Smith 1975

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		17	0.38	58	0.00	24	0.08	17	0.50	42	0.17	26	0.29
Anderszewski 2003		48	0.24	41	0.00	39	0.08	39	0.20	35	0.21	29	0.20
Ashkenazy 1981		74	0.14	82	0.00	78	0.03	75	0.03	83	0.03	77	0.03
Bacha 2000		59	0.21	13	0.00	40	0.08	40	0.15	57	0.05	45	0.09
Badura 1965		68	0.17	59	0.00	68	0.04	68	0.04	76	0.03	76	0.03
Barbosa 1983		58	0.21	55	0.00	60	0.05	65	0.05	75	0.04	65	0.04
Biret 1990		13	0.41	10	0.01	13	0.16	19	0.49	20	0.56	12	0.52
Blet 2003		36	0.28	68	0.00	46	0.06	49	0.06	63	0.05	59	0.05
Block 1995		31	0.29	57	0.00	35	0.08	33	0.34	52	0.06	39	0.14
Blumental 1952		66	0.18	23	0.00	49	0.05	62	0.05	64	0.05	60	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		61	0.20	36	0.00	54	0.06	52	0.06	80	0.03	67	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		43	0.25	60	0.00	52	0.08	45	0.08	48	0.08	47	0.08
Bunin 1987		87	0.06	71	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.02
Bunin 1987b		86	0.06	63	0.00	85	0.02	84	0.02	86	0.02	82	0.02
Chiu 1999		44	0.25	83	0.00	79	0.03	72	0.03	85	0.02	79	0.02
Cohen 1997		1	0.58	1	0.23	1	0.23	1	0.87	1	0.83	1	0.85
Cortot 1951		9	0.46	5	0.10	4	0.26	6	0.77	2	0.78	6	0.77
Csalog 1996		64	0.19	78	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	70	0.04	72	0.03
Czerny 1949		4	0.56	2	0.20	3	0.31	4	0.81	1	0.87	2	0.84
Czerny 1990		78	0.11	79	0.00	76	0.03	74	0.03	79	0.03	78	0.03
Duchoud 2007		39	0.26	28	0.00	41	0.06	42	0.14	74	0.04	49	0.07
Ezaki 2006		3	0.56	3	0.16	2	0.26	2	0.82	1	0.81	3	0.81
Falvay 1989		23	0.32	64	0.00	21	0.12	23	0.44	23	0.35	23	0.39
Farrell 1958		34	0.28	25	0.00	36	0.06	37	0.23	51	0.06	40	0.12
Ferenczy 1958		25	0.31	31	0.00	11	0.16	11	0.61	12	0.78	8	0.69
Fliere 1977		35	0.28	14	0.00	59	0.04	67	0.04	55	0.06	52	0.05
Fou 1978		63	0.20	53	0.00	57	0.06	55	0.06	52	0.05	56	0.05
Francois 1956		6	0.50	9	0.01	7	0.27	5	0.80	2	0.81	4	0.80
Friedman 1923		76	0.12	38	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	85	0.03	88	0.02
Friedman 1923b		77	0.11	69	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.03	87	0.02
Friedman 1930		50	0.23	54	0.00	71	0.04	70	0.04	81	0.03	75	0.03
Garcia 2007		89	0.03	65	0.00	80	0.03	77	0.03	86	0.02	85	0.02
Garcia 2007b		81	0.07	80	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	85	0.02	90	0.01
Gierzod 1998		55	0.22	48	0.00	25	0.07	28	0.40	29	0.40	22	0.40
Gornostaeva 1994		2	0.57	6	0.03	5	0.34	3	0.82	6	0.77	5	0.79
Groot 1988		18	0.38	43	0.00	23	0.08	21	0.46	52	0.07	31	0.18
Harasiewicz 1955		11	0.43	8	0.02	12	0.20	12	0.61	27	0.32	16	0.44
Hatto 1993		46	0.24	72	0.00	56	0.06	48	0.06	72	0.04	61	0.05
Hatto 1997		15	0.40	33	0.00	15	0.12	18	0.50	26	0.29	25	0.38
Horowitz 1949		84	0.06	42	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	85	0.02	83	0.02
Indjic 1988		62	0.20	61	0.00	61	0.05	60	0.05	74	0.04	64	0.04
Kapell 1951		82	0.07	84	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	84	0.02	80	0.02
Kissin 1993		73	0.15	34	0.00	47	0.06	54	0.06	61	0.06	50	0.06
Kushner 1989		56	0.21	66	0.00	69	0.04	69	0.04	81	0.03	68	0.03
Luisada 1991		45	0.25	11	0.01	63	0.06	53	0.06	74	0.04	51	0.05
