Rubinstein 1952

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		60	0.23	17	0.01	43	0.06	42	0.11	49	0.07	46	0.09
Anderszewski 2003		73	0.17	59	0.00	67	0.04	73	0.04	53	0.06	62	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		27	0.35	33	0.00	32	0.11	30	0.35	48	0.08	37	0.17
Bacha 2000		65	0.20	71	0.00	60	0.04	68	0.04	52	0.06	55	0.05
Badura 1965		82	0.11	87	0.00	85	0.02	83	0.02	83	0.03	88	0.02
Barbosa 1983		55	0.24	26	0.00	54	0.04	67	0.04	49	0.06	60	0.05
Biret 1990		46	0.28	20	0.00	36	0.06	37	0.17	23	0.53	29	0.30
Blet 2003		39	0.30	60	0.00	45	0.06	46	0.06	53	0.07	50	0.06
Block 1995		12	0.41	22	0.00	17	0.11	11	0.60	28	0.43	14	0.51
Blumental 1952		64	0.21	44	0.00	70	0.05	52	0.05	45	0.07	53	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		33	0.33	15	0.02	31	0.09	34	0.26	51	0.06	43	0.12
Brailowsky 1960		84	0.10	68	0.00	84	0.02	84	0.02	76	0.04	81	0.03
Bunin 1987		76	0.17	77	0.00	74	0.06	47	0.06	59	0.05	67	0.05
Bunin 1987b		77	0.16	45	0.00	75	0.05	56	0.05	67	0.04	74	0.04
Chiu 1999		57	0.24	78	0.00	66	0.04	74	0.04	66	0.05	69	0.04
Cohen 1997		24	0.36	2	0.11	9	0.12	20	0.47	17	0.54	15	0.50
Cortot 1951		59	0.23	53	0.00	47	0.06	49	0.06	30	0.37	39	0.15
Csalog 1996		54	0.25	43	0.00	64	0.05	54	0.05	55	0.06	61	0.05
Czerny 1949		62	0.22	37	0.00	41	0.05	41	0.12	26	0.61	31	0.27
Czerny 1990		45	0.29	82	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	43	0.17	42	0.13
Duchoud 2007		50	0.26	35	0.00	50	0.05	58	0.05	59	0.05	65	0.05
Ezaki 2006		66	0.20	29	0.00	62	0.04	69	0.04	50	0.07	54	0.05
Falvay 1989		47	0.28	54	0.00	34	0.10	32	0.31	17	0.41	25	0.36
Farrell 1958		81	0.11	52	0.00	68	0.04	75	0.04	61	0.05	71	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		88	0.00	79	0.00	87	0.03	81	0.03	54	0.06	78	0.04
Fliere 1977		26	0.35	28	0.00	33	0.11	33	0.28	49	0.08	38	0.15
Fou 1978		61	0.22	41	0.00	55	0.05	62	0.05	69	0.03	72	0.04
Francois 1956		11	0.41	14	0.02	10	0.12	7	0.63	5	0.75	3	0.69
Friedman 1923		71	0.18	74	0.00	81	0.02	87	0.02	86	0.03	89	0.02
Friedman 1923b		72	0.18	75	0.00	82	0.03	80	0.03	76	0.03	84	0.03
Friedman 1930		38	0.31	47	0.00	52	0.04	70	0.04	54	0.06	64	0.05
Garcia 2007		75	0.17	65	0.00	76	0.05	55	0.05	71	0.04	80	0.04
Garcia 2007b		80	0.14	48	0.00	83	0.02	85	0.02	71	0.04	87	0.03
Gierzod 1998		70	0.18	46	0.00	49	0.05	53	0.05	49	0.07	52	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		16	0.38	25	0.00	16	0.11	13	0.56	14	0.65	8	0.60
Groot 1988		2	0.48	4	0.08	6	0.15	3	0.68	19	0.45	12	0.55
Harasiewicz 1955		5	0.44	6	0.04	4	0.23	5	0.66	8	0.56	7	0.61
Hatto 1993		13	0.39	72	0.00	21	0.12	14	0.55	37	0.25	24	0.37
Hatto 1997		10	0.42	8	0.03	5	0.13	4	0.68	5	0.60	6	0.64
Horowitz 1949		48	0.27	30	0.00	59	0.04	64	0.04	53	0.06	59	0.05
Indjic 1988		15	0.39	76	0.00	24	0.11	18	0.51	34	0.29	23	0.38
Kapell 1951		18	0.37	16	0.01	13	0.10	15	0.53	20	0.43	17	0.48
Kissin 1993		37	0.31	61	0.00	39	0.06	38	0.17	44	0.17	36	0.17
Kushner 1989		36	0.31	55	0.00	53	0.05	59	0.05	66	0.04	73	0.04
Luisada 1991		22	0.37	23	0.00	26	0.09	22	0.43	37	0.27	27	0.34
Lushtak 2004		58	0.23	56	0.00	58	0.05	61	0.05	48	0.06	66	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		34	0.32	27	0.00	30	0.09	29	0.38	30	0.22	30	0.29
