Uninsky 1932

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		57	0.32	52	0.00	58	0.06	55	0.06	40	0.22	61	0.11
Anderszewski 2003		85	0.09	63	0.00	86	0.03	81	0.03	59	0.04	83	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		1	0.64	1	0.24	1	0.24	1	0.84	5	0.85	1	0.84
Bacha 2000		58	0.32	53	0.00	47	0.08	48	0.08	23	0.41	47	0.18
Badura 1965		49	0.38	77	0.00	45	0.08	46	0.08	9	0.58	45	0.22
Barbosa 1983		53	0.35	33	0.00	52	0.07	51	0.07	36	0.21	60	0.12
Biret 1990		64	0.30	29	0.00	68	0.04	69	0.04	30	0.45	57	0.13
Blet 2003		27	0.45	62	0.00	34	0.08	34	0.29	17	0.57	31	0.41
Block 1995		31	0.43	54	0.00	33	0.06	32	0.33	25	0.46	35	0.39
Blumental 1952		50	0.37	38	0.00	43	0.07	44	0.14	22	0.49	44	0.26
Boshniakovich 1969		56	0.33	64	0.00	56	0.06	52	0.06	55	0.06	71	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		74	0.21	47	0.00	76	0.04	77	0.04	53	0.06	73	0.05
Bunin 1987		47	0.39	48	0.00	39	0.09	40	0.20	19	0.50	40	0.32
Bunin 1987b		46	0.39	81	0.00	38	0.07	39	0.21	18	0.51	38	0.33
Chiu 1999		15	0.50	57	0.00	17	0.10	13	0.56	18	0.62	14	0.59
Cohen 1997		79	0.19	84	0.00	85	0.03	83	0.03	78	0.02	90	0.02
Cortot 1951		65	0.29	69	0.00	69	0.04	70	0.04	41	0.15	67	0.08
Csalog 1996		52	0.36	41	0.00	55	0.05	60	0.05	22	0.42	52	0.14
Czerny 1949		78	0.19	55	0.00	75	0.04	78	0.04	41	0.18	65	0.08
Czerny 1990		18	0.49	15	0.01	19	0.11	17	0.49	17	0.73	13	0.60
Duchoud 2007		41	0.40	20	0.00	46	0.09	45	0.09	26	0.40	46	0.19
Ezaki 2006		72	0.22	32	0.00	67	0.05	68	0.05	54	0.06	72	0.05
Falvay 1989		51	0.36	85	0.00	54	0.06	54	0.06	30	0.26	59	0.12
Farrell 1958		61	0.31	78	0.00	65	0.04	71	0.04	23	0.41	54	0.13
Ferenczy 1958		86	0.08	65	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	57	0.06	84	0.03
Fliere 1977		4	0.56	12	0.01	10	0.26	6	0.73	13	0.75	6	0.74
Fou 1978		26	0.45	49	0.00	35	0.08	35	0.29	13	0.51	36	0.38
Francois 1956		80	0.18	86	0.00	81	0.03	84	0.03	59	0.04	87	0.03
Friedman 1923		9	0.54	16	0.01	8	0.22	7	0.73	8	0.76	8	0.74
Friedman 1923b		7	0.55	9	0.01	6	0.23	2	0.74	8	0.78	4	0.76
Friedman 1930		10	0.53	4	0.12	4	0.18	9	0.69	6	0.76	9	0.72
Garcia 2007		25	0.45	6	0.04	28	0.09	23	0.44	11	0.61	22	0.52
Garcia 2007b		40	0.40	24	0.00	42	0.07	42	0.18	13	0.61	39	0.33
Gierzod 1998		81	0.17	73	0.00	64	0.04	73	0.04	44	0.11	68	0.07
Gornostaeva 1994		76	0.20	87	0.00	73	0.04	75	0.04	56	0.05	80	0.04
Groot 1988		22	0.48	25	0.00	27	0.10	24	0.42	22	0.41	32	0.41
Harasiewicz 1955		24	0.46	51	0.00	22	0.09	20	0.45	15	0.49	27	0.47
Hatto 1993		14	0.50	14	0.01	15	0.10	15	0.53	14	0.55	20	0.54
Hatto 1997		45	0.39	40	0.00	50	0.07	50	0.07	30	0.24	56	0.13
Horowitz 1949		23	0.47	45	0.00	30	0.12	26	0.40	7	0.73	19	0.54
Indjic 1988		12	0.52	23	0.00	16	0.15	14	0.54	17	0.58	17	0.56
Kapell 1951		21	0.48	35	0.00	29	0.10	27	0.40	12	0.49	28	0.44
Kissin 1993		11	0.53	11	0.01	11	0.22	10	0.64	9	0.76	11	0.70
Kushner 1989		33	0.43	18	0.00	41	0.07	38	0.22	23	0.45	41	0.31
Luisada 1991		13	0.50	7	0.03	21	0.09	30	0.35	22	0.53	29	0.43
Lushtak 2004		69	0.25	61	0.00	74	0.04	74	0.04	47	0.06	75	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		19	0.48	27	0.00	12	0.14	12	0.60	3	0.71	12	0.65
Magaloff 1978		43	0.40	34	0.00	25	0.09	33	0.32	21	0.47	34	0.39
Magin 1975		36	0.41	28	0.00	18	0.10	29	0.38	15	0.69	23	0.51