Lushtak 2004		33	0.28	30	0.00	38	0.08	36	0.23	42	0.10	35	0.15
Malcuzynski 1961		52	0.22	32	0.00	48	0.04	66	0.04	68	0.04	63	0.04
Magaloff 1978		20	0.34	67	0.00	30	0.12	30	0.37	48	0.06	33	0.15
Magin 1975		32	0.28	37	0.00	42	0.06	43	0.13	55	0.07	43	0.10
Michalowski 1933		71	0.15	70	0.00	74	0.03	79	0.03	83	0.03	71	0.03
Milkina 1970		27	0.30	35	0.00	18	0.12	26	0.43	28	0.39	19	0.41
Mohovich 1999		38	0.27	62	0.00	34	0.08	34	0.33	51	0.07	37	0.15
Moravec 1969		40	0.26	46	0.00	26	0.07	24	0.44	42	0.12	28	0.23
Morozova 2008		51	0.22	50	0.00	66	0.05	59	0.05	87	0.02	74	0.03
Neighaus 1950		8	0.48	4	0.11	6	0.27	9	0.69	6	0.54	11	0.61
Niedzielski 1931		88	0.05	49	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	87	0.02	89	0.01
Ohlsson 1999		14	0.40	45	0.00	20	0.13	20	0.48	68	0.04	38	0.14
Osinska 1989		10	0.44	15	0.00	10	0.26	10	0.62	14	0.61	10	0.61
Pachmann 1927		49	0.23	73	0.00	58	0.05	57	0.05	60	0.06	57	0.05
Paderewski 1930		53	0.22	39	0.00	45	0.07	46	0.07	46	0.07	48	0.07
Perlemuter 1992		28	0.29	40	0.00	51	0.06	47	0.06	57	0.05	53	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		41	0.26	74	0.00	55	0.06	51	0.06	59	0.05	55	0.05
Poblocka 1999		47	0.24	51	0.00	62	0.06	50	0.06	80	0.04	54	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		5	0.51	16	0.00	8	0.19	8	0.70	6	0.77	7	0.73
Rachmaninoff 1923		72	0.15	85	0.00	67	0.05	63	0.05	83	0.03	62	0.04
Rangell 2001		67	0.17	86	0.00	33	0.07	35	0.24	53	0.05	42	0.11
Richter 1976		60	0.20	75	0.00	73	0.03	76	0.03	76	0.04	70	0.03
Rosen 1989		21	0.33	81	0.00	31	0.08	25	0.44	48	0.05	36	0.15
Rosenthal 1930		24	0.32	76	0.00	32	0.10	27	0.41	33	0.38	24	0.39
Rosenthal 1931		54	0.22	27	0.00	27	0.09	31	0.36	28	0.51	17	0.43
Rosenthal 1931b		65	0.18	18	0.00	29	0.12	32	0.35	27	0.49	21	0.41
Rosenthal 1931c		29	0.29	19	0.00	22	0.12	16	0.50	19	0.50	14	0.50
Rosenthal 1931d		70	0.17	24	0.00	28	0.10	29	0.38	18	0.49	18	0.43
Rossi 2007		30	0.29	47	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	7	0.58	27	0.24
Rubinstein 1939		26	0.30	56	0.00	37	0.08	38	0.22	57	0.06	41	0.11
Rubinstein 1952		16	0.39	12	0.01	17	0.10	14	0.56	26	0.40	15	0.47
Rubinstein 1966		22	0.33	22	0.00	19	0.10	22	0.46	59	0.05	34	0.15
Schilhawsky 1960		69	0.17	20	0.00	77	0.03	78	0.03	75	0.04	73	0.03
Shebanova 2002		75	0.14	87	0.00	75	0.02	83	0.02	84	0.03	84	0.02
Smith 1975		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Sokolov 2002		12	0.42	26	0.00	14	0.24	15	0.53	14	0.50	13	0.51
Sztompka 1959		42	0.26	29	0.00	50	0.05	61	0.05	69	0.05	58	0.05
Tomsic 1995		19	0.35	21	0.00	16	0.12	13	0.59	25	0.29	20	0.41
Uninsky 1932		57	0.21	77	0.00	64	0.05	58	0.05	80	0.03	66	0.04
Uninsky 1971		7	0.48	7	0.03	9	0.23	7	0.75	5	0.58	9	0.66
Wasowski 1980		37	0.27	88	0.00	43	0.07	41	0.14	75	0.05	46	0.08
Zak 1937		83	0.07	89	0.00	83	0.02	82	0.02	85	0.02	81	0.02
Zak 1951		80	0.08	90	0.00	72	0.03	73	0.03	83	0.03	69	0.03
Random 1		90	-0.01	44	0.00	70	0.04	71	0.04	30	0.24	44	0.10
Random 2		85	0.06	52	0.00	53	0.05	56	0.05	8	0.49	32	0.16
Random 3		79	0.09	17	0.00	65	0.05	64	0.05	2	0.65	30	0.18

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).