Rachmaninoff 1923

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		25	0.37	44	0.00	24	0.15	23	0.46	26	0.41	22	0.43
Anderszewski 2003		86	0.00	71	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	86	0.02	88	0.02
Ashkenazy 1981		15	0.44	34	0.00	17	0.15	18	0.59	37	0.37	20	0.47
Bacha 2000		88	-0.02	20	0.00	89	0.02	87	0.02	83	0.02	87	0.02
Badura 1965		59	0.25	48	0.00	55	0.03	70	0.03	45	0.07	62	0.05
Barbosa 1983		40	0.30	27	0.00	52	0.04	58	0.04	48	0.06	60	0.05
Biret 1990		41	0.30	40	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.14	32	0.44	30	0.25
Blet 2003		23	0.39	36	0.00	28	0.08	28	0.36	40	0.27	28	0.31
Block 1995		57	0.25	53	0.00	49	0.05	52	0.05	71	0.04	75	0.04
Blumental 1952		81	0.14	37	0.00	71	0.04	59	0.04	61	0.05	76	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		78	0.15	87	0.00	63	0.03	79	0.03	78	0.03	85	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		63	0.23	72	0.00	56	0.04	65	0.04	45	0.11	51	0.07
Bunin 1987		2	0.58	7	0.02	4	0.31	3	0.81	2	0.78	2	0.79
Bunin 1987b		1	0.58	3	0.19	3	0.31	1	0.83	2	0.79	1	0.81
Chiu 1999		16	0.44	6	0.02	16	0.14	16	0.64	23	0.49	17	0.56
Cohen 1997		70	0.19	32	0.00	74	0.03	85	0.03	60	0.04	86	0.03
Cortot 1951		75	0.17	66	0.00	79	0.04	63	0.04	53	0.05	78	0.04
Csalog 1996		35	0.31	12	0.01	25	0.12	27	0.41	25	0.40	24	0.40
Czerny 1949		58	0.25	63	0.00	60	0.04	64	0.04	36	0.47	39	0.14
Czerny 1990		5	0.53	2	0.26	2	0.27	4	0.79	10	0.78	4	0.78
Duchoud 2007		14	0.46	13	0.01	13	0.15	10	0.70	5	0.67	10	0.68
Ezaki 2006		72	0.18	61	0.00	75	0.03	73	0.03	62	0.04	80	0.03
Falvay 1989		37	0.31	64	0.00	43	0.07	41	0.14	52	0.06	44	0.09
Farrell 1958		12	0.47	8	0.02	12	0.16	13	0.68	1	0.75	8	0.71
Ferenczy 1958		83	0.07	62	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	55	0.06	74	0.04
Fliere 1977		13	0.46	21	0.00	15	0.14	14	0.68	34	0.47	15	0.57
Fou 1978		33	0.31	79	0.00	39	0.07	38	0.18	54	0.05	45	0.09
Francois 1956		55	0.25	67	0.00	61	0.04	67	0.04	41	0.20	48	0.09
Friedman 1923		11	0.47	23	0.00	11	0.14	11	0.70	16	0.67	12	0.68
Friedman 1923b		9	0.48	10	0.01	8	0.18	9	0.70	16	0.67	11	0.68
Friedman 1930		18	0.43	9	0.01	19	0.21	17	0.60	26	0.55	16	0.57
Garcia 2007		38	0.30	58	0.00	41	0.06	43	0.13	56	0.05	50	0.08
Garcia 2007b		34	0.31	51	0.00	31	0.09	35	0.21	38	0.23	33	0.22
Gierzod 1998		89	-0.05	54	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	81	0.02	89	0.02
Gornostaeva 1994		60	0.24	31	0.00	45	0.06	47	0.06	43	0.17	43	0.10
Groot 1988		20	0.42	24	0.00	23	0.16	20	0.55	45	0.10	31	0.23
Harasiewicz 1955		36	0.31	42	0.00	37	0.05	36	0.21	72	0.04	47	0.09
Hatto 1993		51	0.26	45	0.00	67	0.03	71	0.03	49	0.09	65	0.05
Hatto 1997		47	0.28	43	0.00	65	0.04	68	0.04	62	0.04	73	0.04
Horowitz 1949		6	0.51	15	0.00	7	0.18	7	0.74	8	0.73	6	0.73
Indjic 1988		49	0.27	17	0.00	68	0.05	49	0.05	65	0.06	59	0.05
Kapell 1951		26	0.37	18	0.00	29	0.09	29	0.36	41	0.12	34	0.21
Kissin 1993		62	0.24	25	0.00	54	0.04	69	0.04	53	0.07	58	0.05
Kushner 1989		43	0.29	59	0.00	48	0.05	55	0.05	60	0.05	55	0.05
Luisada 1991		17	0.43	41	0.00	22	0.13	25	0.46	38	0.27	26	0.35
