.14	10	0.67	2	0.79	6	0.73
Indjic 1988		19	0.50	71	0.00	18	0.15	17	0.63	10	0.64	19	0.63
Kapell 1951		14	0.52	14	0.01	13	0.12	14	0.65	5	0.63	15	0.64
Kissin 1993		43	0.39	72	0.00	41	0.07	39	0.22	27	0.51	40	0.33
Kushner 1989		17	0.50	24	0.00	29	0.10	30	0.38	21	0.45	32	0.41
Luisada 1991		28	0.46	19	0.01	26	0.09	28	0.43	21	0.53	25	0.48
Lushtak 2004		58	0.35	30	0.00	73	0.05	65	0.05	43	0.10	60	0.07
Malcuzynski 1961		44	0.38	28	0.00	51	0.07	51	0.07	66	0.05	63	0.06
Magaloff 1978		52	0.36	61	0.00	36	0.10	34	0.31	23	0.44	36	0.37
Magin 1975		45	0.38	73	0.00	42	0.08	42	0.19	26	0.50	41	0.31
Michalowski 1933		27	0.46	5	0.04	7	0.15	11	0.67	1	0.75	11	0.71
Milkina 1970		63	0.32	59	0.00	57	0.05	62	0.05	26	0.39	49	0.14
Mohovich 1999		71	0.28	86	0.00	69	0.04	71	0.04	64	0.05	73	0.04
Moravec 1969		40	0.41	37	0.00	35	0.09	37	0.26	14	0.51	38	0.36
Morozova 2008		5	0.57	3	0.08	4	0.13	9	0.69	2	0.71	12	0.70
Neighaus 1950		31	0.45	43	0.00	23	0.09	24	0.48	16	0.44	28	0.46
Niedzielski 1931		30	0.45	22	0.00	16	0.15	19	0.61	5	0.66	17	0.63
Ohlsson 1999		7	0.54	13	0.01	17	0.11	16	0.63	5	0.65	16	0.64
Osinska 1989		64	0.32	74	0.00	58	0.05	63	0.05	47	0.07	62	0.06
Pachmann 1927		25	0.46	15	0.01	20	0.09	21	0.55	10	0.72	18	0.63
Paderewski 1930		60	0.32	87	0.00	53	0.06	57	0.06	42	0.22	55	0.11
Perlemuter 1992		67	0.31	75	0.00	64	0.10	46	0.10	55	0.05	59	0.07
Pierdomenico 2008		26	0.46	40	0.00	24	0.09	22	0.50	4	0.69	21	0.59
Poblocka 1999		54	0.36	47	0.00	40	0.07	40	0.21	39	0.23	44	0.22
Rabcewiczowa 1932		78	0.19	42	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	67	0.04	83	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		34	0.44	9	0.03	22	0.12	23	0.49	16	0.64	23	0.56
Rangell 2001		51	0.36	38	0.00	45	0.07	53	0.07	17	0.40	47	0.17
Richter 1976		1	0.62	10	0.02	5	0.16	3	0.76	6	0.82	2	0.79
Rosen 1989		21	0.48	21	0.00	25	0.10	26	0.46	18	0.55	24	0.50
Rosenthal 1930		68	0.30	48	0.00	72	0.04	76	0.04	62	0.05	71	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		82	0.18	67	0.00	81	0.06	59	0.06	51	0.05	67	0.05
Rosenthal 1931b		83	0.16	78	0.00	77	0.03	81	0.03	52	0.05	78	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		70	0.29	64	0.00	52	0.06	61	0.06	36	0.26	54	0.12
Rosenthal 1931d		86	0.08	52	0.00	74	0.04	78	0.04	56	0.04	76	0.04
Rossi 2007		85	0.11	88	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	71	0.04	82	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		49	0.37	68	0.00	56	0.05	67	0.05	30	0.19	56	0.10
Rubinstein 1952		75	0.24	63	0.00	67	0.05	66	0.05	74	0.04	79	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		46	0.38	79	0.00	61	0.07	54	0.07	47	0.06	64	0.06
Schilhawsky 1960		37	0.43	20	0.01	43	0.07	43	0.15	9	0.61	42	0.30
Shebanova 2002		2	0.60	1	0.39	1	0.38	1	0.80	6	0.81	1	0.80
Smith 1975		74	0.25	89	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	72	0.03	89	0.02
Sokolov 2002		57	0.35	58	0.00	59	0.05	64	0.05	50	0.04	68	0.04
Sztompka 1959		24	0.46	80	0.00	27	0.09	27	0.44	22	0.48	27	0.46
Tomsic 1995		80	0.19	81	0.00	76	0.04	75	0.04	78	0.03	84	0.03
Uninsky 1932		18	0.50	49	0.00	19	0.13	18	0.62	13	0.56	22	0.59
Uninsky 1971		65	0.31	60	0.00	68	0.06	58	0.06	70	0.04	66	0.05
Wasowski 1980		10	0.54	16	0.01	3	0.14	8	0.69	3	0.75	9	0.72
Zak 1937		29	0.45	36	0.00	32	0.07	31	0.36	12	0.63	26	0.48
Zak 1951		35	0.43	46	0.00	46	0.08	50	0.08	13	0.57	45	0.21
Random 1		89	0.00	35	0.00	87	0.02	89	0.02	61	0.04	88	0.03
Random 2		88	0.00	69	0.00	89	0.02	86	0.02	66	0.04	87	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.05	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	82	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).