Fou 1978

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		18	0.41	51	0.00	25	0.08	27	0.39	22	0.46	21	0.42
Anderszewski 2003		14	0.42	13	0.01	12	0.13	9	0.58	5	0.70	7	0.64
Ashkenazy 1981		1	0.55	1	0.29	1	0.29	1	0.77	14	0.75	1	0.76
Bacha 2000		26	0.38	19	0.01	26	0.07	17	0.45	8	0.56	15	0.50
Badura 1965		12	0.43	4	0.06	4	0.16	7	0.62	1	0.77	2	0.69
Barbosa 1983		48	0.31	54	0.00	51	0.05	48	0.05	41	0.13	57	0.08
Biret 1990		86	0.11	82	0.00	86	0.04	67	0.04	73	0.04	80	0.04
Blet 2003		54	0.30	65	0.00	70	0.03	80	0.03	54	0.07	68	0.05
Block 1995		27	0.37	58	0.00	20	0.08	18	0.45	29	0.42	20	0.43
Blumental 1952		19	0.41	8	0.04	7	0.12	8	0.62	5	0.71	5	0.66
Boshniakovich 1969		38	0.35	9	0.03	19	0.08	20	0.43	27	0.42	22	0.42
Brailowsky 1960		46	0.32	14	0.01	33	0.07	35	0.25	14	0.58	26	0.38
Bunin 1987		61	0.28	31	0.00	67	0.05	53	0.05	57	0.06	72	0.05
Bunin 1987b		60	0.28	48	0.00	66	0.04	61	0.04	55	0.06	65	0.05
Chiu 1999		7	0.47	53	0.00	18	0.09	19	0.43	36	0.27	30	0.34
Cohen 1997		63	0.28	86	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	41	0.17	58	0.07
Cortot 1951		74	0.23	49	0.00	80	0.03	76	0.03	43	0.12	61	0.06
Csalog 1996		72	0.24	52	0.00	74	0.03	82	0.03	52	0.06	79	0.04
Czerny 1949		67	0.26	17	0.01	65	0.03	70	0.03	37	0.42	49	0.11
Czerny 1990		6	0.48	12	0.01	8	0.11	5	0.64	15	0.74	3	0.69
Duchoud 2007		49	0.31	60	0.00	55	0.05	56	0.05	64	0.05	70	0.05
Ezaki 2006		39	0.34	80	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	26	0.46	38	0.22
Falvay 1989		13	0.43	5	0.05	10	0.11	25	0.41	4	0.56	16	0.48
Farrell 1958		32	0.37	42	0.00	34	0.07	32	0.32	8	0.53	24	0.41
Ferenczy 1958		58	0.28	27	0.00	61	0.03	72	0.03	19	0.71	44	0.15
Fliere 1977		3	0.52	7	0.04	5	0.16	3	0.68	23	0.61	6	0.64
Fou 1978		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Francois 1956		81	0.20	63	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	53	0.06	82	0.04
Friedman 1923		36	0.35	16	0.01	36	0.07	34	0.26	42	0.28	36	0.27
Friedman 1923b		42	0.34	45	0.00	41	0.07	40	0.19	43	0.23	41	0.21
Friedman 1930		50	0.30	34	0.00	56	0.04	62	0.04	53	0.07	69	0.05
Garcia 2007		59	0.28	83	0.00	50	0.07	46	0.07	42	0.17	50	0.11
Garcia 2007b		69	0.26	50	0.00	64	0.05	59	0.05	51	0.07	62	0.06
Gierzod 1998		33	0.36	22	0.00	24	0.07	22	0.42	14	0.64	13	0.52
Gornostaeva 1994		68	0.26	66	0.00	79	0.04	66	0.04	48	0.07	73	0.05
Groot 1988		28	0.37	61	0.00	42	0.07	41	0.18	46	0.09	48	0.13
Harasiewicz 1955		20	0.41	59	0.00	30	0.09	30	0.36	32	0.24	35	0.29
Hatto 1993		15	0.42	67	0.00	22	0.10	28	0.37	35	0.25	34	0.30
Hatto 1997		43	0.34	44	0.00	49	0.07	45	0.07	39	0.15	52	0.10
Horowitz 1949		76	0.23	72	0.00	72	0.03	75	0.03	62	0.05	78	0.04
Indjic 1988		35	0.35	73	0.00	48	0.05	57	0.05	51	0.08	60	0.06
Kapell 1951		29	0.37	39	0.00	28	0.09	26	0.39	23	0.36	29	0.37
Kissin 1993		16	0.42	57	0.00	11	0.12	12	0.53	16	0.65	10	0.59
Kushner 1989		8	0.47	21	0.01	13	0.13	10	0.57	10	0.58	11	0.57
Luisada 1991		37	0.35	18	0.01	37	0.07	39	0.21	43	0.22	39	0.21
Lushtak 2004		23	0.38	35	0.00	17	0.09	16	0.45	6	0.59	14	0.52
Malcuzynski 1961		25	0.38	20	0.01	35	0.07	36	0.23	34	0.20	40	0.21
Magaloff 1978		57	0.29	15	0.01	43	0.07	43	0.14	44	0.12	46	0.13
