Gornostaeva 1994

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		33	0.30	32	0.00	30	0.08	29	0.39	43	0.16	33	0.25
Anderszewski 2003		46	0.27	23	0.00	36	0.10	37	0.28	31	0.25	32	0.26
Ashkenazy 1981		72	0.16	55	0.00	78	0.02	85	0.02	78	0.04	83	0.03
Bacha 2000		60	0.20	69	0.00	65	0.05	59	0.05	63	0.05	54	0.05
Badura 1965		71	0.16	70	0.00	66	0.04	64	0.04	53	0.04	70	0.04
Barbosa 1983		58	0.20	85	0.00	53	0.05	54	0.05	83	0.03	67	0.04
Biret 1990		14	0.43	16	0.01	15	0.12	20	0.59	9	0.67	12	0.63
Blet 2003		82	0.12	71	0.00	81	0.02	86	0.02	77	0.03	87	0.02
Block 1995		21	0.38	46	0.00	25	0.13	21	0.56	41	0.15	28	0.29
Blumental 1952		76	0.15	56	0.00	68	0.03	69	0.03	80	0.03	82	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		53	0.24	63	0.00	39	0.08	39	0.21	47	0.07	44	0.12
Brailowsky 1960		38	0.28	20	0.00	37	0.14	34	0.31	39	0.24	31	0.27
Bunin 1987		69	0.16	44	0.00	74	0.03	71	0.03	55	0.06	71	0.04
Bunin 1987b		70	0.16	52	0.00	75	0.04	67	0.04	65	0.05	64	0.04
Chiu 1999		29	0.32	35	0.00	56	0.05	58	0.05	72	0.04	59	0.04
Cohen 1997		9	0.47	8	0.02	9	0.11	11	0.66	7	0.64	10	0.65
Cortot 1951		11	0.47	21	0.00	11	0.15	13	0.65	3	0.73	9	0.69
Csalog 1996		27	0.33	36	0.00	49	0.08	46	0.08	44	0.14	45	0.11
Czerny 1949		7	0.49	19	0.00	10	0.11	8	0.73	5	0.86	4	0.79
Czerny 1990		75	0.15	64	0.00	76	0.03	79	0.03	63	0.05	72	0.04
Duchoud 2007		32	0.31	26	0.00	34	0.11	30	0.39	49	0.07	36	0.17
Ezaki 2006		15	0.41	17	0.00	14	0.13	16	0.63	15	0.64	11	0.63
Falvay 1989		30	0.32	42	0.00	27	0.11	27	0.45	33	0.22	26	0.31
Farrell 1958		34	0.30	47	0.00	33	0.08	36	0.29	39	0.17	35	0.22
Ferenczy 1958		35	0.30	45	0.00	31	0.10	28	0.45	15	0.75	16	0.58
Fliere 1977		28	0.33	31	0.00	46	0.07	49	0.07	63	0.05	51	0.06
Fou 1978		47	0.26	78	0.00	47	0.07	48	0.07	66	0.04	55	0.05
Francois 1956		8	0.48	39	0.00	8	0.17	7	0.77	4	0.78	7	0.77
Friedman 1923		74	0.15	62	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	78	0.03	89	0.02
Friedman 1923b		80	0.14	48	0.00	83	0.03	77	0.03	78	0.03	84	0.03
Friedman 1930		54	0.22	13	0.01	57	0.04	61	0.04	58	0.06	57	0.05
Garcia 2007		78	0.14	72	0.00	52	0.05	55	0.05	77	0.03	69	0.04
Garcia 2007b		87	0.06	86	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	86	0.02	90	0.01
Gierzod 1998		50	0.25	37	0.00	28	0.11	26	0.45	27	0.40	23	0.42
Gornostaeva 1994		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Groot 1988		25	0.36	5	0.03	21	0.19	19	0.59	38	0.20	25	0.34
Harasiewicz 1955		12	0.45	3	0.11	5	0.20	9	0.71	9	0.55	14	0.62
Hatto 1993		63	0.18	49	0.00	64	0.04	62	0.04	78	0.04	73	0.04
Hatto 1997		26	0.33	80	0.00	32	0.07	35	0.30	50	0.06	39	0.13
Horowitz 1949		65	0.17	57	0.00	79	0.02	83	0.02	57	0.06	76	0.03
Indjic 1988		81	0.13	81	0.00	71	0.03	72	0.03	75	0.04	80	0.03
Kapell 1951		73	0.15	50	0.00	80	0.03	78	0.03	69	0.05	63	0.04
Kissin 1993		88	0.04	65	0.00	87	0.02	82	0.02	76	0.05	79	0.03
Kushner 1989		37	0.28	66	0.00	54	0.05	53	0.05	76	0.04	62	0.04
Luisada 1991		59	0.20	87	0.00	70	0.03	73	0.03	76	0.04	74	0.03
