Czerny 1949

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		19	0.34	40	0.00	20	0.14	17	0.70	38	0.26	25	0.43
Anderszewski 2003		43	0.18	69	0.00	36	0.12	39	0.41	47	0.07	34	0.17
Ashkenazy 1981		71	0.04	47	0.00	75	0.04	75	0.04	87	0.02	75	0.03
Bacha 2000		33	0.22	27	0.00	39	0.18	38	0.41	56	0.05	37	0.14
Badura 1965		57	0.10	70	0.00	51	0.08	45	0.08	75	0.03	53	0.05
Barbosa 1983		72	0.04	56	0.00	69	0.04	73	0.04	88	0.02	70	0.03
Biret 1990		6	0.47	13	0.01	10	0.25	13	0.74	5	0.73	10	0.73
Blet 2003		66	0.06	80	0.00	65	0.04	66	0.04	86	0.02	71	0.03
Block 1995		65	0.07	81	0.00	57	0.05	57	0.05	86	0.02	74	0.03
Blumental 1952		60	0.09	64	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	83	0.03	46	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		85	-0.05	71	0.00	79	0.03	78	0.03	87	0.02	82	0.02
Brailowsky 1960		24	0.26	57	0.00	33	0.24	27	0.61	36	0.33	24	0.45
Bunin 1987		52	0.11	65	0.00	67	0.04	67	0.04	84	0.03	76	0.03
Bunin 1987b		51	0.11	51	0.00	68	0.07	46	0.07	82	0.03	48	0.05
Chiu 1999		39	0.19	67	0.00	61	0.04	72	0.04	83	0.03	61	0.03
Cohen 1997		9	0.43	11	0.01	9	0.21	7	0.84	6	0.67	9	0.75
Cortot 1951		16	0.35	33	0.00	17	0.13	12	0.75	15	0.57	12	0.65
Csalog 1996		47	0.14	72	0.00	53	0.07	49	0.07	71	0.04	50	0.05
Czerny 1949		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Czerny 1990		44	0.17	58	0.00	52	0.07	50	0.07	78	0.03	54	0.05
Duchoud 2007		38	0.20	36	0.00	46	0.07	51	0.07	79	0.03	52	0.05
Ezaki 2006		5	0.48	12	0.01	6	0.24	3	0.86	5	0.74	5	0.80
Falvay 1989		11	0.41	21	0.00	14	0.15	19	0.69	12	0.45	18	0.56
Farrell 1958		14	0.38	15	0.01	18	0.11	14	0.73	16	0.50	14	0.60
Ferenczy 1958		8	0.46	6	0.03	7	0.32	4	0.86	1	0.91	1	0.88
Fliere 1977		79	-0.01	73	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.01	84	0.01
Fou 1978		25	0.26	7	0.02	38	0.16	37	0.42	70	0.03	40	0.11
Francois 1956		4	0.49	2	0.22	2	0.36	2	0.87	3	0.81	3	0.84
Friedman 1923		87	-0.05	82	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	88	0.02	83	0.02
Friedman 1923b		88	-0.07	83	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	87	0.02	89	0.01
Friedman 1930		70	0.05	52	0.00	58	0.05	60	0.05	88	0.02	72	0.03
Garcia 2007		86	-0.05	84	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	88	0.02	81	0.02
Garcia 2007b		83	-0.03	85	0.00	81	0.02	82	0.02	89	0.01	90	0.01
Gierzod 1998		64	0.07	60	0.00	47	0.06	52	0.06	66	0.04	51	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		3	0.49	10	0.01	8	0.27	5	0.86	8	0.73	6	0.79
Groot 1988		46	0.17	31	0.00	45	0.07	48	0.07	83	0.03	55	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		22	0.30	32	0.00	15	0.15	18	0.69	35	0.21	26	0.38
Hatto 1993		55	0.11	74	0.00	55	0.06	53	0.06	84	0.03	58	0.04
Hatto 1997		18	0.34	14	0.01	21	0.12	33	0.51	57	0.05	36	0.16
Horowitz 1949		77	0.00	61	0.00	80	0.03	79	0.03	87	0.02	78	0.02
Indjic 1988		63	0.07	86	0.00	60	0.04	69	0.04	82	0.03	69	0.03
Kapell 1951		54	0.11	48	0.00	56	0.05	56	0.05	79	0.03	57	0.04
Kissin 1993		90	-0.10	87	0.00	86	0.02	85	0.02	88	0.01	86	0.01
Kushner 1989		50	0.11	49	0.00	64	0.05	59	0.05	87	0.02	64	0.03
Luisada 1991		58	0.10	34	0.00	66	0.04	71	0.04	85	0.02	59	0.03
