Zak 1951

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		57	0.24	41	0.00	53	0.05	56	0.05	56	0.04	70	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		54	0.25	42	0.00	46	0.05	51	0.05	33	0.22	40	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		13	0.39	12	0.00	20	0.11	16	0.52	52	0.07	29	0.19
Bacha 2000		45	0.29	22	0.00	47	0.06	50	0.06	35	0.24	37	0.12
Badura 1965		61	0.22	43	0.00	57	0.07	46	0.07	51	0.05	52	0.06
Barbosa 1983		12	0.40	13	0.00	14	0.13	8	0.65	16	0.52	8	0.58
Biret 1990		42	0.30	3	0.00	18	0.12	18	0.49	14	0.60	11	0.54
Blet 2003		16	0.39	23	0.00	9	0.10	9	0.65	21	0.54	7	0.59
Block 1995		26	0.34	4	0.00	38	0.06	37	0.18	46	0.06	41	0.10
Blumental 1952		52	0.26	44	0.00	60	0.04	64	0.04	53	0.05	71	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		2	0.51	24	0.00	2	0.56	2	0.82	5	0.72	2	0.77
Brailowsky 1960		30	0.33	45	0.00	32	0.08	27	0.35	24	0.50	17	0.42
Bunin 1987		36	0.32	14	0.00	30	0.08	31	0.32	34	0.28	23	0.30
Bunin 1987b		35	0.32	46	0.00	31	0.12	32	0.32	34	0.27	24	0.29
Chiu 1999		6	0.43	25	0.00	16	0.12	13	0.57	50	0.08	27	0.21
Cohen 1997		72	0.14	47	0.00	78	0.03	75	0.03	63	0.04	80	0.03
Cortot 1951		71	0.16	5	0.00	80	0.03	77	0.03	87	0.02	87	0.02
Csalog 1996		24	0.34	48	0.00	19	0.12	17	0.50	23	0.42	14	0.46
Czerny 1949		85	0.05	15	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	65	0.05	78	0.03
Czerny 1990		83	0.07	49	0.00	86	0.03	85	0.03	80	0.03	82	0.03
Duchoud 2007		33	0.33	50	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	48	0.07	45	0.09
Ezaki 2006		75	0.13	26	0.00	76	0.03	84	0.03	76	0.03	73	0.03
Falvay 1989		38	0.31	27	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.13	61	0.04	48	0.07
Farrell 1958		56	0.24	51	0.00	8	0.11	28	0.34	28	0.33	22	0.33
Ferenczy 1958		76	0.13	28	0.00	77	0.03	81	0.03	41	0.27	44	0.09
Fliere 1977		40	0.30	29	0.00	52	0.06	48	0.06	68	0.04	54	0.05
Fou 1978		50	0.27	52	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.13	55	0.05	46	0.08
Francois 1956		74	0.14	53	0.00	73	0.03	73	0.03	57	0.04	85	0.03
Friedman 1923		8	0.42	54	0.00	11	0.15	5	0.68	24	0.53	6	0.60
Friedman 1923b		7	0.43	55	0.00	10	0.11	4	0.70	24	0.54	5	0.61
Friedman 1930		23	0.35	56	0.00	22	0.10	21	0.44	43	0.16	26	0.27
Garcia 2007		11	0.42	16	0.00	13	0.11	12	0.61	18	0.47	10	0.54
Garcia 2007b		48	0.27	30	0.00	40	0.06	43	0.13	40	0.17	34	0.15
Gierzod 1998		66	0.20	17	0.00	68	0.07	47	0.07	57	0.06	51	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		79	0.10	7	0.00	72	0.03	80	0.03	76	0.03	81	0.03
Groot 1988		59	0.24	57	0.00	63	0.03	71	0.03	77	0.03	84	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		9	0.42	2	0.00	6	0.11	11	0.61	28	0.31	16	0.43
Hatto 1993		43	0.29	58	0.00	50	0.05	58	0.05	48	0.10	49	0.07
Hatto 1997		58	0.24	59	0.00	65	0.03	76	0.03	78	0.03	77	0.03
Horowitz 1949		21	0.37	18	0.00	23	0.10	22	0.44	38	0.30	21	0.36
Indjic 1988		31	0.33	60	0.00	35	0.07	36	0.25	44	0.13	30	0.18
Kapell 1951		20	0.37	19	0.00	21	0.08	25	0.42	35	0.18	25	0.27
Kissin 1993		63	0.22	61	0.00	59	0.05	57	0.05	73	0.05	60	0.05
Kushner 1989		41	0.30	8	0.00	48	0.05	63	0.05	54	0.06	58	0.05
Luisada 1991		5	0.44	31	0.00	12	0.11	6	0.68	27	0.41	12	0.53
Lushtak 2004		4	0.44	32	0.00	3	0.27	7	0.68	3	0.61	4	0.64
Malcuzynski 1961		25	0.34	33	0.00	33	0.08	30	0.33	42	0.13	28	0.21
Magaloff 1978		55	0.25	6	0.00	55	0.05	61	0.05	54	0.05	57	0.05
