Magin 1975

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		64	0.17	63	0.00	62	0.04	74	0.04	78	0.03	76	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		66	0.17	27	0.00	64	0.04	70	0.04	61	0.04	67	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		2	0.58	4	0.12	4	0.25	4	0.86	13	0.75	4	0.80
Bacha 2000		65	0.17	72	0.00	55	0.05	65	0.05	53	0.06	58	0.05
Badura 1965		55	0.21	43	0.00	60	0.04	76	0.04	81	0.03	77	0.03
Barbosa 1983		47	0.28	68	0.00	43	0.08	44	0.16	46	0.07	44	0.11
Biret 1990		74	0.12	30	0.00	76	0.06	59	0.06	68	0.04	62	0.05
Blet 2003		15	0.46	20	0.00	14	0.15	19	0.61	22	0.54	19	0.57
Block 1995		36	0.34	50	0.00	40	0.09	39	0.26	63	0.05	45	0.11
Blumental 1952		28	0.37	32	0.00	25	0.08	32	0.44	25	0.41	26	0.42
Boshniakovich 1969		35	0.34	23	0.00	37	0.09	41	0.23	52	0.06	43	0.12
Brailowsky 1960		87	-0.03	73	0.00	89	0.02	86	0.02	89	0.02	81	0.02
Bunin 1987		48	0.27	74	0.00	41	0.11	38	0.26	42	0.14	34	0.19
Bunin 1987b		50	0.27	52	0.00	42	0.11	40	0.24	42	0.13	35	0.18
Chiu 1999		25	0.38	75	0.00	31	0.10	26	0.50	42	0.19	30	0.31
Cohen 1997		73	0.12	24	0.00	79	0.04	75	0.04	90	0.01	86	0.02
Cortot 1951		75	0.09	48	0.00	74	0.05	60	0.05	76	0.03	73	0.04
Csalog 1996		40	0.31	28	0.00	50	0.10	46	0.10	47	0.07	50	0.08
Czerny 1949		78	0.05	26	0.00	75	0.05	66	0.05	55	0.05	60	0.05
Czerny 1990		31	0.36	15	0.01	19	0.17	21	0.59	25	0.60	17	0.59
Duchoud 2007		38	0.32	34	0.00	36	0.11	37	0.30	42	0.16	33	0.22
Ezaki 2006		77	0.07	42	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	84	0.02	80	0.02
Falvay 1989		59	0.20	76	0.00	67	0.05	67	0.05	62	0.04	64	0.04
Farrell 1958		80	0.02	77	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	86	0.02	83	0.02
Ferenczy 1958		90	-0.18	84	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	87	0.02	89	0.01
Fliere 1977		13	0.49	47	0.00	16	0.15	11	0.73	29	0.51	15	0.61
Fou 1978		52	0.24	29	0.00	52	0.10	45	0.10	64	0.04	53	0.06
Francois 1956		62	0.19	38	0.00	71	0.09	47	0.09	61	0.04	57	0.06
Friedman 1923		30	0.36	57	0.00	30	0.13	25	0.50	40	0.32	27	0.40
Friedman 1923b		32	0.35	64	0.00	29	0.07	27	0.48	41	0.31	28	0.39
Friedman 1930		19	0.44	58	0.00	20	0.19	17	0.66	24	0.55	16	0.60
Garcia 2007		71	0.12	78	0.00	66	0.04	71	0.04	75	0.04	70	0.04
Garcia 2007b		24	0.39	19	0.00	28	0.08	33	0.42	26	0.46	25	0.44
Gierzod 1998		72	0.12	69	0.00	57	0.06	57	0.06	55	0.06	55	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		60	0.19	35	0.00	59	0.06	56	0.06	74	0.03	72	0.04
Groot 1988		1	0.60	2	0.13	3	0.20	5	0.84	6	0.71	6	0.77
Harasiewicz 1955		27	0.37	85	0.00	33	0.11	35	0.33	61	0.05	41	0.13
Hatto 1993		4	0.57	10	0.01	2	0.22	1	0.87	5	0.78	3	0.82
Hatto 1997		29	0.36	39	0.00	22	0.10	20	0.60	18	0.44	21	0.51
Horowitz 1949		41	0.29	49	0.00	51	0.08	49	0.08	70	0.04	54	0.06
Indjic 1988		3	0.58	1	0.31	1	0.31	2	0.87	4	0.81	1	0.84
Kapell 1951		37	0.33	65	0.00	26	0.09	28	0.48	38	0.15	32	0.27
Kissin 1993		6	0.54	6	0.05	6	0.23	7	0.82	8	0.77	5	0.79
Kushner 1989		22	0.40	66	0.00	32	0.09	34	0.39	40	0.19	31	0.27
Luisada 1991		14	0.47	18	0.00	15	0.17	10	0.76	14	0.62	11	0.69
Lushtak 2004		63	0.18	86	0.00	70	0.07	53	0.07	63	0.05	56	0.06
Malcuzynski 1961		12	0.49	11	0.01	10	0.26	14	0.70	10	0.59	13	0.64
