Rosenthal 1931d

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		6	0.32	9	0.00	6	0.33	7	0.70	13	0.55	8	0.62
Anderszewski 2003		41	0.15	65	0.00	30	0.07	34	0.32	43	0.11	26	0.19
Ashkenazy 1981		37	0.16	35	0.00	34	0.07	31	0.37	51	0.07	28	0.16
Bacha 2000		19	0.24	25	0.00	25	0.09	28	0.40	36	0.21	19	0.29
Badura 1965		40	0.15	36	0.00	33	0.09	32	0.37	39	0.17	22	0.25
Barbosa 1983		45	0.13	55	0.00	57	0.03	63	0.03	73	0.04	72	0.03
Biret 1990		70	0.07	47	0.00	54	0.03	69	0.03	65	0.04	79	0.03
Blet 2003		75	0.05	48	0.00	64	0.03	68	0.03	79	0.03	73	0.03
Block 1995		66	0.08	49	0.00	65	0.03	71	0.03	84	0.02	88	0.02
Blumental 1952		29	0.18	66	0.00	22	0.09	23	0.42	40	0.15	23	0.25
Boshniakovich 1969		47	0.12	56	0.00	49	0.05	49	0.05	71	0.04	57	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		14	0.27	67	0.00	19	0.09	17	0.50	31	0.37	15	0.43
Bunin 1987		39	0.15	68	0.00	44	0.07	44	0.13	63	0.05	44	0.08
Bunin 1987b		36	0.16	69	0.00	41	0.08	41	0.17	69	0.04	43	0.08
Chiu 1999		65	0.08	21	0.00	58	0.04	56	0.04	78	0.04	55	0.04
Cohen 1997		13	0.27	8	0.00	9	0.15	9	0.62	20	0.52	9	0.57
Cortot 1951		11	0.29	18	0.00	14	0.13	10	0.56	23	0.51	11	0.53
Csalog 1996		88	-0.05	70	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	83	0.02	85	0.02
Czerny 1949		23	0.21	29	0.00	21	0.13	20	0.46	23	0.65	10	0.55
Czerny 1990		68	0.07	13	0.00	75	0.03	75	0.03	65	0.04	78	0.03
Duchoud 2007		81	0.02	37	0.00	81	0.03	73	0.03	89	0.02	87	0.02
Ezaki 2006		5	0.36	6	0.00	5	0.24	5	0.72	13	0.65	6	0.68
Falvay 1989		26	0.20	50	0.00	28	0.08	26	0.41	40	0.13	24	0.23
Farrell 1958		59	0.10	38	0.00	72	0.04	62	0.04	76	0.03	63	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		9	0.29	14	0.00	16	0.16	13	0.55	13	0.77	7	0.65
Fliere 1977		73	0.05	39	0.00	66	0.04	61	0.04	64	0.05	52	0.04
Fou 1978		42	0.14	57	0.00	36	0.08	35	0.31	79	0.03	39	0.10
Francois 1956		18	0.25	32	0.00	10	0.18	14	0.54	25	0.51	12	0.52
Friedman 1923		51	0.11	58	0.00	52	0.05	52	0.05	70	0.04	59	0.04
Friedman 1923b		55	0.10	71	0.00	60	0.03	72	0.03	69	0.04	77	0.03
Friedman 1930		77	0.05	72	0.00	51	0.04	60	0.04	83	0.03	74	0.03
Garcia 2007		44	0.13	10	0.00	69	0.04	55	0.04	84	0.03	76	0.03
Garcia 2007b		72	0.06	20	0.00	45	0.07	46	0.07	48	0.08	46	0.07
Gierzod 1998		10	0.29	73	0.00	15	0.12	12	0.55	24	0.43	13	0.49
Gornostaeva 1994		35	0.16	3	0.01	18	0.11	24	0.42	41	0.19	20	0.28
Groot 1988		43	0.13	74	0.00	32	0.07	29	0.38	71	0.04	36	0.12
Harasiewicz 1955		61	0.10	75	0.00	48	0.06	48	0.06	78	0.03	58	0.04
Hatto 1993		74	0.05	33	0.00	78	0.03	81	0.03	83	0.03	80	0.03
Hatto 1997		30	0.17	5	0.00	40	0.11	36	0.29	66	0.04	37	0.11
Horowitz 1949		71	0.06	59	0.00	79	0.03	78	0.03	79	0.03	67	0.03
Indjic 1988		76	0.05	60	0.00	80	0.03	76	0.03	81	0.03	71	0.03
Kapell 1951		83	0.02	40	0.00	84	0.03	79	0.03	80	0.03	64	0.03
Kissin 1993		84	0.01	41	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	84	0.03	84	0.02
Kushner 1989		32	0.17	76	0.00	35	0.06	38	0.25	75	0.04	40	0.10
Luisada 1991		49	0.12	34	0.00	55	0.04	58	0.04	79	0.04	51	0.04
Lushtak 2004		25	0.20	77	0.00	37	0.07	39	0.24	55	0.05	38	0.11
Malcuzynski 1961		33	0.17	61	0.00	39	0.07	40	0.21	72	0.04	41	0.09
