Rosenthal 1931c

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		20	0.32	41	0.00	12	0.16	11	0.61	25	0.43	14	0.51
Anderszewski 2003		40	0.23	52	0.00	43	0.07	43	0.14	46	0.07	41	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		43	0.23	65	0.00	51	0.05	52	0.05	71	0.05	56	0.05
Bacha 2000		32	0.26	39	0.00	33	0.09	31	0.37	43	0.12	27	0.21
Badura 1965		67	0.16	25	0.00	58	0.04	57	0.04	65	0.04	63	0.04
Barbosa 1983		76	0.12	36	0.00	85	0.02	83	0.02	81	0.03	85	0.02
Biret 1990		87	0.04	45	0.00	86	0.02	85	0.02	76	0.03	88	0.02
Blet 2003		66	0.16	53	0.00	73	0.03	72	0.03	68	0.04	79	0.03
Block 1995		42	0.23	86	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.16	70	0.04	45	0.08
Blumental 1952		57	0.19	78	0.00	40	0.07	40	0.20	57	0.05	43	0.10
Boshniakovich 1969		69	0.15	54	0.00	52	0.04	59	0.04	70	0.04	64	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		34	0.26	19	0.00	37	0.07	37	0.26	40	0.19	25	0.22
Bunin 1987		71	0.15	87	0.00	74	0.03	68	0.03	70	0.04	81	0.03
Bunin 1987b		70	0.15	46	0.00	70	0.03	74	0.03	75	0.04	74	0.03
Chiu 1999		26	0.29	79	0.00	32	0.11	36	0.26	61	0.06	38	0.12
Cohen 1997		7	0.40	4	0.03	6	0.27	7	0.69	5	0.69	7	0.69
Cortot 1951		5	0.43	15	0.00	9	0.14	6	0.70	5	0.70	6	0.70
Csalog 1996		83	0.08	88	0.00	81	0.03	73	0.03	79	0.03	78	0.03
Czerny 1949		25	0.29	42	0.00	22	0.09	24	0.47	16	0.71	10	0.58
Czerny 1990		72	0.14	58	0.00	78	0.02	77	0.02	71	0.03	87	0.02
Duchoud 2007		68	0.16	80	0.00	45	0.06	46	0.06	69	0.04	55	0.05
Ezaki 2006		6	0.43	9	0.00	5	0.26	5	0.75	9	0.67	5	0.71
Falvay 1989		46	0.22	40	0.00	49	0.06	47	0.06	70	0.03	58	0.04
Farrell 1958		55	0.20	27	0.00	65	0.04	60	0.04	65	0.04	59	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		21	0.32	59	0.00	27	0.14	26	0.47	18	0.73	9	0.59
Fliere 1977		30	0.27	21	0.00	30	0.11	28	0.44	71	0.04	36	0.13
Fou 1978		52	0.21	55	0.00	54	0.04	65	0.04	81	0.03	72	0.03
Francois 1956		19	0.32	32	0.00	8	0.21	16	0.54	21	0.55	12	0.54
Friedman 1923		59	0.19	47	0.00	60	0.04	58	0.04	62	0.06	57	0.05
Friedman 1923b		62	0.17	72	0.00	69	0.03	67	0.03	65	0.06	65	0.04
Friedman 1930		60	0.18	66	0.00	62	0.04	56	0.04	62	0.05	62	0.04
Garcia 2007		51	0.21	12	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.15	64	0.05	44	0.09
Garcia 2007b		85	0.06	89	0.00	82	0.02	84	0.02	72	0.04	82	0.03
Gierzod 1998		10	0.36	16	0.00	7	0.26	10	0.63	9	0.68	8	0.65
Gornostaeva 1994		28	0.28	81	0.00	34	0.08	30	0.39	38	0.23	20	0.30
Groot 1988		41	0.23	43	0.00	29	0.13	29	0.43	64	0.06	32	0.16
Harasiewicz 1955		48	0.22	29	0.00	56	0.05	51	0.05	77	0.04	67	0.04
Hatto 1993		45	0.23	33	0.00	55	0.04	62	0.04	69	0.05	66	0.04
Hatto 1997		36	0.24	20	0.00	48	0.06	45	0.06	53	0.06	51	0.06
Horowitz 1949		74	0.13	48	0.00	75	0.02	79	0.02	73	0.04	75	0.03
Indjic 1988		61	0.17	56	0.00	68	0.02	78	0.02	73	0.04	77	0.03
Kapell 1951		86	0.05	67	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	81	0.02	89	0.01
Kissin 1993		65	0.16	60	0.00	67	0.03	69	0.03	70	0.05	61	0.04
Kushner 1989		35	0.25	68	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	80	0.03	48	0.06
Luisada 1991		79	0.11	61	0.00	83	0.01	87	0.01	77	0.04	83	0.02