Lushtak 2004		53	0.11	88	0.00	63	0.05	58	0.05	81	0.02	73	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		59	0.09	53	0.00	50	0.07	47	0.07	82	0.03	49	0.05
Magaloff 1978		62	0.08	75	0.00	49	0.06	54	0.06	80	0.03	56	0.04
Magin 1975		69	0.05	62	0.00	54	0.05	55	0.05	66	0.05	47	0.05
Michalowski 1933		76	0.00	76	0.00	74	0.04	74	0.04	87	0.02	68	0.03
Milkina 1970		7	0.47	3	0.16	3	0.30	9	0.81	3	0.76	7	0.78
Mohovich 1999		36	0.21	26	0.00	26	0.12	29	0.53	57	0.06	32	0.18
Moravec 1969		12	0.40	4	0.10	5	0.20	8	0.83	5	0.69	8	0.76
Morozova 2008		42	0.18	42	0.00	43	0.07	42	0.17	81	0.03	44	0.07
Neighaus 1950		20	0.32	19	0.00	19	0.12	24	0.64	51	0.08	29	0.23
Niedzielski 1931		80	-0.01	43	0.00	73	0.05	61	0.05	86	0.02	63	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		27	0.25	18	0.00	34	0.14	32	0.51	66	0.04	39	0.14
Osinska 1989		17	0.35	30	0.00	16	0.14	15	0.72	24	0.50	13	0.60
Pachmann 1927		81	-0.02	59	0.00	84	0.02	83	0.02	86	0.02	80	0.02
Paderewski 1930		89	-0.09	77	0.00	82	0.02	81	0.02	90	0.01	85	0.01
Perlemuter 1992		78	-0.01	78	0.00	78	0.03	80	0.03	88	0.02	77	0.02
Pierdomenico 2008		56	0.10	38	0.00	59	0.04	70	0.04	87	0.02	62	0.03
Poblocka 1999		67	0.06	41	0.00	72	0.04	76	0.04	82	0.03	60	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		2	0.52	5	0.03	4	0.31	6	0.84	2	0.81	4	0.82
Rachmaninoff 1923		28	0.25	17	0.00	35	0.12	36	0.47	64	0.04	38	0.14
Rangell 2001		45	0.17	8	0.01	25	0.10	28	0.56	47	0.06	33	0.18
Richter 1976		74	0.01	68	0.00	83	0.02	84	0.02	89	0.02	79	0.02
Rosen 1989		35	0.21	54	0.00	40	0.08	40	0.27	54	0.04	41	0.10
Rosenthal 1930		21	0.31	35	0.00	22	0.17	20	0.69	19	0.45	19	0.56
Rosenthal 1931		31	0.23	23	0.00	32	0.19	22	0.65	27	0.51	16	0.58
Rosenthal 1931b		34	0.22	55	0.00	31	0.14	25	0.62	26	0.50	20	0.56
Rosenthal 1931c		23	0.29	45	0.00	23	0.17	16	0.71	24	0.47	17	0.58
Rosenthal 1931d		37	0.21	20	0.00	30	0.15	23	0.65	20	0.46	21	0.55
Rossi 2007		41	0.18	44	0.00	48	0.05	62	0.05	41	0.11	43	0.07
Rubinstein 1939		10	0.42	22	0.00	11	0.27	10	0.80	6	0.55	11	0.66
Rubinstein 1952		32	0.22	37	0.00	24	0.09	26	0.61	41	0.12	28	0.27
Rubinstein 1966		26	0.26	39	0.00	29	0.12	31	0.53	52	0.05	35	0.16
Schilhawsky 1960		82	-0.02	89	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01	87	0.01
Shebanova 2002		84	-0.03	46	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	89	0.01	88	0.01
Smith 1975		1	0.56	1	0.31	1	0.30	1	0.87	4	0.81	2	0.84
Sokolov 2002		15	0.38	16	0.00	12	0.17	21	0.67	12	0.52	15	0.59
Sztompka 1959		61	0.08	66	0.00	62	0.05	63	0.05	86	0.02	67	0.03
Tomsic 1995		29	0.24	63	0.00	28	0.13	30	0.53	49	0.06	31	0.18
Uninsky 1932		40	0.19	28	0.00	41	0.08	41	0.18	78	0.04	42	0.08
Uninsky 1971		13	0.39	25	0.00	13	0.16	11	0.78	24	0.33	22	0.51
Wasowski 1980		30	0.23	29	0.00	37	0.12	35	0.47	47	0.08	30	0.19
Zak 1937		73	0.04	90	0.00	76	0.04	68	0.04	86	0.02	65	0.03
Zak 1951		68	0.05	50	0.00	71	0.05	65	0.05	86	0.02	66	0.03
Random 1		75	0.01	79	0.00	70	0.05	64	0.05	44	0.11	45	0.07
Random 2		49	0.12	9	0.01	27	0.10	34	0.48	3	0.54	23	0.51
Random 3		48	0.13	24	0.00	42	0.06	43	0.17	1	0.74	27	0.35

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).