Rosenthal 1931

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		8	0.38	47	0.00	7	0.32	8	0.76	4	0.65	8	0.70
Anderszewski 2003		10	0.34	9	0.00	13	0.15	12	0.68	10	0.59	10	0.63
Ashkenazy 1981		38	0.17	48	0.00	36	0.09	37	0.34	64	0.06	38	0.14
Bacha 2000		15	0.32	35	0.00	12	0.12	10	0.72	14	0.53	11	0.62
Badura 1965		20	0.29	13	0.00	11	0.11	15	0.63	8	0.59	12	0.61
Barbosa 1983		42	0.16	3	0.00	52	0.04	58	0.04	86	0.02	66	0.03
Biret 1990		88	-0.07	29	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	89	0.02	90	0.01
Blet 2003		71	0.04	49	0.00	69	0.03	73	0.03	83	0.02	86	0.02
Block 1995		48	0.11	50	0.00	47	0.10	45	0.10	69	0.04	49	0.06
Blumental 1952		17	0.30	18	0.00	17	0.09	21	0.58	24	0.42	18	0.49
Boshniakovich 1969		73	0.03	36	0.00	63	0.05	50	0.05	77	0.03	59	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		18	0.29	51	0.00	22	0.11	16	0.61	19	0.53	15	0.57
Bunin 1987		78	0.03	52	0.00	80	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.02
Bunin 1987b		72	0.04	53	0.00	78	0.02	83	0.02	87	0.02	82	0.02
Chiu 1999		35	0.18	37	0.00	50	0.05	51	0.05	59	0.06	50	0.05
Cohen 1997		13	0.34	54	0.00	9	0.29	9	0.73	16	0.56	9	0.64
Cortot 1951		12	0.34	55	0.00	16	0.10	14	0.67	20	0.52	13	0.59
Csalog 1996		87	-0.05	56	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	85	0.02	85	0.02
Czerny 1949		28	0.23	57	0.00	27	0.10	27	0.51	22	0.65	14	0.58
Czerny 1990		67	0.05	58	0.00	71	0.03	75	0.03	76	0.03	72	0.03
Duchoud 2007		77	0.03	59	0.00	75	0.03	69	0.03	82	0.03	69	0.03
Ezaki 2006		6	0.44	6	0.00	6	0.41	6	0.79	14	0.65	7	0.72
Falvay 1989		34	0.18	38	0.00	37	0.07	36	0.34	46	0.07	31	0.15
Farrell 1958		32	0.18	25	0.00	42	0.08	42	0.16	64	0.04	45	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		7	0.41	10	0.00	8	0.22	7	0.78	3	0.86	5	0.82
Fliere 1977		56	0.08	39	0.00	53	0.04	64	0.04	79	0.04	52	0.04
Fou 1978		21	0.27	7	0.00	21	0.10	18	0.59	47	0.06	28	0.19
Francois 1956		37	0.17	40	0.00	28	0.12	32	0.46	33	0.36	21	0.41
Friedman 1923		55	0.08	60	0.00	66	0.03	67	0.03	74	0.04	76	0.03
Friedman 1923b		65	0.05	61	0.00	70	0.03	76	0.03	79	0.03	71	0.03
Friedman 1930		76	0.03	19	0.00	58	0.04	62	0.04	73	0.04	57	0.04
Garcia 2007		63	0.06	62	0.00	54	0.04	59	0.04	82	0.03	70	0.03
Garcia 2007b		84	-0.02	26	0.00	77	0.03	71	0.03	84	0.03	75	0.03
Gierzod 1998		4	0.47	30	0.00	4	0.36	4	0.86	2	0.82	4	0.84
Gornostaeva 1994		33	0.18	41	0.00	41	0.09	41	0.23	51	0.06	40	0.12
Groot 1988		54	0.09	42	0.00	40	0.11	40	0.26	74	0.04	42	0.10
Harasiewicz 1955		46	0.12	63	0.00	55	0.04	63	0.04	79	0.03	73	0.03
Hatto 1993		45	0.13	64	0.00	51	0.06	49	0.06	73	0.04	51	0.05
Hatto 1997		40	0.16	65	0.00	43	0.07	44	0.15	72	0.04	46	0.08
Horowitz 1949		86	-0.04	66	0.00	84	0.02	82	0.02	86	0.02	83	0.02
Indjic 1988		59	0.07	67	0.00	73	0.03	72	0.03	79	0.03	65	0.03
Kapell 1951		83	-0.02	14	0.00	86	0.03	74	0.03	88	0.02	80	0.02
Kissin 1993		53	0.10	20	0.00	61	0.04	57	0.04	79	0.04	56	0.04
Kushner 1989		26	0.25	68	0.00	32	0.12	30	0.49	63	0.05	30	0.16
Luisada 1991		70	0.04	69	0.00	83	0.02	78	0.02	83	0.02	77	0.02
Lushtak 2004		19	0.29	15	0.00	26	0.15	19	0.59	20	0.33	19	0.44
