Malcuzynski 1961

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		40	0.35	34	0.00	53	0.06	52	0.06	39	0.23	46	0.12
Anderszewski 2003		75	0.18	67	0.00	72	0.04	73	0.04	45	0.07	68	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		3	0.52	3	0.13	5	0.23	5	0.66	21	0.63	9	0.64
Bacha 2000		38	0.36	53	0.00	18	0.10	23	0.39	11	0.54	21	0.46
Badura 1965		37	0.36	42	0.00	37	0.05	38	0.19	10	0.56	27	0.33
Barbosa 1983		39	0.35	17	0.01	56	0.05	55	0.05	37	0.19	49	0.10
Biret 1990		88	0.02	86	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	85	0.02	90	0.02
Blet 2003		57	0.30	48	0.00	66	0.07	49	0.07	59	0.06	62	0.06
Block 1995		12	0.47	12	0.01	9	0.21	11	0.59	14	0.58	12	0.58
Blumental 1952		18	0.42	15	0.01	11	0.16	17	0.53	8	0.64	13	0.58
Boshniakovich 1969		11	0.47	29	0.00	14	0.12	12	0.59	21	0.51	16	0.55
Brailowsky 1960		73	0.19	68	0.00	78	0.04	67	0.04	62	0.05	72	0.04
Bunin 1987		23	0.40	74	0.00	33	0.07	28	0.28	26	0.43	26	0.35
Bunin 1987b		26	0.40	38	0.00	34	0.06	29	0.26	28	0.40	29	0.32
Chiu 1999		31	0.38	27	0.00	48	0.05	66	0.05	51	0.07	61	0.06
Cohen 1997		55	0.30	24	0.00	60	0.05	57	0.05	35	0.34	42	0.13
Cortot 1951		70	0.22	58	0.00	50	0.05	58	0.05	31	0.35	44	0.13
Csalog 1996		68	0.22	52	0.00	67	0.05	56	0.05	66	0.05	67	0.05
Czerny 1949		85	0.09	87	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	47	0.07	69	0.05
Czerny 1990		58	0.30	88	0.00	61	0.06	54	0.06	54	0.07	64	0.06
Duchoud 2007		78	0.17	37	0.00	75	0.03	75	0.03	66	0.04	84	0.03
Ezaki 2006		41	0.35	26	0.00	32	0.06	37	0.19	25	0.50	30	0.31
Falvay 1989		72	0.20	69	0.00	70	0.04	70	0.04	63	0.04	74	0.04
Farrell 1958		81	0.12	51	0.00	85	0.02	83	0.02	74	0.03	88	0.02
Ferenczy 1958		83	0.11	45	0.00	82	0.02	85	0.02	42	0.25	58	0.07
Fliere 1977		5	0.51	10	0.02	13	0.13	8	0.62	32	0.48	15	0.55
Fou 1978		32	0.38	25	0.00	39	0.05	34	0.20	36	0.23	35	0.21
Francois 1956		80	0.16	89	0.00	80	0.03	81	0.03	68	0.03	87	0.03
Friedman 1923		24	0.40	19	0.01	38	0.05	35	0.20	44	0.18	38	0.19
Friedman 1923b		28	0.39	75	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.13	53	0.08	50	0.10
Friedman 1930		16	0.45	18	0.01	22	0.11	16	0.55	27	0.54	18	0.54
Garcia 2007		61	0.28	65	0.00	29	0.06	39	0.17	36	0.25	37	0.21
Garcia 2007b		35	0.37	22	0.01	24	0.11	27	0.28	20	0.54	23	0.39
Gierzod 1998		15	0.46	2	0.14	2	0.15	9	0.60	5	0.77	4	0.68
Gornostaeva 1994		71	0.21	83	0.00	74	0.04	71	0.04	60	0.05	78	0.04
Groot 1988		22	0.41	20	0.01	35	0.06	31	0.22	47	0.08	43	0.13
Harasiewicz 1955		27	0.40	84	0.00	40	0.07	36	0.19	66	0.04	52	0.09
Hatto 1993		30	0.39	81	0.00	25	0.08	24	0.38	42	0.17	33	0.25
Hatto 1997		63	0.27	30	0.00	52	0.08	45	0.08	45	0.07	57	0.07
Horowitz 1949		45	0.33	70	0.00	59	0.07	47	0.07	49	0.08	55	0.07
Indjic 1988		25	0.40	21	0.01	20	0.10	21	0.47	25	0.41	22	0.44
Kapell 1951		66	0.24	35	0.00	71	0.04	74	0.04	60	0.06	65	0.05
Kissin 1993		4	0.51	16	0.01	8	0.15	6	0.66	12	0.74	3	0.70
Kushner 1989		1	0.54	1	0.27	1	0.27	1	0.76	4	0.78	1	0.77
Luisada 1991		36	0.36	66	0.00	57	0.07	50	0.07	58	0.06	60	0.06
Lushtak 2004		10	0.48	13	0.01	10	0.16	7	0.64	1	0.73	5	0.68
Malcuzynski 1961		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Magaloff 1978		8	0.49	4	0.11	3	0.23	2	0.71	7	0.72	2	0.71
Magin 1975		7	0.49	8	0.02	7	0.17	10	0.59	14	0.70	7	0.64