Magaloff 1978		53	0.11	78	0.00	62	0.04	53	0.04	85	0.03	61	0.03
Magin 1975		89	-0.07	79	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	80	0.02	89	0.01
Michalowski 1933		78	0.05	62	0.00	73	0.03	77	0.03	73	0.04	70	0.03
Milkina 1970		31	0.17	15	0.00	27	0.08	27	0.41	43	0.16	21	0.26
Mohovich 1999		27	0.20	80	0.00	29	0.08	30	0.38	60	0.05	31	0.14
Moravec 1969		12	0.28	81	0.00	20	0.12	19	0.46	58	0.04	30	0.14
Morozova 2008		22	0.21	82	0.00	23	0.08	25	0.41	49	0.06	27	0.16
Neighaus 1950		24	0.21	51	0.00	38	0.08	37	0.26	77	0.03	42	0.09
Niedzielski 1931		62	0.09	42	0.00	50	0.05	51	0.05	65	0.05	50	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		63	0.09	26	0.00	61	0.04	54	0.04	76	0.04	56	0.04
Osinska 1989		48	0.12	27	0.00	63	0.05	50	0.05	74	0.03	53	0.04
Pachmann 1927		82	0.02	83	0.00	83	0.03	80	0.03	81	0.03	69	0.03
Paderewski 1930		60	0.10	84	0.00	59	0.03	74	0.03	71	0.04	68	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		54	0.11	43	0.00	46	0.07	47	0.07	80	0.03	49	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		64	0.09	44	0.00	77	0.03	82	0.03	80	0.03	62	0.03
Poblocka 1999		80	0.03	85	0.00	76	0.03	83	0.03	86	0.03	60	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		7	0.31	11	0.00	7	0.19	6	0.72	14	0.70	5	0.71
Rachmaninoff 1923		17	0.25	22	0.00	12	0.11	11	0.56	30	0.30	17	0.41
Rangell 2001		15	0.27	17	0.00	13	0.15	15	0.53	36	0.19	18	0.32
Richter 1976		86	0.00	52	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	83	0.03	83	0.02
Rosen 1989		16	0.26	53	0.00	17	0.12	16	0.52	70	0.03	34	0.12
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.49	4	0.00	4	0.62	4	0.85	5	0.78	4	0.81
Rosenthal 1931		2	0.77	2	0.02	2	0.89	2	0.97	2	0.97	2	0.97
Rosenthal 1931b		1	0.87	1	0.94	1	0.93	1	0.99	2	0.99	1	0.99
Rosenthal 1931c		3	0.68	7	0.00	3	0.82	3	0.95	3	0.93	3	0.94
Rosenthal 1931d		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rossi 2007		87	0.00	30	0.00	74	0.03	70	0.03	51	0.05	54	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		21	0.22	16	0.00	24	0.10	22	0.44	48	0.08	25	0.19
Rubinstein 1952		56	0.10	54	0.00	56	0.03	67	0.03	77	0.03	81	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		20	0.24	45	0.00	26	0.10	21	0.45	66	0.05	29	0.15
Schilhawsky 1960		58	0.10	28	0.00	47	0.07	45	0.07	54	0.05	48	0.06
Shebanova 2002		79	0.03	46	0.00	82	0.02	84	0.02	82	0.03	86	0.02
Smith 1975		34	0.17	12	0.00	11	0.14	18	0.49	29	0.38	16	0.43
Sokolov 2002		57	0.10	31	0.00	42	0.06	43	0.14	74	0.03	47	0.06
Sztompka 1959		38	0.15	86	0.00	43	0.09	42	0.17	74	0.03	45	0.07
Tomsic 1995		28	0.19	23	0.00	31	0.08	33	0.36	57	0.05	32	0.13
Uninsky 1932		50	0.11	87	0.00	68	0.04	59	0.04	86	0.02	75	0.03
Uninsky 1971		8	0.30	19	0.00	8	0.23	8	0.64	25	0.33	14	0.46
Wasowski 1980		85	0.00	88	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	82	0.03	82	0.02
Zak 1937		52	0.11	89	0.00	71	0.03	64	0.03	74	0.03	65	0.03
Zak 1951		46	0.12	90	0.00	53	0.03	65	0.03	70	0.04	66	0.03
Random 1		69	0.07	63	0.00	67	0.03	66	0.03	6	0.52	35	0.12
Random 2		67	0.08	24	0.00	70	0.04	57	0.04	19	0.39	33	0.12
Random 3		90	-0.13	64	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	75	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).