Hatto 1997

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		10	0.43	49	0.00	9	0.12	7	0.56	9	0.59	8	0.57
Anderszewski 2003		66	0.23	33	0.00	57	0.04	63	0.04	34	0.21	52	0.09
Ashkenazy 1981		7	0.45	48	0.00	12	0.10	8	0.55	31	0.47	15	0.51
Bacha 2000		26	0.37	17	0.00	30	0.06	34	0.22	18	0.48	27	0.32
Badura 1965		72	0.19	70	0.00	77	0.04	69	0.04	66	0.04	76	0.04
Barbosa 1983		19	0.40	28	0.00	14	0.13	10	0.53	10	0.63	7	0.58
Biret 1990		8	0.45	5	0.01	23	0.09	17	0.45	6	0.72	9	0.57
Blet 2003		17	0.41	71	0.00	18	0.09	16	0.45	16	0.57	13	0.51
Block 1995		77	0.16	72	0.00	75	0.04	70	0.04	77	0.04	77	0.04
Blumental 1952		24	0.38	40	0.00	19	0.10	19	0.43	10	0.60	14	0.51
Boshniakovich 1969		80	0.14	53	0.00	61	0.03	74	0.03	62	0.05	79	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		87	0.09	54	0.00	84	0.02	88	0.02	71	0.04	81	0.03
Bunin 1987		50	0.29	11	0.00	10	0.12	24	0.30	30	0.40	24	0.35
Bunin 1987b		49	0.30	43	0.00	11	0.10	27	0.29	30	0.38	26	0.33
Chiu 1999		16	0.41	34	0.00	32	0.06	33	0.22	55	0.07	45	0.12
Cohen 1997		43	0.32	41	0.00	54	0.06	49	0.06	33	0.38	38	0.15
Cortot 1951		60	0.24	24	0.00	60	0.04	64	0.04	50	0.06	70	0.05
Csalog 1996		68	0.21	61	0.00	80	0.03	81	0.03	63	0.05	74	0.04
Czerny 1949		35	0.34	6	0.00	52	0.05	57	0.05	33	0.51	36	0.16
Czerny 1990		32	0.35	80	0.00	45	0.06	52	0.06	36	0.34	39	0.14
Duchoud 2007		25	0.38	22	0.00	29	0.11	28	0.27	36	0.23	30	0.25
Ezaki 2006		45	0.31	62	0.00	50	0.05	59	0.05	33	0.27	44	0.12
Falvay 1989		6	0.47	3	0.01	17	0.09	13	0.48	9	0.51	17	0.49
Farrell 1958		59	0.25	55	0.00	53	0.07	46	0.07	55	0.06	59	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		69	0.20	50	0.00	69	0.04	67	0.04	34	0.53	37	0.15
Fliere 1977		65	0.24	81	0.00	74	0.03	75	0.03	60	0.05	71	0.04
Fou 1978		36	0.34	30	0.00	42	0.06	39	0.15	45	0.07	50	0.10
Francois 1956		31	0.35	20	0.00	25	0.09	20	0.37	13	0.67	16	0.50
Friedman 1923		82	0.14	63	0.00	87	0.04	73	0.04	82	0.03	87	0.03
Friedman 1923b		84	0.13	73	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	83	0.03	89	0.02
Friedman 1930		34	0.35	31	0.00	39	0.07	41	0.14	47	0.09	47	0.11
Garcia 2007		70	0.20	7	0.00	49	0.06	54	0.06	51	0.06	60	0.06
Garcia 2007b		33	0.35	12	0.00	21	0.11	22	0.36	17	0.55	19	0.44
Gierzod 1998		83	0.13	57	0.00	66	0.04	65	0.04	52	0.06	69	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		37	0.33	56	0.00	55	0.06	50	0.06	35	0.30	43	0.13
Groot 1988		20	0.40	15	0.00	20	0.10	14	0.47	43	0.14	29	0.26
Harasiewicz 1955		28	0.36	82	0.00	36	0.07	32	0.22	68	0.04	53	0.09
Hatto 1993		2	0.79	2	0.14	2	0.88	2	0.94	2	0.94	2	0.94
Hatto 1997		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Horowitz 1949		46	0.31	74	0.00	40	0.05	44	0.11	41	0.24	35	0.16
Indjic 1988		1	0.83	1	0.79	1	0.78	1	0.96	2	0.96	1	0.96
Kapell 1951		5	0.48	10	0.00	5	0.12	4	0.64	10	0.59	5	0.61
Kissin 1993		64	0.24	83	0.00	62	0.04	68	0.04	56	0.07	67	0.05
Kushner 1989		52	0.29	84	0.00	68	0.04	71	0.04	52	0.06	64	0.05
Luisada 1991		4	0.48	13	0.00	3	0.35	3	0.70	7	0.72	3	0.71
Lushtak 2004		71	0.19	85	0.00	78	0.03	80	0.03	78	0.03	84	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		56	0.27	16	0.00	46	0.07	45	0.07	45	0.08	57	0.07
Magaloff 1978		79	0.15	75	0.00	79	0.03	76	0.03	75	0.03	82	0.03