Malcuzynski 1961		23	0.26	43	0.00	24	0.12	20	0.58	65	0.05	29	0.17
Magaloff 1978		47	0.11	70	0.00	44	0.08	43	0.16	83	0.03	47	0.07
Magin 1975		85	-0.03	71	0.00	85	0.02	81	0.02	89	0.02	79	0.02
Michalowski 1933		80	0.00	72	0.00	82	0.02	80	0.02	84	0.03	84	0.02
Milkina 1970		27	0.24	21	0.00	33	0.15	31	0.47	36	0.27	24	0.36
Mohovich 1999		25	0.26	27	0.00	23	0.12	17	0.61	33	0.23	23	0.37
Moravec 1969		22	0.27	12	0.00	29	0.15	29	0.50	72	0.04	34	0.14
Morozova 2008		11	0.34	31	0.00	18	0.08	22	0.57	70	0.04	32	0.15
Neighaus 1950		41	0.16	73	0.00	39	0.08	39	0.27	78	0.03	44	0.09
Niedzielski 1931		43	0.15	74	0.00	35	0.15	34	0.40	67	0.05	36	0.14
Ohlsson 1999		49	0.11	75	0.00	57	0.05	54	0.05	85	0.03	55	0.04
Osinska 1989		69	0.05	76	0.00	67	0.04	65	0.04	82	0.03	60	0.03
Pachmann 1927		66	0.05	32	0.00	68	0.03	68	0.03	85	0.03	64	0.03
Paderewski 1930		60	0.07	77	0.00	62	0.05	53	0.05	74	0.04	54	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		50	0.10	28	0.00	45	0.08	48	0.08	77	0.04	48	0.06
Pierdomenico 2008		81	0.00	33	0.00	81	0.02	85	0.02	88	0.02	78	0.02
Poblocka 1999		74	0.03	78	0.00	76	0.03	70	0.03	83	0.03	61	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		29	0.23	22	0.00	25	0.11	23	0.57	26	0.49	16	0.53
Rachmaninoff 1923		44	0.14	23	0.00	34	0.11	35	0.40	51	0.05	35	0.14
Rangell 2001		30	0.22	79	0.00	20	0.09	24	0.56	34	0.22	26	0.35
Richter 1976		58	0.08	34	0.00	72	0.03	77	0.03	81	0.03	63	0.03
Rosen 1989		24	0.26	24	0.00	30	0.15	26	0.54	65	0.04	33	0.15
Rosenthal 1930		5	0.47	11	0.00	5	0.29	5	0.85	4	0.80	6	0.82
Rosenthal 1931		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931b		1	0.91	1	0.98	1	0.97	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Rosenthal 1931c		3	0.70	2	0.01	3	0.87	3	0.96	2	0.95	3	0.95
Rosenthal 1931d		2	0.77	4	0.00	2	0.83	2	0.97	2	0.97	2	0.97
Rossi 2007		82	0.00	80	0.00	48	0.09	47	0.09	43	0.09	43	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		14	0.33	16	0.00	19	0.09	25	0.54	25	0.27	22	0.38
Rubinstein 1952		68	0.05	81	0.00	64	0.05	56	0.05	86	0.02	74	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		9	0.37	8	0.00	10	0.26	11	0.68	19	0.40	17	0.52
Schilhawsky 1960		61	0.06	82	0.00	79	0.02	84	0.02	68	0.04	67	0.03
Shebanova 2002		57	0.08	17	0.00	60	0.04	61	0.04	72	0.04	58	0.04
Smith 1975		31	0.22	83	0.00	15	0.14	28	0.51	31	0.36	20	0.43
Sokolov 2002		64	0.06	84	0.00	65	0.04	66	0.04	83	0.02	62	0.03
Sztompka 1959		39	0.17	85	0.00	38	0.08	38	0.30	72	0.04	41	0.11
Tomsic 1995		36	0.17	5	0.00	31	0.16	33	0.42	50	0.05	37	0.14
Uninsky 1932		52	0.10	44	0.00	56	0.05	55	0.05	85	0.02	68	0.03
Uninsky 1971		16	0.31	45	0.00	14	0.16	13	0.68	37	0.18	25	0.35
Wasowski 1980		89	-0.09	46	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	89	0.01	88	0.01
Zak 1937		79	0.02	86	0.00	74	0.02	79	0.02	75	0.03	81	0.02
Zak 1951		62	0.06	87	0.00	49	0.05	52	0.05	66	0.04	53	0.04
Random 1		75	0.03	88	0.00	59	0.04	60	0.04	16	0.35	39	0.12
Random 2		51	0.10	89	0.00	46	0.10	46	0.10	2	0.57	27	0.24
Random 3		90	-0.13	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	81	0.02	89	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).