Neighaus 1950

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		29	0.42	5	0.05	6	0.15	12	0.50	6	0.63	14	0.56
Anderszewski 2003		75	0.25	80	0.00	65	0.05	65	0.05	29	0.31	56	0.12
Ashkenazy 1981		53	0.36	36	0.00	63	0.05	56	0.05	58	0.06	78	0.05
Bacha 2000		77	0.24	38	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	64	0.05	80	0.04
Badura 1965		87	0.12	85	0.00	87	0.02	84	0.02	60	0.04	87	0.03
Barbosa 1983		48	0.38	63	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.13	14	0.54	40	0.26
Biret 1990		35	0.42	26	0.00	24	0.08	34	0.28	10	0.65	28	0.43
Blet 2003		7	0.49	17	0.01	7	0.13	9	0.53	2	0.72	4	0.62
Block 1995		16	0.45	21	0.01	30	0.13	20	0.40	18	0.56	21	0.47
Blumental 1952		86	0.15	46	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	73	0.04	88	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		6	0.49	18	0.01	11	0.13	5	0.55	9	0.65	7	0.60
Brailowsky 1960		63	0.31	40	0.00	64	0.04	67	0.04	26	0.46	54	0.14
Bunin 1987		76	0.25	86	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	65	0.05	85	0.04
Bunin 1987b		74	0.25	64	0.00	83	0.04	68	0.04	63	0.05	82	0.04
Chiu 1999		20	0.45	41	0.00	20	0.09	16	0.44	24	0.48	22	0.46
Cohen 1997		30	0.42	24	0.00	27	0.08	29	0.31	9	0.59	27	0.43
Cortot 1951		27	0.43	16	0.01	15	0.10	15	0.44	7	0.66	15	0.54
Csalog 1996		46	0.38	69	0.00	57	0.05	63	0.05	20	0.44	52	0.15
Czerny 1949		58	0.32	45	0.00	53	0.08	51	0.08	24	0.64	43	0.23
Czerny 1990		81	0.21	55	0.00	85	0.04	73	0.04	51	0.07	79	0.05
Duchoud 2007		17	0.45	43	0.00	19	0.08	25	0.35	14	0.53	26	0.43
Ezaki 2006		22	0.44	30	0.00	17	0.08	14	0.45	6	0.73	10	0.57
Falvay 1989		72	0.27	65	0.00	69	0.04	71	0.04	49	0.06	75	0.05
Farrell 1958		54	0.35	81	0.00	45	0.06	54	0.06	7	0.56	49	0.18
Ferenczy 1958		85	0.16	73	0.00	84	0.03	79	0.03	36	0.52	57	0.12
Fliere 1977		14	0.46	53	0.00	29	0.11	18	0.42	33	0.48	24	0.45
Fou 1978		57	0.32	19	0.01	60	0.05	64	0.05	49	0.05	76	0.05
Francois 1956		33	0.42	76	0.00	36	0.11	26	0.33	9	0.73	18	0.49
Friedman 1923		28	0.43	32	0.00	22	0.08	31	0.30	21	0.55	32	0.41
Friedman 1923b		25	0.44	44	0.00	21	0.07	27	0.33	26	0.53	31	0.42
Friedman 1930		32	0.42	49	0.00	40	0.06	39	0.17	33	0.44	38	0.27
Garcia 2007		49	0.37	27	0.00	41	0.06	45	0.11	22	0.43	45	0.22
Garcia 2007b		70	0.28	82	0.00	78	0.02	86	0.02	53	0.06	89	0.03
Gierzod 1998		79	0.23	87	0.00	72	0.05	66	0.05	39	0.20	60	0.10
Gornostaeva 1994		11	0.47	74	0.00	25	0.07	22	0.36	12	0.65	19	0.48
Groot 1988		10	0.48	14	0.01	9	0.10	10	0.52	15	0.53	16	0.52
Harasiewicz 1955		4	0.54	3	0.08	3	0.25	2	0.75	2	0.74	2	0.74
Hatto 1993		19	0.45	56	0.00	23	0.07	33	0.28	30	0.31	37	0.29
Hatto 1997		38	0.41	12	0.01	42	0.06	40	0.16	21	0.36	41	0.24
Horowitz 1949		56	0.35	60	0.00	66	0.04	70	0.04	47	0.08	73	0.06
Indjic 1988		39	0.40	66	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.12	38	0.22	51	0.16
Kapell 1951		64	0.30	54	0.00	70	0.05	59	0.05	57	0.06	77	0.05
Kissin 1993		71	0.27	50	0.00	67	0.04	74	0.04	45	0.10	74	0.06
Kushner 1989		65	0.30	88	0.00	74	0.04	76	0.04	65	0.04	81	0.04
Luisada 1991		42	0.40	34	0.00	50	0.09	48	0.09	33	0.29	50	0.16
Lushtak 2004		66	0.30	48	0.00	68	0.04	69	0.04	24	0.26	61	0.10