Magin 1975		44	0.29	62	0.00	37	0.07	38	0.17	48	0.09	38	0.12
Michalowski 1933		22	0.35	63	0.00	24	0.10	19	0.49	36	0.31	18	0.39
Milkina 1970		69	0.16	64	0.00	69	0.07	45	0.07	54	0.06	50	0.06
Mohovich 1999		15	0.39	65	0.00	17	0.13	26	0.38	19	0.40	19	0.39
Moravec 1969		67	0.20	66	0.00	71	0.05	60	0.05	82	0.03	62	0.04
Morozova 2008		62	0.22	67	0.00	58	0.05	53	0.05	75	0.04	69	0.04
Neighaus 1950		3	0.44	68	0.00	5	0.15	10	0.64	30	0.30	15	0.44
Niedzielski 1931		28	0.34	69	0.00	26	0.08	24	0.42	57	0.06	31	0.16
Ohlsson 1999		29	0.34	70	0.00	34	0.07	33	0.32	49	0.06	35	0.14
Osinska 1989		19	0.37	71	0.00	15	0.13	14	0.56	22	0.52	9	0.54
Pachmann 1927		14	0.39	34	0.00	7	0.11	15	0.52	33	0.44	13	0.48
Paderewski 1930		60	0.23	72	0.00	64	0.04	68	0.04	70	0.05	67	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		53	0.25	73	0.00	56	0.05	52	0.05	75	0.04	63	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		51	0.26	35	0.00	66	0.04	69	0.04	60	0.04	65	0.04
Poblocka 1999		49	0.27	74	0.00	51	0.05	55	0.05	60	0.05	55	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		78	0.11	36	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	74	0.03	76	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		64	0.21	75	0.00	70	0.05	62	0.05	62	0.04	64	0.04
Rangell 2001		18	0.37	20	0.00	27	0.08	20	0.47	28	0.29	20	0.37
Richter 1976		34	0.32	76	0.00	49	0.05	59	0.05	59	0.06	59	0.05
Rosen 1989		39	0.30	9	0.00	45	0.06	49	0.06	56	0.04	61	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		87	0.03	37	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	89	0.01	90	0.01
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.06	77	0.00	79	0.04	66	0.04	52	0.05	68	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		70	0.16	78	0.00	61	0.04	67	0.04	39	0.23	42	0.10
Rosenthal 1931c		73	0.14	79	0.00	62	0.03	72	0.03	76	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.12	80	0.00	74	0.04	70	0.04	65	0.03	83	0.03
Rossi 2007		86	0.05	81	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	42	0.09	56	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		80	0.09	82	0.00	81	0.03	74	0.03	82	0.03	75	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		65	0.20	38	0.00	54	0.04	65	0.04	66	0.04	72	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		32	0.33	10	0.00	25	0.10	23	0.42	48	0.06	32	0.16
Schilhawsky 1960		10	0.42	11	0.00	4	0.25	3	0.75	1	0.74	3	0.74
Shebanova 2002		27	0.34	83	0.00	36	0.07	35	0.27	62	0.07	36	0.14
Smith 1975		82	0.08	84	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	73	0.03	74	0.03
Sokolov 2002		47	0.29	85	0.00	39	0.08	40	0.15	67	0.03	47	0.07
Sztompka 1959		81	0.09	39	0.00	83	0.03	79	0.03	84	0.02	86	0.02
Tomsic 1995		68	0.19	86	0.00	67	0.05	54	0.05	74	0.03	66	0.04
Uninsky 1932		17	0.38	21	0.00	28	0.08	29	0.33	47	0.08	33	0.16
Uninsky 1971		37	0.32	87	0.00	29	0.08	34	0.30	60	0.05	39	0.12
Wasowski 1980		46	0.29	40	0.00	41	0.05	39	0.17	76	0.05	43	0.09
Zak 1937		1	0.98	1	1.00	1	0.99	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Zak 1951		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 1		88	0.00	88	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	48	0.04	79	0.03
Random 2		90	-0.10	89	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	82	0.02	89	0.01
Random 3		89	-0.02	90	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	34	0.16	53	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).