Bacha 2000

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		21	0.32	18	0.01	30	0.07	31	0.27	52	0.05	40	0.12
Anderszewski 2003		31	0.29	35	0.00	9	0.13	19	0.46	15	0.52	11	0.49
Ashkenazy 1981		4	0.42	6	0.02	4	0.24	6	0.60	36	0.38	13	0.48
Bacha 2000		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Badura 1965		26	0.30	23	0.00	21	0.11	20	0.46	15	0.51	12	0.48
Barbosa 1983		28	0.29	59	0.00	35	0.07	30	0.28	59	0.05	39	0.12
Biret 1990		71	0.15	45	0.00	82	0.02	85	0.02	75	0.04	83	0.03
Blet 2003		79	0.11	83	0.00	69	0.03	74	0.03	71	0.04	78	0.03
Block 1995		34	0.26	31	0.00	28	0.09	27	0.33	58	0.05	35	0.13
Blumental 1952		1	0.49	2	0.23	2	0.41	2	0.75	1	0.79	2	0.77
Boshniakovich 1969		37	0.26	60	0.00	47	0.06	50	0.06	69	0.04	59	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		20	0.34	21	0.00	18	0.16	13	0.54	7	0.63	5	0.58
Bunin 1987		76	0.12	50	0.00	79	0.02	84	0.02	73	0.04	80	0.03
Bunin 1987b		75	0.13	64	0.00	78	0.02	86	0.02	73	0.04	75	0.03
Chiu 1999		13	0.36	11	0.02	17	0.12	12	0.54	38	0.25	18	0.37
Cohen 1997		41	0.25	78	0.00	58	0.06	49	0.06	40	0.20	42	0.11
Cortot 1951		44	0.24	67	0.00	50	0.05	59	0.05	35	0.27	41	0.12
Csalog 1996		88	-0.04	74	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.01	90	0.01
Czerny 1949		53	0.22	32	0.00	55	0.05	56	0.05	38	0.41	34	0.14
Czerny 1990		65	0.17	68	0.00	68	0.03	75	0.03	69	0.04	82	0.03
Duchoud 2007		73	0.13	37	0.00	72	0.04	72	0.04	75	0.04	68	0.04
Ezaki 2006		7	0.40	19	0.01	14	0.10	15	0.53	24	0.56	7	0.54
Falvay 1989		11	0.37	40	0.00	24	0.11	24	0.40	22	0.37	17	0.38
Farrell 1958		85	0.04	56	0.00	85	0.03	76	0.03	87	0.02	88	0.02
Ferenczy 1958		19	0.34	13	0.01	20	0.12	25	0.38	10	0.80	6	0.55
Fliere 1977		69	0.16	84	0.00	66	0.04	66	0.04	52	0.06	53	0.05
Fou 1978		9	0.38	10	0.02	12	0.14	8	0.56	17	0.45	9	0.50
Francois 1956		68	0.17	88	0.00	59	0.06	47	0.06	51	0.06	51	0.06
Friedman 1923		77	0.12	79	0.00	75	0.04	69	0.04	79	0.03	84	0.03
Friedman 1923b		80	0.11	85	0.00	76	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.03	81	0.03
Friedman 1930		54	0.21	62	0.00	62	0.05	62	0.05	75	0.04	67	0.04
Garcia 2007		47	0.24	36	0.00	45	0.07	46	0.07	47	0.06	50	0.06
Garcia 2007b		40	0.25	38	0.00	26	0.09	29	0.29	41	0.16	28	0.22
Gierzod 1998		2	0.49	1	0.44	1	0.43	1	0.82	1	0.84	1	0.83
Gornostaeva 1994		61	0.20	75	0.00	71	0.05	63	0.05	59	0.05	60	0.05
Groot 1988		55	0.21	76	0.00	61	0.05	61	0.05	76	0.03	71	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		27	0.29	16	0.01	27	0.09	26	0.36	44	0.11	30	0.20
Hatto 1993		6	0.40	8	0.02	5	0.16	4	0.65	31	0.29	16	0.43
Hatto 1997		12	0.37	20	0.00	25	0.12	18	0.48	34	0.22	23	0.32
Horowitz 1949		81	0.10	58	0.00	81	0.02	79	0.02	75	0.04	76	0.03
Indjic 1988		5	0.41	15	0.01	6	0.16	5	0.65	27	0.37	10	0.49
Kapell 1951		15	0.35	7	0.02	13	0.11	17	0.50	30	0.28	19	0.37
Kissin 1993		38	0.26	69	0.00	40	0.07	40	0.19	68	0.05	44	0.10
Kushner 1989		3	0.46	3	0.04	3	0.21	3	0.68	9	0.59	3	0.63
Luisada 1991		62	0.20	70	0.00	63	0.04	65	0.04	69	0.05	62	0.04
Lushtak 2004		39	0.26	89	0.00	53	0.05	60	0.05	62	0.05	58	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		14	0.36	4	0.03	7	0.16	11	0.54	23	0.39	14	0.46
Magaloff 1978		63	0.19	48	0.00	56	0.06	48	0.06	76	0.03	64	0.04
