Rubinstein 1939

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		32	0.30	68	0.00	43	0.06	39	0.12	50	0.06	50	0.08
Anderszewski 2003		13	0.39	17	0.00	12	0.15	12	0.39	14	0.53	9	0.45
Ashkenazy 1981		31	0.32	18	0.00	16	0.08	9	0.42	68	0.06	35	0.16
Bacha 2000		52	0.24	34	0.00	50	0.09	46	0.09	37	0.21	37	0.14
Badura 1965		48	0.26	52	0.00	56	0.04	62	0.04	48	0.05	68	0.04
Barbosa 1983		39	0.28	72	0.00	55	0.04	70	0.04	68	0.05	67	0.04
Biret 1990		19	0.36	41	0.00	24	0.06	18	0.32	12	0.64	10	0.45
Blet 2003		69	0.18	32	0.00	79	0.04	69	0.04	73	0.03	78	0.03
Block 1995		62	0.21	67	0.00	64	0.04	65	0.04	65	0.04	69	0.04
Blumental 1952		28	0.32	36	0.00	32	0.06	31	0.19	32	0.29	28	0.23
Boshniakovich 1969		89	-0.01	79	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	86	0.03	88	0.02
Brailowsky 1960		25	0.33	31	0.00	34	0.06	28	0.23	33	0.36	22	0.29
Bunin 1987		56	0.23	21	0.00	58	0.07	53	0.07	72	0.04	60	0.05
Bunin 1987b		53	0.23	26	0.00	57	0.04	71	0.04	62	0.05	63	0.04
Chiu 1999		15	0.37	35	0.00	30	0.06	30	0.19	67	0.05	44	0.10
Cohen 1997		20	0.35	30	0.00	23	0.06	24	0.27	29	0.42	18	0.34
Cortot 1951		34	0.30	29	0.00	40	0.05	40	0.12	37	0.22	36	0.16
Csalog 1996		27	0.32	6	0.04	13	0.10	19	0.32	24	0.40	14	0.36
Czerny 1949		8	0.42	28	0.00	7	0.14	6	0.55	10	0.80	4	0.66
Czerny 1990		43	0.27	11	0.01	27	0.05	29	0.20	41	0.24	29	0.22
Duchoud 2007		16	0.37	46	0.00	26	0.08	23	0.28	41	0.19	27	0.23
Ezaki 2006		44	0.27	64	0.00	52	0.08	47	0.08	53	0.06	52	0.07
Falvay 1989		3	0.46	2	0.24	2	0.34	3	0.73	2	0.63	3	0.68
Farrell 1958		11	0.40	15	0.01	25	0.07	22	0.29	17	0.48	13	0.37
Ferenczy 1958		58	0.23	47	0.00	59	0.04	67	0.04	35	0.52	39	0.14
Fliere 1977		61	0.22	45	0.00	68	0.06	56	0.06	53	0.06	58	0.06
Fou 1978		18	0.36	54	0.00	17	0.09	13	0.39	33	0.30	16	0.34
Francois 1956		29	0.32	59	0.00	37	0.06	41	0.12	26	0.48	26	0.24
Friedman 1923		80	0.09	71	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	77	0.03	89	0.02
Friedman 1923b		84	0.08	80	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	74	0.04	84	0.03
Friedman 1930		75	0.15	69	0.00	75	0.03	74	0.03	74	0.04	80	0.03
Garcia 2007		86	0.06	85	0.00	81	0.03	76	0.03	83	0.03	81	0.03
Garcia 2007b		79	0.09	27	0.00	80	0.03	73	0.03	69	0.04	85	0.03
Gierzod 1998		68	0.19	49	0.00	46	0.07	52	0.07	37	0.23	41	0.13
Gornostaeva 1994		10	0.40	60	0.00	10	0.11	10	0.40	22	0.55	8	0.47
Groot 1988		38	0.28	81	0.00	36	0.05	42	0.12	59	0.06	51	0.08
Harasiewicz 1955		12	0.39	13	0.01	18	0.12	8	0.45	34	0.22	21	0.31
Hatto 1993		17	0.37	39	0.00	15	0.09	20	0.31	45	0.13	32	0.20
Hatto 1997		6	0.43	4	0.06	4	0.16	16	0.37	23	0.34	15	0.35
Horowitz 1949		63	0.20	42	0.00	66	0.04	63	0.04	61	0.05	65	0.04
Indjic 1988		21	0.34	43	0.00	21	0.07	21	0.30	45	0.13	31	0.20
Kapell 1951		49	0.26	25	0.00	35	0.05	44	0.10	62	0.06	48	0.08
Kissin 1993		74	0.17	53	0.00	33	0.07	43	0.12	59	0.06	49	0.08
Kushner 1989		37	0.28	56	0.00	51	0.08	49	0.08	55	0.06	53	0.07
Luisada 1991		35	0.30	55	0.00	53	0.07	55	0.07	67	0.05	57	0.06