Michalowski 1933		49	0.32	77	0.00	58	0.07	48	0.07	56	0.07	56	0.07
Milkina 1970		84	0.10	62	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	71	0.03	82	0.03
Mohovich 1999		50	0.32	54	0.00	51	0.07	51	0.07	46	0.08	59	0.07
Moravec 1969		46	0.33	23	0.01	44	0.05	44	0.10	44	0.10	47	0.10
Morozova 2008		21	0.42	7	0.04	15	0.13	22	0.43	25	0.34	24	0.38
Neighaus 1950		60	0.29	59	0.00	64	0.05	60	0.05	75	0.04	79	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		19	0.42	14	0.01	19	0.08	18	0.50	18	0.48	20	0.49
Ohlsson 1999		29	0.39	36	0.00	26	0.07	25	0.34	31	0.28	31	0.31
Osinska 1989		74	0.18	78	0.00	73	0.03	77	0.03	72	0.03	80	0.03
Pachmann 1927		20	0.42	46	0.00	23	0.15	20	0.48	18	0.61	17	0.54
Paderewski 1930		17	0.44	60	0.00	21	0.11	19	0.49	13	0.64	14	0.56
Perlemuter 1992		6	0.49	6	0.04	12	0.10	13	0.58	14	0.64	10	0.61
Pierdomenico 2008		34	0.37	43	0.00	45	0.05	62	0.05	29	0.30	45	0.12
Poblocka 1999		59	0.30	28	0.00	28	0.06	43	0.13	54	0.05	53	0.08
Rabcewiczowa 1932		82	0.12	71	0.00	84	0.02	84	0.02	63	0.05	81	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		62	0.27	32	0.00	65	0.05	61	0.05	77	0.03	73	0.04
Rangell 2001		69	0.22	72	0.00	77	0.03	78	0.03	71	0.04	86	0.03
Richter 1976		14	0.46	64	0.00	17	0.15	14	0.58	30	0.61	11	0.59
Rosen 1989		42	0.35	44	0.00	47	0.05	64	0.05	52	0.05	70	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		76	0.18	63	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	74	0.03	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931		64	0.26	61	0.00	49	0.05	65	0.05	20	0.58	40	0.17
Rosenthal 1931b		65	0.25	55	0.00	62	0.07	46	0.07	28	0.48	39	0.18
Rosenthal 1931c		52	0.31	57	0.00	30	0.07	32	0.21	17	0.52	28	0.33
Rosenthal 1931d		79	0.17	79	0.00	68	0.04	72	0.04	40	0.21	51	0.09
Rossi 2007		86	0.08	90	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	32	0.22	54	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		77	0.18	85	0.00	76	0.03	76	0.03	58	0.05	76	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		48	0.32	33	0.00	36	0.05	30	0.22	29	0.38	32	0.29
Rubinstein 1966		53	0.31	49	0.00	46	0.05	63	0.05	46	0.07	63	0.06
Schilhawsky 1960		54	0.30	50	0.00	55	0.06	53	0.06	20	0.44	41	0.16
Shebanova 2002		2	0.53	11	0.01	6	0.20	4	0.69	25	0.60	8	0.64
Smith 1975		67	0.22	41	0.00	69	0.04	68	0.04	66	0.04	75	0.04
Sokolov 2002		47	0.33	31	0.00	27	0.07	33	0.20	36	0.23	34	0.21
Sztompka 1959		13	0.46	9	0.02	16	0.12	15	0.57	21	0.50	19	0.53
Tomsic 1995		33	0.38	47	0.00	31	0.06	26	0.31	15	0.40	25	0.35
Uninsky 1932		9	0.48	5	0.05	4	0.20	3	0.71	12	0.60	6	0.65
Uninsky 1971		44	0.33	40	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.15	49	0.07	48	0.10
Wasowski 1980		56	0.30	39	0.00	63	0.04	69	0.04	61	0.05	71	0.04
Zak 1937		51	0.31	76	0.00	54	0.05	59	0.05	52	0.06	66	0.05
Zak 1951		43	0.34	80	0.00	43	0.07	42	0.13	30	0.33	36	0.21
Random 1		89	0.00	73	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	59	0.04	85	0.03
Random 2		87	0.04	56	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	46	0.06	83	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.03	82	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	32	0.16	77	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).