Lushtak 2004		74	0.17	80	0.00	78	0.03	81	0.03	79	0.03	84	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		48	0.27	26	0.00	58	0.03	77	0.03	61	0.05	68	0.04
Magaloff 1978		42	0.29	68	0.00	36	0.08	34	0.23	47	0.07	40	0.13
Magin 1975		71	0.19	81	0.00	77	0.03	72	0.03	77	0.04	82	0.03
Michalowski 1933		32	0.33	82	0.00	35	0.09	33	0.28	44	0.16	35	0.21
Milkina 1970		68	0.19	88	0.00	72	0.05	54	0.05	52	0.06	56	0.05
Mohovich 1999		80	0.14	65	0.00	82	0.05	57	0.05	77	0.03	77	0.04
Moravec 1969		10	0.48	19	0.00	6	0.20	6	0.74	4	0.70	7	0.72
Morozova 2008		21	0.42	29	0.00	18	0.16	19	0.55	17	0.43	19	0.49
Neighaus 1950		45	0.28	83	0.00	44	0.07	44	0.13	53	0.06	46	0.09
Niedzielski 1931		22	0.40	30	0.00	27	0.15	24	0.46	31	0.25	27	0.34
Ohlsson 1999		27	0.37	55	0.00	33	0.06	31	0.30	38	0.13	36	0.20
Osinska 1989		76	0.16	89	0.00	47	0.07	46	0.07	58	0.05	52	0.06
Pachmann 1927		52	0.26	84	0.00	50	0.05	53	0.05	67	0.05	57	0.05
Paderewski 1930		69	0.19	85	0.00	80	0.04	60	0.04	72	0.04	71	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		29	0.35	5	0.04	20	0.16	22	0.50	31	0.48	18	0.49
Pierdomenico 2008		39	0.30	74	0.00	40	0.05	39	0.16	39	0.17	37	0.16
Poblocka 1999		19	0.42	33	0.00	14	0.16	12	0.68	9	0.58	13	0.63
Rabcewiczowa 1932		50	0.26	86	0.00	59	0.03	75	0.03	37	0.22	49	0.08
Rachmaninoff 1923		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rangell 2001		46	0.28	69	0.00	53	0.05	50	0.05	49	0.06	64	0.05
Richter 1976		24	0.37	49	0.00	26	0.11	26	0.41	41	0.36	25	0.38
Rosen 1989		28	0.35	11	0.01	21	0.16	21	0.50	32	0.38	21	0.44
Rosenthal 1930		7	0.50	28	0.00	9	0.18	8	0.73	1	0.83	3	0.78
Rosenthal 1931		82	0.14	22	0.00	69	0.05	51	0.05	35	0.40	38	0.14
Rosenthal 1931b		67	0.20	50	0.00	66	0.03	76	0.03	31	0.44	42	0.11
Rosenthal 1931c		64	0.23	14	0.00	32	0.08	40	0.16	33	0.30	32	0.22
Rosenthal 1931d		54	0.25	39	0.00	30	0.08	30	0.30	11	0.56	23	0.41
Rossi 2007		85	0.04	75	0.00	73	0.03	78	0.03	63	0.04	81	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		31	0.33	60	0.00	34	0.08	32	0.30	27	0.24	29	0.27
Rubinstein 1952		77	0.16	90	0.00	81	0.05	56	0.05	79	0.03	79	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		44	0.29	70	0.00	51	0.05	48	0.05	60	0.05	61	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		66	0.20	76	0.00	64	0.03	80	0.03	56	0.05	72	0.04
Shebanova 2002		30	0.35	56	0.00	38	0.06	37	0.19	54	0.08	41	0.12
Smith 1975		79	0.15	73	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	63	0.05	66	0.04
Sokolov 2002		56	0.25	35	0.00	46	0.08	45	0.08	47	0.05	53	0.06
Sztompka 1959		4	0.53	4	0.06	5	0.35	2	0.82	8	0.73	5	0.77
Tomsic 1995		73	0.17	57	0.00	70	0.04	61	0.04	58	0.05	70	0.04
Uninsky 1932		3	0.55	1	0.28	1	0.28	5	0.77	11	0.63	9	0.70
Uninsky 1971		61	0.24	52	0.00	57	0.04	66	0.04	73	0.03	83	0.03
Wasowski 1980		8	0.49	16	0.00	10	0.15	15	0.67	22	0.55	14	0.61
Zak 1937		53	0.26	38	0.00	62	0.03	74	0.03	60	0.06	67	0.04
Zak 1951		65	0.21	46	0.00	76	0.04	62	0.04	62	0.05	69	0.04
Random 1		87	0.00	77	0.00	87	0.02	89	0.02	41	0.12	63	0.05
Random 2		84	0.04	47	0.00	85	0.03	82	0.03	41	0.14	54	0.06
Random 3		90	-0.09	78	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	87	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).