Lushtak 2004		43	0.27	58	0.00	45	0.06	50	0.06	61	0.05	58	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		56	0.21	73	0.00	59	0.05	60	0.05	71	0.04	65	0.04
Magaloff 1978		13	0.45	9	0.01	17	0.13	15	0.64	20	0.47	19	0.55
Magin 1975		62	0.19	51	0.00	67	0.03	74	0.03	56	0.06	61	0.04
Michalowski 1933		55	0.22	53	0.00	62	0.05	57	0.05	63	0.06	56	0.05
Milkina 1970		42	0.27	59	0.00	23	0.12	23	0.53	21	0.46	20	0.49
Mohovich 1999		18	0.40	12	0.01	19	0.17	17	0.62	16	0.50	18	0.56
Moravec 1969		45	0.27	24	0.00	29	0.10	33	0.35	39	0.17	34	0.24
Morozova 2008		31	0.32	18	0.00	35	0.10	31	0.35	74	0.04	42	0.12
Neighaus 1950		10	0.47	14	0.01	12	0.21	12	0.65	22	0.36	21	0.48
Niedzielski 1931		79	0.14	74	0.00	77	0.02	84	0.02	78	0.03	85	0.02
Ohlsson 1999		16	0.41	25	0.00	22	0.12	32	0.35	74	0.04	40	0.12
Osinska 1989		1	0.62	1	0.43	1	0.43	1	0.88	1	0.85	2	0.86
Pachmann 1927		61	0.19	75	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	77	0.04	78	0.03
Paderewski 1930		77	0.14	60	0.00	69	0.04	66	0.04	77	0.03	77	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		17	0.40	28	0.00	20	0.16	10	0.66	29	0.50	17	0.57
Pierdomenico 2008		52	0.24	79	0.00	58	0.04	63	0.04	66	0.04	60	0.04
Poblocka 1999		41	0.28	33	0.00	48	0.08	45	0.08	58	0.05	52	0.06
Rabcewiczowa 1932		2	0.62	2	0.18	2	0.35	2	0.84	1	0.90	1	0.87
Rachmaninoff 1923		51	0.24	29	0.00	43	0.07	43	0.17	47	0.06	46	0.10
Rangell 2001		48	0.26	67	0.00	26	0.11	25	0.47	39	0.18	29	0.29
Richter 1976		40	0.28	43	0.00	61	0.04	65	0.04	61	0.05	66	0.04
Rosen 1989		4	0.56	7	0.02	4	0.33	3	0.82	3	0.76	5	0.79
Rosenthal 1930		20	0.38	34	0.00	18	0.14	18	0.60	10	0.64	13	0.62
Rosenthal 1931		64	0.18	61	0.00	51	0.06	51	0.06	41	0.23	41	0.12
Rosenthal 1931b		66	0.17	82	0.00	55	0.06	52	0.06	40	0.15	49	0.09
Rosenthal 1931c		39	0.28	83	0.00	40	0.07	38	0.23	30	0.39	27	0.30
Rosenthal 1931d		68	0.16	15	0.01	41	0.07	41	0.19	24	0.42	30	0.28
Rossi 2007		23	0.37	11	0.01	38	0.09	40	0.21	5	0.62	24	0.36
Rubinstein 1939		19	0.40	30	0.00	13	0.16	22	0.55	10	0.40	22	0.47
Rubinstein 1952		22	0.38	40	0.00	16	0.12	14	0.65	13	0.56	15	0.60
Rubinstein 1966		24	0.37	54	0.00	24	0.14	24	0.53	67	0.04	38	0.15
Schilhawsky 1960		84	0.09	76	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	84	0.02	88	0.02
Shebanova 2002		67	0.17	27	0.00	84	0.03	80	0.03	83	0.03	81	0.03
Smith 1975		3	0.57	4	0.07	3	0.25	6	0.77	3	0.82	3	0.79
Sokolov 2002		5	0.54	10	0.01	7	0.31	5	0.78	1	0.77	6	0.77
Sztompka 1959		36	0.29	22	0.00	44	0.09	44	0.17	43	0.14	37	0.15
Tomsic 1995		49	0.25	84	0.00	42	0.07	42	0.18	53	0.05	47	0.09
Uninsky 1932		57	0.20	77	0.00	60	0.05	56	0.05	75	0.04	68	0.04
Uninsky 1971		6	0.51	6	0.03	6	0.26	4	0.79	1	0.68	8	0.73
Wasowski 1980		44	0.27	88	0.00	50	0.08	47	0.08	69	0.05	50	0.06
Zak 1937		85	0.09	89	0.00	86	0.02	81	0.02	77	0.03	86	0.02
Zak 1951		83	0.10	68	0.00	85	0.03	76	0.03	80	0.03	75	0.03
Random 1		89	0.00	90	0.00	72	0.03	70	0.03	25	0.28	48	0.09
Random 2		86	0.06	41	0.00	63	0.03	68	0.03	11	0.47	43	0.12
Random 3		90	-0.01	38	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	22	0.33	53	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).