Lushtak 2004		37	0.24	57	0.00	39	0.08	39	0.22	56	0.05	42	0.10
Malcuzynski 1961		23	0.31	30	0.00	17	0.14	17	0.52	32	0.21	19	0.33
Magaloff 1978		18	0.33	69	0.00	19	0.13	18	0.51	40	0.23	18	0.34
Magin 1975		81	0.09	73	0.00	72	0.02	81	0.02	68	0.04	71	0.03
Michalowski 1933		77	0.12	82	0.00	79	0.03	70	0.03	75	0.04	76	0.03
Milkina 1970		64	0.16	74	0.00	53	0.04	63	0.04	47	0.08	49	0.06
Mohovich 1999		12	0.34	8	0.00	11	0.13	8	0.66	18	0.48	11	0.56
Moravec 1969		17	0.33	75	0.00	25	0.08	23	0.48	54	0.04	33	0.14
Morozova 2008		14	0.33	5	0.01	15	0.14	25	0.47	37	0.15	21	0.27
Neighaus 1950		9	0.38	10	0.00	13	0.18	9	0.65	50	0.08	24	0.23
Niedzielski 1931		31	0.26	35	0.00	24	0.09	27	0.46	49	0.07	29	0.18
Ohlsson 1999		38	0.24	49	0.00	47	0.05	54	0.05	70	0.04	60	0.04
Osinska 1989		47	0.22	76	0.00	50	0.05	49	0.05	50	0.06	52	0.05
Pachmann 1927		53	0.21	31	0.00	57	0.05	55	0.05	47	0.07	50	0.06
Paderewski 1930		33	0.26	83	0.00	35	0.05	32	0.31	60	0.06	34	0.14
Perlemuter 1992		56	0.20	77	0.00	38	0.08	38	0.25	65	0.04	40	0.10
Pierdomenico 2008		58	0.19	37	0.00	63	0.03	66	0.03	64	0.04	70	0.03
Poblocka 1999		82	0.08	90	0.00	77	0.02	80	0.02	78	0.04	69	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		15	0.33	18	0.00	18	0.10	20	0.50	23	0.56	13	0.53
Rachmaninoff 1923		39	0.23	6	0.01	23	0.08	33	0.30	40	0.16	26	0.22
Rangell 2001		16	0.33	13	0.00	10	0.13	13	0.58	16	0.42	16	0.49
Richter 1976		49	0.22	70	0.00	64	0.04	61	0.04	55	0.06	53	0.05
Rosen 1989		8	0.38	11	0.00	14	0.16	12	0.59	37	0.28	17	0.41
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.51	23	0.00	4	0.38	4	0.82	2	0.82	4	0.82
Rosenthal 1931		2	0.70	2	0.15	2	0.70	2	0.95	3	0.96	1	0.95
Rosenthal 1931b		1	0.75	1	0.68	1	0.67	1	0.95	3	0.96	2	0.95
Rosenthal 1931c		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931d		3	0.68	3	0.08	3	0.81	3	0.93	3	0.95	3	0.94
Rossi 2007		80	0.10	34	0.00	59	0.06	48	0.06	26	0.26	37	0.12
Rubinstein 1939		29	0.27	28	0.00	31	0.10	35	0.27	34	0.15	28	0.20
Rubinstein 1952		50	0.22	22	0.00	36	0.07	34	0.30	63	0.04	39	0.11
Rubinstein 1966		11	0.35	24	0.00	21	0.12	15	0.55	57	0.05	31	0.17
Schilhawsky 1960		84	0.06	84	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	83	0.02	90	0.01
Shebanova 2002		63	0.17	71	0.00	71	0.02	75	0.02	67	0.06	80	0.03
Smith 1975		24	0.29	17	0.00	16	0.12	19	0.50	16	0.50	15	0.50
Sokolov 2002		44	0.23	26	0.00	46	0.05	50	0.05	44	0.08	47	0.06
Sztompka 1959		13	0.34	14	0.00	20	0.14	14	0.56	46	0.10	23	0.24
Tomsic 1995		27	0.28	7	0.01	28	0.17	21	0.49	40	0.12	22	0.24
Uninsky 1932		54	0.20	38	0.00	61	0.05	53	0.05	63	0.05	54	0.05
Uninsky 1971		22	0.31	62	0.00	26	0.09	22	0.48	50	0.07	30	0.18
Wasowski 1980		78	0.11	50	0.00	84	0.02	82	0.02	71	0.05	68	0.03
Zak 1937		75	0.12	63	0.00	80	0.03	71	0.03	71	0.04	73	0.03
Zak 1951		73	0.14	64	0.00	76	0.02	76	0.02	72	0.03	84	0.02
Random 1		88	0.03	85	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	19	0.32	46	0.08
Random 2		90	0.00	44	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	58	0.05	86	0.02
Random 3		89	0.01	51	0.00	66	0.04	64	0.04	12	0.46	35	0.14

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).