Uninsky 1971

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		5	0.47	9	0.02	6	0.15	4	0.60	3	0.65	5	0.62
Anderszewski 2003		36	0.34	50	0.00	35	0.06	34	0.23	19	0.48	30	0.33
Ashkenazy 1981		32	0.36	31	0.00	33	0.06	36	0.20	44	0.13	47	0.16
Bacha 2000		27	0.38	22	0.01	21	0.06	20	0.38	9	0.56	18	0.46
Badura 1965		43	0.32	34	0.00	49	0.09	45	0.09	12	0.54	38	0.22
Barbosa 1983		45	0.32	25	0.00	65	0.06	56	0.06	62	0.05	68	0.05
Biret 1990		28	0.37	85	0.00	37	0.06	40	0.16	18	0.58	34	0.30
Blet 2003		47	0.32	44	0.00	50	0.07	46	0.07	42	0.24	49	0.13
Block 1995		50	0.31	47	0.00	53	0.05	63	0.05	55	0.05	71	0.05
Blumental 1952		17	0.41	27	0.00	16	0.10	10	0.48	7	0.65	6	0.56
Boshniakovich 1969		68	0.25	16	0.01	43	0.07	43	0.14	42	0.14	48	0.14
Brailowsky 1960		9	0.44	15	0.01	10	0.08	6	0.58	4	0.70	4	0.64
Bunin 1987		80	0.21	30	0.00	79	0.04	69	0.04	56	0.06	72	0.05
Bunin 1987b		79	0.21	53	0.00	78	0.03	80	0.03	58	0.06	76	0.04
Chiu 1999		49	0.31	77	0.00	75	0.04	70	0.04	58	0.06	63	0.05
Cohen 1997		25	0.38	55	0.00	48	0.07	47	0.07	23	0.47	42	0.18
Cortot 1951		29	0.37	86	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.15	14	0.57	35	0.29
Csalog 1996		77	0.23	51	0.00	86	0.03	79	0.03	61	0.05	77	0.04
Czerny 1949		22	0.39	59	0.00	23	0.06	24	0.33	11	0.78	13	0.51
Czerny 1990		82	0.20	57	0.00	76	0.04	72	0.04	58	0.06	73	0.05
Duchoud 2007		48	0.32	60	0.00	36	0.06	38	0.17	44	0.15	46	0.16
Ezaki 2006		2	0.50	4	0.06	3	0.20	2	0.66	2	0.78	2	0.72
Falvay 1989		15	0.41	10	0.02	20	0.07	19	0.38	7	0.53	21	0.45
Farrell 1958		72	0.24	62	0.00	58	0.05	64	0.05	63	0.05	64	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		60	0.30	39	0.00	60	0.05	59	0.05	24	0.69	40	0.19
Fliere 1977		41	0.33	63	0.00	51	0.07	48	0.07	51	0.06	58	0.06
Fou 1978		38	0.34	14	0.01	34	0.06	28	0.30	31	0.35	31	0.32
Francois 1956		18	0.40	20	0.01	26	0.07	16	0.42	15	0.66	11	0.53
Friedman 1923		67	0.26	87	0.00	69	0.03	75	0.03	61	0.06	81	0.04
Friedman 1923b		69	0.25	64	0.00	70	0.04	65	0.04	50	0.09	60	0.06
Friedman 1930		59	0.30	52	0.00	55	0.04	67	0.04	50	0.07	69	0.05
Garcia 2007		86	0.14	69	0.00	80	0.03	78	0.03	59	0.05	79	0.04
Garcia 2007b		83	0.17	78	0.00	82	0.02	88	0.02	60	0.05	88	0.03
Gierzod 1998		54	0.31	35	0.00	31	0.07	31	0.26	17	0.62	24	0.40
Gornostaeva 1994		1	0.51	1	0.30	1	0.30	1	0.68	4	0.79	1	0.73
Groot 1988		16	0.41	23	0.00	17	0.11	11	0.47	29	0.33	25	0.39
Harasiewicz 1955		8	0.44	17	0.01	7	0.11	8	0.52	16	0.48	15	0.50
Hatto 1993		33	0.35	74	0.00	29	0.07	30	0.27	38	0.24	37	0.25
Hatto 1997		3	0.49	2	0.17	2	0.24	9	0.52	6	0.57	9	0.54
Horowitz 1949		85	0.16	81	0.00	84	0.02	82	0.02	65	0.05	84	0.03
Indjic 1988		37	0.34	33	0.00	30	0.09	32	0.25	37	0.25	36	0.25
Kapell 1951		61	0.30	6	0.03	42	0.07	39	0.16	36	0.17	45	0.16
Kissin 1993		70	0.24	26	0.00	62	0.05	62	0.05	46	0.10	55	0.07
Kushner 1989		42	0.32	28	0.00	54	0.04	66	0.04	51	0.07	65	0.05
Luisada 1991		53	0.31	43	0.00	66	0.07	51	0.07	60	0.05	57	0.06
Lushtak 2004		63	0.28	56	0.00	74	0.03	74	0.03	58	0.05	80	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		39	0.33	72	0.00	47	0.07	49	0.07	40	0.15	53	0.10