Magin 1975		27	0.36	58	0.00	22	0.11	18	0.44	20	0.60	12	0.51
Michalowski 1933		51	0.29	26	0.00	35	0.05	35	0.21	47	0.08	41	0.13
Milkina 1970		9	0.43	9	0.00	8	0.14	11	0.52	6	0.65	6	0.58
Mohovich 1999		55	0.27	44	0.00	16	0.13	29	0.26	35	0.23	31	0.24
Moravec 1969		42	0.32	35	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.13	32	0.25	34	0.18
Morozova 2008		38	0.33	64	0.00	51	0.06	55	0.06	62	0.05	68	0.05
Neighaus 1950		18	0.41	4	0.01	26	0.09	21	0.36	40	0.16	32	0.24
Niedzielski 1931		58	0.26	59	0.00	56	0.07	47	0.07	45	0.07	56	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		39	0.33	76	0.00	44	0.07	42	0.13	58	0.05	54	0.08
Osinska 1989		57	0.26	45	0.00	63	0.04	60	0.04	51	0.06	62	0.05
Pachmann 1927		85	0.11	77	0.00	82	0.03	79	0.03	74	0.05	73	0.04
Paderewski 1930		53	0.28	65	0.00	34	0.05	36	0.20	41	0.23	33	0.21
Perlemuter 1992		81	0.14	86	0.00	85	0.03	83	0.03	81	0.03	80	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		41	0.32	66	0.00	47	0.06	51	0.06	28	0.30	40	0.13
Poblocka 1999		67	0.21	38	0.00	59	0.05	58	0.05	69	0.05	63	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		29	0.36	87	0.00	38	0.07	37	0.19	22	0.59	25	0.33
Rachmaninoff 1923		54	0.28	23	0.00	58	0.04	62	0.04	68	0.04	72	0.04
Rangell 2001		78	0.15	88	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	80	0.03	86	0.03
Richter 1976		48	0.30	51	0.00	64	0.05	56	0.05	67	0.05	66	0.05
Rosen 1989		44	0.31	21	0.00	48	0.06	48	0.06	73	0.03	78	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		30	0.36	47	0.00	27	0.08	25	0.29	24	0.43	23	0.35
Rosenthal 1931		76	0.16	78	0.00	70	0.04	72	0.04	44	0.15	55	0.08
Rosenthal 1931b		75	0.17	89	0.00	73	0.03	77	0.03	42	0.15	58	0.07
Rosenthal 1931c		62	0.24	42	0.00	65	0.06	53	0.06	45	0.06	61	0.06
Rosenthal 1931d		74	0.17	19	0.00	67	0.04	66	0.04	36	0.29	49	0.11
Rossi 2007		89	-0.05	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	87	0.01	90	0.01
Rubinstein 1939		11	0.43	36	0.00	7	0.13	23	0.34	16	0.37	22	0.35
Rubinstein 1952		14	0.42	46	0.00	6	0.11	5	0.60	4	0.68	4	0.64
Rubinstein 1966		12	0.43	39	0.00	15	0.12	12	0.51	17	0.43	18	0.47
Schilhawsky 1960		73	0.19	32	0.00	76	0.03	85	0.03	46	0.06	75	0.04
Shebanova 2002		40	0.33	52	0.00	37	0.06	38	0.17	60	0.07	48	0.11
Smith 1975		21	0.40	27	0.00	28	0.10	26	0.29	18	0.50	21	0.38
Sokolov 2002		22	0.40	14	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.24	18	0.44	28	0.32
Sztompka 1959		47	0.30	29	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.14	58	0.06	51	0.09
Tomsic 1995		13	0.43	8	0.00	13	0.11	9	0.53	4	0.59	10	0.56
Uninsky 1932		23	0.39	25	0.00	33	0.05	30	0.24	50	0.07	42	0.13
Uninsky 1971		3	0.49	67	0.00	4	0.23	6	0.57	9	0.52	11	0.54
Wasowski 1980		15	0.41	18	0.00	24	0.12	15	0.45	34	0.41	20	0.43
Zak 1937		61	0.24	68	0.00	72	0.04	61	0.04	54	0.06	65	0.05
Zak 1951		63	0.24	79	0.00	71	0.03	78	0.03	76	0.03	83	0.03
Random 1		88	0.00	37	0.00	88	0.02	86	0.02	55	0.04	85	0.03
Random 2		86	0.11	60	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	12	0.45	46	0.12
Random 3		90	-0.06	69	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	52	0.03	88	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).