Kissin 1993

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		62	0.20	53	0.00	64	0.06	63	0.06	57	0.04	68	0.05
Anderszewski 2003		65	0.17	77	0.00	63	0.05	72	0.05	51	0.06	65	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		2	0.66	4	0.06	2	0.57	2	0.90	2	0.88	2	0.89
Bacha 2000		51	0.26	41	0.00	52	0.05	68	0.05	40	0.19	47	0.10
Badura 1965		49	0.27	58	0.00	56	0.09	48	0.09	42	0.12	48	0.10
Barbosa 1983		42	0.31	42	0.00	40	0.08	43	0.28	35	0.21	40	0.24
Biret 1990		83	0.01	72	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	80	0.03	80	0.03
Blet 2003		23	0.40	38	0.00	29	0.07	23	0.52	27	0.46	24	0.49
Block 1995		17	0.43	14	0.00	16	0.26	14	0.68	17	0.56	14	0.62
Blumental 1952		25	0.38	44	0.00	25	0.09	34	0.44	17	0.55	26	0.49
Boshniakovich 1969		37	0.32	59	0.00	39	0.09	41	0.28	57	0.06	46	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		87	-0.02	54	0.00	86	0.02	85	0.02	87	0.02	83	0.02
Bunin 1987		57	0.22	82	0.00	59	0.08	49	0.08	60	0.05	58	0.06
Bunin 1987b		58	0.22	63	0.00	60	0.09	47	0.09	72	0.04	54	0.06
Chiu 1999		24	0.39	78	0.00	28	0.08	27	0.51	39	0.22	36	0.33
Cohen 1997		77	0.08	40	0.00	78	0.03	81	0.03	81	0.02	87	0.02
Cortot 1951		73	0.11	45	0.00	75	0.04	78	0.04	79	0.03	81	0.03
Csalog 1996		47	0.28	8	0.01	34	0.11	38	0.33	21	0.44	32	0.38
Czerny 1949		90	-0.10	85	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	85	0.02	90	0.01
Czerny 1990		11	0.50	10	0.01	7	0.22	6	0.79	5	0.84	4	0.81
Duchoud 2007		44	0.29	67	0.00	32	0.11	33	0.45	32	0.32	33	0.38
Ezaki 2006		74	0.11	19	0.00	74	0.05	74	0.05	64	0.04	72	0.04
Falvay 1989		46	0.28	73	0.00	41	0.10	40	0.29	36	0.21	38	0.25
Farrell 1958		70	0.14	46	0.00	68	0.07	52	0.07	49	0.06	53	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		89	-0.08	32	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	75	0.03	85	0.02
Fliere 1977		4	0.54	12	0.00	6	0.25	4	0.82	16	0.72	7	0.77
Fou 1978		21	0.42	79	0.00	17	0.18	16	0.65	12	0.53	18	0.59
Francois 1956		85	0.00	80	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	86	0.02	89	0.02
Friedman 1923		18	0.43	20	0.00	21	0.13	18	0.62	23	0.53	19	0.57
Friedman 1923b		19	0.43	68	0.00	22	0.12	20	0.60	28	0.51	21	0.55
Friedman 1930		28	0.36	39	0.00	31	0.10	30	0.47	39	0.36	30	0.41
Garcia 2007		50	0.26	83	0.00	49	0.08	51	0.08	58	0.05	57	0.06
Garcia 2007b		33	0.35	35	0.00	43	0.13	42	0.28	31	0.34	37	0.31
Gierzod 1998		60	0.21	47	0.00	61	0.07	54	0.07	46	0.08	51	0.07
Gornostaeva 1994		81	0.04	48	0.00	81	0.05	76	0.05	82	0.02	78	0.03
Groot 1988		14	0.48	26	0.00	12	0.18	15	0.68	14	0.53	15	0.60
Harasiewicz 1955		45	0.29	49	0.00	53	0.06	58	0.06	67	0.04	71	0.05
Hatto 1993		13	0.49	24	0.00	14	0.15	10	0.75	12	0.59	13	0.67
Hatto 1997		53	0.24	86	0.00	55	0.07	56	0.07	68	0.04	67	0.05
Horowitz 1949		39	0.31	74	0.00	51	0.07	57	0.07	67	0.05	55	0.06
Indjic 1988		12	0.49	69	0.00	15	0.25	11	0.75	12	0.63	12	0.69
Kapell 1951		26	0.38	36	0.00	30	0.08	24	0.52	32	0.27	35	0.37
Kissin 1993		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kushner 1989		7	0.53	25	0.00	8	0.22	5	0.81	5	0.76	6	0.78
Luisada 1991		15	0.45	15	0.00	13	0.17	19	0.61	19	0.57	16	0.59
Lushtak 2004		36	0.33	43	0.00	27	0.11	29	0.47	10	0.52	25	0.49