Magin 1975		67	0.17	86	0.00	57	0.06	53	0.06	65	0.05	55	0.05
Michalowski 1933		66	0.17	12	0.01	42	0.05	44	0.12	53	0.07	47	0.09
Milkina 1970		30	0.29	34	0.00	33	0.07	32	0.26	30	0.35	24	0.30
Mohovich 1999		18	0.35	25	0.00	8	0.09	22	0.42	27	0.32	20	0.37
Moravec 1969		50	0.23	39	0.00	52	0.06	51	0.06	65	0.04	52	0.05
Morozova 2008		16	0.35	5	0.02	16	0.10	10	0.55	34	0.20	21	0.33
Neighaus 1950		48	0.24	24	0.00	49	0.05	64	0.05	81	0.03	72	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		59	0.20	14	0.01	43	0.06	41	0.13	76	0.04	49	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		51	0.23	61	0.00	29	0.09	38	0.21	55	0.05	43	0.10
Osinska 1989		72	0.14	29	0.00	70	0.04	68	0.04	71	0.03	74	0.03
Pachmann 1927		43	0.24	65	0.00	44	0.07	42	0.13	56	0.06	46	0.09
Paderewski 1930		45	0.24	30	0.00	32	0.06	39	0.19	47	0.07	38	0.12
Perlemuter 1992		74	0.13	71	0.00	74	0.04	70	0.04	70	0.04	63	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		64	0.18	27	0.00	65	0.05	58	0.05	71	0.03	65	0.04
Poblocka 1999		83	0.08	53	0.00	83	0.02	81	0.02	84	0.03	85	0.02
Rabcewiczowa 1932		57	0.21	51	0.00	67	0.03	73	0.03	57	0.06	66	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		87	-0.02	77	0.00	86	0.02	83	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.02
Rangell 2001		35	0.26	63	0.00	36	0.08	33	0.25	44	0.09	32	0.15
Richter 1976		56	0.21	66	0.00	64	0.04	67	0.04	58	0.06	57	0.05
Rosen 1989		52	0.22	87	0.00	60	0.07	45	0.07	86	0.02	69	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		78	0.12	90	0.00	80	0.02	82	0.02	59	0.05	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		22	0.32	49	0.00	15	0.11	14	0.53	10	0.72	4	0.62
Rosenthal 1931b		25	0.31	46	0.00	23	0.09	21	0.45	14	0.66	8	0.54
Rosenthal 1931c		36	0.26	73	0.00	41	0.06	43	0.12	31	0.37	29	0.21
Rosenthal 1931d		46	0.24	44	0.00	37	0.07	36	0.21	28	0.40	25	0.29
Rossi 2007		86	-0.01	54	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	84	0.03	86	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		49	0.24	28	0.00	39	0.07	37	0.21	46	0.09	33	0.14
Rubinstein 1952		60	0.20	80	0.00	54	0.06	52	0.06	68	0.04	61	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		17	0.35	26	0.00	22	0.10	16	0.50	37	0.15	26	0.27
Schilhawsky 1960		32	0.28	43	0.00	34	0.06	34	0.24	22	0.43	22	0.32
Shebanova 2002		8	0.39	55	0.00	11	0.11	7	0.59	58	0.08	27	0.22
Smith 1975		58	0.21	17	0.01	51	0.05	57	0.05	40	0.15	45	0.09
Sokolov 2002		33	0.28	47	0.00	46	0.06	54	0.06	55	0.04	54	0.05
Sztompka 1959		70	0.15	72	0.00	73	0.04	71	0.04	81	0.03	77	0.03
Tomsic 1995		24	0.31	22	0.00	31	0.06	28	0.30	60	0.05	37	0.12
Uninsky 1932		23	0.32	41	0.00	19	0.11	23	0.41	48	0.08	31	0.18
Uninsky 1971		10	0.38	9	0.02	10	0.11	9	0.56	20	0.38	15	0.46
Wasowski 1980		84	0.06	81	0.00	84	0.02	80	0.02	64	0.05	73	0.03
Zak 1937		42	0.25	52	0.00	48	0.05	55	0.05	56	0.06	56	0.05
Zak 1951		29	0.29	33	0.00	38	0.08	35	0.24	50	0.06	36	0.12
Random 1		89	-0.04	42	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	49	0.04	89	0.02
Random 2		82	0.09	82	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	27	0.28	48	0.09
Random 3		90	-0.04	57	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	30	0.18	70	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).