Magaloff 1978		34	0.34	56	0.00	23	0.10	29	0.46	39	0.26	29	0.35
Magin 1975		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Michalowski 1933		18	0.45	8	0.03	21	0.18	22	0.56	22	0.45	23	0.50
Milkina 1970		68	0.16	53	0.00	68	0.05	64	0.05	64	0.04	66	0.04
Mohovich 1999		67	0.16	79	0.00	69	0.05	61	0.05	70	0.04	71	0.04
Moravec 1969		51	0.27	80	0.00	47	0.08	52	0.08	63	0.04	52	0.06
Morozova 2008		49	0.27	45	0.00	48	0.08	50	0.08	50	0.06	51	0.07
Neighaus 1950		44	0.29	55	0.00	39	0.09	42	0.18	58	0.05	49	0.09
Niedzielski 1931		10	0.50	12	0.01	9	0.23	6	0.82	4	0.70	7	0.76
Ohlsson 1999		11	0.49	16	0.01	11	0.17	13	0.72	15	0.56	14	0.63
Osinska 1989		58	0.20	46	0.00	58	0.07	54	0.07	73	0.03	59	0.05
Pachmann 1927		23	0.39	44	0.00	27	0.10	24	0.51	34	0.42	24	0.46
Paderewski 1930		9	0.51	13	0.01	12	0.19	9	0.78	9	0.70	8	0.74
Perlemuter 1992		20	0.43	36	0.00	24	0.09	23	0.54	28	0.51	20	0.52
Pierdomenico 2008		43	0.29	81	0.00	45	0.08	51	0.08	42	0.13	47	0.10
Poblocka 1999		56	0.21	70	0.00	65	0.04	72	0.04	67	0.05	63	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		81	0.02	87	0.00	85	0.02	82	0.02	87	0.02	82	0.02
Rachmaninoff 1923		61	0.19	82	0.00	61	0.04	77	0.04	72	0.03	74	0.03
Rangell 2001		84	0.00	67	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	88	0.02	87	0.02
Richter 1976		5	0.56	5	0.07	5	0.25	3	0.86	12	0.79	2	0.82
Rosen 1989		70	0.13	59	0.00	72	0.04	69	0.04	84	0.03	78	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		82	0.01	88	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	88	0.02	85	0.02
Rosenthal 1931		86	-0.03	89	0.00	81	0.02	89	0.02	81	0.02	84	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		88	-0.05	90	0.00	87	0.02	84	0.02	89	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		76	0.09	83	0.00	73	0.04	68	0.04	81	0.02	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		89	-0.07	51	0.00	86	0.02	80	0.02	89	0.01	90	0.01
Rossi 2007		69	0.14	25	0.00	56	0.05	62	0.05	21	0.33	40	0.13
Rubinstein 1939		53	0.23	60	0.00	53	0.05	63	0.05	68	0.04	65	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		8	0.51	3	0.12	7	0.19	12	0.72	2	0.69	10	0.70
Rubinstein 1966		54	0.22	61	0.00	54	0.06	58	0.06	78	0.03	68	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		57	0.20	62	0.00	63	0.04	73	0.04	61	0.05	69	0.04
Shebanova 2002		7	0.52	7	0.04	8	0.19	8	0.80	23	0.61	9	0.70
Smith 1975		45	0.28	21	0.00	49	0.07	55	0.07	43	0.13	46	0.10
Sokolov 2002		17	0.45	14	0.01	18	0.14	18	0.63	6	0.65	12	0.64
Sztompka 1959		26	0.37	22	0.00	35	0.11	30	0.45	50	0.07	37	0.18
Tomsic 1995		39	0.31	31	0.00	38	0.09	36	0.31	42	0.10	36	0.18
Uninsky 1932		21	0.41	37	0.00	17	0.17	15	0.69	29	0.38	22	0.51
Uninsky 1971		33	0.35	17	0.00	34	0.12	31	0.44	53	0.07	38	0.18
Wasowski 1980		16	0.46	9	0.02	13	0.16	16	0.66	27	0.51	18	0.58
Zak 1937		46	0.28	71	0.00	44	0.08	43	0.16	40	0.16	39	0.16
Zak 1951		42	0.29	33	0.00	46	0.09	48	0.09	38	0.17	42	0.12
Random 1		83	0.00	54	0.00	80	0.02	81	0.02	43	0.12	61	0.05
Random 2		85	-0.02	40	0.00	83	0.02	87	0.02	67	0.04	75	0.03
Random 3		79	0.05	41	0.00	82	0.02	83	0.02	17	0.40	48	0.09

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).