Malcuzynski 1961		8	0.51	6	0.01	11	0.17	12	0.74	6	0.66	9	0.70
Magaloff 1978		35	0.33	21	0.00	26	0.08	28	0.50	30	0.37	28	0.43
Magin 1975		5	0.54	2	0.07	4	0.21	8	0.77	7	0.82	5	0.79
Michalowski 1933		41	0.31	60	0.00	50	0.06	62	0.06	64	0.06	56	0.06
Milkina 1970		71	0.13	87	0.00	69	0.06	60	0.06	62	0.04	63	0.05
Mohovich 1999		69	0.14	17	0.00	70	0.08	50	0.08	82	0.03	70	0.05
Moravec 1969		31	0.36	64	0.00	36	0.08	35	0.43	27	0.32	34	0.37
Morozova 2008		32	0.35	55	0.00	37	0.11	36	0.41	39	0.13	41	0.23
Neighaus 1950		48	0.27	23	0.00	45	0.10	45	0.10	74	0.04	59	0.06
Niedzielski 1931		16	0.45	61	0.00	18	0.18	17	0.63	14	0.56	17	0.59
Ohlsson 1999		29	0.36	30	0.00	24	0.09	25	0.52	28	0.31	31	0.40
Osinska 1989		80	0.07	81	0.00	77	0.05	71	0.05	83	0.02	75	0.03
Pachmann 1927		30	0.36	33	0.00	35	0.09	31	0.46	32	0.45	27	0.45
Paderewski 1930		3	0.58	3	0.06	3	0.36	3	0.83	1	0.83	3	0.83
Perlemuter 1992		22	0.41	5	0.02	23	0.13	22	0.55	23	0.57	20	0.56
Pierdomenico 2008		27	0.36	50	0.00	33	0.11	32	0.46	14	0.54	23	0.50
Poblocka 1999		43	0.30	65	0.00	38	0.11	37	0.35	41	0.17	39	0.24
Rabcewiczowa 1932		88	-0.05	75	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	86	0.02	84	0.02
Rachmaninoff 1923		55	0.24	22	0.00	57	0.07	53	0.07	69	0.04	61	0.05
Rangell 2001		64	0.18	88	0.00	71	0.05	67	0.05	85	0.02	79	0.03
Richter 1976		10	0.50	11	0.01	10	0.18	7	0.78	17	0.76	8	0.77
Rosen 1989		63	0.19	89	0.00	67	0.07	55	0.07	82	0.03	69	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		72	0.12	66	0.00	80	0.04	77	0.04	78	0.03	77	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		76	0.10	31	0.00	76	0.04	79	0.04	57	0.04	73	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		79	0.07	28	0.00	79	0.04	80	0.04	74	0.03	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		67	0.16	70	0.00	72	0.05	70	0.05	69	0.03	74	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		84	0.01	71	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	86	0.02	88	0.02
Rossi 2007		78	0.07	27	0.00	48	0.06	64	0.06	14	0.45	45	0.16
Rubinstein 1939		66	0.17	84	0.00	47	0.06	59	0.06	43	0.12	49	0.08
Rubinstein 1952		40	0.31	18	0.00	44	0.09	44	0.17	38	0.17	44	0.17
Rubinstein 1966		34	0.35	9	0.01	19	0.14	26	0.51	20	0.37	29	0.43
Schilhawsky 1960		61	0.20	34	0.00	66	0.05	69	0.05	62	0.05	66	0.05
Shebanova 2002		1	0.71	1	0.70	1	0.69	1	0.92	2	0.89	1	0.90
Smith 1975		68	0.15	62	0.00	65	0.06	61	0.06	54	0.06	52	0.06
Sokolov 2002		56	0.24	37	0.00	58	0.06	65	0.06	57	0.04	60	0.05
Sztompka 1959		9	0.51	7	0.01	9	0.15	13	0.73	9	0.66	11	0.69
Tomsic 1995		38	0.31	76	0.00	42	0.11	39	0.30	38	0.13	42	0.20
Uninsky 1932		6	0.53	13	0.00	5	0.22	9	0.76	10	0.64	10	0.70
Uninsky 1971		52	0.24	16	0.00	46	0.10	46	0.10	62	0.05	50	0.07
Wasowski 1980		20	0.42	51	0.00	20	0.12	21	0.58	31	0.45	22	0.51
Zak 1937		54	0.24	29	0.00	54	0.05	66	0.05	69	0.05	62	0.05
Zak 1951		59	0.22	90	0.00	62	0.05	73	0.05	57	0.05	64	0.05
Random 1		75	0.11	52	0.00	73	0.05	75	0.05	2	0.56	43	0.17
Random 2		82	0.04	56	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	61	0.04	76	0.03
Random 3		86	0.00	57	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	51	0.04	86	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).