Biret 1990

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		44	0.24	77	0.00	51	0.06	51	0.06	86	0.02	76	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		86	0.01	78	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	84	0.02	82	0.02
Ashkenazy 1981		58	0.16	45	0.00	71	0.04	67	0.04	81	0.04	66	0.04
Bacha 2000		64	0.15	83	0.00	67	0.04	75	0.04	85	0.02	68	0.03
Badura 1965		82	0.03	84	0.00	62	0.04	61	0.04	85	0.03	77	0.03
Barbosa 1983		39	0.25	61	0.00	38	0.08	39	0.27	58	0.05	39	0.12
Biret 1990		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Blet 2003		24	0.30	7	0.02	28	0.10	27	0.47	43	0.16	25	0.27
Block 1995		72	0.09	62	0.00	74	0.03	78	0.03	87	0.02	83	0.02
Blumental 1952		79	0.06	63	0.00	87	0.02	83	0.02	87	0.02	84	0.02
Boshniakovich 1969		57	0.17	51	0.00	55	0.06	53	0.06	79	0.03	65	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		69	0.12	59	0.00	68	0.04	74	0.04	80	0.03	70	0.03
Bunin 1987		34	0.28	85	0.00	30	0.14	29	0.45	40	0.15	26	0.26
Bunin 1987b		31	0.28	56	0.00	29	0.11	28	0.46	39	0.16	24	0.27
Chiu 1999		18	0.36	26	0.00	26	0.16	22	0.53	68	0.05	31	0.16
Cohen 1997		16	0.37	5	0.03	10	0.16	13	0.63	15	0.56	8	0.59
Cortot 1951		51	0.20	24	0.00	46	0.06	52	0.06	47	0.06	52	0.06
Csalog 1996		12	0.41	2	0.12	5	0.24	17	0.59	15	0.52	11	0.55
Czerny 1949		3	0.47	6	0.02	6	0.17	5	0.73	13	0.74	4	0.73
Czerny 1990		54	0.18	57	0.00	60	0.03	77	0.03	82	0.03	78	0.03
Duchoud 2007		5	0.44	22	0.00	8	0.17	7	0.71	22	0.46	10	0.57
Ezaki 2006		46	0.23	12	0.01	16	0.10	35	0.34	39	0.22	23	0.27
Falvay 1989		19	0.34	58	0.00	24	0.12	21	0.55	34	0.21	19	0.34
Farrell 1958		6	0.43	14	0.01	4	0.21	4	0.77	3	0.67	5	0.72
Ferenczy 1958		71	0.11	79	0.00	64	0.05	59	0.05	47	0.08	51	0.06
Fliere 1977		63	0.15	69	0.00	73	0.04	72	0.04	84	0.03	69	0.03
Fou 1978		70	0.11	80	0.00	78	0.04	73	0.04	67	0.04	59	0.04
Francois 1956		7	0.43	9	0.01	3	0.29	3	0.79	11	0.70	3	0.74
Friedman 1923		59	0.16	52	0.00	52	0.09	46	0.09	69	0.04	53	0.06
Friedman 1923b		55	0.17	33	0.00	41	0.07	42	0.16	61	0.06	44	0.10
Friedman 1930		43	0.24	46	0.00	49	0.08	48	0.08	66	0.05	50	0.06
Garcia 2007		67	0.13	43	0.00	58	0.05	58	0.05	81	0.03	62	0.04
Garcia 2007b		27	0.30	50	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	57	0.06	47	0.08
Gierzod 1998		90	-0.18	86	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01
Gornostaeva 1994		8	0.43	15	0.01	12	0.17	9	0.67	20	0.59	7	0.63
Groot 1988		45	0.24	87	0.00	48	0.08	47	0.08	79	0.03	58	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		21	0.32	70	0.00	25	0.12	15	0.59	64	0.05	30	0.17
Hatto 1993		52	0.20	27	0.00	57	0.05	54	0.05	82	0.03	67	0.04
Hatto 1997		4	0.45	4	0.03	13	0.18	6	0.72	17	0.45	9	0.57
Horowitz 1949		40	0.25	34	0.00	35	0.10	36	0.34	60	0.05	36	0.13
Indjic 1988		41	0.25	32	0.00	50	0.09	45	0.09	69	0.05	48	0.07
Kapell 1951		23	0.31	47	0.00	31	0.11	26	0.50	73	0.05	32	0.16
Kissin 1993		85	0.01	71	0.00	82	0.03	80	0.03	82	0.03	74	0.03
Kushner 1989		62	0.16	20	0.00	66	0.04	66	0.04	82	0.03	72	0.03
Luisada 1991		13	0.38	29	0.00	18	0.10	11	0.65	50	0.07	28	0.21
Lushtak 2004		61	0.16	72	0.00	54	0.05	55	0.05	74	0.04	64	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		84	0.02	88	0.00	83	0.02	85	0.02	89	0.02	81	0.02