Lushtak 2004		67	0.19	48	0.00	73	0.03	81	0.03	75	0.04	82	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		71	0.18	65	0.00	71	0.05	58	0.05	76	0.03	64	0.04
Magaloff 1978		65	0.20	40	0.00	63	0.04	66	0.04	77	0.03	74	0.03
Magin 1975		59	0.23	73	0.00	65	0.04	68	0.04	63	0.05	62	0.04
Michalowski 1933		51	0.25	33	0.00	54	0.08	50	0.08	62	0.06	54	0.07
Milkina 1970		1	0.52	1	0.33	1	0.33	1	0.75	1	0.79	1	0.77
Mohovich 1999		72	0.17	82	0.00	60	0.04	64	0.04	76	0.03	83	0.03
Moravec 1969		2	0.48	5	0.05	3	0.28	2	0.74	2	0.76	2	0.75
Morozova 2008		7	0.43	24	0.00	19	0.14	11	0.40	31	0.27	20	0.33
Neighaus 1950		47	0.26	74	0.00	44	0.06	38	0.12	72	0.04	56	0.07
Niedzielski 1931		22	0.33	70	0.00	29	0.06	26	0.26	48	0.07	40	0.13
Ohlsson 1999		5	0.44	8	0.02	8	0.14	5	0.61	19	0.44	6	0.52
Osinska 1989		36	0.29	37	0.00	42	0.06	35	0.14	33	0.32	30	0.21
Pachmann 1927		77	0.11	50	0.00	82	0.03	80	0.03	78	0.04	77	0.03
Paderewski 1930		78	0.10	86	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	76	0.03	87	0.02
Perlemuter 1992		70	0.18	51	0.00	72	0.03	79	0.03	66	0.04	72	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		82	0.09	77	0.00	74	0.03	75	0.03	78	0.03	75	0.03
Poblocka 1999		66	0.20	62	0.00	70	0.04	61	0.04	79	0.04	61	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		40	0.28	38	0.00	38	0.05	33	0.18	28	0.40	24	0.27
Rachmaninoff 1923		24	0.33	12	0.01	20	0.08	27	0.24	32	0.30	23	0.27
Rangell 2001		73	0.17	78	0.00	62	0.04	72	0.04	64	0.05	71	0.04
Richter 1976		45	0.26	20	0.00	31	0.06	37	0.13	51	0.07	45	0.10
Rosen 1989		55	0.23	57	0.00	61	0.05	59	0.05	66	0.04	70	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		14	0.38	10	0.02	6	0.13	17	0.35	29	0.41	12	0.38
Rosenthal 1931		26	0.33	16	0.01	22	0.06	25	0.27	25	0.54	11	0.38
Rosenthal 1931b		42	0.27	87	0.00	41	0.05	36	0.14	29	0.47	25	0.26
Rosenthal 1931c		41	0.27	22	0.00	39	0.05	34	0.15	35	0.27	33	0.20
Rosenthal 1931d		60	0.22	23	0.00	47	0.08	48	0.08	22	0.44	34	0.19
Rossi 2007		88	0.02	61	0.00	76	0.03	78	0.03	70	0.04	73	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1952		23	0.33	7	0.04	9	0.14	7	0.49	19	0.48	7	0.48
Rubinstein 1966		4	0.46	3	0.06	5	0.18	4	0.63	11	0.48	5	0.55
Schilhawsky 1960		76	0.12	19	0.00	83	0.02	84	0.02	77	0.04	79	0.03
Shebanova 2002		64	0.20	75	0.00	69	0.07	54	0.07	55	0.08	55	0.07
Smith 1975		33	0.30	66	0.00	45	0.06	57	0.06	38	0.22	42	0.11
Sokolov 2002		50	0.26	58	0.00	48	0.08	51	0.08	35	0.26	38	0.14
Sztompka 1959		57	0.23	88	0.00	67	0.04	60	0.04	71	0.04	66	0.04
Tomsic 1995		54	0.23	83	0.00	49	0.10	45	0.10	64	0.04	59	0.06
Uninsky 1932		46	0.26	63	0.00	28	0.05	32	0.19	67	0.05	46	0.10
Uninsky 1971		9	0.41	14	0.01	11	0.16	15	0.38	27	0.31	17	0.34
Wasowski 1980		30	0.32	9	0.02	14	0.13	14	0.39	36	0.28	19	0.33
Zak 1937		85	0.07	89	0.00	86	0.02	88	0.02	76	0.03	86	0.02
Zak 1951		81	0.09	84	0.00	85	0.03	82	0.03	74	0.03	76	0.03
Random 1		87	0.04	76	0.00	78	0.03	77	0.03	11	0.38	43	0.11
Random 2		83	0.08	44	0.00	77	0.03	83	0.03	23	0.34	47	0.10
Random 3		90	-0.07	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	74	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).