Michalowski 1933		28	0.45	74	0.00	31	0.10	28	0.39	9	0.59	25	0.48
Milkina 1970		67	0.27	50	0.00	62	0.05	66	0.05	32	0.34	55	0.13
Mohovich 1999		71	0.23	79	0.00	77	0.04	72	0.04	65	0.04	79	0.04
Moravec 1969		39	0.41	13	0.01	32	0.07	31	0.33	11	0.53	30	0.42
Morozova 2008		32	0.43	36	0.00	26	0.10	19	0.46	10	0.54	24	0.50
Neighaus 1950		44	0.40	42	0.00	49	0.05	59	0.05	44	0.11	69	0.07
Niedzielski 1931		20	0.48	17	0.00	24	0.09	22	0.44	11	0.62	21	0.52
Ohlsson 1999		30	0.44	37	0.00	13	0.15	25	0.41	16	0.54	26	0.47
Osinska 1989		60	0.31	56	0.00	57	0.05	61	0.05	34	0.31	58	0.12
Pachmann 1927		16	0.49	46	0.00	14	0.14	16	0.51	15	0.68	15	0.59
Paderewski 1930		42	0.40	82	0.00	44	0.08	43	0.15	21	0.55	42	0.29
Perlemuter 1992		35	0.42	26	0.00	36	0.09	36	0.26	17	0.61	33	0.40
Pierdomenico 2008		17	0.49	19	0.00	20	0.09	21	0.45	3	0.70	16	0.56
Poblocka 1999		38	0.41	58	0.00	37	0.07	37	0.26	12	0.47	37	0.35
Rabcewiczowa 1932		75	0.20	59	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	62	0.05	78	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		8	0.55	2	0.18	3	0.19	11	0.63	5	0.77	10	0.70
Rangell 2001		55	0.34	43	0.00	63	0.05	64	0.05	38	0.19	63	0.10
Richter 1976		5	0.56	22	0.00	9	0.20	5	0.73	13	0.79	3	0.76
Rosen 1989		34	0.43	31	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.18	31	0.40	43	0.27
Rosenthal 1930		63	0.30	71	0.00	70	0.05	65	0.05	43	0.13	66	0.08
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.10	66	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	55	0.05	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.13	83	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	57	0.04	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		77	0.20	80	0.00	78	0.05	63	0.05	53	0.05	76	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.11	88	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	59	0.04	85	0.03
Rossi 2007		87	0.07	70	0.00	72	0.04	76	0.04	18	0.42	53	0.13
Rubinstein 1939		68	0.26	72	0.00	61	0.05	67	0.05	32	0.19	62	0.10
Rubinstein 1952		70	0.24	89	0.00	71	0.05	62	0.05	71	0.04	81	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		62	0.30	39	0.00	66	0.06	57	0.06	55	0.05	74	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		66	0.27	67	0.00	51	0.06	53	0.06	23	0.42	50	0.16
Shebanova 2002		2	0.61	3	0.18	2	0.29	8	0.72	8	0.76	7	0.74
Smith 1975		73	0.21	60	0.00	80	0.03	80	0.03	58	0.05	77	0.04
Sokolov 2002		54	0.34	30	0.00	59	0.06	56	0.06	31	0.32	51	0.14
Sztompka 1959		6	0.56	5	0.04	7	0.19	3	0.74	5	0.77	5	0.75
Tomsic 1995		59	0.31	90	0.00	48	0.05	58	0.05	37	0.14	64	0.08
Uninsky 1932		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Uninsky 1971		29	0.44	21	0.00	23	0.09	18	0.48	3	0.62	18	0.55
Wasowski 1980		3	0.58	10	0.01	5	0.21	4	0.73	1	0.79	2	0.76
Zak 1937		37	0.41	44	0.00	53	0.07	49	0.07	29	0.36	48	0.16
Zak 1951		48	0.38	75	0.00	60	0.08	47	0.08	29	0.33	49	0.16
Random 1		88	0.00	8	0.02	88	0.02	88	0.02	37	0.16	70	0.06
Random 2		90	-0.03	76	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	77	0.03	88	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.03	68	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	64	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).