Magaloff 1978		7	0.43	21	0.00	7	0.14	10	0.61	14	0.58	9	0.59
Magin 1975		1	0.51	1	0.26	1	0.26	2	0.69	12	0.72	2	0.70
Michalowski 1933		44	0.29	62	0.00	63	0.05	60	0.05	46	0.08	49	0.06
Milkina 1970		42	0.30	49	0.00	27	0.10	25	0.41	17	0.51	19	0.46
Mohovich 1999		30	0.33	19	0.01	18	0.12	28	0.39	26	0.34	26	0.36
Moravec 1969		41	0.30	57	0.00	42	0.06	39	0.14	41	0.12	40	0.13
Morozova 2008		52	0.26	66	0.00	51	0.06	50	0.06	72	0.04	63	0.05
Neighaus 1950		20	0.37	24	0.00	23	0.11	21	0.47	49	0.08	33	0.19
Niedzielski 1931		25	0.36	39	0.00	25	0.09	24	0.42	30	0.26	28	0.33
Ohlsson 1999		8	0.43	18	0.01	11	0.11	8	0.62	18	0.45	13	0.53
Osinska 1989		3	0.47	3	0.10	3	0.18	1	0.76	6	0.76	1	0.76
Pachmann 1927		49	0.27	69	0.00	71	0.04	65	0.04	70	0.05	76	0.04
Paderewski 1930		19	0.37	9	0.03	28	0.09	31	0.33	28	0.43	22	0.38
Perlemuter 1992		6	0.44	11	0.03	14	0.09	17	0.51	18	0.61	10	0.56
Pierdomenico 2008		53	0.25	63	0.00	65	0.04	72	0.04	53	0.06	57	0.05
Poblocka 1999		40	0.30	58	0.00	48	0.06	45	0.06	56	0.05	56	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		17	0.38	50	0.00	15	0.08	12	0.57	11	0.73	5	0.65
Rachmaninoff 1923		79	0.16	80	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	56	0.05	70	0.04
Rangell 2001		74	0.17	88	0.00	69	0.05	57	0.05	46	0.06	68	0.05
Richter 1976		29	0.34	32	0.00	38	0.05	40	0.13	49	0.08	45	0.10
Rosen 1989		43	0.29	34	0.00	35	0.09	35	0.25	43	0.13	35	0.18
Rosenthal 1930		51	0.26	38	0.00	61	0.04	76	0.04	42	0.14	48	0.07
Rosenthal 1931		86	0.05	83	0.00	80	0.02	86	0.02	56	0.05	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.06	89	0.00	86	0.02	82	0.02	54	0.05	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		63	0.22	84	0.00	56	0.04	63	0.04	34	0.30	44	0.11
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.10	64	0.00	78	0.03	77	0.03	67	0.03	85	0.03
Rossi 2007		69	0.18	31	0.00	40	0.05	43	0.10	16	0.44	32	0.21
Rubinstein 1939		32	0.33	13	0.02	19	0.10	19	0.48	7	0.49	16	0.48
Rubinstein 1952		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1966		9	0.42	7	0.04	8	0.12	6	0.64	10	0.48	11	0.55
Schilhawsky 1960		78	0.16	40	0.00	77	0.03	78	0.03	55	0.05	77	0.04
Shebanova 2002		35	0.32	51	0.00	46	0.06	48	0.06	69	0.06	51	0.06
Smith 1975		14	0.39	10	0.03	22	0.10	26	0.40	14	0.56	18	0.47
Sokolov 2002		4	0.45	5	0.07	2	0.16	9	0.61	2	0.75	4	0.68
Sztompka 1959		23	0.36	42	0.00	29	0.11	23	0.42	48	0.08	34	0.18
Tomsic 1995		31	0.33	12	0.03	12	0.11	27	0.40	14	0.40	21	0.40
Uninsky 1932		56	0.24	90	0.00	57	0.04	71	0.04	62	0.05	79	0.04
Uninsky 1971		21	0.37	81	0.00	20	0.11	16	0.51	18	0.40	20	0.45
Wasowski 1980		28	0.34	36	0.00	37	0.08	36	0.19	45	0.09	41	0.13
Zak 1937		68	0.19	73	0.00	73	0.06	51	0.06	68	0.05	58	0.05
Zak 1951		67	0.20	67	0.00	72	0.04	66	0.04	65	0.04	75	0.04
Random 1		90	-0.10	85	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	82	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		89	0.00	86	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	57	0.05	83	0.03
Random 3		87	0.02	70	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	20	0.34	47	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).