Magaloff 1978		49	0.21	64	0.00	47	0.07	49	0.07	64	0.04	54	0.05
Magin 1975		68	0.12	49	0.00	70	0.04	68	0.04	59	0.06	55	0.05
Michalowski 1933		32	0.28	60	0.00	34	0.15	31	0.45	58	0.06	33	0.16
Milkina 1970		14	0.37	25	0.00	7	0.19	8	0.71	10	0.64	6	0.67
Mohovich 1999		78	0.06	89	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	84	0.02	85	0.02
Moravec 1969		53	0.19	65	0.00	45	0.07	50	0.07	51	0.05	49	0.06
Morozova 2008		50	0.21	73	0.00	53	0.05	56	0.05	80	0.03	61	0.04
Neighaus 1950		9	0.42	18	0.00	9	0.15	10	0.65	34	0.28	18	0.43
Niedzielski 1931		77	0.06	44	0.00	61	0.04	70	0.04	83	0.03	71	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		22	0.32	19	0.00	23	0.14	24	0.51	47	0.06	29	0.17
Osinska 1989		1	0.55	1	0.58	1	0.57	1	0.88	4	0.80	1	0.84
Pachmann 1927		60	0.16	81	0.00	63	0.04	60	0.04	58	0.06	56	0.05
Paderewski 1930		75	0.08	28	0.00	76	0.04	63	0.04	84	0.03	73	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		74	0.08	74	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	89	0.02	80	0.02
Pierdomenico 2008		37	0.26	31	0.00	40	0.07	40	0.20	49	0.06	40	0.11
Poblocka 1999		33	0.28	53	0.00	42	0.07	41	0.19	57	0.05	42	0.10
Rabcewiczowa 1932		10	0.42	8	0.02	17	0.14	19	0.57	25	0.52	12	0.54
Rachmaninoff 1923		29	0.30	21	0.00	33	0.13	32	0.44	42	0.14	27	0.25
Rangell 2001		48	0.22	40	0.00	36	0.11	33	0.40	48	0.06	35	0.15
Richter 1976		65	0.14	54	0.00	77	0.04	71	0.04	80	0.04	60	0.04
Rosen 1989		36	0.27	41	0.00	37	0.13	37	0.33	64	0.04	41	0.11
Rosenthal 1930		56	0.17	23	0.00	56	0.05	57	0.05	81	0.03	63	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		89	-0.07	66	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	88	0.01	89	0.01
Rosenthal 1931b		88	-0.02	55	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.02	86	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		80	0.04	75	0.00	72	0.03	76	0.03	85	0.02	87	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d		76	0.07	90	0.00	69	0.04	65	0.04	69	0.03	79	0.03
Rossi 2007		42	0.24	38	0.00	59	0.04	64	0.04	34	0.16	45	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		17	0.36	39	0.00	19	0.11	12	0.64	18	0.32	17	0.45
Rubinstein 1952		30	0.28	11	0.01	22	0.12	23	0.53	37	0.17	21	0.30
Rubinstein 1966		47	0.22	82	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.12	50	0.05	46	0.08
Schilhawsky 1960		35	0.27	35	0.00	39	0.09	38	0.31	37	0.25	22	0.28
Shebanova 2002		66	0.13	16	0.00	79	0.04	69	0.04	79	0.03	75	0.03
Smith 1975		11	0.41	10	0.01	11	0.15	20	0.56	19	0.49	14	0.52
Sokolov 2002		20	0.34	36	0.00	21	0.10	25	0.50	22	0.41	16	0.45
Sztompka 1959		73	0.09	76	0.00	84	0.02	84	0.02	89	0.01	88	0.01
Tomsic 1995		38	0.25	67	0.00	27	0.14	34	0.40	46	0.06	34	0.15
Uninsky 1932		25	0.30	13	0.01	32	0.11	30	0.45	69	0.04	37	0.13
Uninsky 1971		15	0.37	30	0.00	20	0.13	18	0.58	40	0.16	20	0.30
Wasowski 1980		2	0.48	3	0.07	2	0.31	2	0.81	9	0.68	2	0.74
Zak 1937		26	0.30	37	0.00	15	0.12	16	0.59	25	0.40	15	0.49
Zak 1951		28	0.30	17	0.00	14	0.14	14	0.60	18	0.49	13	0.54
Random 1		83	0.03	42	0.00	75	0.03	79	0.03	20	0.32	43	0.10
Random 2		81	0.04	48	0.00	65	0.04	62	0.04	14	0.44	38	0.13
Random 3		87	-0.02	68	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	37	0.14	57	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).