Malcuzynski 1961		67	0.29	70	0.00	73	0.04	75	0.04	60	0.05	83	0.04
Magaloff 1978		13	0.46	51	0.00	28	0.09	21	0.38	16	0.55	23	0.46
Magin 1975		68	0.29	33	0.00	55	0.05	58	0.05	42	0.18	64	0.09
Michalowski 1933		50	0.37	59	0.00	58	0.06	55	0.06	39	0.25	55	0.12
Milkina 1970		60	0.32	11	0.01	33	0.08	32	0.29	11	0.62	29	0.42
Mohovich 1999		15	0.46	13	0.01	12	0.14	4	0.55	5	0.69	5	0.62
Moravec 1969		55	0.35	29	0.00	34	0.09	36	0.23	12	0.52	34	0.35
Morozova 2008		44	0.39	15	0.01	32	0.08	28	0.32	16	0.45	33	0.38
Neighaus 1950		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Niedzielski 1931		59	0.32	72	0.00	59	0.05	61	0.05	46	0.07	72	0.06
Ohlsson 1999		2	0.56	2	0.19	2	0.25	8	0.53	13	0.59	13	0.56
Osinska 1989		3	0.54	7	0.03	4	0.20	3	0.62	7	0.76	3	0.69
Pachmann 1927		37	0.41	42	0.00	38	0.06	41	0.15	19	0.55	36	0.29
Paderewski 1930		52	0.36	77	0.00	49	0.09	47	0.09	25	0.50	46	0.21
Perlemuter 1992		41	0.40	25	0.00	48	0.10	46	0.10	25	0.55	42	0.23
Pierdomenico 2008		31	0.42	23	0.00	51	0.08	52	0.08	19	0.46	47	0.19
Poblocka 1999		61	0.32	58	0.00	56	0.05	60	0.05	35	0.26	58	0.11
Rabcewiczowa 1932		21	0.45	10	0.02	26	0.07	17	0.43	9	0.74	12	0.56
Rachmaninoff 1923		69	0.28	83	0.00	71	0.06	53	0.06	44	0.13	63	0.09
Rangell 2001		18	0.45	9	0.02	10	0.12	13	0.49	1	0.68	9	0.58
Richter 1976		45	0.38	22	0.01	54	0.05	57	0.05	45	0.10	70	0.07
Rosen 1989		1	0.58	1	0.31	1	0.31	1	0.75	1	0.81	1	0.78
Rosenthal 1930		62	0.31	75	0.00	62	0.05	62	0.05	39	0.26	59	0.11
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.16	67	0.00	80	0.03	78	0.03	39	0.27	65	0.09
Rosenthal 1931b		80	0.22	68	0.00	79	0.02	83	0.02	36	0.36	68	0.08
Rosenthal 1931c		47	0.38	28	0.00	46	0.08	50	0.08	9	0.65	44	0.23
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.21	89	0.00	81	0.03	77	0.03	37	0.26	67	0.09
Rossi 2007		82	0.21	78	0.00	76	0.02	87	0.02	13	0.45	62	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		73	0.26	57	0.00	61	0.04	72	0.04	38	0.12	69	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		51	0.37	31	0.00	47	0.08	49	0.08	21	0.47	48	0.19
Rubinstein 1966		36	0.41	61	0.00	31	0.08	23	0.36	9	0.48	30	0.42
Schilhawsky 1960		78	0.23	71	0.00	77	0.02	88	0.02	45	0.07	84	0.04
Shebanova 2002		23	0.44	52	0.00	39	0.06	37	0.18	46	0.12	53	0.15
Smith 1975		9	0.48	6	0.04	5	0.15	6	0.54	9	0.69	6	0.61
Sokolov 2002		8	0.49	8	0.02	14	0.09	7	0.53	7	0.65	8	0.59
Sztompka 1959		40	0.40	47	0.00	37	0.07	38	0.18	33	0.37	39	0.26
Tomsic 1995		26	0.44	39	0.00	18	0.08	19	0.41	8	0.55	20	0.47
Uninsky 1932		43	0.40	35	0.00	52	0.11	44	0.11	59	0.05	71	0.07
Uninsky 1971		34	0.42	62	0.00	35	0.09	35	0.27	12	0.44	35	0.34
Wasowski 1980		5	0.50	20	0.01	8	0.11	11	0.52	13	0.61	11	0.56
Zak 1937		12	0.46	4	0.07	13	0.11	24	0.35	7	0.68	17	0.49
Zak 1951		24	0.44	37	0.00	16	0.08	30	0.30	10	0.64	25	0.44
Random 1		88	0.07	79	0.00	88	0.02	85	0.02	8	0.45	66	0.09
Random 2		89	-0.02	90	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	68	0.04	86	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.05	84	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	62	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).