Magaloff 1978		58	0.30	36	0.00	57	0.06	55	0.06	49	0.06	59	0.06
Magin 1975		35	0.35	18	0.01	45	0.07	53	0.07	31	0.44	41	0.18
Michalowski 1933		56	0.31	11	0.02	32	0.06	44	0.12	45	0.10	52	0.11
Milkina 1970		24	0.38	8	0.03	13	0.06	29	0.28	20	0.46	26	0.36
Mohovich 1999		26	0.38	29	0.00	39	0.07	33	0.24	20	0.39	33	0.31
Moravec 1969		64	0.27	42	0.00	59	0.04	71	0.04	59	0.04	74	0.04
Morozova 2008		30	0.37	65	0.00	38	0.06	35	0.23	42	0.12	44	0.17
Neighaus 1950		12	0.42	54	0.00	15	0.07	12	0.44	35	0.27	29	0.34
Niedzielski 1931		78	0.21	58	0.00	72	0.03	77	0.03	70	0.04	83	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		11	0.42	66	0.00	19	0.07	26	0.32	30	0.30	32	0.31
Osinska 1989		20	0.40	32	0.00	27	0.08	23	0.35	16	0.58	20	0.45
Pachmann 1927		76	0.23	75	0.00	77	0.02	84	0.02	71	0.05	86	0.03
Paderewski 1930		74	0.23	70	0.00	73	0.03	76	0.03	50	0.07	66	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		19	0.40	7	0.03	8	0.15	13	0.43	22	0.57	14	0.50
Pierdomenico 2008		84	0.16	71	0.00	85	0.02	83	0.02	76	0.03	89	0.02
Poblocka 1999		40	0.33	82	0.00	56	0.05	58	0.05	49	0.06	61	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		10	0.42	24	0.00	25	0.07	22	0.37	15	0.69	12	0.51
Rachmaninoff 1923		71	0.24	48	0.00	71	0.03	73	0.03	66	0.04	82	0.03
Rangell 2001		65	0.27	67	0.00	52	0.07	52	0.07	33	0.24	50	0.13
Richter 1976		81	0.21	79	0.00	83	0.02	85	0.02	75	0.04	85	0.03
Rosen 1989		13	0.41	5	0.04	9	0.14	7	0.55	20	0.51	10	0.53
Rosenthal 1930		23	0.39	40	0.00	28	0.08	21	0.37	12	0.61	17	0.48
Rosenthal 1931		51	0.31	76	0.00	40	0.07	37	0.18	13	0.68	27	0.35
Rosenthal 1931b		34	0.35	46	0.00	11	0.08	14	0.43	9	0.73	7	0.56
Rosenthal 1931c		52	0.31	73	0.00	46	0.07	50	0.07	22	0.48	43	0.18
Rosenthal 1931d		57	0.30	41	0.00	22	0.06	25	0.33	8	0.64	19	0.46
Rossi 2007		87	0.14	49	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	36	0.14	62	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		14	0.41	21	0.01	18	0.08	27	0.31	15	0.38	28	0.34
Rubinstein 1952		31	0.37	45	0.00	24	0.06	18	0.40	16	0.51	22	0.45
Rubinstein 1966		21	0.40	19	0.01	12	0.06	17	0.40	18	0.41	23	0.40
Schilhawsky 1960		75	0.23	37	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	57	0.05	78	0.04
Shebanova 2002		55	0.31	88	0.00	64	0.05	57	0.05	47	0.10	56	0.07
Smith 1975		4	0.48	12	0.02	5	0.12	5	0.58	7	0.75	3	0.66
Sokolov 2002		6	0.46	13	0.01	14	0.06	15	0.42	8	0.57	16	0.49
Sztompka 1959		66	0.26	61	0.00	63	0.05	61	0.05	55	0.06	67	0.05
Tomsic 1995		44	0.32	38	0.00	44	0.08	42	0.15	26	0.28	39	0.20
Uninsky 1932		7	0.44	3	0.09	4	0.17	3	0.62	18	0.48	8	0.55
Uninsky 1971		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Wasowski 1980		73	0.24	83	0.00	68	0.04	68	0.04	77	0.05	75	0.04
Zak 1937		62	0.29	80	0.00	67	0.06	54	0.06	42	0.13	54	0.09
Zak 1951		46	0.32	68	0.00	61	0.05	60	0.05	34	0.30	51	0.12
Random 1		89	0.02	89	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	60	0.04	87	0.03
Random 2		88	0.03	90	0.00	88	0.02	86	0.02	37	0.15	70	0.05
Random 3		90	-0.06	84	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	60	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).