Magin 1975		71	0.24	38	0.00	68	0.04	64	0.04	45	0.10	59	0.06
Michalowski 1933		75	0.23	74	0.00	73	0.03	85	0.03	55	0.07	67	0.05
Milkina 1970		62	0.28	75	0.00	63	0.04	60	0.04	38	0.23	51	0.10
Mohovich 1999		56	0.29	64	0.00	57	0.04	63	0.04	55	0.06	71	0.05
Moravec 1969		22	0.39	25	0.00	31	0.10	29	0.36	16	0.47	23	0.41
Morozova 2008		2	0.52	3	0.12	2	0.21	2	0.69	6	0.64	4	0.66
Neighaus 1950		45	0.32	33	0.00	46	0.05	49	0.05	64	0.05	74	0.05
Niedzielski 1931		31	0.37	23	0.00	40	0.06	42	0.15	44	0.12	47	0.13
Ohlsson 1999		17	0.41	11	0.02	14	0.11	14	0.48	17	0.45	18	0.46
Osinska 1989		83	0.18	87	0.00	84	0.03	71	0.03	77	0.03	83	0.03
Pachmann 1927		52	0.30	10	0.02	38	0.07	37	0.23	38	0.29	37	0.26
Paderewski 1930		70	0.25	43	0.00	58	0.03	73	0.03	49	0.07	66	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		41	0.34	30	0.00	39	0.06	38	0.23	35	0.42	33	0.31
Pierdomenico 2008		55	0.30	70	0.00	71	0.03	74	0.03	54	0.05	76	0.04
Poblocka 1999		24	0.38	6	0.05	9	0.11	15	0.46	13	0.46	17	0.46
Rabcewiczowa 1932		78	0.22	88	0.00	76	0.02	86	0.02	44	0.13	64	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		47	0.31	55	0.00	52	0.05	54	0.05	38	0.18	54	0.09
Rangell 2001		30	0.37	40	0.00	29	0.09	21	0.42	12	0.48	19	0.45
Richter 1976		9	0.47	24	0.00	15	0.12	11	0.55	31	0.58	12	0.56
Rosen 1989		21	0.40	28	0.00	23	0.10	23	0.42	35	0.35	28	0.38
Rosenthal 1930		44	0.33	68	0.00	47	0.05	50	0.05	21	0.45	45	0.15
Rosenthal 1931		64	0.27	46	0.00	45	0.06	47	0.06	18	0.59	42	0.19
Rosenthal 1931b		73	0.24	76	0.00	53	0.05	58	0.05	25	0.50	43	0.16
Rosenthal 1931c		79	0.21	71	0.00	78	0.03	81	0.03	65	0.04	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.14	77	0.00	75	0.03	79	0.03	35	0.31	53	0.10
Rossi 2007		88	0.00	89	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	83	0.03	87	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		34	0.36	32	0.00	32	0.09	33	0.30	13	0.39	31	0.34
Rubinstein 1952		77	0.22	62	0.00	60	0.03	69	0.03	62	0.05	81	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		5	0.48	2	0.13	3	0.23	4	0.65	3	0.63	8	0.64
Schilhawsky 1960		84	0.17	84	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	64	0.04	85	0.03
Shebanova 2002		4	0.50	36	0.00	6	0.19	6	0.63	26	0.57	9	0.60
Smith 1975		82	0.20	56	0.00	85	0.05	52	0.05	55	0.06	63	0.05
Sokolov 2002		80	0.21	47	0.00	82	0.03	78	0.03	69	0.03	84	0.03
Sztompka 1959		11	0.45	29	0.00	21	0.07	24	0.42	27	0.41	25	0.41
Tomsic 1995		53	0.30	69	0.00	62	0.03	68	0.03	54	0.05	77	0.04
Uninsky 1932		10	0.45	37	0.00	16	0.11	13	0.51	35	0.29	27	0.38
Uninsky 1971		40	0.34	26	0.00	27	0.08	31	0.35	28	0.30	32	0.32
Wasowski 1980		51	0.30	41	0.00	59	0.04	65	0.04	62	0.05	75	0.04
Zak 1937		65	0.27	78	0.00	54	0.05	51	0.05	39	0.18	55	0.09
Zak 1951		66	0.27	81	0.00	69	0.05	55	0.05	41	0.13	56	0.08
Random 1		90	-0.01	85	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	74	0.03	89	0.02
Random 2		87	0.00	79	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	73	0.03	88	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.01	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	58	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).